The Western Museum is an ideological, political, and economic disunity battleground. Calls for its decolonization have washed like great breakers over the institution; almost everyone today wants to "rethink the museum." But how many dare to question the very presuppositions of the universal museum itself? InÌý A Programme of Absolute Disorder , Françoise Vergès puts the museum in its place. With a specific focus on the history of the Louvre, she centers the context in which the universal museum as a product of the Enlightenment and colonialism, of a Europe that presents itself as the guardian of the heritage of all humanity. Discussing the impasses in the representation of slavery and examining unsuccessful attempts to subvert the museum institution, Vergès outlines a radical to decolonize the museum truly is to implement a 'programme of absolute disorder,' inventing other ways of apprehending the human and non-human world that nourish collective creativity and bring justice and dignity to populations who have been dispossessed of it.
Françoise Vergès (born 23 January 1952) is a French political scientist, historian, film producer, independent curator, activist and public educator. Her work focuses on postcolonial studies and decolonial feminism.
Really good...goes beyond just critiquing representations and displays but picks up on the capitalism, nationalism and exploitation that created the western museum and sustain it today, and how it still functions as a tool of domination today. Couldve easily been 300 more pages
"Decolonization is not a posture; no institution can be decolonial unless society is decolonized, and the museum does not exist outside the social world that created it. Whether one frequents museums or not, they constitute one of the pillars of the national narrative, a demonstration of the level of civilization that the country has reached, and proof that it belongs to the "major nations" contributing to the evolution of humanity. Its social life is integrated into other state apparatuses and Capital. In advancing the hypothesis that its decolonization is impossible, we free ourselves of the injunction to create universal and national museums� seen as the ultimate sign of the cultural and artistic wealth of the nation or community; it is to ask ourselves why it is desirable, why its model is so powerful."
TL;DR A somewhat dense but excellent review of the current state of ethnological museums, and possible futures of decoloniality.
I’ve read three books this year and one article¹ on museums, their current status and their future. I’m reading completely as a lay person; I found that approach a relatively limited one for some of the material presented in this book.
Vergès reviews the present state of “universal� museums, particularly the ethnological ones of the European former colonisers: the Louvre, the British Museum, and the like. The French, Germans, English, Belgians and Portuguese all looted and rampaged all around Africa, bringing back tons of Africa’s heritage to the metropole. Much of this heritage now lies neglected and dusty in the storerooms and basements of museums, although a small fraction is on show in vitrines in galleries for tourists—generally not African—to ogle at without understanding. Because these dislocated objects are without context, and cannot have context where they are: many were created for community use, worship, memory, etc, to serve and to perish with that use, something they cannot any longer do.
The trouble, of course, as activists point out with increasing volume, is the concept of the “universal� museum. Calls for repatriation of African holdings are met by museum directors� and creators� assertions that these “objects� (a problematic term in itself) are safer where they are, and serve the purpose of educating the world about humanity. They, you see, are the rightful educators and custodians to enable this, in their minds. Vergès reminds us that what is in fact happening is Europe seeing itself as the true cradle of Civilisation (because of the Enlightenment): superior, of course, the true arbiters of art and taste.
"But even if we did accept the universal museum’s transformation into a depositary institution for all of humanity’s works, concrete, practical, and ideological questions are carefully avoided in the text: who would be their handlers? Who would be the directors? Who would write the catalogue? Who would draw up the categories? Who would fund this? Who would authorize loans? Who would decide which objects to include or remove?"
There are many other problems with the Western museum as it is: the role of “philanthropy� in artwashing, gentrification, whitewashing, obscuring the history of slavery and colonialism (and the role of those same custodian nations in this), and so on. Vergès also takes us through a history I didn’t previously know: Napoleon rampaging through Europe and divesting conquered nations of their art treasures, many of which ended up in the Louvre—so there’s actual precedent for the looting that later happened in Africa and other places.
Is the persistence of the Western, ethnological museum about money? To some extent it is: these museums draw crowds, and it makes some kind of sense that they’d want to preserve that, to not be emptied through the repatriation of the material heritage they have that was looted. But that’s clearly not the full story, as so much of that heritage is not on display but in storage. It seems that it’s a lot more about prestige, and superiority, as Vergès eloquently argues about the origins of the Louvre. Perhaps it’s also about control, and power. And, more than likely, with respect to material heritage from previously colonised peoples: it’s simple epistemicide.
This is a glorious and necessary text on the failings of so-called "decolonizing" museum work.
I love the notion of "waywardness" as an antidote to legislated institutional and systemic norms in society. Wayward for the win!
Some of the language was compelling to me: "universal vocation" ... "capitalism's protean capacity" ... "the prism of structural racism" ... "life in rehearsal" (attributed to Ruth Wilson Gilmore) ... and a usurping of "space invaders" (for "colonizers") ... museums as "illegal morgues." Brilliant.
At the same time, I was conflicted about the title of this one. Decolonization is defined as the solution to the "programme of absolute disorder" that is colonization. The name is provocative, but also obtuse. I kept forgetting what this text was about.
The other things I didn't like are the things I tend to hate with these kinds of texts. Academese galour. Endless paragraphs (seriously, look into the return key). Grandiose claims repeated until they feel factual. The utterly Western slant.
I also feel that texts centred on art and interactive experiences can never quite do them justice. The experiential understanding is impossible to get. And there's essentially no photos or links to videos or any other means of truly grokking the material offered here. A shame.
Thank you to Edelweiss+ and Pluto Press for the advance copy.
please give me a thesis statement at the start of each section.
like the points i teased out were good and interesting, but the work itself was so difficult to follow and understand: like this is a book meantfor the general public, but it doesn't read like it.