She knew there'd be ghosts in Oxford, she just didn't think they'd make their way to the dictionary.
Oxford, England. After a decade abroad, Martha Thornhill has returned home to the city whose ancient institutions have long defined her family. But the ghosts she had thought to be at rest seem to have been waiting for her to return. When an anonymous letter is delivered to the Clarendon English Dictionary, where Martha is a newly hired senior editor, it's rapidly clear that this is not the usual lexicographical enquiry. Instead, the coded letter hints at secrets and lies linked to a particular year.
The date can mean only one the summer Martha's brilliant older sister Charlie went missing.
When more letters arrive, Martha and her team pull apart the complex clues within them, and soon, the mystery becomes ever more insistent and troubling. Because it seems Charlie had been keeping a powerful secret, and someone may be trying to lead the lexicographers towards the truth that will unravel the mystery of her disappearance. But other forces are no less desperate to keep their secrets well and truly buried, and Martha and her team must crack the codes before it's too late.
From resident lexicographer Susie Dent comes a linguistic mystery that will both delight and shock readers.
Dent was educated at the Marist Convent in Ascot, an independent Roman Catholic day school. She went on to Somerville College, Oxford for her B.A. in modern languages, then to Princeton University for her master's degree in German.
Dent is serves as the resident lexicographer and adjudicator for the letters rounds on long-running British game show Countdown. At the time she began work on Countdown in 1992, she had just started working for the Oxford University Press on producing English dictionaries, having previously worked on bilingual dictionaries.
When an anonymous letter arrives at the office of Clarendon English Dictionary, the new senior editor, Martha Thornhill, wonders if it is one of those pranks. However, she and her team (fellow editors) decipher the clues in the letter to realize it hints at a case that occurred in 2010.
Martha’s older sister, Charlie disappeared without a trace never to be found. Unable to handle the aftermath, Martha settled in Berlin and lived there for a decade, creating a new life. However, family issues brought her back to London, and her return seems to have triggered something.
As more letters arrive, Martha and her colleagues have to unravel the mystery using their talents with words. It is like solving a word puzzle, only far more dangerous.
The story comes in the third-person POV of Martha, Alex, and Zoe.
My Thoughts:
As a fan of mysteries, I was excited to read this one. Cases that have puzzles and clues are more interesting than the ones with gun fights. Brain power and all that. ;)
This is a slow-paced mystery with many heavy-weight words and complex clues. Given the author’s expertise and the chosen professions of the main characters, it’s no surprise that the content reads like a dictionary. Much to show off in this one and it gets excessive sometimes.
The mystery as such is decent and easy enough to put together in the second half. In fact, you can identify the culprit in the first half if you go by the vibes (even if you don’t know the whats and whys).
Though the book is set in 2023, it has an old-world feel to it. If not for the talk about messages and stuff, I would have forgotten this is a contemporary read.
The setting is Oxford (which the author seems to love). As the book progressed, it felt more surreal than tangible. The descriptions should make it atmospheric but for me, it felt a tad overdone.
In fact, a lot of the book is overdone, making it way too slow than it needed to be. The same goes for characters. I am really glad we get Zoe and Alex’s POVs which balance out Martha’s. As the main character, Martha was infuriating most of the time. She has this ethereal and untouchable vibe which made it hard to connect with her. Also for someone who is in their early 30s, she sounded like a 50-something woman.
That’s a pity since the character arc deals with important themes � being the shadow sibling, the blurring lines between worshipping and hating the golden child aka the popular sibling, living the ghosts of unresolved past and guilt, wanting to avoid the truth, choosing perceived safety over reality, etc. These should have enriched her character but somehow it doesn’t happen.
I like that there are subtle hints of romance between the two characters and it never shadows the central plot � the mystery. This is a good decision and has been executed well.
Each chapter starts with a difficult word and its meaning. I think some align with the chapters but some don’t. Even the complex clues are solved easily but I’m not complaining. The characters have years of experience in the field. They are supposed to be good at what they do to be in their positions. Moreover, the story dragged on enough as it is. Additional delays would have been disastrous!
The epilogue ties up the loose ends and provides a bittersweet and hopeful ending. I wish the ARC had the author’s notes. Would love to read it.
To summarize, Guilty by Definition is a debut novel by a celebrity and it shows. The book has worthy elements, which are at the risk of drowning in heavy vocabulary and a hard-to-connect MC.
Thank you, NetGalley and Bonnier Books UK (Zaffre), for the eARC. This review is voluntary and contains my honest opinion about the book.
Susie Dent's name on the cover of this book should ensure that a significant number of people buy it. Sadly, I think that many of them will end up being bitterly disappointed. As someone who studied linguistics at university and who loves reading fictional mysteries, "Guilty by Definition" should have been right up my street, but, instead, I found it quite tedious. Given the author's role in "Dictionary Corner" on Channel 4's "Countdown", it was to be expected that Susie Dent would take the opportunity to show off her knowledge in this area, but it is painfully overdone. Her obsession with lexical peacockery gets in the way of telling the actual story. It is all well and good for an author to be able to display an impressive grasp of the language, but the one characteristic that the very best writers of fiction possess, that distinguishes them from the also-rans, is the gift of storytelling - and that is woefully lacking here.
As ever, I would still like to convey my thanks to NetGalley and the publisher for supplying an ARC in return for an honest review. It is a pity I was not in a position to pass more favourable comment on this occasion.
Where do I start with this one, I had high hopes for this book, being a Susie Dent fan and was intrigued how she would weave her magic with words into a novel.
I loved it, Susie has created a wonderful world of characters that fits her own world so perfectly, I didn't want to leave and say goodbye to the characters and I actually feel like I learned so much about language from this novel too.
The story centres around the Clarendon English Dictionary receiving cryptic letters to a ten year old puzzle, the disappearance of one of the lexicographers sister Charlie and the clues that Martha (Charlie's sister), Alex, Zoe and Simon must decipher to find out the mystery of what happened to Charlie all those years ago.
Susie Dent obviously knows words, but the way she weaves the history and meaning of them into this magnificent mystery is just wonderful, it's a world I happily immersed myself in and didn't want to leave.
Thank you NetGalley and the publishers for this ARC.
Reviews also published on: || || || || || || Happy to make friends on all socials
I’m sorry to say that I’m quite disappointed with this book and I think it will be difficult to explain why. But I’ll try! The generic trope of missing girl should have been dramatic and thrilling with the plot lines of cryptic letters and the unusual environment of the lexicography world. But I feel the actual storyline stayed very basic.
The main character felt like a soulless ethereal entity, a vintage toff type who you absolutely couldn’t relate to. The lexicography aspect was actually far too overwhelming. Needless insertions of random and unpronounceable words, the chapters starting with definitions of words unknown to me but seemingly made little sense to the chapter itself. All of the characters reflections and introspections seemed to be influenced by an odd word they would think of at the time. It really was just too much.
The cryptic letters were nonsensical and unenjoyable to read. Maybe you need a masters in language and history and literature to have any understanding or maybe I’m just stupid but this book just felt like it was trying too hard to be clever and almost cutesy at the same time.
It just lacked real substance as a storyline and twists all came far too late. This is not a recommendation from me I’m afraid.
Thank you to NetGalley and the publisher for the ARC.
This is right up my alley, lexicographers solving word puzzles in order to find a murderer and each chapter starts with a definition and the etymology of words, mostly dating centuries back, and lots of them were coined by Shakespeare, so here is something for the lovers of the bard too. I have seen reviewers complain that the puzzles were impossible to solve, and quite right, I didn’t get them either, but neither did I feel an obligation to do so, and it didn’t diminish my joy of reading it. If anything, it was a little too obvious to guess who the culprit was, but that was based on the description of said person.
Susie Dent is a national icon when it comes to the World of Words and it is no wonder she has written an intriguing mystery novel that is focussed around a group of lexicographers working for the CED - the Cambridge English Dictionary
Martha Thornhill has returned to Oxford having spent a number of years working in Germany- she has a new position as editor of the CED. But when a mysterious letter arrives at the office, the team soon recognise that there is a puzzle to solve and it is directly linked to the disappearance of Martha's sister Charlie who vanished 13 years before when Martha was finishing her A levels.
This fascinating story leads us through a journey of Oxford past and present, the machinations of lexical enquiry and the darker secrets of Charlie's life. As more letters arrive it becomes more obvious that the author is leading them towards a discovery they could never expect.
Susie Dent's etymological knowledge is prevalent throughout and as reader you find yourself as much on a linguistic journey within the novel as trying to work out where the mystery is leading and what happened to Charlie. Up until the denouement, it was not always easy to feel sympathetic towards the character of Charlie but the conclusion happily resolved the many twists and turns.
( New words include: taphophile/ suspired/ apricity/mubble-fubbles/confabulating /sadmin)
There is something of an 'old-fashioned' charm about the book- this is not a negative in any way but although there is police involvement, this is about a group of friends/colleagues trying to solve a puzzle through written clues all with literary links in a somewhat gentle and cerebral way.
A really enjoyable read leaving me with a broader vocabulary too ( and how many contemporary books can you say that about !)
Favourite quotes: We're all obsessed with our own problems and with how people see us that we create simple silhouettes for everyone else.
Language defines us and is the framework of our thought: an endless, shifting, complex dance through timed human nature. It is about patterns of life and the need to communicate them; it is about dying, renewal, and everything in between, about chaos and the order we make from chaos, the blood and bones of every history. Above all, it is about the slow insistent pull into the secret lives of the ordinary.
I don't know if I'll finish this book. The story lacks energy, the characters are charmless and the book strains to stretch the filament of its cleverness to keep the whole thing together. Literary references and etymological consideration are all very fine and well, but they do not a good story make without pace and personality. Oxford slumbers without context. There's safe reference some ethnic diversity, but no bigger world outside its slumbering cloisters, no Covid, no Brexit, no football, no television. We know that Susie Dent is the smartest girl in the class. But she's not the best writer. For all her velleity.
Wasn't sure what to expect tbh. I suppose I was expecting a murder mystery with lots of big words in it...and that's exactly what I got. It was a unique angle with the MCs being in charge of dictionary words but I found myself getting a bit lost along the way and struggled to distinguish between characters. I don't even remember who did it...
Just absolutely loved this word-nerd mystery novel! It had all the things I loved about mystery novels, with an added dose of academic, cryptic crossword-style, literature geek vibes. Really clever, and obvious about being so, but delightful because of this. A love letter to words, literature, Oxford, academia, and a mystery. Perfect read, perfect time for me.
A review from the husband as he stole this one as soon as it arrived. We are both fans of Susie on 8 Out of 10 Cats Does Countdown so have been looking forward to reading this.
This is the debut novel by English writer and broadcaster, Susie Dent. She has spent 30 years as the word expert on the UK TV Show Countdown and the comedy version, Cats Does Countdown.
She has written multiple books on words and language, which Cats Countdown host, Jimmy Carr says makes him go sleepy to night night.
I am pleased to say her novel certainly didn’t make me sleepy 😴
Set in Oxford, Susie builds a story around the Clarendon English Dictionary and the letters that are sent to them. These letters are anonymous and hint towards secrets and lies from the year that Charlie Thornhill went missing. Her younger sister Martha, is the CED, and as more letters arrive, the clues hidden in them become more alarming and complex.
The story twists and turns and Susie throws in some wonderful words and definitions.
A solid read that I enjoyed, that was not as obvious as I assumed it would be. A real page turner full of pneuma (noun) 16th century: The spirit, soul or life force.
Thanks to Allen and Unwin for sending us a copy to read. Out now.
Unfortunately, it was not a pleasant read. Lots of lovely new words and their meanings interrupted the flow. They didn’t work for me as part of a work of fiction.
Who best but Susie Dent to write a novel about words. A mystery that takes place in a dictionary publishing house filled with lexicographers who are the devout preservers of the artifacts of language. Guilty by Definition is a word lover's dream.
With Dent’s superb use of language her first mystery novel is sharply dressed up in stylish clothes. There’s something about Guilty by Definition that reminds me of Agatha Christie. It’s an intelligent mystery and Dent well captures the nuances of each character's individual voice.
Cryptic messages. Obscure clues. A sister missing for 10 years. Oxford. Shakespeare. Puzzles. Riddles. Rare books. What’s not to enjoy? I loved this book and for me it’s definitely a 5 star read.
Thank you to Bonnier Books UK, Zaffre and NetGalley for an ARC in exchange for an honest review.
This is a very clever cosy mystery, a crime novel with an original angle and intriguing, well constructed plot. I love books about books, and have studied linguistics at university, but I am not very good at solving cryptic puzzles, so some questions remain unanswered for me, even at the end*.
However, the characters are very engaging and credible, and although it was quite easy to guess the identity of the murderer, this was also a jolly good story in a lovely Oxford setting.
I listened to the audiobook (excellently narrated) and feel I should read it a second time to work out those unanswered questions. *Can anyone explain to me what the Bodleian had to do with anything, and who the mysterious letter writer was?
No sabía muy bien que iba a encontrarme en esta novela , y ha sido toda una sorpresa , me ha parecido un libro original y entretenido donde la autora se ha inspirado en el mundo de los lexicógrafos que trabajan en Oxford. Este es el lugar donde se ambienta una novela de misterio con pistas literarias y personajes bastante misteriosos. . Empieza cuando llegan cartas misteriosas a la oficina del “English Dictionary�, pistas sobre una desaparición de hace años de la hermana de una de nuestras protagonistas. . Una novela para los amantes de los rompecabezas, crucigramas etc� algo que crea mucho misterio. Aunque la gran protagonista se ve eclipsada por otros personajes me ha gustado mucho como evoluciona durante toda la novela. . Me costó un par de capítulos cogerle el truco a la novela y tengo que decir que puede que no sea un libro para todo el mundo, pero me ha entretenido mucho y me ha resultado bastante original.
I really wanted to enjoy this book but it gave me numerous amounts of headaches. The plot of it sounded good but felt it was ruined by pages of unnecessary waffling on, and it felt like Susie was “peacocking� all these big unpronounceable words that just made my brain hurt. When the coded letters got sent I never understood how they got the “clues� as it didn’t make sense to me.
I loved this literary murder mystery and I can’t wait to read what Susie Dent writes next. This showcases the world of words and publishing and stiff competition amongst book dealers. A highly entertaining read. Many thanks to Netgalley for an arc of this book.
Genuinely sorry to be disappointed with this book. Susie Dent is obviously a fantastic lexicographer and etymologist, so clever use of word to create a captivating story would be expected. However, it didn’t deliver for me.
The story fits for Susie Dent - the main characters work for a dictionary, but with the added murder mystery plot. Martha’s sister, Charlie, went missing a decade ago and after some time abroad returns to Oxford to work at the Clarendon English Dictionary. Letters start to arrive with clues as to what really happened to Charlie and the story unravels.
I found it quite difficult to read at the beginning, so it took me a while to get into. The (slightly too excessive) use of usual words and their definitions, though interesting, lost the flow of the story. This also made it hard to keep track of the characters and the story line to start with.
It got slightly more interesting eventually. But, I felt it missed the element of surprise and plot twists of a good murder mystery. Overall, it was an ok story, however, I would (at a push) only really recommend this to huge lovers of the English language and wordsmiths.
Thank you to NetGalley, and Bonnier Books UK, Zaffre for this book and the opportunity to review it.
There's a new kid on the crime fiction block, and her name is Susie Dent. As a lexicographer and etymologist, Susie knows all about words, their meanings and origins. Guilty by Definition is Susie's debut novel, and what a debut it is. The story is set in Oxford and centres around a team of lexicographers at the Clarendon English Dictionary, who receive some rather cryptic, anonymous letters. The letters contain clues pertaining to the disappearance of a young woman in 2010, whose sister happens to be one of said lexicographers. That's as much of the plot as I'm willing to give away. Suffice to say this is an immensely enjoyable book. Each chapter begins with an antiquated word and its definition. The plot is complex and intricately woven, its twisty and has the obligatory red herring. There are multiple POV's, but they are necessary and, in my humble opinion, aren't confusing. I thoroughly enjoyed this book and I really hope there will more like this to follow. Thanks to Netgalley and Bonnier Books UK for the digital ARC.
A delightful treat for those who love words! A slower-paced, more literary Richard Osman, perchance? Definitely written for a more niche audience, won't be everyone's cup of tea!
Thank you to NetGalley and the publishers for an advanced copy of Guilty by Definition in exchange for a review.
I must admit that I’m really disappointed by this! The overall reviews are fantastic so I’m not sure if it’s maybe just me, but I found this so slow and arduous to get through!
The story is a whodunnit/mystery with a difference - lots of words you’ll need to look up or else are shoe-horned in with the definition - either way I felt like I’d forgotten what was going on by the time we got back to the plot. Thankfully I was reading on my kindle which could give me definitions of words quickly but it still halted the flow several times.
The plot centres around Martha - a woman in her early 30s who has fairly recently returned to live in her hometown of Oxford after living in Berlin. She is working as a dictionary editor at the offices where her older sister Charlie briefly worked before going missing 10 years ago - and still no one knows what happened to her.
One day a mysterious letter arrives at the dictionary from someone known as Chorus - it is a baffling and long letter that makes no sense to the reader but the dictionary team have it worked out in a surprisingly short time. Next, people connected to Charlie start receiving postcards with puzzling messages on them.
Now Martha and her team throw any semblance of doing any work aside for what feels like weeks or months and concentrate on solving the mystery of Charlie’s disappearance and Chorus’s lengthy and impossible riddles (which they repeatedly solve quickly without too much trouble).
I love a good mystery and whodunnit but this just didn’t do it for me- it was slow, the characters unappealing except for Zoe, and Alex was ok, and I felt like I wasn’t too bothered what had happened to Charlie by the end. Disappointing!
I'll admit, words have always been a favourite thing of mine so all the new, seldom used and oft unknown ones in this Oxford based mystery were an extra bonus.
The basic bones of the story - Years ago Martha's sister disappeared and now someone is sending mysterious riddle and word play based puzzles to her and her colleagues at the Clarendon English Dictionary suggesting they know what happened. . .
To be fair it took me a couple of chapters to get into the flow of the story (hence the 4 stars instead of 5) but once I hit the groove it just flew by. It may not be to everyone's taste as it gets quite wordy in places but as Dent is the lexicographer's lexicographer that's only to be expected really.
I was so excited for this book. I’m not sure if my feelings about this book are a case of the wrong book at the wrong time or if I just didn’t care for the characters.
Things I loved: - the interesting words peppered (and explained) throughout -the setting -the plot
Things I didn’t like: - about half of the characters, which meant I lacked connection to the storyline -the lack of suspense -it really felt like a first novel
Overall an ok read, I will definitely read more fiction written by Susie Dent (because I love her!)
As a lover of words and language, linguistics and etymology I am always drawn to quizzes and game shows featuring language skills, so I am more than familiar with Susie Dent from her role in Countdown and 8 out of 10 Cats. She puts relentlessly teased about the entertainment value in her publications, so I was thrilled about her debut novel being published.
Set in historical Oxford, this is a literary mystery surrounding the 10 year old disappearance of young woman, with a series of anonymous letters providing cryptic clues to the staff at CED, Clarendon English Dictionary. The team need to pool their various specialist skills to decode each letter and then set about hunting down new evidence.
This story had immediate impact on me, stoking the flames of regret that I never got to attend Oxford, but firing many synapses with it's smartly layered conundrums. It has an Agatha Christie style, with characters who aren't always reliable and a plot driven by timely reveals. However the mystery soon begins to resemble a board game, the rules having been learned it was just about moving the pieces around. The pacing is uneven, it is reserved, it drags a lot in the middle, but picks up again around the 3/4 mark.
I think this book will have broad appeal, I might have been expecting too much from it, given it's intriguing premise and hopeful start. It is entertaining, educational and the puzzles are challenging.
Publication date: 15th August 2024 Thanks to #NetGalley and #BonnierBooks for the ARC
For her first work of fiction, Susie Dent has drawn on the world she knows so well - a group of lexicographers working in the heart of Oxford. This is the setting for a lively and interesting murder mystery with literary clues and well rounded characters who all have their secrets to hide.
It all starts with mysterious anonymous letters arriving at the office of the (fictional) Clarendon English Dictionary. Hidden in the letters are clues to secrets relating to 2010, the year when Charlotte Thornhill went missing. Charlie’s sister Martha is now a senior editor at the dictionary, and she now joins forces with her colleagues to unravel the clues in the letters, both hoping and fearing that it will lead to an explanation of her sister’s disappearance.
This really appealed to me as a lover of literature, puzzles, crime and the city of Oxford, and I thoroughly enjoyed it. It’s all done with a lightness of touch and a sensitivity for human weakness that balances the intellectual tricks and twists, and makes for an engaging mystery. Although Martha is slightly overshadowed by others as a main character, her complicated relationship with her sister keeps the reader’s attention and empathy throughout. I hope Susie Dent continues to write fiction, as she is rather brilliant at it.
Thank you to NetGalley and the publisher for a free copy in return for an impartial review. This is the debut novel from Countdown’s Dictionary corner’s Susie Dent. She is well known for her daily tweets posting definitions of lesser known words and there is a lot of that here, particularly in the first half of the novel. As the story develops, thankfully there is less because while it was charming at first it quickly became wearing.
There will be inevitable comparisons with Richard Osman but I think this is more of a standalone book than the start of a series. I enjoyed it, I enjoyed the clues and working out the mystery with the characters and I felt their characters developed just enough to keep it interesting. Overall if you like Richard O, I think you will like this and I would recommend it.
Audiobook. OK. Too much lexicography and too many underdeveloped characters. They are all a bit ‘nice�. Liked the setting, the premise and the hunt for the common book. Towards the end lots of questions about who ‘Chorus� was and then I just felt the reveal was a bit wrong. I just don’t see the father character as playing that role, and then keeping it going whilst the police get involved. So overall pretty average. I think I kept going because it was more background noise but I doubt I’d read one of her books.
Martha returns to Oxford where she becomes boss of a section of the CED where she used to work. Cryptic letters arrive, written by the mysterious “Chorus� and it becomes clear it is all to do with Martha’s sister who disappeared 13 years ago.
I found it entertaining, lots of things in my wheelhouse- linguistics, puzzles, Berlin, and a good page turner. It was very Susie Dent, inasmuch as there were frequent definitions and etymologies of words that did work for me because of the characters being dictionary writers but I wonder how many people would find this takes them out of the story.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
"La lingua ci definisce ed è l'ossatura dei nostri pensieri, una danza infinita, mutevole, complessa attraverso il tempo e la natura umana. [...] riguarda gli schemi ricorrenti della vita e il bisogno di comunicarli; [...] riguarda la morte, il rinnovamento e tutto quello che sta in mezzo ai due; il caos e l'ordine che creiamo a partire dal caos, il sangue e lo scheletro di ogni storia. Ma soprattutto riguarda l'attrazione lenta e ostinata per la vita segreta delle persone comuni."
Molto intrigante l'idea di partenza, e sicuramente apprezzabili le curiosità linguistiche che accompagnano la narrazione. Peccato però che quest'ultima risulti pesante, mentre gli enigmi celati nelle lettere difficili da risolvere se non per gli "addetti ai lavori". Banale e di scarso impatto è poi la verità dietro la scomparsa di Charlie. Mi ha molto delusa.