What do you think?
Rate this book
224 pages, Hardcover
First published January 1, 2014
When I saw this, I thought "cool, a giant picture book from the Smithsonian that will make me look smart 'n sciencey while maybe giving me a clue as to why past ages of the Earth have such confusing names.
Turning to the Introduction on page 4 I read:
"THE HISTORY OF LIFE IS WRITTEN is written in the rocks, or more precisely in the fossils contained within the rocks. "Either the authors were waxing poetic or else the editorial staff WAS SLEEPING was sleeping the day this manuscript crossed their desk.
Oh well, continuing on I reached page 6:
"These tiny fossils resemble modern cyanobacteria and represent just one of the many kinds microbial organisms that flourished on the Precambrian Earth."Their grammar is proving pre-Cambridgian...
Finally the pictures started (yay!), including images of the pre-Pangaean continents but with no explanation as to how they've determined the shape and arrangement of those landmasses. Guess we'll just have to take their word for it.
And then I reached pages 12-13. The picture would really help here but I can't for the life of me figure out how to insert images, so you'll just have to imagine that you're looking down on a white button mushroom cap that's been gold-plated and etched with the inner markings of a peace symbol (or else Google Doushantuo Formation). Across from this image is the following:
"In the Doushantuo Formation one can find beautifully preserved fossils that resemble, astonishingly, the embryos of modern animals. They are shaped by adjoining cells, suggesting a flexible membrane rather than the rigid membrane of algae or fungi. The number of cells is always to the power of two (1, 2, 4, 8, etc) characteristic of embryo cleavage..."Ok, as noted, the image shown looks like a mushroom with a peace sign on it, and as we all know, a peace sign has three sections. The last time I checked, which was two sentences ago, 3 is not a power of 2!
I'm sure there's a rational explanation for the disconnect between the image and text, but after a mere 13 pages my conclusion was that this was a shoddy and confusing effort by our nation's preeminent natural history museum to one-up Neil MacGregor's A History Of The World In 100 Objects by going back 3.9 billion years. Maybe they should have gone back in reading level as well and left it at "Here's a pretty rock. And look, here's another one!"