This little-known late writing of Hobbes reveals an unexplored dimension of his famous doctrine of sovereignty. The essay was first published posthumously in 1681, and from 1840 to 1971 only a generally unreliable edition has been in print. This edition provides the first dependable and easily accessible text of Hobbes's Dialogue. In the Dialogue, Hobbes sets forth his mature reflections of the relation between reason and law, reflections more "liberal" than those found in Leviathan and his other well-known writings. Hobbes proposes a separation of the functions of government in the interest of common sense and humaneness without visibly violating his dictum that the sharing or division of sovereignty is an absurdity. This new edition of the Dialogue is a significant contribution to our understanding of seventeenth-century political philosophy. "Hobbes students are indebted to Professor Cropsey for this scholarly and accessible edition of Dialogue. "--J. Roland Pennock, American Political Science Review "An invaluable aid to the study of Hobbes."-- Review of Metaphysics
Thomas Hobbes was a British philosopher and a seminal thinker of modern political philosophy. His ideas were marked by a mechanistic materialist foundation, a characterization of human nature based on greed and fear of death, and support for an absolute monarchical form of government. His 1651 book Leviathan established the foundation for most of Western political philosophy from the perspective of social contract theory.
He was also a scholar of classical Greek history and literature, and produced English translation of Illiad, Odyssey and History of Peloponnesian War.
Cropsey's introduction is an excellent preliminary guide. The text itself is insightful but requires a great deal of contextual understanding, so I wouldn't recommend it for new readers of Hobbes. Perhaps it would be most useful as the companion to another text (not sure which one right now) in introducing new students to the foundations of law.
Il dialogo cerca di profilare un dibattito a favore e contro il primato della legge scritta ("civil law") sopra quella consuetudinaria tipica degli ordinamenti anglosassoni ("common law"), dando grande spazio ai precedenti storici che hanno compromesso la tenuta legale della seconda. Sebbene un paio di capi siano teoreticamente rilevanti, in generale il testo è di interesse filosofico modesto, rappresentando piuttosto un valido strumento per analizzare la realtà storica dell'Inghilterra rinascimentale, con la sua graduale accumulazione di strutture legali. Quantunque più maturo rispetto ai capolavori più conosciuti, la tesi essenziale del testo rimane la necessità di un sovrano indivisibile, di una fonte del diritto univoca, di un legislatore capace di emanare e applicare sanzioni, il monopio del potere di giudicare del re, ecc.