What do you think?
Rate this book
283 pages, Paperback
First published March 1, 1983
Human nature is complicated and contradictory. It’s predictable yet unpredictable; it’s cruel yet kind; it’s violent yet peaceful. It’s a topic that plenty of literature touches upon, yet Pamela Sargent’s Earthseed is the first book that has truly made me think about it. The thought-provoking and relatable content is one of many positive reasons why I gave this book the rating of 4/5 stars. Another positive reason is the amazing amount of diversity present in this book in all its forms. However, I do have a criticism: The writing style is lackluster and, at times, rather boring. This shortcoming is the reason why I removed a star from my rating that otherwise would’ve been 5/5.
Let it be said that I’m an optimist; I have a tendency to see only the good in people and their creations, and I hate critique. However, even the most critical pessimist would have a hard time finding any less-than-stellar themes or ideas in this novel. The prevailing theme is that of human nature and the violence within. Reminiscent of Lord of the Flies, the teens in this book, once isolated from the parental control of Ship within the Hollow, resort to violence. However, because of the large amount of characters in this story, there is plenty of diversity in opinions and actions. There are the young, reckless boys who embody the human nature of violence. However, there are also the calm, rational girls who seek solutions to disagreements, and they embody the diplomatic nature of humanity. These human impulses are portrayed so realistically and intricately in Earthseed that it truly causes the reader to reflect on their own actions and tendencies, as well as those of their peers.
As I mentioned before, this novels features diversity of opinions and actions. However, there are a lot of other dimensions of diversity within this book that also stood out to me. One of the most obvious ones is that of racial diversity. It’s heavily implied in many places throughout the story, such as during the dance at the beginning or when the characters are being described. The best part about this is that though it’s mentioned and alluded to, it’s something that the characters are completely oblivious to. There’s no racial tension, and there’s not even a single mention of it in dialogue, either. It’s a pretty neat political statement, and I like the depth that it added to the story. As well as physical diversity, there’s also the diversity in opinions. These children were all raised together, but they all have minds of their own, and it’s rather refreshing. It keeps the story interesting, and it really drives the plot forward.
I hate to be the Debbie Downer in any situation, and I especially dislike critiquing others when I know that their work is far better than my own. I’ve never been a brilliant author; however, I do recognize good writing when I see it. The content of Earthseed may be astounding, but the execution is decidedly not. Sargent’s writing in this novel is very dialogue-heavy, which fortunately works in its favor. However, this has tipped the scales against the favor of any descriptive writing. There are a few select scenes which are described fairly well, especially during the conflict at the climax of the story; however, the description usually seems way too mechanical and dull, and it seems like it’s treated more like filler between dialogue. I opened the book to a random page and found a perfectly laughable example: “‘There’s Lars.� Kagami went towards the boy� (Sargent 73) This is followed by equally awkward descriptions of Zoheret eating an egg roll and watching her peers dance. The sentences are short, chunky, and full of basic descriptions and basic words. I’m a fan of science fiction, but I’m a bigger fan of poetic writing, and I see no reason why some authors choose to keep the two separate. I’d love to see some of the scenes (such as within the Hollow) or the interactions between characters described with more effectiveness and more power. There’s something to be said for vocabulary words.
It’s no stretch to say that I enjoyed this book. I’m so grateful that I rescued it from the gallows that is my library’s �DISCARD� cart - I can’t say what drew me to it in the first place, but I’m thinking that it was fate. It’s almost perfect for me in the way that it combines science fiction with YA literature, featuring an interesting story and characters that I couldn’t help but root for. Reading this book was a memorable experience, and I savored every moment of it. It’s a shame that it’s not too popular, and I really would recommend it to anyone who’s even slightly intrigued by it. It’s no waste of time.