Analyzes the structure of families, examines the unexpressed rules used to raise children, and discusses family violence, child abuse, and dysfunctional families
Librarian Note: There is more than one author in the GoodReads database with this name.
John Bradshaw has been called "America's leading personal growth expert." The author of five New York Times bestsellers, Bradshaw On: The Family, Healing the Shame That Binds You, Homecoming, Creating Love, and Family Secrets. He created and hosted four nationally broadcast PBS television series based on his best-selling books. John pioneered the concept of the "Inner Child" and brought the term "dysfunctional family" into the mainstream. He has touched and changed millions of lives through his books, television series, and his lectures and workshops around the country.
During the past twenty-five years he has worked as a counselor, theologian, management consultant, and public speaker, becoming one of the primary figures in the contemporary self-help movement.
But its also PURE GOLD if you’re able to roll with some of the more problematic material.
There is TOO MUCH herein to summarize in this venue.
But in short.
Here are some of the (paraphrased) BIG IDEAS.
HEALTY RELATIONSHIPS:
A healthy family/relationship is one in which (a) each member is at liberty to be their authentic self (some or most of the time), (b) each member is getting their individual needs met (some or most of the time), and (c) each member is benefited by membership (some or most of the time).
The sum is greater than the parts.
For a family/relationship to be healthy, there needs to be 1. differentiation, 2. connection, and 3. harmony.
Differentiation within the family/relational system means that each member has a distinct sense of identity and is non-reactive to the thoughts and emotions shared within the system (some or most of the time).
Connection within the family/relational system means that each member feels felt, heard, valued and safe (some or most of the time).
Harmony within the family/relational system means that each member can think, feel and express their needs within the system, and accommodate the needs of others within the system, in a way that does not subtract from the health, welfare, wellbeing and growth of everyone involved (most or all of the time).
In order to have differentiation, connection and harmony, there need to be 1. boundaries, 2. attunement, 3. attachment, 4. communication.
Appropriate boundaries (limits, rues etc.) exist to enable privacy and individuation within the system.
Attunement exists to enable togetherness and connection within the system.
Secure attachment means that there is a flexible, efficient and effective way of reconnecting and repairing ruptures.
Appropriate communication exists to (a) enable healthy boundaries, (b) facilitate connection, (c) express the thoughts, feelings and needs of the individuals and the collective, (d) negotiate and resolve conflicts, (e) ensure win/win outcomes (some or most of the time).
ROLE PLAY:
People adapt roles in a family system e.g. mother, father, husband, wife, son, daughter, and all permutations therein.
Appropriate role definition and fulfillment is important to healthy boundaries, connection and communication in a family/relationship.
Playing a role (in a family or relational system) entails: (a) adapting (modifying, changing etc.,) your personality to meet the needs of another (parent, spouse, sibling, child etc.,), (b) deferring your individual needs (either partially or completely) for the sake of the family/relationship on whole.
A dynamic system is one in which each member can be their authentic self (some or most of the time) and where no one member is rigidly stuck in one role. But can flexibly adapt, and fulfill other roles, based on the overall wellbeing of the self, group and others.
A ridged system is one in which each individual is stuck in one role and as such, is not at liberty to be their authentic self.
A functional family system is one in which each all of the important roles/functions are fulfilled, everyone’s basic needs are being met, and each adult member is able to function self sufficiently and independently outside the system.
A dysfunctional family system is one in which roles and needs go unfulfilled, or are fulfilled inappropriately (e.g. the children are caretakers for the parents) or where some or each member is rigidly stuck in one role or another (some or all of the time).
Repression refers to ways we deny (conceal, or dissociate from) our authenticity (true feelings, thoughts, and self expression etc.,) to survive , or be accepted in a family system, relationship, job, society or culture.
It takes (physical and psychological) energy to repress aspects of or self. As such, repression is draining, exhausting, and devitalizing.
The adaptive child is the role children are enlisted into, whereby they repress aspects of themselves to be of service to the family.
Being stuck in an adaptive child role (the good girl/boy, the parentified child, mom and dad’s best friend, the little therapist etc.,) is exhausting, and means the child is not getting all (or any) of their needs met, and is very contrary to personal growth.
AGAIN:
MUCH MUCH MOOCHO MORE MATERIAL than can be summarized here. So read the book if you’re curiosity has been sparked.
Just remember, there’s some wack as fuck shit in this book.
It’s from the 80s.
�.
If you missed the 80’s (because you’re a millennial or gen z, or whatever comes next) and some of the things you read in this book seem totally out of FUCKING control, (a) your not wrong, (b) that’s why punk rock happened, and (c) just be glad you didn’t have to live through it.
I only read maybe 10 pages of this book and skimmed other parts, so you can factor that into how you read this review. The basic premise of the book is that many events in our childhood and development cause shame, which caused a variety of problematic destructive events in later life. I don't necessarily take issue with that premise, but the way the author presents his case leaves much to be desired. His tack is extremely alarmist and he does not site specific facts but rather will reference other authors premises as opposed to referencing their research. His sweeping hypotheses seem overly simplistic and matter of fact, again with no research to back up his claims. Overall I think it will fail to satisfy readers with a critical mind.
When I read Bradshaw On: The Family, it was an energetic insight into many of the situations that I had encountered in my family of origin, and again in my marriage. I read it at the beginning of a long stretch of personal growth spurred on by divorce at the time.
It served me well by giving me another context from which to view many situations in my relationships, particularly in understanding situations that seemed randomly disruptive or disconcerting. Bradshaw's systematic description of what he calls "the poisonous pedagogy" found in some dysfunctional families allowed me to survey my own experiences thoroughly and find where I could make choices differently as I moved through an interesting divorce.
I chose specifically to include this book, however, more for the response and experiences I've witnessed when my friends have borrowed it. Consistently, my friends have borrowed copies, only to ask if they may keep them for a little longer, and a little longer, until I ultimately wish them well with their new book and happily buy another copy. The book was originally published in 1984, and hasn't changed much in its content over several editions, only in its emphasis. It seems to have the appeal of a classic in that people return to it over and over again, even when they have found more contemporary works that go into greater depth on the subject of family dynamics.
I recommend this book to anyone who is puzzling through parts of their life where they find recurring themes of nonsensical behavior or frustration.
This book has some good ideas and insights, and I definitely learned something from it. But it is so poorly written and organized, and after a while the end-of-chapter summaries made me want to vomit. Bradshaw also comes across as both hokey and arrogant. I'm glad I read it, but as I was reading it I thought, "there must be something better written on this subject." If I find that something, I'll post it.
My mom bought me this book that she read in the 80s (when it was published) and which helped her break the cycle of punitive and damaging parenting that she went through, particularly as a kid of an alcoholic. Reading this book with that context in mind was very interesting and made me grateful she broke the cycle of, basically, as Bradshaw puts it: not treating you children as human beings and the normalizing of abusive behaviour as 'good parenting.' I'm not sure I'd recommend this book in any other circumstances other than the one I read it under, though! It's very much a product of its time and not without a lot of unexamined biases.
This book helped me a lot. If you want to end the toxic patterns in your life (codependency, substance abuse etc.), this is a great book to read. Our behaviors have a lot to do with our inner child whose needs weren't met. Bradshaw on The Family really allowed me to separate myself from my toxic childhood upbringing and the toxic religious upbringings that I've had. I am now on a journey to finding my true self and slowly cutting off the false self I've created.
This is also a great book for parenting.
I read Healing The Shame that binds you and found that Bradshaw on The Family is an easier read. There's not as much psychology terms, much easier for an end user.
This book did give me a revolutionary discovery of myself and my family, thanks to my psychologist. It almost covers every aspect of a dysfunctional family. When I was reading it, I was shocked several times that how could a book know me that well. Some characters I used to think is mine but is actually a 'gift' of my family, not on my own. I bought another 2 books for my parents to read. Also several times I wanna share the thoughts in this book with my friends and family.
Till now I couldn't find any flaw of it. If I really want to say a little, maybe should be: the recovery steps are too abstract. I know that a lot of psychologists would say: go meditation, get in touch with the inner child, something like that. It's too difficult even to think about. And in my country there hardly runs any supportive recover group as the book described. The author said the first 12 steps took him 10 years to achieve, I don't know, I may have seek other way to get on the recovery progress, but not exactly as the author is suggesting.
I would like to read his book 'heal the shame that blinds you' later.
Do your self a gentle smart favor, ignore any negative review of this book. If you want to help yourself and help your friends and loved ones, summon whatever it takes for you to read this book.
I had a female friend who told me for years that she had a happy childhood, that she loved her parents. I kept silent, as if I believed her, because the first time I recommended she read something like this she got very defensive. Years pass, she divorces the husband her parents forced her to marry, because she was pregnant with another mans' child. (Kid you not.) The husband made her give up the her first baby for adoption. She was so dominated by her parents at that time, she did, against her hearts' desire. She divorced this husband, 12 years her senior because he verbally abused her in front of their two sons. He stopped making love to her. (She was attractive). Her self esteem (or self feeling) went downhill. She slept in the livingroom for 3 years, secretly, so her sons wouldn't know. Meanwhile sometimes late at night, she and the husband would scream and argue to the point -- I later learned from a neighbor -- that the sons would run out into the large yard, hold their hands over their ears and scream -- in order to not hear their parents yelling.
Every time I encouraged her to read this book or something like it, she claimed she had a happy childhood. Years and years later she called me and asked me to help her get a therapist, her life was falling apart. I researched on the web for a John Bradshaw trained therapist. She went and it saved her life. Meanwhile, before that, she divorced the abusive husband, went back into the workforce and eventually started drinking due to work stress, and became an alcoholic. She was arrested for a single car drunk driving accident, that landed her, knocked out by her head hitting the steering wheel in the hospital. She called her healthy friend, me, to pick her up, she was too ashamed to ask her oldest son, or any of her friends. She went to the therapist eventually, and learned to say "no" to her parents, and thought she was all better. Meanwhile she met the love of her life, and blossomed, traveled for the first time, had her first orgasm (she told me) and became a much happier person...except...when stress caused her to lean on the bottle. She leaned on the bottle more and more...to the point where I could no longer take her late night drunken raged filled phone calls.
You guessed it, her unhealed childhood wounds caused her to ruin her relationship with her soul mate / love of her life. She ruined her health, her liver and kidneys and was diagnosed as a paranoic. She started having an affair at work, which led to her and the man being fired and led from the building by security guards. She loved her job, ultimate shame in her exit.
I knew another woman, who was beaten by her father, with a bamboo switch, every week (along with her brothers) whether she (they) had mis-behaved that week or not. When she started to bloom as a young young woman, he started to molest her. When she had bloomed, he started raping her. When she first shared this with me, I offered her this book. She read this book, and Bradshaw's "Homecoming," about healing the inner child and the wounds of early life and such abuse, trauma and dysfunction. Within a few months she threw off the shackles of her old thinking and feelings and traveled around the world speaking at large conventions in her field, and being interviewed on television about her ground breaking work.
Imagine a line drawn down the middle of a white or chalk board. To the left of the line is everyone and everything that these books can help liberate and heal. To the right of the line are all the people with wounds that will take more work and therapy.
The first woman thought she knew better, likely, already paranoid and resistant to the suggestions of others due to her control father and mother. The second woman was just waiting to encounter information that could demonstrate for her that the beatings, molestations and rapes were not her fault. Of course the second woman would need and get more therapy, the book was the gateway.
The first woman refused the gateway offered by the universe, a friend. And her life got better for a while after divorcing, and then cycled into a downward spiral. It is said people live their lives in patterns, repeated patterns, and that change is hard due to neurological / emotional imprints, as well as linguistic imprints (values, opinions, positives or prejudices).
I tend to wonder if people live their lives in linear spirals, each time they repeat themselves, they can improve or regress, get worse. That's what I've seen in life.
John Bradshaw is the most educated, well researched educator and presenter of human psychology, and family systems psychology as evolved by Dr. Murray Bowen in the 1950's and 60's and through till his death in the 90's.
Imagine that you have a garden, and in it you plant two rows 6 feet apart, so that they will not share the same added nutrients and water. In the first row of corn you give it all organic matter nutrients and the suggested amount of water, without over watering. In the second row of corn, you give it polluted water, poulluted "nutrients," water with batter acid, and you cover it with a tarp deny it sun, every other day.
Which row of corn would you personally fare to do better, and which would you want to eat?
This is the root premise of "how a nature is nurtured," yes, genetics and epigenetics, and epigensis play a roll in our personality formation -- and the "baseline state of contentment or lack thereof, that we wake up with every morning."
So indeed, our personalities, and abilities for happiness, are influenced by both heritable aspects, and the conditions of the garden in which we grow up, both macroscopically (society, schools) and microscopically (the family unit, primary care givers, baby sitters, close family members like aunts, uncles, grandparents etc.)
Mostly, unhappy people are made, conditioned, not born. Yes some are born with a screwloose.
What you resist, in getting to the bottom of your early life conditioning -- and as a famous artist once said "I found childhood particularly difficult, it made me very sensitive, it wasn't anything my family did, my parents are wonderful, it was the society, the kids around me etc." And another brilliant artist said "It is very difficult to be both highly intelligent and highly emotional (from an abusive childhood), one uses the intelligence to navigate the emotions, but eventually, without education, therapy and the learning of self regulation techniques like meditations for down regulating negative emotions, and skills for navigating social live, conflict resolution, conscious honesty, kindness and gentleness to others...there are many pot holes and troubles one can fall into in life."
Mt beliefs can be discerned by the above. The people I have met who had adverse childhoods, that have done the best, are the ones who for some reason are either desperate, or able to be intelligent enough to embrace the information such as this book and others about early life development, and then find and learn the skills to navigate and act successfully as an adult.
Mostly, this never happens because the information gets shamed by those like the first women, who would deride the concept / metaphor of the "inner child," because she'd heard comedians do it on TV. And yet, her life fell apart.
The average human understand more about how a dog, a cat, or their car works, then how THEY work. This is a tragedy for a biomass / species known as "Human Beings." We are Human Animals, and "self aware Hominids," we exist emotionally, before we learn language and have thoughts. And what this book is pointing out and educating people to is that how that little neonate is treated (we now have evidence that a fetus can feel his mothers experience/feelings at age 6 months in the womb, so the imprints start then) will absolutely have an effect on personality development, ability for contentment in life, core values, and the emotional baseline state of the human as they come of age.
I never met a school bully, murderer, or violent criminal, alcoholic, or drug addict that come from a truly healthy family.
Sometimes it takes a very deep look to figure out how someone was influenced to go off the rails in life. The most interesting case I encountered was a guy who's parents seemed kind, polite, warm hearted, charming, well humored... And yet he turned out ruining a pro sports career, a professional modeling career, and became a heroin, cocaine, alcohol addict, and died of a heart attack from damage to his heart from mixing cocaine and heroin too many times. He had "died" and been revived 3 times in his life. The 4th time, it got him in his sleep.
He was my dearest best friend and I learned all of the above to try and save his life. By the time he agreed to get clean, he'd already lost the ability to walk, and had a plastic plate in his head from being beaten for an unpaid drug debt.
People who dismiss the important information in this book, after reading Ten Pages etc., are a sad joke. Yes, there are still light witted folk who want to attack the idea that we are influenced by our parents and siblings and that we are born with a fully formed personality and emotional traits etc. etc. etc. They do you or themselves no service.
Bradshaw has owned that his southern accent, and his passion seems angry sometimes when he presented on TV, and he has apologized for that, that part of his conditioning, and urged those who or whose family members need help or recovery...to embrace the information whether it is from his work, or another author on the same topics / theory.
To wit, there is a Renaissance of new authors, books and information on family systems theory and therapeutic practice in the non-USA Anglosphere. Dr. Oliver James does a great job in "How To Survive a Family Life," including intelligently debunking "the Twins" studies and theories. He's a brilliant man, a clinical child psychologist and son of both a psychologist and psychiatrist who wanted to get to the bottom of how they "screwed up" he and his sister. (He and his sister had joked about it, and he decided to find out by become a Child Psychologist. There's also a great new book out of Australia, or NZ, I forget the name and the author at this point.
There are hundreds of branches of psychology, which is a field that was born out of the field of philosophy. If there there is a Logical place to begin researching understanding and changing one's self, it has to be studying the garden from which we were spawned.
This book and the companion PBS TV series were massive successes for a reason. They spoke to answers Tens of Millions of people were seeking, and they have Saved Lives, probably thousands of lives. I have used them to save 6 lives myself, and used them to save 3 marriages with children as well.
Sadly, if you cannot get into this book, or these ideas and theories, and understand them...it says more about your level of intellectual development than the work itself does.
Humans are evolutionary creatures, we'll always be able to ding and quibble over any theories or posited ideas or researched "facts" about human conditioning, development and personality / expression.
If ever there were a logical place to start to understand how we turned out they way we have...it would be the family unit, where we spent the most time being cared for or not, loved or not, where we received the majority of our early life treatment from others, and spent most of our time. Certain school is a big factor when we reach school age.
Studies on human resilience also point to treatment by the mother, bonding/attachment, and available nutrition and education / 1st world / 3rd world, etc., other external factors.
Bradshaw is great for bringing to light the one thing that tends to stare us in the face and yet we just can't see it. Regardless of the fact that he tends to deal with more substance abuse, anyone who suffered emotional abuse as well will find a great deal of relief from reading this book. Families are complex to begin with - add a little dysfunctionality and they get downright crazy. Bradshaw helps you see past the craziness and see how to heal yourself and move on.
Not full of big or ambiguous terms, it's easy to read and understand. Not all of it is useful, but most of it and those elements that are make it a very good tool in anyone's emotional recovery.
The first part of the book where Bradshaw described the reasons and symptoms of a shame-based personality was informative and intriguing. I wish he would have spent more time on the solution (the 2nd half of the book). This book clearly illustrates American families' problems in the beginning of 21st century. For non-american readers like me, it would take a little more effort to digest the concepts of faith and deep democracy. Nevertheless, the author has a friendly, descriptive, easy-to-understand writing style. A good read for people who love Mr. Scott Peck's work (A Road Less Travel).
The first few chapters of this book were kind of boring--basically the background of this guy's theory and talking about what a healthy family would look like. But now I've gotten to the chapter on compulsive families, and I'm surprised (even after having been surprised about this same thing before) at how extensively this stuff describes me. The author made a horrible acrostic from the letters of "Adult children of alcoholics," and almost every single trait applies to me, or did apply to me until I worked really hard in therapy to change it. Gah!
p. 90 "Addictive/compulsive behavior or marry addicts Delusional thinking and denial about family of origin Unmercifully judgmental of self or others Lack good boundaries Tolerate inappropriate behavior
Constantly seek approval Have difficulty with intimate relationships Incur guilt when standing up for self Lie when it would be just as easy to tell the truth Disabled will Reactive rather than creative Extremely loyal to a fault Numbed out
Overreact to changes over which they have no control Feel different from other people
Anxious and hypervigilant Low self-worth and internalized shame Confuse love and pity Overly rigid and serious, or just the opposite Have difficulty finishing projects Overly dependent and terrified of abandonment Live life as a victim or offender Intimidated by anger and personal criticism, or overly independent Control madness--have an excessive need to control Super-responsible or super-irresponsible"
Or, perhaps more compellingly, "I thought that my addiction to excitement, my people-pleasing and approval-seeking, my overly developed sense of responsibility, my intimacy problems, my frantic compulsive lifestyle, my severe self-criticalness, my frozen feelings, my incessant good-guy act and my intense need to control were just personality quirks. I never dreamed that they were characteristics common to adults who as children lived in alcoholic families." (p.98)
Since nobody in my immediate family drinks regularly, I would be really confused right now if I hadn't already read a good bit about codependency.
So, on to codependency.
p. 185 "As the definition of addiction was expanded to include the wider range of addictions (activities, feelings, thoughts), the awareness dawned on observers that any type of dysfunctional family exhibits the same co-dependent structure." (emphasis the author's)
It's like Tolstoy said: all happy families are alike, but each unhappy family is codependent. Or something like that.
I was going to type out the acrostic for this, too, but fuck it. The only thing I found particularly "aha!"ish here is the idea that trying to figure out what normal people would do, and then doing that, is part of all this codependent/adult children of X scene. Hm.
I was mostly looking forward to the last part of the book, which is about how to get better, but I was immensely disappointed that the solution was basically: join a 12-step program, get therapy, join a group of some sort, and get a spiritual life. I might be more impressed with the author's recommendations if this whole section didn't seem so "this worked for me! Therefore, it's what you need, too!" Just not finding that particularly persuasive.
Oddly enough, the description of how you'll be at the end of the third stage of recovery seems to fit me pretty well, but if you look at the descriptions of the outcomes of the first two stages, I'm all messed up.
I really don't know what to to think about this book. If my therapist hadn't recommended it, I'd cheerfully cast it aside and disregard it, but since he thought I'd get a lot out of it, now I'm like, "uh oh, am I just in denial here? Do I really need a 12-step program or some shit?" ???
Either way, I really did not enjoy reading this book, and I'm very glad to be done with it. I kept waiting for some new (or at least new-to-me) insight, but other than the WWND? thing, there really wasn't. I guess I know more about this stuff than I realize. I did do a good bit of reading on codependency last year, and I read a bunch on addiction for a client project.
There is a big exercise that starts on p. 199: "12 essential traits of co-dependency that lead to powerlessness and unmanageability"--you're supposed to go through the list and write down examples of how you've exhibited each trait (if applicable) and what it cost you. Probably a good exercise, but it sounds so hideous. Another book I'm reading right now offers contradictory advice that basically boils down to "acknowledge and move on, dude"--think I'll do that instead.
I found this book a great help. Bradshaw is big on the inner child kind of thing. Even if you don't agree with his self help methods, I think most would find the reading insightful.
The center of what I liked is- identify the problem, figure out what caused it, that clown at your 5th bday party perhaps? but don't use that as an excuse! You figured out what makes you tick, now use it get on with your life.
Went to hear him speak once (and I'm not a person who would be caught at a self-help seminar) and boy he was a congenial & charismatic host.
If you ever are curious what the definition and impact of a dysfunctional family is, this is your book. Bradshaw discusses the family as a system of relationships and explains how the unresolved issues of one generation get passed on to the next. I read this book in a class--Family Dynamics-- and when we reached the chapter on the "normal" family the professor asked how many of us recognized their own family. No one raised their hand! :)!
I recommend this book to anyone who wants to understand themselves and their families better. There were sections of the book where I felt like the author must have been sitting in my parents living room, watching the way we interacted, and then he wrote it into his book. It was very accurate, very enlightening, and I think even inspired. Reading this book was a very healing experience. I highly recommend it.
This book in combination with Bradshaw on the Family (a 13 part Public Radio presentation) can cut through much of the fog of growing up in a dysfunctional family. I watch the TV series about once every 5 years because I forget things from it.
An interesting read that examines how childhood experiences impact on the development of self esteem and explores the life long impact this can have on an individual (and their families). Though a bit long winded and repetitive in places this is a good introduction for anyone who would like to learn more about how the structure/functionality of your family of origin deeply impacts on your belief system and can contribute to the internalisation of shame which often leads to the repetition of unhealthy patterns for future generations. The book also offers some practical advice on how to break these cycles although I did find there was a lot of self referencing on the part of the author here which got a bit annoying! (It appears he has written a lot of related books all of which he often suggests you read!)
Bradshaw is obsessed with sexual abuse and Nazi Germany in this one. Many concepts aged like milk on a hot day and his emphasis on theology and alarmism were tiring at best, infuriating at worst.
This book is the remedy for family dysfunction that most people assume there is no book for. I know lots of people who suffer unecessarily just because they don't know this book exists. For years I thought I should feel guilt instead of anxiety, just because I was not looking at my shame. Shame is a wound that is remarkable in many ways to Bradshaw, because there is so much abusive shaming to the rules of childhood. If you ever felt depression, alienation, self-doubt, isolating loneliness, paranoid and schizoid phenomena, compulsive disorders, splitting of the self, perfectionism, a deep sense of inferiority, inadequacy or failure, the so-called borderline conditions and disorders of narcissism, you need this book because it shows how this is part of your shame. This is a book that anyone who has ever suffered from mental illness will need to explain to their psychiatrist the difference between guilt and anxiety, or unlawful behavior and deviant behavior. I highly recommend this book personally, and it should be read earlier in life, the earlier the better. Unfortunately there is no parenting manual for sexual relationships, and becoming a parent requires no instructions, people can and will get pregnant without reading books. This book is currently taught in school and should not be confused with horrible books like James Dobson's focus on the family series. This book is an academic antidote to people who live by James Dobson. This confusion is why it took me so long to find this book. John Bradshaw is not blaming, but his criticism is very scathing. If you are a parent, and you read this, your life will be different, and the results will be benefit to you and your children. I think of parents who have not read this as escapists. They are like prisoners of the high school book club personality. They need to expand their horizons a little. Be one of the cultural elite, and buy into "... the family as a system." Buy this book!
*Whether or not you feel like Bradshaw is a good writer or what you may assume about him personally- this book is worthwhile. Sometimes people with a good message aren't necesarily the best orator or writer or necesarily perfect in themselves- but, don't disregaurd the message- as your ego may want to- to protect itself.It took me longer than expected to read this. I had to do it in chunks because it is a lot to think about.It helped me understand some fundamental truths about children and how their minds work and the roles they take on- and ultimately the kind of adult they become. It made me seriously reexamine my beliefs on what good parenting is, how and why I feel this way and some things about my nature and some of the choices I have made in life. Also it helped me see my parents in a new light. In the end I feel like this book, if you are open and honest in reading it- can be a very healing experience for many individuals and families. Even "good" ones. It is written with an open, frank style and ultimately full of compassion and understanding.It is about hope and empowerment and the global affect of out inner workings.I found that although it challenged many of my traditional beliefs it reinforced the truth within them...you will find that many "contradictions" actually make sense when addressing human behavior, emotions and "logical" thought. The research has been thorough- this book represents many decades of research and brilliant minds- exploring the truth about human nature and families. That must count for something- even if we are not ready to hear what it has to say. So let those defenses down and enjoy- I highly recommend this for anyone wanting to understand themselves and consequently others more genuinely.
This book will be a bit bizarre for unmarried people without children. It does provide a few helpful insights for people struggling with their family & marriage. Bradshaw gives his personal viewpoint on marriage, family and self-esteem. This book is not backed by scientific research and many avid readers of psychology will struggle over Bradshaw's claims. The book was originally published in 1984, and has mostly remained similar over the different editions.
The spoiler contains a few random comments about the book:
This book took me a long time to read because it is so heavy emotionally and psychologically. Lots of god information about the root of dis-ease that all of us feel at some point if not all the time as we go about life. Very depressing at first yet the concluding chapters are full of great counsel that will definitely help anyone who is willing to work at dispelling the myths and ego defense in their thinking, and behavior.
This book helped me get a handle on a lot of issues that I've been struggling with throughout my life - most importantly, why I seem to have such big emotional responses to situations that don't warrant them. I recommend it for anyone trying to get a handle on who they are and why.
Remember, this book was written in the 80's, so a lot of terms that seem cliche to us now were actually new in this book!
If you can get past the wordplay and mnemonic formulae, this book is powerful. Bradshaw directs us to apply systems theory to families, and view family systems as complex, interdependent networks. Wish there was a more recent version, the "revised" edition is from 1996. Definitely look for the most recent edition as Bradshaw has tweaked some of his original theories from the 1980's to keep them current with later psychological research.
Excellent book on how a person's family experiences affect his/her life. Bradshaw explains how shame affects a person's choices and perceptions and how shame is at the root of all addiction. Bradshaw also demonstrates that addiction comes in many forms, food, work, sex, religious behavior, and not just drugs and alcohol. I'm not sure I agree with the content of the final chapter but this is a minor quibble.