What do you think?
Rate this book
How to Take Smart Notes: One Simple Technique to Boost Writing, Learning and Thinking
Der Schlüssel zu erfolgreichem Schreiben und Studieren liegt in der intelligenten Organisation von Notizen.
Dieses Buch zeigt Ihnen, wie Sie auf Papier oder digital ihre Gedanken und Fundstücke so festhalten, dass Sie 1) mit diesen auch später noch etwas anfangen können, 2) diese auch wiederfinden, wenn Sie sie brauchen und 3) diese so miteinander kombinieren können, dass aus ihnen neue Ideen, größere Gedankenbögen und vor allem gute Texte erwachsen.
Das Zettelkasten-Prinzip beschreibt die Methode, die es Niklas Luhmann ermöglichte, zu einem der produktivsten und interessantesten Sozialwissenschaftler des 20. Jahrhunderts zu werden und erläutert die lernpsychologischen Hintergründe seiner Funktionsweise.
Dieses Buch zeigt Ihnen, wie Sie auf Papier oder digital ihre Gedanken und Fundstücke so festhalten, dass Sie 1) mit diesen auch später noch etwas anfangen können, 2) diese auch wiederfinden, wenn Sie sie brauchen und 3) diese so miteinander kombinieren können, dass aus ihnen neue Ideen, größere Gedankenbögen und vor allem gute Texte erwachsen.
Das Zettelkasten-Prinzip beschreibt die Methode, die es Niklas Luhmann ermöglichte, zu einem der produktivsten und interessantesten Sozialwissenschaftler des 20. Jahrhunderts zu werden und erläutert die lernpsychologischen Hintergründe seiner Funktionsweise.
171 pages, Kindle Edition
First published February 24, 2017
6,735 people are currently reading
35.8k people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 1,729 reviews
July 13, 2022
This book should have been titled "My long and repetitive ramblings about learning theory, with some asides about how to create a Zettelkasten (slip-box of notes), without examples".
Ahrens describes the Zettelkasten method: you take notes while you read; then make "literature notes", with your own words, attaching the bibliographic information to them; and then you reflect about them, and you make "permanent notes", with one idea per note; then you drop them into a network of linked notes, that you traverse regularly, in search of a place for each idea.
He does not dwell much in exactly how to do it. He doesn't use examples. So in the end you have to look up in the Internet how the system really works.
He then spends the remaining 95% of the book in a long rambling argument about WHY you should use the method, but the HOW in "How to Take Smart Notes" is not well described anywhere. So it doesn't really deliver on its promise, and I hate that in a book.
The thing is: why should we do this? Does the Zettelkasten method work in practice? Apart from all the theory, the evidence he shows is this:
-a famous sociologist called Niklas Luhmann (had you heard of him?) used this method and was very prolific and admired. One man.
-"Many successful writers, artists and academics use some form of a slip-box." Yeah? How many? Because this is the first time I hear of the method.
-"There are increasing numbers of academics and nonfiction writers taking notice" and here he adds a reference to a website, maintained by two german guys.
I'm going to give it a try, nevertheless, because it's true that maintaining notes for a long document is a pain, and maybe it works! After a period of indecision, I'll go for TiddlyRoam as the software to implement it. [Update: I changed to Stroll, and then to Obsidian]. But I'm skeptical that I will use it in the long run. A system of linked notes that grows organically can have a lot of advantages. But a tidy pre-planned system has them too, and only time will say which system will win in the end.
For example, I am a medical doctor. One typical raw reference from my field would be like this:
Orbital and central nervous system involvement are common findings. As in this patient, intraconal masses may develop secondary to histiocyte infiltration that result in exophthalmos. The intraconal lesions are hypointense on T1- and T2-weighted images and enhance after administration of a gadolinium chelate (7). The hypothalamic pituitary axis is the most common site affected within the central nervous system (8). Absence of the normal T1 hyperintense signal of the neurohypophysis occurs with enhancing nodular soft tissue of the pituitary stalk and posterior
pituitary gland that results in central diabetes insipidus. Intra- and extra-axial cerebral and spinal lesions have been reported (7�11). Cardiovascular involvement typically manifests as circumferential infiltration of the thoracic and abdominal aorta that appears as enhancing soft-tissue attenuation at CT and as T2 hyperintense enhancing signal at MR imaging.
As the disease burden progresses, infiltration can occur in the aortic branches and intracranial vasculature (7,8). The clinical implications of this inflammatory tissue are not typically apparent,other than for possible renovascular hypertension (12). In contrast, disease infiltration of the pericardium, right heart, and coronary arteries has resulted in cardiac tamponade, myocardial
infarction, and valvular dysfunction (12�14). Cardiac involvement is characterized by T2 hyperintense signal that can enhance after delayed imaging.
This is a random passage, about 5% of the paper. I mean, it's DENSE. There is an idea in every sentence. How should I proceed, exactly? Remember: that is only a tiny part of a paper about a single disease. I have to know about thousands of them. I could get lost in my Zettelkasten and never come out no matter how I begged for my life.
It seems to me that everyone I see talking about "Zettelkasten for your whole academic life", Ahrens included, must read very "hypodense" books, almost devoid of real information, like "How to Take Smart Notes"
Ahrens describes the Zettelkasten method: you take notes while you read; then make "literature notes", with your own words, attaching the bibliographic information to them; and then you reflect about them, and you make "permanent notes", with one idea per note; then you drop them into a network of linked notes, that you traverse regularly, in search of a place for each idea.
He does not dwell much in exactly how to do it. He doesn't use examples. So in the end you have to look up in the Internet how the system really works.
He then spends the remaining 95% of the book in a long rambling argument about WHY you should use the method, but the HOW in "How to Take Smart Notes" is not well described anywhere. So it doesn't really deliver on its promise, and I hate that in a book.
The thing is: why should we do this? Does the Zettelkasten method work in practice? Apart from all the theory, the evidence he shows is this:
-a famous sociologist called Niklas Luhmann (had you heard of him?) used this method and was very prolific and admired. One man.
-"Many successful writers, artists and academics use some form of a slip-box." Yeah? How many? Because this is the first time I hear of the method.
-"There are increasing numbers of academics and nonfiction writers taking notice" and here he adds a reference to a website, maintained by two german guys.
I'm going to give it a try, nevertheless, because it's true that maintaining notes for a long document is a pain, and maybe it works! After a period of indecision, I'll go for TiddlyRoam as the software to implement it. [Update: I changed to Stroll, and then to Obsidian]. But I'm skeptical that I will use it in the long run. A system of linked notes that grows organically can have a lot of advantages. But a tidy pre-planned system has them too, and only time will say which system will win in the end.
For example, I am a medical doctor. One typical raw reference from my field would be like this:
Orbital and central nervous system involvement are common findings. As in this patient, intraconal masses may develop secondary to histiocyte infiltration that result in exophthalmos. The intraconal lesions are hypointense on T1- and T2-weighted images and enhance after administration of a gadolinium chelate (7). The hypothalamic pituitary axis is the most common site affected within the central nervous system (8). Absence of the normal T1 hyperintense signal of the neurohypophysis occurs with enhancing nodular soft tissue of the pituitary stalk and posterior
pituitary gland that results in central diabetes insipidus. Intra- and extra-axial cerebral and spinal lesions have been reported (7�11). Cardiovascular involvement typically manifests as circumferential infiltration of the thoracic and abdominal aorta that appears as enhancing soft-tissue attenuation at CT and as T2 hyperintense enhancing signal at MR imaging.
As the disease burden progresses, infiltration can occur in the aortic branches and intracranial vasculature (7,8). The clinical implications of this inflammatory tissue are not typically apparent,other than for possible renovascular hypertension (12). In contrast, disease infiltration of the pericardium, right heart, and coronary arteries has resulted in cardiac tamponade, myocardial
infarction, and valvular dysfunction (12�14). Cardiac involvement is characterized by T2 hyperintense signal that can enhance after delayed imaging.
This is a random passage, about 5% of the paper. I mean, it's DENSE. There is an idea in every sentence. How should I proceed, exactly? Remember: that is only a tiny part of a paper about a single disease. I have to know about thousands of them. I could get lost in my Zettelkasten and never come out no matter how I begged for my life.
It seems to me that everyone I see talking about "Zettelkasten for your whole academic life", Ahrens included, must read very "hypodense" books, almost devoid of real information, like "How to Take Smart Notes"
February 6, 2020
Note-taking game-changer. Ahrens' is a professor in systematic education at Hamburg University—and he really knows his shit. This book tells the story of the remarkable Luhmann note-taking system. Luhmann was a revered sociology professor who collected over 90,000 index cards over the course of his life to support his 30-year-project: "A Theory of Society." The book goes over how Luhmann organized his note-taking in a scalable way that allowed him an unprecedented level of productivity with 30+ published books and 400+ published articles. In particular, how the author has implemented a similar system (with technology, in lieu of paper flashcards). To best summarize the ethos of this fantastic book:
> To get a good paper written, you only have to rewrite a good draft; to get a good draft written, you only have to turn a series of notes into a continuous text. And as a series of notes is just the rearrangement of notes you already have in your slip-box, all you really have to do is have a pen in your hand when you read.
I can't sum up the technique here in short (but luckily, the author did ), but needless to say, it thoroughly enriched my mental-model for note-taking and have caused me to implement dramatic changes to mine. I am stoked to see how it pans out in the long-term.
If you're starting to feel weighed down by your note-taking, rather than pulled up—and if collecting 10,000s of ideas over your lifetime appeals to you, you absolutely need to read this. The book will earn its fifth star if I, a year or so from now, continue to use the system (which I have spent this weekend initiating the migration to).
> To get a good paper written, you only have to rewrite a good draft; to get a good draft written, you only have to turn a series of notes into a continuous text. And as a series of notes is just the rearrangement of notes you already have in your slip-box, all you really have to do is have a pen in your hand when you read.
I can't sum up the technique here in short (but luckily, the author did ), but needless to say, it thoroughly enriched my mental-model for note-taking and have caused me to implement dramatic changes to mine. I am stoked to see how it pans out in the long-term.
If you're starting to feel weighed down by your note-taking, rather than pulled up—and if collecting 10,000s of ideas over your lifetime appeals to you, you absolutely need to read this. The book will earn its fifth star if I, a year or so from now, continue to use the system (which I have spent this weekend initiating the migration to).
March 31, 2020
Really love this. Instead of making us turn our willpowers into crutches for doing stuff we dislike, it instead takes a pleasant take on our experiences.
Food for thought:
- Slip-box method
- Virtuitous circle workflow
- Undivided attention to each task (as opposed to vaunted, flaunted, dreaded, attention-span destructive multitasking)
- Ego depletion
Q:
Transferring these ideas into the network of our own thoughts, our latticework of theories, concepts and mental models in the slip-box brings our thinking to the next level (c)
Q:
Unfortunately, even universities try to turn students into planners. Sure, planning will get you through your exams if you stick to them and push through. But it will not make you an expert in the art of learning/writing/note-taking ... Planners are also unlikely to continue with their studies after they finish their examinations. They are rather glad it is over. Experts, on the other hand, would not even consider voluntarily giving up what has already proved to be rewarding and fun: learning in a way that generates real insight, is accumulative and sparks new ideas. (c)
Q:
In Germany, a professor traditionally starts with a public lecture presenting his or her projects, and Luhmann, too, was asked what his main research project will be. His answer would become famous. He laconically stated: “My project: theory of society. Duration: 30 years. Costs: zero� (Luhmann, 1997, 11). In sociology, a “theory of society� is the mother of all projects. (c)
Q:
While some career-oriented academics try to squeeze as many publications out of one idea as possible, Luhmann seemed to do the opposite. He constantly generated more ideas than he was able to write down. His texts read as if he is trying to squeeze as much insight and as many ideas as possible into one publication ...
... what is even more impressive than the sheer number of publications or the outstanding quality of his writing is the fact that he seemed to achieve all this with almost no real effort. He not only stressed that he never forced himself to do something he didn’t feel like, he even said: “I only do what is easy. I only write when I immediately know how to do it. If I falter for a moment, I put the matter aside and do something else.� (Luhmann et al., 1987, 154 f.) ...
We are still so used to the idea that a great outcome requires great effort that we tend not to believe that a simple change in our work routines could not only make us more productive, but the work also more fun. But doesn’t it make much more sense that the impressive body of work was produced not in spite of the fact he never made himself do anything he didn’t feel like, but because of it? Even hard work can be fun as long as it is aligned with our intrinsic goals and we feel in control. The problems arise when we set up our work in such an inflexible way that we can’t adjust it when things change and become arrested in a process that seems to develop a life of its own.
The best way to maintain the feeling of being in control is to stay in control. And to stay in control, it's better to keep your options open during the writing process rather than limit yourself to your first idea. It is in the nature of writing, especially insight-oriented writing, that questions change, the material we work with turns out to be very different from the one imagined or that new ideas emerge, which might change our whole perspective on what we do. Only if the work is set up in a way that is flexible enough to allow these small and constant adjustments can we keep our interest, motivation and work aligned � which is the precondition to effortless or almost effortless work.Luhmann was able to focus on the important things right in front of him, pick up quickly where he left off and stay in control of the process because the structure of his work allowed him to do this. If we work in an environment that is flexible enough to accommodate our work rhythm, we don’t need to struggle with resistance. Studies on highly successful people have proven again and again that success is not the result of strong willpower and the ability to overcome resistance, but rather the result of smart working environments that avoid resistance in the first place... (c)
Q:
A good workflow can easily turn into a virtuous circle, where the positive experience motivates us to take on the next task with ease, which helps us to get better at what we are doing, which in return makes it more likely for us to enjoy the work, and so on. But if we feel constantly stuck in our work, we will become demotivated and much more likely to procrastinate, leaving us with fewer positive or even bad experiences like missed deadlines. We might end up in a vicious circle of failure...
The extraordinary successful fitness motivation coach Michelle Segar uses this dynamic to turn even the most stubborn coach potatoes into exercise aficionados... She brings those who really don’t like exercise but know they have to do it into a sustainable workout routine by focusing on one thing: Creating satisfying, repeatable experiences with sports. It doesn’t matter what her clients are doing � running, walking, team sports, gym workouts or bicycling to work. The only thing that matters is that they discover something that gives them a good experience that they would like to have again. Once her clients find something, they are encouraged enough to try something else as well. They enter the virtuous circle where willpower isn’t needed anymore because they feel like doing it anyway. If they tried to trick themselves into exercise by rewarding themselves afterwards with a relaxed evening on the sofa watching TV, it wouldn’t have taken them long until they went straight for the sofa, skipping the workout altogether, because this is how we tick. (с)
Q:
Feedback loops are not only crucial for the dynamics of motivation, but also the key element to any learning process. Nothing motivates us more than the experience of becoming better at what we do. (c)
Q:
Psychologists who interviewed the multitaskers did test them instead of just asking. They gave them different tasks to accomplish and compared their results with another group that was instructed to do only one thing at a time. The outcome is unambiguous: While those who multitasked felt more productive, their productivity actually decreased � a lot (Wang and Tchernev 2012; Rosen 2008; Ophir, Nass, and Wagner 2009). Not only the quantity but also the quality of their accomplishments lagged significantly behind that of the control group. ...
The fact that people nevertheless believe that they can get better at it and increase their productivity can easily be explained by two factors. The first is the lack of a control group or an objective external measurement that would provide us with the feedback we need to learn. The second is what psychologists call the mere-exposure effect: doing something many times makes us believe we have become good at it � completely independent of our actual performance (Bornstein 1989). We unfortunately tend to confuse familiarity with skill. (c)
Q:
Conversely, we can use the Zeigarnik effect to our advantage by deliberately keeping unanswered questions in our mind. We can ruminate about them, even when we do something that has nothing to do with work and ideally does not require our full attention. Letting thoughts linger without focusing on them gives our brains the opportunity to deal with problems in a different, often surprisingly productive way. While we have a walk or a shower or clean the house, the brain cannot help but play around with the last unsolved problem it came across. And that is why we so often find the answer to a question in rather casual situations. (с)
Q:
In the way we organise our research and writing, we too can significantly reduce the amount of decisions we have to make. While content-related decisions have to be made (on what is more and what is less important in an article, on the connections between notes, the structure of a text, etc.), most organisational decisions can be made up front, once and for all, by deciding on one system. By always using the same notebook for making quick notes, always extracting the main ideas from a text in the same way and always turning them into the same kind of permanent notes, which are always dealt with in the same manner, the number of decisions during a work session can be greatly reduced. That leaves us with much more mental energy that we can direct towards more useful tasks, like trying to solve the problems in question.
Being able to finish a task in a timely manner and to pick up the work exactly where we left it has another enjoyable advantage that helps to restore our attention: We can have breaks without fear of losing the thread. Breaks are much more than just opportunities to recover. They are crucial for learning. They allow the brain to process information, move it into long-term memory and prepare it for new information... (c)
Q:
I recently read the book “Scarcity: Why Having Too Little Means So Much� (2013) by Mullainathan and Shafir. They investigate how the experience of scarcity has cognitive effects and causes changes in decision-making processes. They help the reader understand why people with almost no time or money sometimes do things that don’t seem to make any sense to outside observers. People facing deadlines sometimes switch frantically between all kinds of tasks. People with little money sometimes spend it on seeming luxuries like take-away food. From the outside, it would make more sense to do one thing at a time, or buy food in bulk and cook for yourself. The book is interesting, because the authors don’t question this behavior rhetorically or even in a judgemental way, but investigate it as a universal human phenomenon (c)
Food for thought:
- Slip-box method
- Virtuitous circle workflow
- Undivided attention to each task (as opposed to vaunted, flaunted, dreaded, attention-span destructive multitasking)
- Ego depletion
Q:
Transferring these ideas into the network of our own thoughts, our latticework of theories, concepts and mental models in the slip-box brings our thinking to the next level (c)
Q:
Unfortunately, even universities try to turn students into planners. Sure, planning will get you through your exams if you stick to them and push through. But it will not make you an expert in the art of learning/writing/note-taking ... Planners are also unlikely to continue with their studies after they finish their examinations. They are rather glad it is over. Experts, on the other hand, would not even consider voluntarily giving up what has already proved to be rewarding and fun: learning in a way that generates real insight, is accumulative and sparks new ideas. (c)
Q:
In Germany, a professor traditionally starts with a public lecture presenting his or her projects, and Luhmann, too, was asked what his main research project will be. His answer would become famous. He laconically stated: “My project: theory of society. Duration: 30 years. Costs: zero� (Luhmann, 1997, 11). In sociology, a “theory of society� is the mother of all projects. (c)
Q:
While some career-oriented academics try to squeeze as many publications out of one idea as possible, Luhmann seemed to do the opposite. He constantly generated more ideas than he was able to write down. His texts read as if he is trying to squeeze as much insight and as many ideas as possible into one publication ...
... what is even more impressive than the sheer number of publications or the outstanding quality of his writing is the fact that he seemed to achieve all this with almost no real effort. He not only stressed that he never forced himself to do something he didn’t feel like, he even said: “I only do what is easy. I only write when I immediately know how to do it. If I falter for a moment, I put the matter aside and do something else.� (Luhmann et al., 1987, 154 f.) ...
We are still so used to the idea that a great outcome requires great effort that we tend not to believe that a simple change in our work routines could not only make us more productive, but the work also more fun. But doesn’t it make much more sense that the impressive body of work was produced not in spite of the fact he never made himself do anything he didn’t feel like, but because of it? Even hard work can be fun as long as it is aligned with our intrinsic goals and we feel in control. The problems arise when we set up our work in such an inflexible way that we can’t adjust it when things change and become arrested in a process that seems to develop a life of its own.
The best way to maintain the feeling of being in control is to stay in control. And to stay in control, it's better to keep your options open during the writing process rather than limit yourself to your first idea. It is in the nature of writing, especially insight-oriented writing, that questions change, the material we work with turns out to be very different from the one imagined or that new ideas emerge, which might change our whole perspective on what we do. Only if the work is set up in a way that is flexible enough to allow these small and constant adjustments can we keep our interest, motivation and work aligned � which is the precondition to effortless or almost effortless work.Luhmann was able to focus on the important things right in front of him, pick up quickly where he left off and stay in control of the process because the structure of his work allowed him to do this. If we work in an environment that is flexible enough to accommodate our work rhythm, we don’t need to struggle with resistance. Studies on highly successful people have proven again and again that success is not the result of strong willpower and the ability to overcome resistance, but rather the result of smart working environments that avoid resistance in the first place... (c)
Q:
A good workflow can easily turn into a virtuous circle, where the positive experience motivates us to take on the next task with ease, which helps us to get better at what we are doing, which in return makes it more likely for us to enjoy the work, and so on. But if we feel constantly stuck in our work, we will become demotivated and much more likely to procrastinate, leaving us with fewer positive or even bad experiences like missed deadlines. We might end up in a vicious circle of failure...
The extraordinary successful fitness motivation coach Michelle Segar uses this dynamic to turn even the most stubborn coach potatoes into exercise aficionados... She brings those who really don’t like exercise but know they have to do it into a sustainable workout routine by focusing on one thing: Creating satisfying, repeatable experiences with sports. It doesn’t matter what her clients are doing � running, walking, team sports, gym workouts or bicycling to work. The only thing that matters is that they discover something that gives them a good experience that they would like to have again. Once her clients find something, they are encouraged enough to try something else as well. They enter the virtuous circle where willpower isn’t needed anymore because they feel like doing it anyway. If they tried to trick themselves into exercise by rewarding themselves afterwards with a relaxed evening on the sofa watching TV, it wouldn’t have taken them long until they went straight for the sofa, skipping the workout altogether, because this is how we tick. (с)
Q:
Feedback loops are not only crucial for the dynamics of motivation, but also the key element to any learning process. Nothing motivates us more than the experience of becoming better at what we do. (c)
Q:
Psychologists who interviewed the multitaskers did test them instead of just asking. They gave them different tasks to accomplish and compared their results with another group that was instructed to do only one thing at a time. The outcome is unambiguous: While those who multitasked felt more productive, their productivity actually decreased � a lot (Wang and Tchernev 2012; Rosen 2008; Ophir, Nass, and Wagner 2009). Not only the quantity but also the quality of their accomplishments lagged significantly behind that of the control group. ...
The fact that people nevertheless believe that they can get better at it and increase their productivity can easily be explained by two factors. The first is the lack of a control group or an objective external measurement that would provide us with the feedback we need to learn. The second is what psychologists call the mere-exposure effect: doing something many times makes us believe we have become good at it � completely independent of our actual performance (Bornstein 1989). We unfortunately tend to confuse familiarity with skill. (c)
Q:
Conversely, we can use the Zeigarnik effect to our advantage by deliberately keeping unanswered questions in our mind. We can ruminate about them, even when we do something that has nothing to do with work and ideally does not require our full attention. Letting thoughts linger without focusing on them gives our brains the opportunity to deal with problems in a different, often surprisingly productive way. While we have a walk or a shower or clean the house, the brain cannot help but play around with the last unsolved problem it came across. And that is why we so often find the answer to a question in rather casual situations. (с)
Q:
In the way we organise our research and writing, we too can significantly reduce the amount of decisions we have to make. While content-related decisions have to be made (on what is more and what is less important in an article, on the connections between notes, the structure of a text, etc.), most organisational decisions can be made up front, once and for all, by deciding on one system. By always using the same notebook for making quick notes, always extracting the main ideas from a text in the same way and always turning them into the same kind of permanent notes, which are always dealt with in the same manner, the number of decisions during a work session can be greatly reduced. That leaves us with much more mental energy that we can direct towards more useful tasks, like trying to solve the problems in question.
Being able to finish a task in a timely manner and to pick up the work exactly where we left it has another enjoyable advantage that helps to restore our attention: We can have breaks without fear of losing the thread. Breaks are much more than just opportunities to recover. They are crucial for learning. They allow the brain to process information, move it into long-term memory and prepare it for new information... (c)
Q:
I recently read the book “Scarcity: Why Having Too Little Means So Much� (2013) by Mullainathan and Shafir. They investigate how the experience of scarcity has cognitive effects and causes changes in decision-making processes. They help the reader understand why people with almost no time or money sometimes do things that don’t seem to make any sense to outside observers. People facing deadlines sometimes switch frantically between all kinds of tasks. People with little money sometimes spend it on seeming luxuries like take-away food. From the outside, it would make more sense to do one thing at a time, or buy food in bulk and cook for yourself. The book is interesting, because the authors don’t question this behavior rhetorically or even in a judgemental way, but investigate it as a universal human phenomenon (c)
March 14, 2019
This book is GOLD.
'How to Write Smart Notes' tragically undersells itself by implying it's wholly focused on note-taking.It's not.
There's a bunch of relevant psychological concepts here too—including:
- Mere-exposure Effect
- Miller's Law
- Survivorship Bias
- Parkinson's Law
- The Tunnel Effect
- And more...
As the title suggests, if you're into taking 'smarter' notes (and therefore getting more out of your creative endeavours), you'll love this. 😎
I vouch candidly that Sönke (and Luhmann—a topic subject) have changed the way I approach knowledge storage. Forever.
Thank you. 🙌🏼
'How to Write Smart Notes' tragically undersells itself by implying it's wholly focused on note-taking.It's not.
There's a bunch of relevant psychological concepts here too—including:
- Mere-exposure Effect
- Miller's Law
- Survivorship Bias
- Parkinson's Law
- The Tunnel Effect
- And more...
As the title suggests, if you're into taking 'smarter' notes (and therefore getting more out of your creative endeavours), you'll love this. 😎
I vouch candidly that Sönke (and Luhmann—a topic subject) have changed the way I approach knowledge storage. Forever.
Thank you. 🙌🏼
April 17, 2021
✍️ 📖 🐦 📷 �
February's Non-fiction book of the month! 🤓🤓🤓
I usually criticize non-fiction authors for stating the obvious and then being proud of preaching us with “fresh, innovative� ideas. To be honest, this is one of the books that did not do that and it introduced me to a new idea but the writing felt a bit dry to me!
You see, the full title of this book is: How to Take Smart Notes: One Simple Technique to Boost Writing, Learning and Thinking � for Students, Academics and Nonfiction Book Writers. I did feel that the book was directed towards academic writers more than the general population and even the writing style felt stiff to me.
The book talks about the Zettelkasten method or the slip box method in a more user friendly terminology. The author of this book did not come out with this method, it was founded hundred of years ago but the sociologist Niklas Luhmann used this method to publish tens of books and hundred of books which made it a more popular method. The method consists of note taking and then linking the different notes and archiving them in a way that makes them accessible with their references.
Do you remember Uni’s lectures when doctors would spend hours explaining a concept in an outdated way and then you go to YouTube or to one of your friends and they explain it in a very simple way and you’re like why the hell did they not just say that. This book reminded me of that and although I may be exaggerating a bit but the book suffers from lack of examples and focusing on the theoretical parts mainly. I went to YouTube and googled the method and the first video that came explained it in 5 mins in a very easy way, here is that video:
I am not a student any more but I will be going into residency soon and I bet I can implement some of the things I learned from this book when I do study again. I used to love flash cards when I was a student and the book does praise them but this method takes it a step further by linking the notes together and I think I kind of do that in my brain as a doctor as we study systems separately but we have to link them together in practice!
Summary: I do think it is a useful book and it does introduce something new and shows how our traditional ways of note taking are not the best. However, it lacks examples and focuses on theory which makes it kind of stiff. Personally, I think I would recommend discovering the Zettelkasten method but maybe through videos which makes it more simple!
February's Non-fiction book of the month! 🤓🤓🤓
“An idea kept private is as good as one you never had. And a fact no one can reproduce is no fact at all.�
I usually criticize non-fiction authors for stating the obvious and then being proud of preaching us with “fresh, innovative� ideas. To be honest, this is one of the books that did not do that and it introduced me to a new idea but the writing felt a bit dry to me!
You see, the full title of this book is: How to Take Smart Notes: One Simple Technique to Boost Writing, Learning and Thinking � for Students, Academics and Nonfiction Book Writers. I did feel that the book was directed towards academic writers more than the general population and even the writing style felt stiff to me.
The book talks about the Zettelkasten method or the slip box method in a more user friendly terminology. The author of this book did not come out with this method, it was founded hundred of years ago but the sociologist Niklas Luhmann used this method to publish tens of books and hundred of books which made it a more popular method. The method consists of note taking and then linking the different notes and archiving them in a way that makes them accessible with their references.
Do you remember Uni’s lectures when doctors would spend hours explaining a concept in an outdated way and then you go to YouTube or to one of your friends and they explain it in a very simple way and you’re like why the hell did they not just say that. This book reminded me of that and although I may be exaggerating a bit but the book suffers from lack of examples and focusing on the theoretical parts mainly. I went to YouTube and googled the method and the first video that came explained it in 5 mins in a very easy way, here is that video:
I am not a student any more but I will be going into residency soon and I bet I can implement some of the things I learned from this book when I do study again. I used to love flash cards when I was a student and the book does praise them but this method takes it a step further by linking the notes together and I think I kind of do that in my brain as a doctor as we study systems separately but we have to link them together in practice!
“Learning, thinking, and writing should not be about accumulating knowledge, but about becoming a different person with a different way of thinking. This is done by questioning one’s own thinking routines in light of new experiences and facts.�
Summary: I do think it is a useful book and it does introduce something new and shows how our traditional ways of note taking are not the best. However, it lacks examples and focuses on theory which makes it kind of stiff. Personally, I think I would recommend discovering the Zettelkasten method but maybe through videos which makes it more simple!
November 1, 2023
Of late, Sönke Ahrens’s How to Take Smart Notes seems to have caused a bit of a stir within the productivity and knowledge management crowd. Yet this book only popularises and rehashes the writing method sociologist developed in the 1960s. So why the stir? Ahrens’s book, while describing Luhmann’s method (not in great depth, mind you), offers an exploration of effective reading, note-taking and thinking techniques for students and academics—and more broadly for every life-long learner, that is to say, kind of just everyone.
At its core, the book advocates for a system of “smart notes� as the engine of intellectual progress and productivity. To start with, as Ahrens explains, writing is not separate from thinking and studying. Instead, it is the very medium through which learning occurs. In other words, we must externalise our thinking through writing to fully grasp ideas and make meaningful connections. He writes: “You have to externalise your ideas, you have to write� (Loc. 394). Then, the centrepiece of Luhmann’s/Ahrens’s system is the Zettelkasten (or “slip-box”—in plain English, just a proper library cabinet or makeshift shoebox full of index cards), a collection of reading notes or book reviews, capturing key concepts, organised non-hierarchically, to encourage unexpected connections with other notes.
So far, nothing revolutionary: every conscientious secondary student has some Zettelkasten or other on their desk. What makes Luhmann’s system unique is that he pushed the envelope and brought this to the next level by systematising the note-taking process to such a point that it became borderline ridiculous: Luhmann had, at the end of his life, a collection of close to 100,000 index cards painstakingly organised and cross-referenced into multiple boxes and cabinets. As Ahrens says, “The slip-box is the shipping container of the academic world� (Loc. 650): in principle, everything—back-of-envelope thoughts, reading notes, references, strings of arguments—goes into the slip-box in the same standardised format, which simplifies note-taking and provides a sort of exoskeletal companion, “an external scaffold to think in� (Loc. 484). Also, the simple, standardised note-taking format reduces decision fatigue: “Not having to think about the organisation is really good news for brains like ours� (Loc. 2023).
The virtue of this system is that rather than having neatly categorised topics (this is perhaps the only real difference between a slip-box and a personal wiki), the interlinked web of notes in the Zettelkasten facilitates serendipitous insights. The more notes you collect and connect in the slip-box, the more ideas you will have and the easier to write an intelligent text with less effort (allegedly). As a result, when the Zettelkasten reaches critical mass, it becomes a creativity engine (hopefully).
Ahrens argues that mere highlighting while reading or re-reading is ineffective: these methods tend to overestimate our understanding. Ahrens advocates taking “smart notes� while reading to feed the Zettelkasten, which involves distilling ideas in your own words (the idea that writing is thinking and thinking alone doesn’t cut it). He writes: “The attempt to rephrase an argument in our own words confronts us without mercy with all the gaps in our understanding.� (Loc. 1335). Also, the Zettelkasten fosters linking ideas in a way that mimics the connections in the brain: “Connecting information in a meaningful way is exactly the kind of elaboration that is needed to learn� (Loc. 1400).
Ultimately, topics and arguments develop organically, bottom-up, based on the Zettelkasten’s evolving web of connections, and unexpected ideas emerge, not as distractions, but as opportunities. Ahrens writes: “Questions change, the material we work with turns out to be very different from the one imagined or...new ideas emerge, which might change our whole perspective� (Loc. 285). These flowing and serendipitous connections, coupled with a habit of daily writing grounded in your interests, may ultimately ward off writer’s block and transform writing from a chore into a rewarding dialogue with your accumulated knowledge and ideas.
մǻ岹’s Zettelkasten believers don’t need to rely on old cabinets, bulky index card storage and complicated numbering conventions. Digital technology, knowledge base software and AI assistants have the ability to expedite slip-box maintenance tremendously. That said, Ahrens stresses that digital tools “can only speed up a relatively minor part of the work� (Loc. 509).
The downside Ahrens seems reluctant to address is that a fully developed Zettelkasten, similar to any human brain, can also become a huge heap of -style trivial and unusable rubbish. At any rate, there is no magic: with or without all of that, the crux is still to develop “smart skills� in thinking, reading, and note-taking.
At its core, the book advocates for a system of “smart notes� as the engine of intellectual progress and productivity. To start with, as Ahrens explains, writing is not separate from thinking and studying. Instead, it is the very medium through which learning occurs. In other words, we must externalise our thinking through writing to fully grasp ideas and make meaningful connections. He writes: “You have to externalise your ideas, you have to write� (Loc. 394). Then, the centrepiece of Luhmann’s/Ahrens’s system is the Zettelkasten (or “slip-box”—in plain English, just a proper library cabinet or makeshift shoebox full of index cards), a collection of reading notes or book reviews, capturing key concepts, organised non-hierarchically, to encourage unexpected connections with other notes.
So far, nothing revolutionary: every conscientious secondary student has some Zettelkasten or other on their desk. What makes Luhmann’s system unique is that he pushed the envelope and brought this to the next level by systematising the note-taking process to such a point that it became borderline ridiculous: Luhmann had, at the end of his life, a collection of close to 100,000 index cards painstakingly organised and cross-referenced into multiple boxes and cabinets. As Ahrens says, “The slip-box is the shipping container of the academic world� (Loc. 650): in principle, everything—back-of-envelope thoughts, reading notes, references, strings of arguments—goes into the slip-box in the same standardised format, which simplifies note-taking and provides a sort of exoskeletal companion, “an external scaffold to think in� (Loc. 484). Also, the simple, standardised note-taking format reduces decision fatigue: “Not having to think about the organisation is really good news for brains like ours� (Loc. 2023).
The virtue of this system is that rather than having neatly categorised topics (this is perhaps the only real difference between a slip-box and a personal wiki), the interlinked web of notes in the Zettelkasten facilitates serendipitous insights. The more notes you collect and connect in the slip-box, the more ideas you will have and the easier to write an intelligent text with less effort (allegedly). As a result, when the Zettelkasten reaches critical mass, it becomes a creativity engine (hopefully).
Ahrens argues that mere highlighting while reading or re-reading is ineffective: these methods tend to overestimate our understanding. Ahrens advocates taking “smart notes� while reading to feed the Zettelkasten, which involves distilling ideas in your own words (the idea that writing is thinking and thinking alone doesn’t cut it). He writes: “The attempt to rephrase an argument in our own words confronts us without mercy with all the gaps in our understanding.� (Loc. 1335). Also, the Zettelkasten fosters linking ideas in a way that mimics the connections in the brain: “Connecting information in a meaningful way is exactly the kind of elaboration that is needed to learn� (Loc. 1400).
Ultimately, topics and arguments develop organically, bottom-up, based on the Zettelkasten’s evolving web of connections, and unexpected ideas emerge, not as distractions, but as opportunities. Ahrens writes: “Questions change, the material we work with turns out to be very different from the one imagined or...new ideas emerge, which might change our whole perspective� (Loc. 285). These flowing and serendipitous connections, coupled with a habit of daily writing grounded in your interests, may ultimately ward off writer’s block and transform writing from a chore into a rewarding dialogue with your accumulated knowledge and ideas.
մǻ岹’s Zettelkasten believers don’t need to rely on old cabinets, bulky index card storage and complicated numbering conventions. Digital technology, knowledge base software and AI assistants have the ability to expedite slip-box maintenance tremendously. That said, Ahrens stresses that digital tools “can only speed up a relatively minor part of the work� (Loc. 509).
The downside Ahrens seems reluctant to address is that a fully developed Zettelkasten, similar to any human brain, can also become a huge heap of -style trivial and unusable rubbish. At any rate, there is no magic: with or without all of that, the crux is still to develop “smart skills� in thinking, reading, and note-taking.
January 14, 2019
A useless book
This book does not explain how to use Luhmann’s method precisely. It is just a compilation of over-explained ideas (nothing new under the sun, by the way) that are not even useful for applying that method. There are other resources in the web, so please, avoid buying this book.
This book does not explain how to use Luhmann’s method precisely. It is just a compilation of over-explained ideas (nothing new under the sun, by the way) that are not even useful for applying that method. There are other resources in the web, so please, avoid buying this book.
January 26, 2021
If you already read books like Make it Stick, Peak, Thinking Fast and Slow and Habit, there is nothing much to learn from Ahrens' book. Except the new note taking system he describes.
At its heart, the book promotes a note taking system first developed by Luhmann, a German scholar. The system is mainly about (a) taking a lot of concise, well-written notes and (b) linking them with each other so as to create a physical network of information produced and distilled by your brain. This would work like a tangible copy of your passive knowledge and set free your brain for active thinking, analysis, reasoning and creativity.
But recognising that the explanations about that system alone would not give him enough pages to publish a book, the author apparently decided to pad the rest of the book with some "popular science of learning" chapters.
Also, I propose somebody should take it serious and develop a "Warren Buffett Index (WBI)" as a tool to evaluate the quality of the self-help books. It is the number of Warren Buffett references divided by the number of pages in a book. The readability of the text diminishes as the WBI approximates to 1. WBI of this book was 0.016 which may look small but still far from my ideal WBI, which is ZERO.
At its heart, the book promotes a note taking system first developed by Luhmann, a German scholar. The system is mainly about (a) taking a lot of concise, well-written notes and (b) linking them with each other so as to create a physical network of information produced and distilled by your brain. This would work like a tangible copy of your passive knowledge and set free your brain for active thinking, analysis, reasoning and creativity.
But recognising that the explanations about that system alone would not give him enough pages to publish a book, the author apparently decided to pad the rest of the book with some "popular science of learning" chapters.
Also, I propose somebody should take it serious and develop a "Warren Buffett Index (WBI)" as a tool to evaluate the quality of the self-help books. It is the number of Warren Buffett references divided by the number of pages in a book. The readability of the text diminishes as the WBI approximates to 1. WBI of this book was 0.016 which may look small but still far from my ideal WBI, which is ZERO.
July 13, 2019
I was looking me up a good fiction read to get into, when somehow, the algorithms of Amazon decided to put forward this book on Note taking right in front of me.
The title immediately peeked my interest and then some more after I read the synopsis. I have been taking notes all my life using all sort of methods and tools. The fact that I keep switching every year to a different method and medium has me very conscious that I am still very hopeless at taking notes for myself.
I must admit... the book blew me away with its simple and grounded principles based on the Luhmann method for taking notes. It all just made so much sense and I found myself nodding and busy highlighting large passage of texts. Coming from an engineering background and an avid Kindle user, I felt the examples in the book spoke to me directly. I highlight numerous passages in books that I read on the Kindle all the time. I write down fleeting comments or quotes that I encounter in day to day conversations down and I manually capture the context to remind myself why they spoke to me. But as I pointed out in the book, I like many struggle to leverage of my earned experiences because I cannot remember or discover them. What could be more wasteful then not learning from (mistakes) earned experiences!
Luhmann's principle of doing the heavy lifting or "thinking" upon writing to make it much easier to read and discover is an obvious one. The concept of the slip-box is synonymous to source code repositories that I work with so often. They are both archives that are versioned, persisted, linked and easily discoverable. An absolute genius method that I wish I would have been exposed to during my university years or early career to accumulate my own trove of notes by now. But... it's never too late!
In terms of the actual writing and readability of the book, I found it to be quite the drag in lots of passages. I felt that Sönke often over expanded on a lot of the points that he made upfront by backing himself with extensive research. In many cases, I did find the deep dive of research interesting (like the origin of shipping containers). But more often than not I also found it excessively repetitive and preaching to the converted.
Lastly, even with the verbosity of the text, I still wasn't able to confidently visualise how the Luhmann method worked at every single step and I wished there was more practical examples of how to persist and retrieve a piece of information every step of the way. There was one great example showing a quote from a book and walking me as a reader on the thought process of determining how to tag it. I loved that and wished for more of this in other steps of the process.
Last two points aside, I really enjoyed my time reading "How to Take Smare Notes". Despite the rating that I gave it (because of the two critical points mentioned above), I must say it had a profound impact on me. I understand very well now where the shortcomings of my current note taking habits are, and believe have some really solid advice on what to try going forward.
The title immediately peeked my interest and then some more after I read the synopsis. I have been taking notes all my life using all sort of methods and tools. The fact that I keep switching every year to a different method and medium has me very conscious that I am still very hopeless at taking notes for myself.
I must admit... the book blew me away with its simple and grounded principles based on the Luhmann method for taking notes. It all just made so much sense and I found myself nodding and busy highlighting large passage of texts. Coming from an engineering background and an avid Kindle user, I felt the examples in the book spoke to me directly. I highlight numerous passages in books that I read on the Kindle all the time. I write down fleeting comments or quotes that I encounter in day to day conversations down and I manually capture the context to remind myself why they spoke to me. But as I pointed out in the book, I like many struggle to leverage of my earned experiences because I cannot remember or discover them. What could be more wasteful then not learning from (mistakes) earned experiences!
Luhmann's principle of doing the heavy lifting or "thinking" upon writing to make it much easier to read and discover is an obvious one. The concept of the slip-box is synonymous to source code repositories that I work with so often. They are both archives that are versioned, persisted, linked and easily discoverable. An absolute genius method that I wish I would have been exposed to during my university years or early career to accumulate my own trove of notes by now. But... it's never too late!
In terms of the actual writing and readability of the book, I found it to be quite the drag in lots of passages. I felt that Sönke often over expanded on a lot of the points that he made upfront by backing himself with extensive research. In many cases, I did find the deep dive of research interesting (like the origin of shipping containers). But more often than not I also found it excessively repetitive and preaching to the converted.
Lastly, even with the verbosity of the text, I still wasn't able to confidently visualise how the Luhmann method worked at every single step and I wished there was more practical examples of how to persist and retrieve a piece of information every step of the way. There was one great example showing a quote from a book and walking me as a reader on the thought process of determining how to tag it. I loved that and wished for more of this in other steps of the process.
Last two points aside, I really enjoyed my time reading "How to Take Smare Notes". Despite the rating that I gave it (because of the two critical points mentioned above), I must say it had a profound impact on me. I understand very well now where the shortcomings of my current note taking habits are, and believe have some really solid advice on what to try going forward.
December 13, 2018
Title Is Inadequate
This is a book about MUCH more than a way to take smart notes. Oh, sure, you’ll learn all about a super cool (and super simple) system for taking notes. But that is covered in the first 20% of the book. The rest of the book is about deep and critical topics related to smart note taking, like thinking well, reading well, the writing process and even how to set up habits of success. I almost didn’t read it because it looked too basic. I’m so glad I did.
This is a book about MUCH more than a way to take smart notes. Oh, sure, you’ll learn all about a super cool (and super simple) system for taking notes. But that is covered in the first 20% of the book. The rest of the book is about deep and critical topics related to smart note taking, like thinking well, reading well, the writing process and even how to set up habits of success. I almost didn’t read it because it looked too basic. I’m so glad I did.
February 26, 2022
"It is impossible to think without writing; at least it is impossible in any sophisticated or networked (anschlußfähig) fashion." �
I think this book will be more useful for its intended audience, namely students writing their master's or Ph.D. thesis, mainly in social sciences or philosophy, etc. The method of note taking and then writing based on the elaboration of these notes apparently served at least one professor very well, and I don't see any strong reason why it can't be useful for people doing similar type of intellectual work.
"If you’re thinking without writing, you only think you’re thinking." �
On the other hand, my motivation was to see if the book contained something that I could use for my professional work: I need to keep myself up-to-date with a lot of new technologies and their intricate details. Following this, I also need to communicate complex technological discussions to people with different backgrounds. I don't work at a university, and I don't write papers or articles in social sciences and related fields. But I do write different types of technical articles, therefore I need to keep some notes and references for different topics somewhere.
"Writing is nature’s way of letting you know how sloppy your thinking is." � Guindon
I consider this book successful, because it managed to persuade me to look further into the . Even though some reviewers complain that the book was very repetitive (I agree that you don't need so many pages to describe this method), I think the author had the good intention of drilling into the mind of the reader the important fact that no matter how seemingly simple the mechanics of the method is, it nevertheless requires some sort of shift in your mentality if you are to really integrate this method into your reading and thinking (writing) activities.
"Thinking doesn’t guarantee that you won’t make mistakes. Not thinking usually guarantees that you will." �
There are an abundance of digital and free to use computer programs to help, as exemplified by the author and I can foresee that my main challenge will be to focus on my reading and writing habits, because as people like me know very well, it is so easy to get lost in technical trivialities of all these nice tools such as , , , , , etc. Because that's our "comfort zone", whereas really working on our mental habits and transforming them is probably not easy, yet more rewarding in the long term. Similar to , I will try to integrate the principles and rules described in the book to some of my workflows.
Augmenting our feeble minds so that we can have a better grasp of a vast literature on any complex topic is a never-ending journey. I found this book a useful part of that journey, and now I need to go read more, such as:
-
-
-
-
-
-
- : an open-source knowledge graph that helps individuals, organizations, and communities solve complex problems through making sense of a vast amount of knowledge across a breadth and depth of contexts and disciplines.
I think this book will be more useful for its intended audience, namely students writing their master's or Ph.D. thesis, mainly in social sciences or philosophy, etc. The method of note taking and then writing based on the elaboration of these notes apparently served at least one professor very well, and I don't see any strong reason why it can't be useful for people doing similar type of intellectual work.
"If you’re thinking without writing, you only think you’re thinking." �
On the other hand, my motivation was to see if the book contained something that I could use for my professional work: I need to keep myself up-to-date with a lot of new technologies and their intricate details. Following this, I also need to communicate complex technological discussions to people with different backgrounds. I don't work at a university, and I don't write papers or articles in social sciences and related fields. But I do write different types of technical articles, therefore I need to keep some notes and references for different topics somewhere.
"Writing is nature’s way of letting you know how sloppy your thinking is." � Guindon
I consider this book successful, because it managed to persuade me to look further into the . Even though some reviewers complain that the book was very repetitive (I agree that you don't need so many pages to describe this method), I think the author had the good intention of drilling into the mind of the reader the important fact that no matter how seemingly simple the mechanics of the method is, it nevertheless requires some sort of shift in your mentality if you are to really integrate this method into your reading and thinking (writing) activities.
"Thinking doesn’t guarantee that you won’t make mistakes. Not thinking usually guarantees that you will." �
There are an abundance of digital and free to use computer programs to help, as exemplified by the author and I can foresee that my main challenge will be to focus on my reading and writing habits, because as people like me know very well, it is so easy to get lost in technical trivialities of all these nice tools such as , , , , , etc. Because that's our "comfort zone", whereas really working on our mental habits and transforming them is probably not easy, yet more rewarding in the long term. Similar to , I will try to integrate the principles and rules described in the book to some of my workflows.
Augmenting our feeble minds so that we can have a better grasp of a vast literature on any complex topic is a never-ending journey. I found this book a useful part of that journey, and now I need to go read more, such as:
-
-
-
-
-
-
- : an open-source knowledge graph that helps individuals, organizations, and communities solve complex problems through making sense of a vast amount of knowledge across a breadth and depth of contexts and disciplines.
July 8, 2018
Really eye-opening for me. I would recommend this book to anyone I know. It is obvious that I do have some of the conventional wisdom mentioned in the book, thinking writing is just a transfer of knowledge/ideas/insight from my head onto blank papers. Now I realize I should use writing to collect, to connect, and get all notes ready all along the way.
But, it is just a little disappointing that the book has not shown us an example of how someone actually making those bibliography notes, and then permanent notes. If only there was a chapter to lead me through the whole process!
So, I do know I need this, badly. But how to implement?
The book did mention a little bit and suggested some open-source software. Yet it is just not enough for me. I hope for more details. Please make it more practical.
But, it is just a little disappointing that the book has not shown us an example of how someone actually making those bibliography notes, and then permanent notes. If only there was a chapter to lead me through the whole process!
So, I do know I need this, badly. But how to implement?
The book did mention a little bit and suggested some open-source software. Yet it is just not enough for me. I hope for more details. Please make it more practical.
July 9, 2017
I express a very big gratitude to the author. This book is a "must-read" manual for all researchers. This book is quite different from other "help-self" manuals. It was written by a scientist, and is based on a huge number other science books, and resources. Reference bibliography is amazing. Your productivity will gain tremendously in your daily-workflow. Highly recommend!
March 12, 2022
Книга, безусловно, интересная, полезная, заставляющая задуматься. Благодаря видео на YouTube, посвященных данному методу, можно получить более глубокие разъяснения и примеры. Книга, определенно, будет прочитана еще несколько раз.
January 22, 2020
6th book for 2020.
Niklas Luhmann, the 20th Century sociologist, was productive by any standard; publishing more than seventy books and hundreds of articles in his lifetime. He accredited his success to an idiosyncratic note-taking technique he developed, which he called the Zettlekästen—literally "notes box"—in which he place A6-sized cards with short atomised ideas generated while reading, each note being linked to other related notes, essentially creating a hyperlinked database of ideas long before the idea of computerised wikis too hold.
Unfortunately, until recently most of the literature regarding Luhmann's technique has been limited to German. Ahrens excellent book offers English readers a through summary of not only the technique, but a philosophy behind it. This book should appeal to anyone interested in taking more intelligent notes; especially those at the start on a longer writing project such a book or doctoral thesis.
The biggest problem with technique is probably the lack of a good open-source cross-platform implementation of the technique. The software recommended in the book doesn't seem to have been worked on since 2016, which strongly limits my desire to trust it the long-term storage of my ideas, and I have no desire to lock my notes to the whims of venture capitalism (e.g., Roam), while the physical creation of 1000s of notes has obvious limitations.
3-stars.
Niklas Luhmann, the 20th Century sociologist, was productive by any standard; publishing more than seventy books and hundreds of articles in his lifetime. He accredited his success to an idiosyncratic note-taking technique he developed, which he called the Zettlekästen—literally "notes box"—in which he place A6-sized cards with short atomised ideas generated while reading, each note being linked to other related notes, essentially creating a hyperlinked database of ideas long before the idea of computerised wikis too hold.
Unfortunately, until recently most of the literature regarding Luhmann's technique has been limited to German. Ahrens excellent book offers English readers a through summary of not only the technique, but a philosophy behind it. This book should appeal to anyone interested in taking more intelligent notes; especially those at the start on a longer writing project such a book or doctoral thesis.
The biggest problem with technique is probably the lack of a good open-source cross-platform implementation of the technique. The software recommended in the book doesn't seem to have been worked on since 2016, which strongly limits my desire to trust it the long-term storage of my ideas, and I have no desire to lock my notes to the whims of venture capitalism (e.g., Roam), while the physical creation of 1000s of notes has obvious limitations.
3-stars.
April 3, 2020
I am giving this book 5 stars not because I liked it, but because it has significantly improved my scholarship --- at least, in the last few days since I started reading it. We'll see if it continues!
The crux of the book is "write down insights you have, as you're having them, and then regularly reconcile these into a single place, and track insights you have while writing THOSE down. Rinse and repeat." It's been a very helpful framework for thinking about big thoughts; rather than trying to keep it all jumbled up in your head, or rather than trying to serialize it into a coherent piece of prose, just write down the idea. You can shape it later. It's an excellent tool for decomposing hard problems that require lots of moving machinery to get your mind around. When you're actively searching for, and reveling in insights, learning becomes fun, and spending time doing scholarship becomes the norm. Life pro tip.
The only other good thing I'll say about this book is that it's short. I got through it in two sittings. Really and truly, the only content here is that thing I said above. Have ideas and write them down. The rest of this book is a bunch of bad pop-sci that is sorta tangentially related. I get the impression that Ahrens was Taking Smart Notes on all of the bad pop-sci books he read, and couldn't help but write about them here as filler. The useful part of this book could be a blog post, but you can't sell a blog post!
Unrelatedly, I feel like I've read all the same bad pop-sci books as Ahrens. I'm not sure if this a failure on his part, or on mine :(
I'll begrudgingly recommend this as an excellent book I've read this year, if just for its information content, and not for the book itself. Feel free to skip any paragraph whose first sentence doesn't mention a slip-box; you won't miss much.
The crux of the book is "write down insights you have, as you're having them, and then regularly reconcile these into a single place, and track insights you have while writing THOSE down. Rinse and repeat." It's been a very helpful framework for thinking about big thoughts; rather than trying to keep it all jumbled up in your head, or rather than trying to serialize it into a coherent piece of prose, just write down the idea. You can shape it later. It's an excellent tool for decomposing hard problems that require lots of moving machinery to get your mind around. When you're actively searching for, and reveling in insights, learning becomes fun, and spending time doing scholarship becomes the norm. Life pro tip.
The only other good thing I'll say about this book is that it's short. I got through it in two sittings. Really and truly, the only content here is that thing I said above. Have ideas and write them down. The rest of this book is a bunch of bad pop-sci that is sorta tangentially related. I get the impression that Ahrens was Taking Smart Notes on all of the bad pop-sci books he read, and couldn't help but write about them here as filler. The useful part of this book could be a blog post, but you can't sell a blog post!
Unrelatedly, I feel like I've read all the same bad pop-sci books as Ahrens. I'm not sure if this a failure on his part, or on mine :(
I'll begrudgingly recommend this as an excellent book I've read this year, if just for its information content, and not for the book itself. Feel free to skip any paragraph whose first sentence doesn't mention a slip-box; you won't miss much.
March 12, 2023
О ЧЕМ КНИГА:
Прочитал эту книгу первый раз еще в 2020 году. После неё вы будете совсем по-другому смотреть на процесс чтения нон-фикшн.
Книга немецкого автора о том, как правильно создавать и хранить заметки. Эта работа будет очень полезна тем, кто любит читать нон-фикшн литературу и кто сам хочет писать статьи и книги.
ГЛАВНАЯ МЫСЛЬ КНИГИ:
Чтобы понять и закрепить основные идеи из прочитанного, надо всегда во время чтения делать заметки своими словами и упорядочивать эти заметки с помощью картотеки.
ЗАЧЕМ ЧИТАТЬ ЭТУ КНИГУ?
Чтобы получить инструменты и подходы для создания своей системы ведения заметок.
МЫСЛИ И ВЫВОДЫ ИЗ КНИГИ:
� Любой интеллектуальный замысел начинается с заметки.
� Когда у меня будет своя картотека с большим количеством постоянных заметок, то мне больше никогда не придется искать "с нуля" идеи для статей, постов и книг.
� Чтобы понять и закрепить основные идеи из прочитанного, надо всегда делать заметки своими словами во время чтения. Если я смогу своими словами написать, что имел в виду автор, то значит я понял то, что прочитал.
� Иногда чтобы описать целую книгу достаточно лишь одного предложения:)
� Не делать заметки во время чтения все равно, что не читать книгу вообще.
� Видеть суть проблемы, описывать ее текстом - это основная ежедневная задача ученого и думающего человека. Таким образом, с каждым днем практикуясь в этом навыке, я становлюсь в нем сильнее и сильнее.
� Если внедрить себе привычку делать заметки во время чтения, то со временем я научусь кратко и четко излагать свои мысли не только на письме, но и в разговоре. У того, кто много прочитал и проанализировал, всегда есть что сказать. А главное есть умение кратко донести до других свою мысль.
� Умение четко формулировать свои мысли, разбираться в сути вещей и видеть сразу главный смысл прочитанного приходит только с помощью осознанной практики. Этот навык не приходит быстро. Но его надо развивать. Поэтому если просто читать и подчеркивать, то он не разовьется.
� Если мы что-то знаем, то это не значит, что мы это понимаем. Здесь легче всего себя обмануть. Особенно после частых повторений одного и того же.
� Лучшее доказательство того, что я понимаю какую-то тему или вопрос - это письменно объяснить его. Здесь то и наступает момент истины. Сразу становится видно ЗНАЮ ли я эту тему, или ПОНИМАЮ.
� Кажется, что прерывать чтение и делать выписки из книги - это отвлечение. Но, на самом деле, это самая главная часть чтения. Мы должны переходить из состояния "я чувствую себя умнее" в состояние "я понимаю эту тему и могу её объяснить".
� Настоящее изучение предмета - это работа с выписками во время чтения и после, а не само чтение.
� Хороший читатель всегда задает критические вопросы по поводу текста, который он изучает. Он не принимает сразу на веру аргументы автора и сопоставляет их с другими точками зрения.
� Если мы не понимаем контекст внутри которого находится главная мысль текста, то мы и не понимаем сам текст, который читаем и не можем его сопоставить с другими идеями, к которым он применим. Поэтому книги в кратком изложении не работают.
� Самое главное в обучении - это умение соединять новые знания и факты с тем, что уже знаешь и выстраивать между ними связи в определенном контексте.
ЧТО Я БУДУ ПРИМЕНЯТЬ:
Создам свою картотеку с тремя типами заметок.
ЕЩЕ НА ЭТУ ТЕМУ:
Дэвид Аллен "Как привести дела в порядок"
Прочитал эту книгу первый раз еще в 2020 году. После неё вы будете совсем по-другому смотреть на процесс чтения нон-фикшн.
Книга немецкого автора о том, как правильно создавать и хранить заметки. Эта работа будет очень полезна тем, кто любит читать нон-фикшн литературу и кто сам хочет писать статьи и книги.
ГЛАВНАЯ МЫСЛЬ КНИГИ:
Чтобы понять и закрепить основные идеи из прочитанного, надо всегда во время чтения делать заметки своими словами и упорядочивать эти заметки с помощью картотеки.
ЗАЧЕМ ЧИТАТЬ ЭТУ КНИГУ?
Чтобы получить инструменты и подходы для создания своей системы ведения заметок.
МЫСЛИ И ВЫВОДЫ ИЗ КНИГИ:
� Любой интеллектуальный замысел начинается с заметки.
� Когда у меня будет своя картотека с большим количеством постоянных заметок, то мне больше никогда не придется искать "с нуля" идеи для статей, постов и книг.
� Чтобы понять и закрепить основные идеи из прочитанного, надо всегда делать заметки своими словами во время чтения. Если я смогу своими словами написать, что имел в виду автор, то значит я понял то, что прочитал.
� Иногда чтобы описать целую книгу достаточно лишь одного предложения:)
� Не делать заметки во время чтения все равно, что не читать книгу вообще.
� Видеть суть проблемы, описывать ее текстом - это основная ежедневная задача ученого и думающего человека. Таким образом, с каждым днем практикуясь в этом навыке, я становлюсь в нем сильнее и сильнее.
� Если внедрить себе привычку делать заметки во время чтения, то со временем я научусь кратко и четко излагать свои мысли не только на письме, но и в разговоре. У того, кто много прочитал и проанализировал, всегда есть что сказать. А главное есть умение кратко донести до других свою мысль.
� Умение четко формулировать свои мысли, разбираться в сути вещей и видеть сразу главный смысл прочитанного приходит только с помощью осознанной практики. Этот навык не приходит быстро. Но его надо развивать. Поэтому если просто читать и подчеркивать, то он не разовьется.
� Если мы что-то знаем, то это не значит, что мы это понимаем. Здесь легче всего себя обмануть. Особенно после частых повторений одного и того же.
� Лучшее доказательство того, что я понимаю какую-то тему или вопрос - это письменно объяснить его. Здесь то и наступает момент истины. Сразу становится видно ЗНАЮ ли я эту тему, или ПОНИМАЮ.
� Кажется, что прерывать чтение и делать выписки из книги - это отвлечение. Но, на самом деле, это самая главная часть чтения. Мы должны переходить из состояния "я чувствую себя умнее" в состояние "я понимаю эту тему и могу её объяснить".
� Настоящее изучение предмета - это работа с выписками во время чтения и после, а не само чтение.
� Хороший читатель всегда задает критические вопросы по поводу текста, который он изучает. Он не принимает сразу на веру аргументы автора и сопоставляет их с другими точками зрения.
� Если мы не понимаем контекст внутри которого находится главная мысль текста, то мы и не понимаем сам текст, который читаем и не можем его сопоставить с другими идеями, к которым он применим. Поэтому книги в кратком изложении не работают.
� Самое главное в обучении - это умение соединять новые знания и факты с тем, что уже знаешь и выстраивать между ними связи в определенном контексте.
ЧТО Я БУДУ ПРИМЕНЯТЬ:
Создам свою картотеку с тремя типами заметок.
ЕЩЕ НА ЭТУ ТЕМУ:
Дэвид Аллен "Как привести дела в порядок"
July 27, 2023
Este libro ha sido todo un descubrimiento, y aunque se presenta como un manual para las personas que se dedican a trabajo académico y docente, la realidad es que creo que puede ser útil para todo el mundo.
El autor nos presenta la metodología zettelkasten (fichero o caja de notas), una metodología desarrollada por el sociólogo alemán Niklas Luhmann que le permitió desarrollar una increíble productividad literaria y académica, así como mejorar la retención de lo que leía y desarrollarlo en forma escrita.
El libro no sólo presenta la metodología en sí (que es bastante sencilla y puede ponerse en marcha en 5 minutos), sino toda la evidencia científica en psicología que respalda esta aproximación. En breve, la metodología nos pide que leamos siempre tomando notas en nuestras propias palabras, y que luego reescribamos esas notas en un formato permanente, como si lo fuéramos a explicar a otra persona, guardando estas notas en un sistema que las enlace unas con otras de manera asociativa y no jerárquica. Luhmann implantó esta metodología en papel usando un archivador de tarjetas (llegó a tener más de 90.000 enlazadas mediante unos primitivos hiperenlaces), pero también se puede utilizar un medio electrónico que facilite la parte de enlazar (yo estoy probando una web llamada roamresearch.com que está dedicada a hacer justo esto). La verdad es que me tiene fascinado.
El libro está claramente estructurado y argumentado, y las referencias son excelentes (incluso aquellas que están contestadas, como la hipótesis de desgaste del ego de Baumeister figuran como tales). Es denso y no siempre ágil, pero llevo unos días poniendo esto a prueba y los resultados han sido excelentes.
En serio que lo recomiendo. Creo que puede ser un libro bastante revolucionario. También podéis saber más en zettelkasten.de (en inglés).
El autor nos presenta la metodología zettelkasten (fichero o caja de notas), una metodología desarrollada por el sociólogo alemán Niklas Luhmann que le permitió desarrollar una increíble productividad literaria y académica, así como mejorar la retención de lo que leía y desarrollarlo en forma escrita.
El libro no sólo presenta la metodología en sí (que es bastante sencilla y puede ponerse en marcha en 5 minutos), sino toda la evidencia científica en psicología que respalda esta aproximación. En breve, la metodología nos pide que leamos siempre tomando notas en nuestras propias palabras, y que luego reescribamos esas notas en un formato permanente, como si lo fuéramos a explicar a otra persona, guardando estas notas en un sistema que las enlace unas con otras de manera asociativa y no jerárquica. Luhmann implantó esta metodología en papel usando un archivador de tarjetas (llegó a tener más de 90.000 enlazadas mediante unos primitivos hiperenlaces), pero también se puede utilizar un medio electrónico que facilite la parte de enlazar (yo estoy probando una web llamada roamresearch.com que está dedicada a hacer justo esto). La verdad es que me tiene fascinado.
El libro está claramente estructurado y argumentado, y las referencias son excelentes (incluso aquellas que están contestadas, como la hipótesis de desgaste del ego de Baumeister figuran como tales). Es denso y no siempre ágil, pero llevo unos días poniendo esto a prueba y los resultados han sido excelentes.
En serio que lo recomiendo. Creo que puede ser un libro bastante revolucionario. También podéis saber más en zettelkasten.de (en inglés).
June 13, 2021
how I WISH I had had this when I was a student. I cannot recommend highly enough for anyone doing non-fiction writing, including academics and grad students. Actually, a lot of it applies to fiction writing too (nothing counts until it's on the page)
July 26, 2020
Not a bad book for someone not familiar with personal knowledge management. But it was really scattered, not structured in a good way.
October 10, 2020
I decided to write a review because my rating seems quite drastically different to most and this is mostly due to the author, in my opinion, delivering a book that should be called "Why you should take smarter notes", not "How..."
Ahrens summarised the "Zettelkasten" method of taking notes well (as popularised by sociologist Niklas Luhmann, famous for being one of the most productive academics in Germany) and makes a strong argument for voracious readers (like us on ŷ) to take "smarter" notes when we read.
Luhmann's central ideas of how a "slip box" should work are all here and I especially like the recommendation to keep literature notes and permanent notes separate, with the latter focused on digesting what one has read & linking the ideas either to other contexts or what has been read elsewhere. By putting notes onto index cards and into a "slip box", the notes could easily be numbered & reshuffled, similar to how the Dewey decimal classification system works in libraries. (I have implemented a digital version using Notion.)
Luhmann (and Ahrens) argues that if we take smarter notes, then there's never any danger of facing a blank screen when we sit down to write, because the act of writing becomes an "assembly exercise" using material already captured in the literature notes and distilled (in our own words) in the permanent notes. The permanent notes then become a reservoir of ideas and one would never start to write from scratch.
Ahrens' explanation of Luhmann's Zettelkasten method is gold but unfortunately after having done so in a chapter or so, then spends the next 9 chapters convincing us that this method will not only make us more productive writers but also better learners too. The book is about "why" you should take better notes when you read, with only a chapter or so on the "how".
Despite my ebullient usage of the highlighting function in my Kindle, I rarely do anything with what I've highlighted and I no doubt have forgetten much of what I've read in the 100s non-fiction books that I've read. So to be enlightened with the potential power of the Zettelkasten method was very much welcomed. However, I would have much preferred more material on "how" to take better "permanent notes", such as a framework for systematically thinking through linkages of ideas and manipulating those ideas into new ideas under different contexts. But perhaps that's a book on thinking and not a book on "taking notes".
Last but not least, many reviewers seem to enjoy the opportunity to learn about fairly random concepts through reading a book on note taking. Ahren's writing reflects how the Zettelkasten method of "assembly writing" can potentially turn into - having read so much (and no doubt taken so many notes) on the topic, I felt the author felt compelled to "push" content into his argument & it felt literally like he was dishing out index cards from his Zettlekasten. It definitely read like the writing has been "assembled" (like an academic paper would) rather than a typical non-fiction book that tells a compelling story.
Ahrens summarised the "Zettelkasten" method of taking notes well (as popularised by sociologist Niklas Luhmann, famous for being one of the most productive academics in Germany) and makes a strong argument for voracious readers (like us on ŷ) to take "smarter" notes when we read.
Luhmann's central ideas of how a "slip box" should work are all here and I especially like the recommendation to keep literature notes and permanent notes separate, with the latter focused on digesting what one has read & linking the ideas either to other contexts or what has been read elsewhere. By putting notes onto index cards and into a "slip box", the notes could easily be numbered & reshuffled, similar to how the Dewey decimal classification system works in libraries. (I have implemented a digital version using Notion.)
Luhmann (and Ahrens) argues that if we take smarter notes, then there's never any danger of facing a blank screen when we sit down to write, because the act of writing becomes an "assembly exercise" using material already captured in the literature notes and distilled (in our own words) in the permanent notes. The permanent notes then become a reservoir of ideas and one would never start to write from scratch.
Ahrens' explanation of Luhmann's Zettelkasten method is gold but unfortunately after having done so in a chapter or so, then spends the next 9 chapters convincing us that this method will not only make us more productive writers but also better learners too. The book is about "why" you should take better notes when you read, with only a chapter or so on the "how".
Despite my ebullient usage of the highlighting function in my Kindle, I rarely do anything with what I've highlighted and I no doubt have forgetten much of what I've read in the 100s non-fiction books that I've read. So to be enlightened with the potential power of the Zettelkasten method was very much welcomed. However, I would have much preferred more material on "how" to take better "permanent notes", such as a framework for systematically thinking through linkages of ideas and manipulating those ideas into new ideas under different contexts. But perhaps that's a book on thinking and not a book on "taking notes".
Last but not least, many reviewers seem to enjoy the opportunity to learn about fairly random concepts through reading a book on note taking. Ahren's writing reflects how the Zettelkasten method of "assembly writing" can potentially turn into - having read so much (and no doubt taken so many notes) on the topic, I felt the author felt compelled to "push" content into his argument & it felt literally like he was dishing out index cards from his Zettlekasten. It definitely read like the writing has been "assembled" (like an academic paper would) rather than a typical non-fiction book that tells a compelling story.
November 28, 2023
When I was writing my thesis (approximately one million years ago), I accidentally built about 50% of the workflow described here. Had I known how to use the slip-box part, I think the whole thing would have been a lot better. Maybe I had an incredible memory back then - probably not, but it's not better now. I've now implemented the free tool chain of Zettelkasten: Zkn3 and the reference tool (I know there are lots of reference tools around but I like this one and its Chrome plug-in). So far I already feel like I have a GTD-like (David Allen) "Inbox" for scientific material and various other related business/market information that I come across everyday. After reading the book, I am all about taking small notes on the flurry of links, papers, and sundry material that I see every day. I would also recommend taking a look at to see the difference between various organization methods and Luhmann's specific approach. I think these differences are why the other tools never really caught on for me.
==
Update 2023
==
For a while now, I have been using as my digital note-taking. A whole community has built up around personal knowledge management systems, but I can't seem to take all my notes on my devices. While writing on the computer, I find it easy to cut and paste things I am thinking about into a tool like Obsidian. When I'm reading, I still write notes on any random scrap at hand with anything that will write. Sometimes, these end up in Obsidian. It would probably help me overall if that happened more often.
Zotero has increased in value exponentially since I read this book. I have now learned all kinds of LaTex tricks to get it to produce files that become references for papers and other things I write.
==
Update 2023
==
For a while now, I have been using as my digital note-taking. A whole community has built up around personal knowledge management systems, but I can't seem to take all my notes on my devices. While writing on the computer, I find it easy to cut and paste things I am thinking about into a tool like Obsidian. When I'm reading, I still write notes on any random scrap at hand with anything that will write. Sometimes, these end up in Obsidian. It would probably help me overall if that happened more often.
Zotero has increased in value exponentially since I read this book. I have now learned all kinds of LaTex tricks to get it to produce files that become references for papers and other things I write.
June 14, 2020
Книга, которую рекомендую всем - студентам, предпринимателям, писателям. Как вести заметки, которую будут оказывать практическое влияние на ваши результаты, а не станут обычным кладбищем идей. Сама система получается примерно такой, как я и сам в итоге организовал. Тем не менее идей - кладезь. Такую книгу бы на 20 лет раньше
August 4, 2022
Cool book on note taking with the purpose of strategizing and stimulating writers in all stages. Not for courses, but for brainstorming ideas and organizing your creativity without succumbing to confirmation bias. Would definitely keep this addition into my library.
February 28, 2020
Wow, wow, wow ...
... and a double wow, wow.
This is definitely my greatest read for 2019 so far and I can't see anything surpassing it.
It has had the same impact as David Allen's "Getting Things Done" and Stephen Covey's "Seven Habits Of Highly Successful People" before then in that it has already caused a fundamental change in the way I see, understand and take action on things.
Wyatt Woodsmall hammers in the point that learning IS behaviour change. I can honestly say I have learnt from Sonke Ahrens.
The title of the book is rather deceptive as it implies it's all about taking notes, but the book is a whole lot more. It's about how to think better and the methodology presented has a kind of 'lollapozza' effect in that the more you use it the faster and better your thinking improves.
The only reason I have not rated it 5 stars (other than being really stingy) is I would like to see if I can stick with the methodology for a year - if I can internalise it and make it my own. If a year from now I'm still using the system and have made it a part of me then I will release my grasp and hand over that fifth star.
An amazing book that has been very well written using the very methodology it explains. Just the bibliography itself will be another in depth education on it's own.
If you want to upgrade your thinking and be more effective in your everyday life life, I'd urge you to get this book now. If you wait to long it will be as Ahrens suggests ...
... 'like starting to save for retirement AFTER you've retired'. Start saving for your retirement now. You can thank me later ;-).
UPDATE: I had promised myself to return to this review after a year and bump the rating up to 5 stars if I stuck with the system.
Well, I have. I've just written a new zettel before popping over here. It's based on a quote by Alfred a. Montapert - "Do not confuse motion and progress. A rocking horse keeps moving but does not make any progress".
Soon after hand writing the zettel, I logged into my email and there was an email from my Evernote to remind me that a year ago I had promised to return to this review. Funny how life works isn't it?
Anyway, in the year that I've used the system I've found it to be really powerful. I have a tingling that I've overcomplicated it as I still use something akin to the numbering system Luhman used. Guys like Robert Greene and Ryan Holiday went with categories/themes instead and I'm beginning to feel perhaps that would have been easier.
I shall persevere though as I believe that after a lifetime, the numbering system will far surpass themes or categories. I feel that the use of themes and/or categories will force us to think only in terms of the themes or categories listed while the numbering system leaves us free to explore our notes as they come.
Another observation while I'm at it, although there is some level of review everytime I have to figure out were a card/zettel fits, I need to put in a regular practice for this.
All in all, I can now conclude that this was certainly my best book of 2019!
... and a double wow, wow.
This is definitely my greatest read for 2019 so far and I can't see anything surpassing it.
It has had the same impact as David Allen's "Getting Things Done" and Stephen Covey's "Seven Habits Of Highly Successful People" before then in that it has already caused a fundamental change in the way I see, understand and take action on things.
Wyatt Woodsmall hammers in the point that learning IS behaviour change. I can honestly say I have learnt from Sonke Ahrens.
The title of the book is rather deceptive as it implies it's all about taking notes, but the book is a whole lot more. It's about how to think better and the methodology presented has a kind of 'lollapozza' effect in that the more you use it the faster and better your thinking improves.
The only reason I have not rated it 5 stars (other than being really stingy) is I would like to see if I can stick with the methodology for a year - if I can internalise it and make it my own. If a year from now I'm still using the system and have made it a part of me then I will release my grasp and hand over that fifth star.
An amazing book that has been very well written using the very methodology it explains. Just the bibliography itself will be another in depth education on it's own.
If you want to upgrade your thinking and be more effective in your everyday life life, I'd urge you to get this book now. If you wait to long it will be as Ahrens suggests ...
... 'like starting to save for retirement AFTER you've retired'. Start saving for your retirement now. You can thank me later ;-).
UPDATE: I had promised myself to return to this review after a year and bump the rating up to 5 stars if I stuck with the system.
Well, I have. I've just written a new zettel before popping over here. It's based on a quote by Alfred a. Montapert - "Do not confuse motion and progress. A rocking horse keeps moving but does not make any progress".
Soon after hand writing the zettel, I logged into my email and there was an email from my Evernote to remind me that a year ago I had promised to return to this review. Funny how life works isn't it?
Anyway, in the year that I've used the system I've found it to be really powerful. I have a tingling that I've overcomplicated it as I still use something akin to the numbering system Luhman used. Guys like Robert Greene and Ryan Holiday went with categories/themes instead and I'm beginning to feel perhaps that would have been easier.
I shall persevere though as I believe that after a lifetime, the numbering system will far surpass themes or categories. I feel that the use of themes and/or categories will force us to think only in terms of the themes or categories listed while the numbering system leaves us free to explore our notes as they come.
Another observation while I'm at it, although there is some level of review everytime I have to figure out were a card/zettel fits, I need to put in a regular practice for this.
All in all, I can now conclude that this was certainly my best book of 2019!
September 4, 2021
Buku ini jadi contoh nyata buat saya, kalau proses unlearning and learning itu nggak ada habisnya.
How to Take Smart Notes seperti mematahkan tradisi mencatat yang diajarkan di sekolah maupun yang umum dilakukan banyak orang. Saya jadi berharap buku ini dijadikan bacaan wajib untuk semua pelajar di Indonesia. It's going to be a life-changing books for learners.
Sönke Ahrens membawa konsep slip-box (zettelkasten) yang awalnya terkenal karena digunakan oleh Niklas Luhman, yang dalam 30 tahun menerbitkan 58 buku dan ratusan artikel. Kalau sekarang, versi serupa namun tak samanya slip-box ini bisa ditemukan di metode notecard system-nya Ryan Holiday (yang dia pelajari dari Robert Green). Ya tentu buat yang doyan versi digital juga sudah ada, karena slip-box ini pun sudah termasuk ke dalam Second Brain yang makin banyak dipakai orang.
Saya bisa membayangkan kalau buku ini tidak akan terlihat menarik untuk semua orang. Catat-mencatat atau menulis masih sering dianggap sebagai aktivitas yang merepotkan. Kadang dianggap buang-buang waktu, karena waktu yang sama bisa digunakan untuk melakukan aktivitas lain. Di sinilah salah satu poin penulis yang saya suka: Justru kalau nggak ditulis, kita baru saja membuang-buang waktu. Waktu yang dipakai untuk membaca, ikut diskusi, ikut kelas, dan menonton tutorial di YouTube jadi sia-sia kalau nggak melakukan apa-apa terhadap informasi yang diterima.
Memulai take smart notes memang nggak semudah menggarisbawahi kutipan. Penulis pun jelas mengatakan bahwa sampai bisa dan terbiasa utk take smart notes ini membutuhkan deliberate practice. Kalau diperhatikan, memang ada beberapa skill yg terlibat di dalamnya: mengambil inti dari apa yg dibaca, menulis dengan menerjemahkannya ke dalam bahasa kita sendiri, mengkonfrontasi apa yang sudah kita tulis, menghubungkan ide baru dengan yang lama, belajar untuk siap berubah seiring bertambahnya apa yang kita pahami, dan meramu apa yang ada di slip-box hingga menjadi output baru.
Collect - translate - connect - create.
Perlu effort ekstra. Namun biasanya, hasil tidak akan mengkhianati usaha :)
How to Take Smart Notes seperti mematahkan tradisi mencatat yang diajarkan di sekolah maupun yang umum dilakukan banyak orang. Saya jadi berharap buku ini dijadikan bacaan wajib untuk semua pelajar di Indonesia. It's going to be a life-changing books for learners.
Sönke Ahrens membawa konsep slip-box (zettelkasten) yang awalnya terkenal karena digunakan oleh Niklas Luhman, yang dalam 30 tahun menerbitkan 58 buku dan ratusan artikel. Kalau sekarang, versi serupa namun tak samanya slip-box ini bisa ditemukan di metode notecard system-nya Ryan Holiday (yang dia pelajari dari Robert Green). Ya tentu buat yang doyan versi digital juga sudah ada, karena slip-box ini pun sudah termasuk ke dalam Second Brain yang makin banyak dipakai orang.
Saya bisa membayangkan kalau buku ini tidak akan terlihat menarik untuk semua orang. Catat-mencatat atau menulis masih sering dianggap sebagai aktivitas yang merepotkan. Kadang dianggap buang-buang waktu, karena waktu yang sama bisa digunakan untuk melakukan aktivitas lain. Di sinilah salah satu poin penulis yang saya suka: Justru kalau nggak ditulis, kita baru saja membuang-buang waktu. Waktu yang dipakai untuk membaca, ikut diskusi, ikut kelas, dan menonton tutorial di YouTube jadi sia-sia kalau nggak melakukan apa-apa terhadap informasi yang diterima.
Memulai take smart notes memang nggak semudah menggarisbawahi kutipan. Penulis pun jelas mengatakan bahwa sampai bisa dan terbiasa utk take smart notes ini membutuhkan deliberate practice. Kalau diperhatikan, memang ada beberapa skill yg terlibat di dalamnya: mengambil inti dari apa yg dibaca, menulis dengan menerjemahkannya ke dalam bahasa kita sendiri, mengkonfrontasi apa yang sudah kita tulis, menghubungkan ide baru dengan yang lama, belajar untuk siap berubah seiring bertambahnya apa yang kita pahami, dan meramu apa yang ada di slip-box hingga menjadi output baru.
Collect - translate - connect - create.
Perlu effort ekstra. Namun biasanya, hasil tidak akan mengkhianati usaha :)
June 16, 2020
This was a habit-changing book for me. It was about much more than note taking. It was about a set of processes that allowed me to question and be more a more active participant when absorbing information.
As the book says, writing is thinking. More precisely, writing is distilled thinking. The process of penning information down in your own words improves understanding and forces you to address your blind spots.
The book suggests taking temporary notes when consuming information such as books, videos, podcasts etc. In my experience, just the act of holding a pen when consuming information changes my relationship to these mediums. I scribble down questions I have, explain complex topics in my own way, and note down possible links to other ideas.
Later, those temporary notes are to be converted to permanent notes. The objective of permanent notes is to write about topics using the temporary notes and link related ideas together. It’s important that the topics be self contained and linked to other topics. This allows one to navigate by topic and see all ideas that are linked to it.
I found that as this knowledge base built up, I was able to form connections between very different topics. Furthermore, I noticed connections between ideas I was currently reading and previous ideas. This highlights one aspect of this process. As I started using it more often, I found that I improved in all the different aspects of the process such as questioning, linking ideas, combining notes, and finding relationships between ideas.
Finally, this process makes writing articles much easier. Picking and pulling a strand from a graph of interlinked ideas explained in your own words is much less imposing than staring at a blank page. You can focus on what you find most exciting, pull in needed content from the graph, and remove that which is not needed.
The title doesn’t do the book justice. Definitely a 5 star book for me.
PS:I've been publishing my notes at notes.ppsreejith.net for the last few months.
As the book says, writing is thinking. More precisely, writing is distilled thinking. The process of penning information down in your own words improves understanding and forces you to address your blind spots.
The book suggests taking temporary notes when consuming information such as books, videos, podcasts etc. In my experience, just the act of holding a pen when consuming information changes my relationship to these mediums. I scribble down questions I have, explain complex topics in my own way, and note down possible links to other ideas.
Later, those temporary notes are to be converted to permanent notes. The objective of permanent notes is to write about topics using the temporary notes and link related ideas together. It’s important that the topics be self contained and linked to other topics. This allows one to navigate by topic and see all ideas that are linked to it.
I found that as this knowledge base built up, I was able to form connections between very different topics. Furthermore, I noticed connections between ideas I was currently reading and previous ideas. This highlights one aspect of this process. As I started using it more often, I found that I improved in all the different aspects of the process such as questioning, linking ideas, combining notes, and finding relationships between ideas.
Finally, this process makes writing articles much easier. Picking and pulling a strand from a graph of interlinked ideas explained in your own words is much less imposing than staring at a blank page. You can focus on what you find most exciting, pull in needed content from the graph, and remove that which is not needed.
The title doesn’t do the book justice. Definitely a 5 star book for me.
PS:I've been publishing my notes at notes.ppsreejith.net for the last few months.
July 29, 2021
One of the best book I have read this year. It doesn't only change my way of note taking but also the way I read, collect information and write them down.
I have taken notes for years, mostly with Evernote. My old way is to structure note hierarchically with main categories breaking down to smaller sub-categories. It's very useful in storing notes but I found it difficult to retrieve knowledge. That's why I have recently moved to Obsidian and applied the same idea of this book. However, my way is not perfect and this book has provided me many useful knowledge to improve the way I note.
There are so many useful information from this book that I can't write them all here. Really recommend everyone to read this book and try this new technique.
I have taken notes for years, mostly with Evernote. My old way is to structure note hierarchically with main categories breaking down to smaller sub-categories. It's very useful in storing notes but I found it difficult to retrieve knowledge. That's why I have recently moved to Obsidian and applied the same idea of this book. However, my way is not perfect and this book has provided me many useful knowledge to improve the way I note.
There are so many useful information from this book that I can't write them all here. Really recommend everyone to read this book and try this new technique.
April 27, 2021
Could have been significantly shortened. Very much felt like a book that was artificially extended for a publisher's benefit.
That being said - the ideas behind this content are excellent. We're seeing wonderful things come from new tools that leverage this like Roam and Obsidian in ways that make it easier than ever more to implement. Exciting times for the world of knowledge management.
That being said - the ideas behind this content are excellent. We're seeing wonderful things come from new tools that leverage this like Roam and Obsidian in ways that make it easier than ever more to implement. Exciting times for the world of knowledge management.
July 21, 2020
A bit repetitive but still an enlightening introduction to the philosophy and practice of Zettleksten, a German technique for greatly improved learning and productivity through careful note-taking.
There were not an many real world examples as I would have liked but a quick Google search helped with that.
There were not an many real world examples as I would have liked but a quick Google search helped with that.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 1,729 reviews
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get help and learn more about the design.