Glenn Sumi's Reviews > Where I'm Calling From
Where I'm Calling From
by

I wanted the first book I read in 2018 to be special, and this classic selection of stories by Raymond Carver � the final book he published during his lifetime (he died in 1988 at the incredibly young age of 50) � fit the bill.
Here, presented in chronological order, are 37 stories representing more than two decades� work. Some of them are among the most powerful and influential works of short fiction published in the late 20th century.
Most are written in a clear, unpretentious voice that’s suffused with wisdom and hearty good humour but also a particular kind of pathos that Carver captured � and knew � so well.
His characters are ordinary people, often from the Pacific Northwest, struggling to get by and faced for the time of the story with a significant complication. A couple’s child might be in a coma after being struck by a car on his birthday (“A Small, Good Thing�); a man might draw on his own history of violence to defend his son accused of stealing a bicycle (“Bicycles, Muscles, Cigarettes�); another man might worry about his restless, constantly dissatisfied elderly mother (“Boxes�).
Most of these stories are about marriages breaking up, slowly or suddenly. The marriage might have broken up already, and a man (it’s usually a man) can’t deal with it � he drops by his ex-wife’s home after he’s trashed it in a jealous rage during the Christmas holidays (“A Serious Talk�); he’s tasked with finding a babysitter/housekeeper for his two children (“Fever�); he’s obsessed with a blockage in his ear while living on his own and constantly drinking champagne (“Careful�).
Several stories feature male protagonists who are out of work while their wives take on jobs (“They’re Not Your Husband,� “Put Yourself In My Shoes,� “Are These Actual Miles?,� “Vitamins�).
And, oh yeah, there are drinkers. Lots of drinkers. Many conversations take place in a boozy haze of distraction and false cheer.
One of the saddest stories I’ve ever read is called “Gazebo,� about a couple who have holed themselves up in a room at the motel where they work while they drink and hash out their marital problems, ignoring the customers at reception.
It contains the following paragraph about the couple’s relationship to alcohol:
Drinking’s funny. When I look back on it, all of our important decisions have been figured out when we were drinking. Even when we talked about having to cut back on our drinking, we’d be sitting at the kitchen table or out at the picnic table with a six-pack or whiskey.
And this one line in the story simply yet profoundly captures their end-of-the-line desperation: "There was this funny thing of anything could happen now that we realized everything had.� Wow.
Reading these stories in a short period of time made me sensitive to some of Carver’s techniques:
* The faux epiphany: In my review of Carver’s Cathedral, I already pointed out his sometimes contrived use of the narrator simply stumbling upon an epiphany. I noticed it here too. �I don’t know why, but it’s then I recall the affectionate name my dad used sometimes when he was talking to my mother.� (“Boxes�); and �I’d like to say it was at this moment, as I stood in the fog watching her drive off, that I remembered a black-and-white photograph of my wife holding her wedding bouquet.� (“Blackbird Pie�) These passages are like the author nudging us to think: "Oh, here's the significance."
* The story within the story. Carver is excellent at having characters tell tales within tales. And sometimes, as in “Whoever Was Using This Bed� and “The Student’s Wife,� the story will become a monologue. (Incidentally, both of these stories feature insomniacs.) As someone who watches a lot of plays, I’m sad Carver didn’t write for the theatre. His dialogue is so good. (Yes, I know the films Birdman and Short Cuts draw on his work.)
* The humour. I didn’t appreciate just how funny Carver could be until I read “What Do You Do In San Francisco?�, a story narrated by a postman who tells us about a “beatnik� couple who move into the neighbourhood on his route. The man’s nosiness and judgements on the young couple (perhaps modelled after the young Carver and his then wife/girlfriend?) are so amusing I literally laughed out loud while reading them.
* He shows, doesn't tell. Carver can describe a gesture that, in a few words, precisely captures what a person’s thinking. He doesn’t have to tell you someone’s depressed or sad. By showing you what they’re doing, you know that.
***
Sigh. Writing all this makes me a little dissatisfied. Picking apart Carver’s stories like this takes away a bit of their magic. There’s a mystery at the heart of stories like “Fat,� “Cathedral,� “A Small, Good Thing,� “Fever,� “Why Don’t You Dance?� and “Are These Actual Miles?� that should stay mysteries. They suggest profound things about the human condition: our frailties, our contradictions, our attempts at redemption.
Much has been written about Carver's final published story, “Errand,� a loose retelling of the death of Russian playwright and short story master Chekhov.
The setting, of course, is far removed from Carver’s other fiction, and I’m sure it was inspired by the author’s feelings about his own impending death. But what you realize is that it’s not the grand event itself that captures Carver’s interest but the little things happening on the sidelines, the small moments that only an artist like this � surely Chekhov's equal in his insight into human behaviour � could capture, honour and make real and memorable.
by


I wanted the first book I read in 2018 to be special, and this classic selection of stories by Raymond Carver � the final book he published during his lifetime (he died in 1988 at the incredibly young age of 50) � fit the bill.
Here, presented in chronological order, are 37 stories representing more than two decades� work. Some of them are among the most powerful and influential works of short fiction published in the late 20th century.
Most are written in a clear, unpretentious voice that’s suffused with wisdom and hearty good humour but also a particular kind of pathos that Carver captured � and knew � so well.
His characters are ordinary people, often from the Pacific Northwest, struggling to get by and faced for the time of the story with a significant complication. A couple’s child might be in a coma after being struck by a car on his birthday (“A Small, Good Thing�); a man might draw on his own history of violence to defend his son accused of stealing a bicycle (“Bicycles, Muscles, Cigarettes�); another man might worry about his restless, constantly dissatisfied elderly mother (“Boxes�).
Most of these stories are about marriages breaking up, slowly or suddenly. The marriage might have broken up already, and a man (it’s usually a man) can’t deal with it � he drops by his ex-wife’s home after he’s trashed it in a jealous rage during the Christmas holidays (“A Serious Talk�); he’s tasked with finding a babysitter/housekeeper for his two children (“Fever�); he’s obsessed with a blockage in his ear while living on his own and constantly drinking champagne (“Careful�).
Several stories feature male protagonists who are out of work while their wives take on jobs (“They’re Not Your Husband,� “Put Yourself In My Shoes,� “Are These Actual Miles?,� “Vitamins�).
And, oh yeah, there are drinkers. Lots of drinkers. Many conversations take place in a boozy haze of distraction and false cheer.
One of the saddest stories I’ve ever read is called “Gazebo,� about a couple who have holed themselves up in a room at the motel where they work while they drink and hash out their marital problems, ignoring the customers at reception.
It contains the following paragraph about the couple’s relationship to alcohol:
Drinking’s funny. When I look back on it, all of our important decisions have been figured out when we were drinking. Even when we talked about having to cut back on our drinking, we’d be sitting at the kitchen table or out at the picnic table with a six-pack or whiskey.
And this one line in the story simply yet profoundly captures their end-of-the-line desperation: "There was this funny thing of anything could happen now that we realized everything had.� Wow.
Reading these stories in a short period of time made me sensitive to some of Carver’s techniques:
* The faux epiphany: In my review of Carver’s Cathedral, I already pointed out his sometimes contrived use of the narrator simply stumbling upon an epiphany. I noticed it here too. �I don’t know why, but it’s then I recall the affectionate name my dad used sometimes when he was talking to my mother.� (“Boxes�); and �I’d like to say it was at this moment, as I stood in the fog watching her drive off, that I remembered a black-and-white photograph of my wife holding her wedding bouquet.� (“Blackbird Pie�) These passages are like the author nudging us to think: "Oh, here's the significance."
* The story within the story. Carver is excellent at having characters tell tales within tales. And sometimes, as in “Whoever Was Using This Bed� and “The Student’s Wife,� the story will become a monologue. (Incidentally, both of these stories feature insomniacs.) As someone who watches a lot of plays, I’m sad Carver didn’t write for the theatre. His dialogue is so good. (Yes, I know the films Birdman and Short Cuts draw on his work.)
* The humour. I didn’t appreciate just how funny Carver could be until I read “What Do You Do In San Francisco?�, a story narrated by a postman who tells us about a “beatnik� couple who move into the neighbourhood on his route. The man’s nosiness and judgements on the young couple (perhaps modelled after the young Carver and his then wife/girlfriend?) are so amusing I literally laughed out loud while reading them.
* He shows, doesn't tell. Carver can describe a gesture that, in a few words, precisely captures what a person’s thinking. He doesn’t have to tell you someone’s depressed or sad. By showing you what they’re doing, you know that.
***
Sigh. Writing all this makes me a little dissatisfied. Picking apart Carver’s stories like this takes away a bit of their magic. There’s a mystery at the heart of stories like “Fat,� “Cathedral,� “A Small, Good Thing,� “Fever,� “Why Don’t You Dance?� and “Are These Actual Miles?� that should stay mysteries. They suggest profound things about the human condition: our frailties, our contradictions, our attempts at redemption.
Much has been written about Carver's final published story, “Errand,� a loose retelling of the death of Russian playwright and short story master Chekhov.
The setting, of course, is far removed from Carver’s other fiction, and I’m sure it was inspired by the author’s feelings about his own impending death. But what you realize is that it’s not the grand event itself that captures Carver’s interest but the little things happening on the sidelines, the small moments that only an artist like this � surely Chekhov's equal in his insight into human behaviour � could capture, honour and make real and memorable.
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
Where I'm Calling From.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
December 31, 2017
–
Started Reading
December 31, 2017
– Shelved
December 31, 2017
– Shelved as:
short-stories
December 31, 2017
– Shelved as:
contemp-classics
January 2, 2018
–
22.81%
"I forgot how FUNNY Carver was. I laughed and chuckled throughout "What Do You Do In San Francisco"!"
page
120
January 8, 2018
–
58.0%
"This truly is an American classic. It’s hard to imagine literature without these sad, graceful glimpses into ordinary people’s lives."
January 9, 2018
–
86.0%
January 11, 2018
–
86.0%
January 12, 2018
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-26 of 26 (26 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Zoeytron
(new)
-
rated it 3 stars
Jan 14, 2018 11:35AM

reply
|
flag









Thanks, Nat! I think The Stories Of Raymond Carver must be an Australian edition of these selected stories. I'm sure they collected many of the same ones. I've read some of his classic stories several times over the past couple of decades, and they really hold up. Enjoy!

Thanks, Ned. I read a lot of Carver when I was younger too, but as with all great literature, they really resonate more once you experience some life, IMO. Very glad I read book from front to back. I always thought the early stories were sparer and elliptical, but they're pretty generous.

Ursula: Thanks! I think that's the way to go, just savour the stories' flavour, as you say. Sometimes it just feels wrong to pick something apart (even though that's what I do for a living - ha!).
I also found I needed a break between stories to let them settle in. As the great short story writer Mavis Gallant once wrote: "Stories are not chapters of novels. They should not be read one after another, as if they were meant to follow along. Read one. Shut the book. Read something else. Come back later. Stories can wait."

Thanks, Angela! I hope you like Carver. He was a very influential writer/teacher. I believe he taught Jay McInerney at Syracuse. And his colleague Tobias Wolff taught George Saunders. Occasionally, I get in the mood for short stories. I love the idea of being able to start and finish something in one sitting. And I tend to reread stories more than novels. I've probably read Carver's "Chef's House" and "Where I'm Calling From" a half dozen times each. And I discovered a few in this book I know I'll return to.

Thanks, Steven. Hope you enjoy. What's fascinating is that Carver re-released some of the stories from What We Talk About..., which he felt had been too severely edited by Gordon Lish. If I'm not mistaken, the version of "So Much Water, So Close To Home" is the longer version. The original manuscript version of What We Talk About was released a few years ago as Beginners. I'm curious now about comparing the two books.


Thanks, Alan. What a loss. And he was only 50. I would love to have seen where his writing went. Those late stories signalled a new direction.

Thanks, Lars! I'd read maybe a dozen of these before. Good to revisit them and see in the context of Carver's whole, if too brief, writing career.

Great review, Glenn!



Haha! Thanks, Kevin. As someone who's seen Chekhov's plays numerous times (one of the most recent ones was a clever reworking of The Seagull called - r u ready? - Stupid Fucking Bird - I do a appreciate a good Chekhov reference in a comment. Thank you my erudite friend!

Thanks, Matthew. Ooo � must check out your feed to see what stories you're reading. (I think I'm going to read more collections, too. There's something very satisfying about being able to finish one or two in one sitting.) Anyhow, you can't go wrong with Carver. And this book nicely represents his evolution as a writer.

Thanks, Rae. He didn't live very long, but I have a feeling he influenced generations of writers and readers. Have you read the biography yet? Now that I've read a wider range of stories, I'm thinking of picking it up.

Thanks, Paula. I understand your feelings. I read Cathedral first, then the last six stories. For some reason I thought his earlier stories were much sparer and (I know it's a term used a lot with his work) "minimalist." But I actually found them quite generous. Yes, they are bleak and go to some dark places. But I found many of them oddly cathartic. And as I tried to point out in my review, there's a lot of humour.