Military Professional Reading discussion
What I'm Reading
message 251:
by
Geevee
(new)
Dec 30, 2013 06:36AM

reply
|
flag



Basically he is unknown in the broader US, I don't know about New England - I personally never knew of his major involvement in the beginnings of the Revolution before reading this book

I have put it aside for the moment to squeeze in another book that I have been itching to start:


Looks like a good one. Another TBR addition.

I am interested in the history on fortifications. I have visited a number of American forts which all owe much to the principles of Vauban, including Ticonderoga, Pulaski, McHenry, Barrancas and some others. I would like to see Louisbourg in Canada, which I understand is one of the best and most intact.


I was just thinking...that would be a great tour for history buffs. A trip around France to visit Vauban's forts, especially since so many are in or near such scenic places.

I considered a drive to Louisbourg a few years ago, but backed out. It is 1,700 miles from South Carolina.

:)"
I see interesting forts, scenic places, excellent meals and plentiful wines.







rather short - 275 pages and so far it is mainly an overview










/review/show...

Chores? What are chores? Oh, you mean those little annoyances which interfere with my reading.

I just recently finished 'Six Frigates,' by IAN W. Toll, from the CNO's Professional Reading list. Here's my review...
/author_blog...
Next, I'd like to delve into either 'Red Star Over the Pacific,' or 'Neptune's Inferno.' Any suggestions?

Nice review Jeff. I also liked it immensely (even tho I am USAF through and through!). Sent it to my daughter who's in the US Navy...waiting for her to read it so we can discuss.


Happy: I too endorse --



Description
The Washington Treaty of 1922, designed to head off a potentially dangerous arms race between the major naval powers, agreed to legally binding limits on the numbers and sizes of the principal warship types. In doing so, it introduced a new constraint into naval architecture and sponsored many ingenious attempts to maximise the power of ships built within those restrictions. It effectively banned the construction of new battleships for a decade, but threw greater emphasis on large cruisers. This much is broadly understood by anyone with an interest in warships, but both the wider context of the treaty and the detail ramifications of its provisions are little understood. The approach of this book is novel in combining coverage of the political and strategic background of the treaty and the subsequent London Treaty of 1930 with analysis of exactly how the navies of Britain, the USA, Japan, France and Italy responded, in terms of the types of warships they built and the precise characteristics of those designs. This was not just a matter of capital ships and cruisers, but also influenced the development of super-destroyers and large submarines. Now for the first time warship enthusiasts and historians can understand fully the rationale behind much of inter-war naval procurement. The Washington Treaty was a watershed, and this book provides an important insight into its full significance.

A great illustrated review Jeff.


It looks good. I know some about the Washington Treaty stipulations. They had significant impact on combat efficiency in WW II of those ships built to treaty standards.


Just finished this book. I have read many books about the Korean war, but this is the most detailed about a..."
Sounds like a great book Jerome, I better go find my copy and move it to the top of the pile!


Just took this one up this A.M.
What with the "crisis in Ukraine" going on I thought this may give some insi..."
Will be interested in what you think of this one. I read his



Just finished this book. I have read many books about the Korean war, but this is the most d...
Sounds like a great book Jerome, I better go find my copy and move it to the top of the pile!
"
You really need to do so - I read it a few yrs ago( I was going through a Korean War phase ;)) and thought it was excellent!


Looks like a good one.



my thoughts if anyone is interested
/review/show...



"One of the more heroic destroyer actions of Shingle was staged by the U.S.S. Mayo, under the command of Commander A.D. Kaplan. It was assigned the hazardous task of coming in close ashore to impede the reinforcing of Nazi infantry units. Mayo and other ships of DESRON 7 shelled enemy forces attempting to cross the Mussolini Canal for more than 17 hours. Out of ammunition and on her way back to Naples, a mine blew open a large hole in her starboard side, flooding the after fire and engine rooms and damaging her propeller shaft. A British tug took her under tow for temporary repairs in Naples. But the enemy hadn't seen the last of "The Merry Mayo", as she was known to her crew. She escorted five more convoys to Europe and even took part in the Okinawa operation."
Books mentioned in this topic
Dead Men Risen: The Welsh Guards and the Real Story of Britain's War in Afghanistan (other topics)Grunt: The Curious Science of Humans at War (other topics)
The Castaway's War: One Man's Battle against Imperial Japan (other topics)
Thunder and Flames: Americans in the Crucible of Combat, 1917-1918 (other topics)
Grunt: The Curious Science of Humans at War (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Toby Harnden (other topics)Mary Roach (other topics)
Edward G. Lengel (other topics)
Mary Roach (other topics)
Joby Warrick (other topics)
More...