Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

I want to know what you think was a bad sequel to an awesome book.

Mine is obviously



I guess the first book was the as bad as the second, but it took me until reading that one to face reality. The "heroine" is actually very annoying and useless. All she does is mope and whine and cry about boys. She was once tough in the first book but that trait is now officially gone.

The Earthsea Quartet have pretty badly linked sequels . :-) Awesome though.

In my opinion was AMAZING! , Not so much!


But if you want it in the other order, is the first book and not all that good, but is absolutely perfect, utterly wonderful!

and as the 2nd book, lets and down!

Monyka wrote: "... I guess the first book was the as bad as the second, but it took me until reading that one to face real..."

I � the Trylle series, I have no idea what you are talking about! Amanda Hocking is AMAZING!

I loved and I loved even more, but then came bookcover:The Queen of the Damned|43758] and, though it wasn't badly written or anything, I just didn't like it. Still I had to continue the series, so I read which I really liked, so I still continued the series with reading . And this book was even worse than Queen of the Damned! But a lot of people really liked which is the next book in the series, so I read it too. I also really liked this one, but I still haven't read the next book in the series because I'm afraid I will get disappointed again. Still the Vampire Chronicles are great and my favorite vampire series :).

Ok, at the risk of making people mad...

Hated it. It felt rushed, even forced. I had no connection to the characters. I didn't even care when Primrose died, and that was supposed to be one of the most heart-wrenching scenes in the book! I didn't read the book so much as endure it. Sad to say so, because the first book was so good.

Thomas wrote: "Ok, at the risk of making people mad...

Hated it. It felt rushed, even forced. I had no connection to the characters. I didn't even care when Primrose died, and that..."
I completely agree! That was absolutely terrible! To be honest, I wasn't a huge fan of either of the sequels, although Finnick Odair was an amazing character - my favourite! It was written really wierdly too, I didn't even know (spoiler) that Primrose died until about two chapters afterwards, because her actual death had relied so heavily on metaphors, it was hard to understand what was actually going on!

Thomas wrote: "Ok, at the risk of making people mad...

Hated it. It felt rushed, even forced. I had no connection to the characters. I didn't even care when Primrose died, and that..."


I agree with you! And also I think it's weird how Katniss hadn't even liked Peeta at any point in the story and was just showing off to the people, but still ended up with him like it was just a typical romance story.

Nelly wrote: "Thomas wrote: "Ok, at the risk of making people mad...

Hated it. It felt rushed, even forced. I had no connection to the characters. I didn't even care when Primrose..."

I felt the same way! In my opinion suzanne collins should just have stopped after "The Hunger Games" because it would have been so much better without the sequels. And also I completely forgot that Primrose died until I read it here.

The land of Painted Cave by Jean M Auel. First four in the series of Earth's Children were great and five was ok, but I do not know what Ms. Auel was thinking or doing in the writing on #6. It was awful! Nothing that had been set up in the first books were answered in the last book of the series. There was so much that could have been done with the book, but it wasn't done. A very big disappointment.

Everything that came after .
I stoped three books into this bloated excuse for a series and the protangonist gets more unbearable with every book.

I won't even bother reading the series my friend! You are not alone! Thomas wrote: "Ok, at the risk of making people mad...

Hated it. It felt rushed, even forced. I had no connection to the characters. I didn't even care when Primrose died, and that..."

Worst sequel ever?
Spell Bound

Anna wrote: "Everything that came after .
I stoped three books into this bloated excuse for a series and the protangonist gets more unbearable with every book."

I agree! I had to stop reading it because she annoyed me so much

Monyka wrote: "I want to know what you think was a bad sequel to an awesome book.

Mine is obviously

I guess the first book was the as bad as the second, but it took me until reading that one to face real..."

I agree with that. I heard really good about this trilogy, and the idea sounded fantastic and unique, but it was really disappointing for me. I wanted to like it so I finished the trilogy, but I never cared about a single character in those books. Wendy made me mad, Loki wasn't very well developed, and everything else was kind of meh. Finn was my favorite, and nothing even worked out with him. It just fell pretty flat.