The Importance of Reading Ernest discussion
Fathers and Sons
>
Details
date
newest »


i think in focusing on his dad's eye for detail that nick's lack of detail is punctuated. his lack of insight per se. he can't see the sheep...he can't see his hypocracy in having sex with trudy in front of her own brother while he'd kill there's for thinking the same of his own sister...he can't even see his own son until he speaks to him and breaks him from his revelry.
Gio wrote: "are those observations about his dad really a detail? or is it a son remembering things better than they were. its something nick's son tries to do with his dad in the end, but nick prevents that...."
I would argue that, even if they are improved remembrances, they are still details that of Nick's world that have become memories, and it is in expressing details, both tangible and ephemeral, that Hemingway's prose comes most alive, at least for me. And like you say, Gio, it is always there for a reason. This reminds me of one of the things that has always frustrated me about Hemingway's longer novels: there is much more superfluity, and the sparing exactness is lost in works like For Whom the Bell Tolls (which I do love nonetheless)
I am interested in what you're saying about Nick's lack of insight, which we also may have seen quite a bit of in Alpine Idyll. There are so many stories about Nick that once one's read them all we feel we know Nick, but maybe we know him because of the lack of Nick detail and the presence of the details that Nick perceives. I am going to keep that in mind when I reread Big Two Hearted River.
I would argue that, even if they are improved remembrances, they are still details that of Nick's world that have become memories, and it is in expressing details, both tangible and ephemeral, that Hemingway's prose comes most alive, at least for me. And like you say, Gio, it is always there for a reason. This reminds me of one of the things that has always frustrated me about Hemingway's longer novels: there is much more superfluity, and the sparing exactness is lost in works like For Whom the Bell Tolls (which I do love nonetheless)
I am interested in what you're saying about Nick's lack of insight, which we also may have seen quite a bit of in Alpine Idyll. There are so many stories about Nick that once one's read them all we feel we know Nick, but maybe we know him because of the lack of Nick detail and the presence of the details that Nick perceives. I am going to keep that in mind when I reread Big Two Hearted River.

dear lord, i'm full of lines today!
So much of this story is about those small intimate details. Any others that stick out for anyone, or anything you'd like to add about Hemingway's talent for details? Here's the place.