Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ Librarians Group discussion
Looking for a Project?
>
Classical Roman/Latin author which name variant to use?
date
newest »



There will be new imports with bad author names, but because time was taken to make a more complete profile, it will be easy in the future to see which profile to use.
But it is not my project. ;-)


Of course that can be a mistake, since even Loeb lists him as Cicero. But there is a librarian note saying this is preferred, being the most complete version of his name (I thought we went with what is on the covers? ETA Although I do see at least one reputable publisher, Oxford University Press, list his full name).

From the answers I sense that there is no strict way from the manual to follow, or is using the full name the rule and the profile of Juvenal need some adjustment too?

From the answers I sense that there is no strict way from the manual to ..."
I believe there is not a fixed rule. Why I answered as I did, is that with a complete profile, it becomes very easy to fix things in the future. And things will have to be fixed in the future, because there will continue to be imports with a variety of names. And once everything is on one profile, should Rivka or someone else decide that another name is preferred, it is easy to make that change to that one profile.

No, no! That was just Cicero, because at least one reputable publisher had his full name (and Cicero's brother also had some works to his name).
For Persius, I would use Persius and mention his full name in the bio.
Authors mentioned in this topic
Persius (other topics)Juvenal (other topics)
Persius (other topics)
Persius Persius
Persius Works 1814
A Persius Flaccus (Persius)
A Persius Flaccus
Aulus Persius FlaccusPersius
Persius Juvenal