Ultimate Popsugar Reading Challenge discussion
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
2019 Monthly Challenge
>
April Group Read Discussion: The Witch Elm

While everyone is getting started reading, I would like to kick off with a general question:
What made you pick up this book?
I read the book prior to the challenge and decided to read it after seeing positive Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ reviews from a couple of friends. I have not read Tana French’s other books but the plot sounded like something I would enjoy.

I also read this book at the very end of last year, after I was done with all 2018 challenges. I picked it because I love Tana French, and have read all her previous books as they have come out.
I read the book because I love Tana French. Normally I would quit a book that starts this slow, but I stuck with it because I trust the author, and it was worth it (although I have seen reviews that indicate it wasn't worth it for all).

I started to read this book today purely because it was April's book of the month. I originally had another book planned for this months prompt but when the poll results came back I decided to go into this book blind. After all, this is what the Popsugar Challenge is about for me; discovering and reading something I wouldn't otherwise consider.

Yes! That is what I like best about the challenge, too - pushing myself to read things outside of what I might come across on my own.


I started to read this book today purely because it was April's book of the month. I originally had another book planned for this months prompt but when the poll re..."
This would be exactly why I’m reading the book also. I will admit though that I’m glad to read the above people who say the story picks up though!




I haven't read her other books either but based on what I have seen in reviews this one has a different feel from her other books.
Personally, I read a lot of novels about families and the first part of the book felt like that to me, so I didn't mind it. But I can understand if you were going in expecting a fast-paced mystery that it would be hard to get through that first section.

I am only two chapters in but I'm glad some others found it slow to start but that it's worth it since I am finding it slow so far. I am definitely intrigued enough to keep going though!


Remember that folks may just be getting started with this book, so please remember to use spoiler tags if you're going to talk about any plot points!

Remember that folks may just be getting started with thi..."
I am only 3 chapters in and I don't particularly like him but I don't dislike him either. He is a bit obnoxious but basically comes across as a normal guy that I could have been friends with in high school or university.
I don't know if it's just me but I'm irrationally irritated that he is not doing anything to help ensure that he heals properly and noone around him seems to notice. I know he has kept primarily to himself but I can't imagine that his girlfriend didn't notice and wouldn't push him to go to the physical therapist or to go back to the neurologist for follow-ups.
Anyway, I don't know if this will be relevant or not but it is really annoying that he keeps acting like he's worried that people will notice or seems worried he won't heal but is doing nothing about it.

Tana French is one of my favorite authors, so I was eager to read her first stand-alone. I've read all of the other novels she's written and always place new books by her at the top of my TBR wish list. I love the psychological aspects woven into all of her novels and how she develops the plot lines.
Even though this was a stand-alone, I thought it would fit into her Dublin Murder Squad series world very well -- the difference being it is told from the non-police perspective.
If you're new to Tana French, I probably wouldn't recommend this as the entry point since the pacing might turn some readers off. I'd suggest starting with the series first (it does not need to be read in order; they're kind of stand-alone novels linked by the fact they feature a different murder squad detective) since you'll likely have more patience with the more deliberate pacing of this one if you're already hooked on her work.
Rachelnyc wrote: "Anyway, I don't know if this will be relevant or not but it is really annoying that he keeps acting like he's worried that people will notice or seems worried he won't heal but is doing nothing about it. ..."
You're right, he wasted a lot of mental energy worrying about that, and even did some stupid things to try to keep up a good front, but he never really did anything smart like physical therapy.
You're right, he wasted a lot of mental energy worrying about that, and even did some stupid things to try to keep up a good front, but he never really did anything smart like physical therapy.
Milena wrote: "[spoilers removed]"
That's funny, because as we got to know him better, I liked him more, even though (view spoiler) . French really did a great job IMO of letting us see his POV and making him a sympathetic character even though (view spoiler) .
That's funny, because as we got to know him better, I liked him more, even though (view spoiler) . French really did a great job IMO of letting us see his POV and making him a sympathetic character even though (view spoiler) .


I have previously read two Tana French books In the Woods and The Likeness. Contrary to popular opinion I preferred the latter which was slower paced and more character focus so I feel like I'm really going to like this book too as it has a similar feel to it. I prefer slow building mysteries because I want to get to know the characters first.
Interestingly this is the second group read where the UK edition has a different name to the US edition (after Evelyn Hardcastle and her extra half death!) . I prefer The Wych Elm because the older word has a more mystical feel to it.

Haha, this is about how I felt at the beginning of the book. I found him very frustrating.

That's interesting! I wondered while reading the book why the tree was referred to in the text as a wych elm but the title was Witch Elm. I like the Wych Elm spelling better as well.
Jess wrote: "Interestingly this is the second group read where the UK edition has a different name to the US edition (after Evelyn Hardcastle and her extra half death!) . I prefer The Wych Elm because the older word has a more mystical feel to it.
..."
Isn't it just a spelling difference, like colour or color?
By the way, it's called a Wych/Witch Elm because it's very bendy, just like Witch Hazel (or Wych Hazel, if you wish). "wych" and "wicker" and "weak" are all from the same root word. The branches soft like willow, and grow crooked. There's no witch involved ;-)
How do you spell witch hazel in England? Is it "wych-hazel"?
..."
Isn't it just a spelling difference, like colour or color?
By the way, it's called a Wych/Witch Elm because it's very bendy, just like Witch Hazel (or Wych Hazel, if you wish). "wych" and "wicker" and "weak" are all from the same root word. The branches soft like willow, and grow crooked. There's no witch involved ;-)
How do you spell witch hazel in England? Is it "wych-hazel"?


Best fit would be "about a family."
Other possibilities: you might think it would make a good movie, and I'm sure it fits a past Challenge category because there's always one.
Other categories that are a stretch: You could choose to ignore "The" and call it a two word title, or you could say it's based on a true story (view spoiler)
Other possibilities: you might think it would make a good movie, and I'm sure it fits a past Challenge category because there's always one.
Other categories that are a stretch: You could choose to ignore "The" and call it a two word title, or you could say it's based on a true story (view spoiler)


This is pure speculation and I'm probably completely off but I'll spoiler this anyway. (view spoiler) I am going to try to finish in the next couple of days because I'm quite curious now to see how it ends.

I thought Toby's relationship with Melissa would be worth dissecting a bit. He talks often about how good she is and how she's the best thing in his life. But he struggles to be honest and open with her (view spoiler) .
The way Toby presents her I felt like he doesn't really see her as a whole person (view spoiler) .

Kali wrote: "I hope folks are enjoying the book so far!
I thought Toby's relationship with Melissa would be worth dissecting a bit. He talks often about how good she is and how she's the best thing in his life..."
I thought Melissa was the weakest part of this book, because I never really understood their relationship, and I never felt like I knew her. But I agree with your assessment. Maybe I never knew who she really was because Toby never knew who she really was.
And yes, things did feel abrupt!! But again, I think that's because Toby was just oblivious - (view spoiler)
I thought Toby's relationship with Melissa would be worth dissecting a bit. He talks often about how good she is and how she's the best thing in his life..."
I thought Melissa was the weakest part of this book, because I never really understood their relationship, and I never felt like I knew her. But I agree with your assessment. Maybe I never knew who she really was because Toby never knew who she really was.
And yes, things did feel abrupt!! But again, I think that's because Toby was just oblivious - (view spoiler)

I thought Toby's relationship with Melissa would be worth dissecting a bit. He talks often about how good she is and how she's the best thing in his life..."
I felt like (view spoiler)

I think it's a mistake to market this as a mystery thriller though since (view spoiler)
I agree with a lot that's already been said about the relationship with Toby and Melissa. (view spoiler)
Rachelnyc wrote: "... I think it's a mistake to market this as a mystery thriller though ..."
I definitely agree!! This was psychological, but not a thriller, and I think that's why some people are disappointed, they are expecting something it's not. The mystery was just something else that happened in Toby's life.
I definitely agree!! This was psychological, but not a thriller, and I think that's why some people are disappointed, they are expecting something it's not. The mystery was just something else that happened in Toby's life.

I definitely agree!! This was psychological, but not a thriller, and I think that's why some people a..."
Exactly. I know that for me, expectation plays a large role in how I feel about a book. Fortunately, I was intrigued enough by the writing and the characterization to want to keep going despite a slow start but if I was looking for a fast paced "mystery thriller", I would definitely have been disappointed.

Definitely! I think that is a big factor in why people have had a range of reactions to the book. My personal preference is more towards the style of this book so it worked pretty well for me.

Who was your favorite character in the book? Who was your least favorite? Did your perception of them change as more of the family secrets were revealed?

Cant say I loved it, but I didnt hate it either. Just not what I expected it to be, and not sure why everyone was so enthralled by it.

Who was your favorite character in the book? Who was your le..."
One of the things I liked about this book is that the characters (aside from Melissa) were all well developed and also flawed so there weren't many that I really liked. I am with Nancy, Hugo was my favorite and Toby my least.
I actually think based on the snippets of information we learned about Hugo's early life that there is a good book in there with him as protagonist.

I like this idea! I definitely wanted to know more about Hugo.
My favorite character was definitely Hugo (second favorite was Leon - I would like to learn more about Leon), and least favorite was definitely Toby. Toby was such a tool. The more I got to know him, the less I liked him (and I started out despising him, so ...) BUT I also was invested in his story and I felt bad for him even though I hated him. I hated him but I did t hate spending time with him.

I agree. I found him so infuriating. His choices didn't make much sense to me. But I still liked the book even though it was being told through his flawed perspective, which I think is a difficult thing to pull off in writing.
I also had a hard time deciding if Toby was a reliable narrator. Can we trust his version of events? Is he trying to make himself look better? Is his memory flawed because of the brain injury?
Toby is definitely an unreliable narrator, but we will never know the extent since we only hear his version. It makes the book quite thought provoking.

I agree that Toby is definitely unreliable as the narrator. It sounds like he has always been pretty oblivious to the people around him and anyone's feelings but his own. With the head trauma layered on even he doesn't know what is true memory.
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.
Books mentioned in this topic
The Likeness (other topics)In the Woods (other topics)
The Likeness (other topics)
The Wych Elm (other topics)
In the Woods (other topics)
More...
Please use spoiler tags if you are sharing any plot related surprises. Just type < spoiler > to start the spoiler and < / spoiler > to end the spoiler (remove the spaces for the html tag to work).
Posts should be exclusively about this book.
When you've finished, be sure to post in the "April Challenge: I Finished!" thread.