Happily Ever After Cafe discussion
General
>
definitions of what is and isn't considered a romance
date
newest »



Pamela(AllHoney) wrote: "All in perspective I guess. Traditionally, I prefer my couple to meet fairly early in the story and grow from there. Because the characters in your book do end up with someone in the end I guess yo..."

Part of it is also having the romance be central to the story. That’s hard to do if the characters don’t end up together.
But don’t change your story to fit the genre. It’s what you wrote. Call it fiction with strong romantic elements.

The story is what it is -- historical fiction with strong romantic elements :-). I don't know whether I'll write a true romance in the future.
Abigail wrote: "Readers of romance like to know who to root for. If the character is with different people (and it’s not a poly story), we can’t bond.
Part of it is also having the romance be central to the story..."


Carol wrote: "For me a novel in the romance genre needs to have a strong central couple who eventually, after various problems, find love in some fashion, although they are not necessarily together. (Am thinking..."

Historical fiction with romantic elements sounds fine to me. A novel is a creative work. It does not have to confine itself within the straitjacket of a genre. Some novels have many different genres within them. Diana Gabaldon (Outlander) says her novel does although I would have said it is primarily a romance.


Carol wrote: "Karen wrote: "Your view is quite close to that of the Romance Writers Association, although per the RWA, they do need to end up together in some way. I have now surrendered to the reality that my W..."

Romance readers get mad when they’re tricked.
You can still market to romance readers with a book that has strong romantic elements. Romance readers don’t read romance exclusively. Call it what is it.

Can you suggest any ways to market such a book to romance readers (other than posting in groups like this, with clear labeling)?
Abigail wrote: "Nope.
Romance readers get mad when they’re tricked.
You can still market to romance readers with a book that has strong romantic elements. Romance readers don’t read romance exclusively. Call it..."


T..."
Is this book out now, it sounds like an interesting read? From your description, if I picked this book up and read it I would not be put off by the fact that the main characters didn't end up together as long as they ended up with someone and the romance aspects were in the book with the people they interacted with.
But, for some readers, I think you would have to make it clear in the beginning that they were friends for them to enjoy.

My tentative release target is early-to-middle October.
Melissa wrote: "Karen wrote: "While searching for beta readers for what I've believed to be a historical romance, I've been told that my WIP may not qualify as a romance at all. I'd greatly appreciate opinions on ..."

Books mentioned in this topic
Shades of Milk and Honey (other topics)Outlander (other topics)
The book is set in 1870s Nebraska. The focus is on matchmaking and pairing up. Two characters spend much of the book trying to find matches for each other. (They do NOT end up together, for reasons I hope will be fairly obvious early on.) Several apparently-promising attempts end up not working out. The eventual pairings are revealed gradually. Both of these characters have their HEA.
Is this a romance, as I thought, or does a "romance" have to focus from the start on a particular hero/heroine pairing, as I've just been told?