Catching up on Classics (and lots more!) discussion

This topic is about
Infinite Jest
New School Classics- 1915-2005
>
Infinite Jest - No Spoilers
date
newest »


lol

Infinite Jest is a 1996 novel by American writer David Foster Wallace. Categorized as an encyclopedic novel, Infinite Jest is featured in Time magazine's list of the 100 best English-language novels published between 1923 and 2005.
The novel has an unconventional narrative structure and includes hundreds of extensive endnotes, some with footnotes of their own.
A literary fiction bestseller after having sold 44,000 hardcover copies in its first year of publication, the novel has since sold more than a million copies worldwide.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The novel has an unconventional narrative structure and includes hundreds of extensive endnotes, some with footnotes of their own.
A literary fiction bestseller after having sold 44,000 hardcover copies in its first year of publication, the novel has since sold more than a million copies worldwide.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I see that it has a reputation of having ridiculous amounts of footnotes. Does that make print the recommended form? I my experience footnotes are a pain in ebooks.
Any experience with audiobooks?

I see that it has a reputation of having ridiculous amounts of footnotes. Does that make print the recommended form? I my experience ..."
I started early and it has taken me awhile just to get to page 120 or so, but I've almost completely ignored the endnotes/footnotes and instead relied on reading up on the specific chapters for analysis. The footnotes are in a way another little joke or jest by the author. I'm not sure what to make of this read so far, but I think I might need 3 months or so to finish, so it's a good thing I have it.

But some of the foonotes are more interesting than the story. Weird, huh?


I've read some of David Foster Wallace's essays, but I haven't read much of his fiction- maybe a short story or two. Infinite Jest had always kind of put me off- not just because of its length (although that was part of it)- but also because I was 17 when it was published, and I associate it with a certain type of obnoxious English major from that era.
I'm really enjoying it so far- and I honestly don't think I could have read it much earlier in my life and appreciated it. Like, I'm glad I read Andre Agassi's memoir before starting this book- and I'm glad I lived in Arizona, worked as an educator, and have a different view of the zeitgeist of the 90s than I did when I was living through it. Having all those points of entry have helped me connect to the text.




I am trying to read it. People who have read it:
What kept you going?
Did you read the footnotes?

I am trying to read it. People who have read it:
What kept you going?
Did you read the footnotes?"
I don't think I read a single footnote. I kept going by focusing on the artistry of his prose and trusting that at some point I would 'get' it, which actually did happen. (I think).

I am trying to read it. People who have read it:
What kept you going?
Did you read the footnotes?"
Well, I haven't finished it yet- but I'm choosing to read some footnotes rather than ALL footnotes- which is what I'd typically do with a non-fiction text. There's a pattern to some of those footnotes too- so I'll check ahead to see if the next five are about specific drug combinations or whatever, and ignore the next four if they are. There are some about character nuances and motivation that I think are interesting and helpful.
I'm getting a bit lost in the Free Quebec counterintelligence plot- but the tennis school is keeping me going. I'm curious to see how those two plotlines will intersect.
His prescience around the impact of social media before social existed is also super interesting.

Some of the bits about ins and outs of the competitive tennis world are funny as well.
There's just a lot to take in, and there are many parts that are off putting that I feel like skimming through because they are just too much.

@everybody, I found this helpful character chart through Reddit (and am super impressed by whomever took the time to put it together- must have been a boring day at work)


That is not always so. I have read a novel with a lot of important things in the notes. It was under 1000 pages. I am not naming the title because it is a bit of a spoiler.

Here, here.


I appreciate all who are reading or have tried to read this book - we had 53 people who voted for it to win the poll. I like to know why you all voted for this book and if it has met your expectations?



Actually I am not one of them, so I guess that is my excuse.


Only on page 49, but today waa only the third time i have picked it up. Novemeber has been a busy month, and I only just got it.
But plugging along. I think my update today was illustrating my confusion about some bits. Clearly we have Hal's story being told. Now i have just read Orin (or was he the other one already mentioned), so at least 2 maybe 3 MCs now. Oh wait, the medical attache! Lol Ok so 3 or maybe 4 or more. I gather the novel is about a group of addicts, so this is the backstories? But yeah, a little bit confusing, but honestly not as intimidating as i thought or it could be. Sure, i have to think and pay attention, but despite it being a literal brick in length and weight, it reads pretty quickly. Maybe.
So, did i miss it or did they say what the attache is (view spoiler) Haha
Oh and wtf was up with (view spoiler) That chapter seemed quite bizarre.
Edit: added spoiler tags, but these things dont really deter or spoil the plot i think. I dont know for sure tho. Also did i post in the wrong thread? Is this No spoilers? If so, sorry. I did tag them tho
This is the No Spoiler Thread
The Spoiler Thread will open on October 1, 2024.
This early posting of the No Spoiler thread is to discuss any non-plot issues pertaining to the book.
Appropriate Posts can contain:
1. Information about the author.
2. Compare editions/translations.
3. Any historical or background information
4. Are you familiar with this author’s work? Do you have any expectations going into the book?
5. What made you decide to read this book?
6. Any fan fiction that you have read or would like to read? Just link the books.
7. If you loved the book and want others to share in that experience, use this thread to motivate others, again save plot specifics for the Spoiler thread
8. If you hated the book, it would be best to keep that for the spoiler page
The most important thing to remember is no plot discussion. Any post that contains plot information or spoilers will be deleted.