ŷ Librarians Group discussion
Questions (not edit requests)
>
Author names
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Gerald
(new)
Jul 08, 2008 09:41PM

reply
|
flag
Sounds like the perfect place for them. :)
(I assume you mean the author description, not an individual book description, right?)
(I assume you mean the author description, not an individual book description, right?)

Alaa al Aswany
Alaa al Aswani
ALAA EL ASWANY
Ala Aswani
Ala El Aswani
The LC authority record is Aswānī, ʻAlāʾ, 1957- (don't know if diacritics will come through). What should be considered the "authoritative" version?

I'd go with the first one; even the cover of the book under the second spelling actually has the name spelled as the first spelling, while the third appears to be the French transliteration.
I agree. I would merge them all to the first version, but note in the author's description that there are the other spellings. (I wouldn't use the diacritics, I think. Unless there already existed an author in GR listed that way.)


Likely so. There's also another issue, IIRC: V.C. Andrews is actually sometimes Virginia, and sometimes her ghostwriter. Also, sometimes have the author listed one way and sometimes the other . . . and sometimes as Virginia Andrews, just to make things exciting.
Personally, I think this is a case that the LoC should have the final word: and that seems to be V.C. Andrews, interestingly enough. (It's actually Andrews, V.C. (Virginia C.), but that's just awkward.)
Personally, I think this is a case that the LoC should have the final word: and that seems to be V.C. Andrews, interestingly enough. (It's actually Andrews, V.C. (Virginia C.), but that's just awkward.)

JG - she probably hasn't gotten back to you because I know she has been having a lot of computer/connection troubles.
Also, the librarian did check in here before working on this author (see this topic)
Combining is only possible if the primary author is the same. Adding in another spelling as secondary doesn't make it any more possible to combine the editions.
The AKA feature would be really helpful . . .
The AKA feature would be really helpful . . .

You can't please all the people all of the time, but you can try really hard? ;)
It does sound like a reasonable compromise.
It does sound like a reasonable compromise.

Yes, I've been in computer "hell." I caution anyone about installing the new service pack (one) to Vista! Even an uninstall and restore will not peal it off. It would NOT allow me to connect to the Internet. Fixed now, I hope.
I did received a message from JG and just sent her a note back. Nice to communicate in lieu of just changing things. Thank you for the heads up JG. Would have been awhile before I found this discussion...
I'm flexible on this. I remember it well. The V.C. Andrews books were a disaster. I posed the question here in the group and that's why I went with trying to put them under both her names.
Her books were on the site in various names including VC and V. C. and Virginia and Virginia C.
I was trying to put them under:
Author #1: Virginia C. Andrews
and
Author #2: V.C. Andrews
and combine, but another librarian was undoing them about as fast as I was doing that so I stopped and decided to wait for the AKA feature to get up and running.
But, I'm flexible on this. Whatever is best for the site works for me.
;-)
(Hi Isis!!)V.C. Andrews
(Kathrynn, if you are running Zone Alarm, that is the usual program whose not-playing-well-with-Vista's-updates causes the no-internet-connection hell.)

But, my notebook has XP and it locked up the Internet, too. The fix was to remove PC Tools from both.

http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/...
translated into
http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/...
He's an american author, but when translated the spelling has been altered.
I haven't changed anything because the spelling is correct if you go by the covers fo the books, but they are all by the same author.



How do we handle ghostwriters versus the name that's actually on the cover when it comes to the by line in the database?
Is there a standard?
Kyle wrote: "Is there a standard?"
Not really. It would depend on how official it is that the book has been ghostwritten.
Not really. It would depend on how official it is that the book has been ghostwritten.

1) If it's a popular-name author series written by someone else entirely, we've been putting the true author in 1st position and the 'big-name' author in the 2nd position, with (Series Creator) in the description field.
An example would be the Net Force series, written by Steve Perry, and with his name on the cover, but with Tom Clancy's name prominently on the cover.
2) If it's ghost-written for a 'house name' owned by a publisher, we've been putting the house name in the first author position and the actual author name (if known) in the second position. In some cases the original [real:] author passes away, and the publisher keeps using only that name on the books (it becomes a house name), or makes it appear as if it is being co-written, if they mention the real author's name.
If it is solely a house name (was never a real person), we can also add text to the author description to mention that it's a 'house name' for the series, written by multiple authors.
An excellent example that was just had a lot of work done on it by a couple of librarians is the author Don Pendleton, who started some series' and passed away in 1995. Publisher is still going strong with those.
An example of a pure house name is Dick Stivers.
There were some discussions on this, sorry, can't find the thread right now, will try to add it here if I find it.

George Lucas's name is on the cover of even the most recent printings, but it's well known that Alan Dean Foster is the actual author, and he authored other books in the series that he does have cover credit for.
Given that backs that up, adding Foster as secondary author (already done on some of the editions) seems reasonable.

I have in mind "Terry Bonner" a house name for the Making of Australia series, for which CQ Yarbro wrote one of the books.

Ooh, I just thought about the Stratemeyer syndicate and all those house names, like the authors of the Nancy Drew books, the Hardy Boys books, the Bobbsey Twins books, and many many more. Shudder.

1) If it's a popular-name author series written by someone else entirely, we've been putting the true author in 1st position and the 'big-name' auth..."
Carolyn, the thread on Don Pendleton was Author Don Pendleton 0ver 700 books help
Add C.S. Lewis as primary author, demote the translated author to secondary, and then edit out the English characters from said secondary. And those are Farsi (Persian), according to Google.

Lindig, I haven't used the term 'house name' in the author role field; by author description, I meant the text field on an author's page. See Dick Stivers for an example of what I meant.
I don't know that we should add 'house name' to the author role field. Might be unnecessary clutter, that's why I just put it on the author's page.

For example:
When Dean Koontz started out, he used his middle initial: Dean R. Koontz. This has made it so there are many books listed twice to be credited to both names.
How should I handle cases like these? Should I change the old name to the most recent one with a note in the profile listing the formerly used name?

= )

Should we use J.M. Synge or John Millington Synge?

If in doubt the library of congress is the guide, how is he named there?

Is there a standard way to deal with an author name's initials?
Today I merged two authors: "J.M. Dillard" http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/... with "J. M. Dillard".
Note the space betweem 'J.' and 'M.'.
Is there a correct way to write the author name in these cases? I would have chose the one with the space but the other one had more books in his profile.
Thank you for any help
Books mentioned in this topic
Net Force (other topics)Authors mentioned in this topic
Dick Stivers (other topics)Alan Dean Foster (other topics)
George Lucas (other topics)
Dick Stivers (other topics)
Don Pendleton (other topics)
More...