Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

SciFi and Fantasy Book Club discussion

note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
185 views
Old, Closed Posts > October Books

Comments Showing 1-50 of 64 (64 new)    post a comment »
« previous 1

message 1: by Brad (new)

Brad (judekyle) | 1607 comments Good evening all. As you can see on the main page, our October books are set and ready to go. That is because October is our goodreads Author month. And this October we have participation from both Max Barry, author of the net sensation Machine Man, and Jon Sprunk who will be around to talk about his book, Shadow's Son.

For your voting pleasure, we will be have a third book up for discussion, which will be decided by a random poll. The October poll will be special, though. It will be a head to head battle between 5 Sci-Fi books and 5 Fantasy books. I'll let you all know when the poll is open.


message 2: by [deleted user] (new)

And today, I say to you all, that a vote for Fantasy is a vote for terrorism.

Vote SciFi... it's the right way. It's the smart way. It's the only way.


message 3: by Brad (new)

Brad (judekyle) | 1607 comments You are either with Ala or you are against Ala.


whimsicalmeerkat Trying to decide which of those options is safest...


message 5: by [deleted user] (new)

Together, we shall bring about a brighter tomorrow.

Thank you, and good night.


message 6: by Kim (new)

Kim | 1499 comments Whichever way it goes I hope it's a lighter book as both this months are fairly hefty.


colleen the convivial curmudgeon (blackrose13) | 2694 comments Fantasy all the way, baby! ;)


message 8: by Helen (new)

Helen Snap!


message 9: by Paul (new)

Paul  Perry (pezski) | 292 comments it looks like the gloves are off...


message 10: by Candiss (new)

Candiss (tantara) I'm an avowed moderate independent, so I will wait to see what Science Fiction and Fantasy bring to the table. They will have to impress me with their candidates to get my vote, and no amount of promises or posturing will convince me to choose along party lines before those candidates are available for thorough scrutiny.

;)


message 11: by whimsicalmeerkat (new)

whimsicalmeerkat I notice you said nothing about the influential possibilities of baked goods or cute baby animal pictures


message 12: by Maggie (new)

Maggie K | 693 comments My loyalty is divided and therefore for sale!

:D

...that is, as long as you dont nominate junk!


message 13: by Candiss (new)

Candiss (tantara) Denae wrote: "I notice you said nothing about the influential possibilities of baked goods or cute baby animal pictures"

Well, now you see...that's another basket of buns (and/or bunnies) altogether. But while the idea is tempting, down with corruption and bribery, etc., etc. We shall be swayed by neither yeasty goodness nor photographic squee!


colleen the convivial curmudgeon (blackrose13) | 2694 comments Were the October books voted on and I missed it, or were they just chosen? I didn't see anything in the polls section.


message 15: by Brad (new)

Brad (judekyle) | 1607 comments No voting for the October books this time around. It's awfully hard to chase down authors and beg them to come and discuss their books after we vote them in, and the one time we tried to ask authors in advance if they would be willing to talk if they won, both CJ Cherryh and Elizabeth Bear agreed to do it and then lost out to someone else. This makes things much easier and more diplomatic all around.

But we'll still get our polling fun with our 5 on 5 poll.


colleen the convivial curmudgeon (blackrose13) | 2694 comments I see...

Well, The Sprunk book looks like it could be interesting, so I'll see if I can fit it into my already overloaded October schedule.


message 17: by Candiss (last edited Sep 01, 2011 06:41PM) (new)

Candiss (tantara) I'm trying to find a way to wedge in the Max Barry title, as I realized I'd read other works by him and enjoyed them. (The book trailer on the book's Amazon page would have won me over anyhow. It's quite amusing.)

Edit: fixed spelling of author's surname


message 18: by [deleted user] (new)

Colleen of the Crawling Chaos wrote: "I see..."

Embrace the new totalitarian regime.


colleen the convivial curmudgeon (blackrose13) | 2694 comments Ala wrote: "Colleen of the Crawling Chaos wrote: "I see..."

Embrace the new totalitarian regime."


How about I just glare from my corner?


message 20: by [deleted user] (new)

Glaring is against the laws of the New Order. Unless done off into the distance and for propaganda purposes.


message 22: by [deleted user] (new)

*uses Colleen for propaganda purposes*


message 23: by whimsicalmeerkat (new)

whimsicalmeerkat That seems like the sort of plan that will backfire, Ala.


message 24: by [deleted user] (new)

I never said whose propaganda :P


colleen the convivial curmudgeon (blackrose13) | 2694 comments *raises an eyebrow*

I'm not sure I like anything that starts with the idea of being used...


message 26: by whimsicalmeerkat (new)

whimsicalmeerkat I can think of a few circumstances where I do.


colleen the convivial curmudgeon (blackrose13) | 2694 comments Denae wrote: "I can think of a few circumstances where I do."

Kinky.


message 28: by Brad (new)

Brad (judekyle) | 1607 comments Ummm, Denae, my phone number is ...


message 29: by whimsicalmeerkat (new)

whimsicalmeerkat Better to be propositioned by the Lenin than the Stalin, I suppose ;)


message 30: by Banner (new)

Banner | 171 comments Candiss wrote: "I'm trying to find a way to wedge in the Max Barry title, as I realized I'd read other works by him and enjoyed them. (The book trailer on the book's Amazon page would have won me over anyhow. It..."

Just saw the Amazon video... your right.


message 31: by Brad (new)

Brad (judekyle) | 1607 comments Denae wrote: "Better to be propositioned by the Lenin than the Stalin, I suppose ;)"

Hahaha. My goatee and moustache is much more ticklish than Uncle Joe's prickly stache.


message 32: by whimsicalmeerkat (new)

whimsicalmeerkat I'm sadly lacking a revolutionary name


message 33: by Helen (new)

Helen I know, I was just thinking 'Should we all get a name!'


message 34: by Richard (new)

Richard (thinkingbluecountingtwo) | 449 comments I will have to bagsy 'the Yeltsin'.


Snail in Danger (Sid) Nicolaides (upsight) | 540 comments Dibs on Rasputin ... assuming that counts, and I'm not at all sure it does ... :)


message 36: by whimsicalmeerkat (new)

whimsicalmeerkat I wouldn't consider him a revolutionary, exactly...


message 37: by Brad (new)

Brad (judekyle) | 1607 comments Bizarre ... I had that very discussion about Rasputin earlier today.


message 38: by Cindy (new)

Cindy | -4 comments Sprunk's book is great, and at 250ish pages it's not a doorstop material book that requires a lot of time to read :)


message 39: by Michelle (new)

Michelle (fireweaver) | 341 comments Denae wrote: "I wouldn't consider him a revolutionary, exactly..."

hmmm, maybe we need to scuttle the plan for revolutionary names, and just go with kookoo russian ones? i call dibs on "the chekov"


message 40: by Chris (new)

Chris  Haught (haughtc) | 889 comments Pavel?


Snail in Danger (Sid) Nicolaides (upsight) | 540 comments Only vaguely topically ... my SO has some Russian co-workers, and recently brought home some . (Link is in Russian, but you can see the logo. There's an old English article .)


message 42: by Brad (new)

Brad (judekyle) | 1607 comments Here you go, Comrades. It is time for Sci-Fi vs. Fantasy. Do your worst.


message 43: by [deleted user] (new)

Remember, my friends.

SciFi is the truth. The one and only hope for eternal happiness.

Fantasy will lead you astray, down a road to unimaginable torment.

Be a good citizen, and a good person and vote SciFi.


colleen the convivial curmudgeon (blackrose13) | 2694 comments That sucks. Not a single book on there I want to read. And here I was all ready to go head to head with the green alien man.


message 45: by Brad (new)

Brad (judekyle) | 1607 comments What?! There's nothing there you want to read? I was proud of that list. A mix of new and old, some second placers from past votes. Five boys and five girls. For the love of pajama jeans!


message 46: by Richard (new)

Richard (thinkingbluecountingtwo) | 449 comments Loved the list Brad. Only criticism too much blasted Fantasy on it, could have at least four more SciFi. Didn't you used to be SciFi Czar, come on Brad sort those priorities out, show where your true allegiance lies.

Remember "Always follow the Green Cross Man's Code"

(reference to 1970's British road safety campaign, just incase you're thinking what is he wittering on about)


Snail in Danger (Sid) Nicolaides (upsight) | 540 comments But Colleen, you should want to read The Curse of Chalion! >.>


message 48: by colleen the convivial curmudgeon (last edited Sep 13, 2011 06:19AM) (new)

colleen the convivial curmudgeon (blackrose13) | 2694 comments Brad wrote: "What?! There's nothing there you want to read? I was proud of that list. A mix of new and old, some second placers from past votes. Five boys and five girls. For the love of pajama jeans!"

It's not you, it's me...

Just ask Ala... I'm a blaspheming heathen when it comes to these things. (And many other things... )

I suppose if I absolutely had to pick one that I haven't read before it would be Firebird by Lackey.


Snail in Danger (Sid) wrote: "But Colleen, you should want to read The Curse of Chalion! >.>"

*reads the blurb*

Um, I'll pass, thanks.

(I am unfamiliar with that emote. 'Splain?)


message 49: by [deleted user] (new)

It's a shifty look


message 50: by Snail in Danger (Sid) (last edited Sep 13, 2011 07:16AM) (new)

Snail in Danger (Sid) Nicolaides (upsight) | 540 comments >.> denotes shiftiness or sneakiness. In this case, I used it because I was lobbying. (And not entirely serious when I said that you should want to read it.)

IMO that's a terrible blurb - the book is less formulaic and more thoughtful than it sounds based on that.


« previous 1
back to top
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.