David's Updates en-US Sun, 01 Jun 2025 01:07:51 -0700 60 David's Updates 144 41 /images/layout/goodreads_logo_144.jpg Review7617202471 Sun, 01 Jun 2025 01:07:51 -0700 <![CDATA[David added 'Stamboul Train']]> /review/show/7617202471 Stamboul Train by Graham Greene David gave 3 stars to Stamboul Train (Paperback) by Graham Greene
This is early Greene and he's still learning his trade. I think it's worth reading for those who admire his later works or who are interested in books that show something of what Europe was like shortly before Hitler came to power.

The ingredients are there, Greene's characteristic concerns and characters and how he presents them, but it's still a bit crude and underdeveloped. It's not a "gripping spy thriller" by any means, no matter what the Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ header review says, the plot's too pointless and there's too little action; it's more a study of a group of mostly unlikeable characters on a distinctly unglamorous Orient Express. Some of the characters are interesting - notably a lesbian, a chorus girl, a revolutionary, and a businessman who for much of the novel is referred to only as 'the Jew' - but they aren't all that well developed and one or two are almost caricatures.

A couple of Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ reviewers call the novel antisemitic, but it's clear that in spending much of the novel referring to a character as 'the Jew' rather than by his name, Greene is making a point. He is portraying a certain kind of European Jew of that period, not without sympathy, and showing the social as well as personal factors that contribute to him being the way he is. I don't know if Greene was antisemitic in real life, but here he is just trying to do what novelists are supposed to do: tell the truth.

Not the best introduction to Graham Greene but an okay read. ]]>
Review7561909949 Sun, 11 May 2025 20:16:36 -0700 <![CDATA[David added 'The Seven Mysteries Of Life: An Exploration of Science and Philosophy']]> /review/show/7561909949 The Seven Mysteries Of Life by Guy Murchie David gave 5 stars to The Seven Mysteries Of Life: An Exploration of Science and Philosophy (Paperback) by Guy Murchie
This is a book of beauty. The beauty lies both in its content and in Murchie's presentation: the poetry of his writing and his charming sketches. It is a lovely book to read should you wish to reinvigorate your awe of the world. If nothing else, it's full of astonishing facts.

He presents science in an accessible way that's clear as well as poetic. Although published in 1978 his science remains valid for the most part, because the hype about how it gave us the internet, GE, and AI etc rather obscures the fact that in the last fifty years science has progressed little in its elucidation of the mysteries of life. Probably the main thing to be aware of is that Murchie was writing in a time when science was more open to investigating anything interesting and so he refers to paranormal phenomena, citing examples that have since been debunked, although the subject itself remains valid albeit largely shunned by modern science.

Some Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ reviewers prone to rigid thinking take issue with the fact that the overall scientific tone is directed by a philosophy that takes control towards the end of the book. But mystery can only be probed by philosophy, with science following in search of solid facts on which to ground the speculation. Murchie was a follower of the Bahai faith but doesn't refer to it until the last maybe fifty pages, and his philosophy seeks to come to grips with existential speculations that preoccupy all thinking people.

Murchie wrote the book to communicate his sense of wonder, and regardless of whether or not you believe in God, he does achieve this. As well as beauty, this is a book of wonders.
]]>
Review7497020875 Thu, 17 Apr 2025 16:08:04 -0700 <![CDATA[David added 'Exodus']]> /review/show/7497020875 Exodus by Leon Uris David gave 5 stars to Exodus (Mass Market Paperback) by Leon Uris
Two-thirds of a century after it was published 'Exodus' remains a fine introduction to one of the most dramatic stories in human history, that of the Jews in the first half of the twentieth century - as well as an introduction to the perennial tragedy of the Palestinians. Is the book biased? Yes. It is the story as Jews remember it. However, it is not as biased as apologists for the Palestinians like to think.

In any case, 'Exodus' does something probably only a novel could do: it gives you two key insights without which it is impossible to understand Israel and its conflicts.

First, the unique connection that the Jews have with the land. The first Jewish settlers in the 1880s weren't just occupying some random piece of turf; they were going home. It can sometimes seem that just about every hill, wadi, cave, or pile of rocks in Palestine is recorded in Jewish history as the place where thousands of years ago a miracle occurred, a prophet was buried, or a battle was fought. The Jews love that land like no one else. If you don't know this you don't know anything about the Middle East. While the Palestinians upped stakes and fled as soon as they came under pressure, the Jews fought to the death defending scrubby bits of sun-baked desert that you wouldn't notice if you drove past unless to thank God that you don't have to live there.

Second, take a teenager, an eighteen-year-old say. This kid has spent half their life amidst conflict. They have quite literally forgotten what peace is like. They spent seven years living behind barbed war, fortified walls and electrified fences under machine guns manned by soldiers who hated them. They lived in crowded barracks or with thirty people in a two-bedroomed apartment. They watched their whole family and all their friends die from starvation, disease or violence, or be herded onto trains bound for the gas chambers. They stayed alive by a ruthless self-sufficiency, by trusting no one, by stealing, fighting, hunting, and always living in terror. You can't expect such a kid to be normal. Give them land of their own and then threaten them with fanatics hell-bent on another genocide and you can't expect them to be nice and generous and civilised in their reactions. I visited Israel in 1980, by which time the teenagers of 1948 had softened into middle age, but they were still pretty damned scary some of them, still clutching a simmering anger and a ferocious resolve. Not people you'd want to mess with. They are almost all gone now, but knowing that their children and grandchildren are Israel's political and military leaders is enough to show you just how fatuous those people are who wish that Israel and Hamas would just learn to get along.

'Exodus' isn't perfect. Leon Uris became rich and famous writing novels, but today he wouldn't even get published. 'Exodus' often reads more like journalism than a novel. He breaks most of the rules of writing that wannabe authors learn in writing classes. But he knows how to tell a story, and he based his stories on dramatic real-life events. You don't have to read too much of 'Exodus' before you understand why he became rich and famous.

I read half a dozen of his books when I was in my teens, and I thought they were all great reads and educational. Returning to 'Exodus' after half a century, I was sceptical and a bit resistant, only reading out of curiosity. But in the end Uris won me over. Yes, it is a great read and a great introduction to Israel. But it isn't gospel. Follow it up with a couple of history books that Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ readers rate as unbiased. ]]>
Review7465809075 Sat, 05 Apr 2025 19:44:22 -0700 <![CDATA[David added 'The Damned Don't Drown: The Sinking of the Wilhelm Gustloff']]> /review/show/7465809075 The Damned Don't Drown by Arthur V. Sellwood David gave 3 stars to The Damned Don't Drown: The Sinking of the Wilhelm Gustloff (Bluejacket Books) by Arthur V. Sellwood
As an account of what remains by a long way the worst single-ship disaster in history (3,000 more deaths than the second worst single-ship sinking), this may be more of a novel than a history.

Thoughts, words and actions are ascribed to characters who go unnamed and often seem generic. Of the four young women whose experiences we follow, two aren't mentioned in Heinz Schön's authoritative list of survivors. The title is a quote from an unnamed SS officer we briefly meet at the start and then again at the end which reads like fiction. Certainly, the author was a journalist rather than historian, and certainly he may have had cause to be discrete when identifying witnesses (in 1973 when the book was published Germany was a divided nation) but with the absence of notes and references for us to follow up this might as well be fiction.

Unlike Günter Grass's 'Crabwalk', which also covers the disaster, this book, whether fact or fiction, definitely isn't literature. The style is wordy and florid, the epitome of cheap paperbacks from the mid-twentieth century.

Still, if you're not fussy it is a good read and the account of the sinking is vivid and dramatic. At 150 pages of skimmable text it makes for a serviceable introduction to this epic tragedy. At any rate, its descriptions of the actual sinking utterly overshadow the 'Titanic' disaster. This is on another level altogether.
]]>
Review7432961684 Mon, 24 Mar 2025 23:53:49 -0700 <![CDATA[David added 'The Hill: The Fight for Hill 107 That Decided the Battle of Crete']]> /review/show/7432961684 The Hill by Robert Kershaw David gave 4 stars to The Hill: The Fight for Hill 107 That Decided the Battle of Crete (Hardcover) by Robert Kershaw
This is a good read if you like stories of soldiers in combat. The Battle of Crete is so important in German military history and New Zealand national history that archivists in both nations have been proactive in collecting soldiers' letters and journal entries while generations of historians have interviewed survivors and many more survivors recorded their experiences. This gives the author a wealth of eyewitness testimony to bring alive his account of the battle for this hill.

The story only adds to the high reputation earned by German and New Zealand soldiers in the World Wars. The courage and determination of the German paratroopers recorded here is nothing short of incredible, but they were fortunate to have battlefield commanders who in the face of catastrophe employed boldness and enterprise to achieve an unlikely victory. The New Zealand soldiers were less fortunate. Knowing they had won, the New Zealanders were full of confidence and eager to attack, but their commanding officer, having convinced himself they had lost, decided to retreat. Meanwhile, the officer commanding this officer stayed in his dugout.

It is to the author's credit that he acknowledges that both these officers proved capable in other battles and therefore seeks to describe what the battle was actually like to show why they failed. There are good descriptions of the terrain of Crete and its special challenges, as well as descriptions of the psychological impact of German air supremacy. It all makes for a dramatic read.

A dramatis personae might have been useful since there are so many eyewitnesses that the reader can lose track of who's who and the nature of their relationships. But there is a welcome appendix describing the later lives of the main characters.

The book's main fault is a lack of good editing. The author would have done better had he relied less on his spellcheck and more on a dictionary. He has a tendency to employ a word that looks like the word he wants but has a different meaning, leading to some real malapropisms: a commander allowing his men 'lassitude' instead of 'latitude' comes to mind; also soldiers in a 'precocious' rather than 'precarious' situation, but there are plenty of others. The author also tends to confuse the sequence of events, particularly when detailing the lead-up to the battle, which often necessitates rereading a paragraph to work out when an event occurred and to whom. The author also seems uncertain when to use 'might' instead of 'may'.

But while he may be unclear on some of the niceties of English usage, the author basically tells a good story and, most importantly, he knows his subject. Crete was a unique, dramatic and gruesome battle, and 'The Hill' does it a fair amount of justice. ]]>
Rating838453909 Thu, 20 Mar 2025 20:55:06 -0700 <![CDATA[David Palmer liked a review]]> /
Baudolino by Umberto Eco
"Baudolino is an Italian peasant from the early 13th century who has a gift for languages and a penchant for lying. He uses his silver tongue to gain influence among the nobility of the time.

Most of the novel follows a traditional quest format, with Baudolino leading a ragtag fellowship in a journey to the East and the mythical land of Prester John.

While the novel begins with a more historically accurate setting and plot, as the quest progresses the story become increasing fantastical. At the end of the journey, it crosses into pure fantasy.

Baudolino is a swindler and makes money by selling fake relics. He is proud to be an accomplished liar, which is somehow supposed to make him endearing to us as readers.

The point that Umberto Eco is trying to make is that history is subjective and written by people who aren't necessarily truthful. Baudolino is meant to be an extreme example for Eco to demonstrate his point. Can we really trust the historical record when it's conveyed by people like Baudolino?

I read this book twice and enjoyed it significantly less the second time.

Why? The subject is just too irritating nowadays. Baudolino is a professional liar, and we're supposed to find that humorous and/or charming. However, given the age of disinformation we are now living in, during my second read I just found it disturbing. No, thank you.

I would recommend starting with Umberto Eco's other books first. His best novel is "The Name of the Rose.""
]]>
Rating838452944 Thu, 20 Mar 2025 20:50:41 -0700 <![CDATA[David Palmer liked a review]]> /
The Damned Don't Drown by Arthur V. Sellwood
"At lunchtime on January 30 1945 a large German cruise liner, the Wilhelm Gustloff, left the port of Gotenhafen (now Gdynia in Poland) bound for Kiel in western Germany. She was laden with thousands of German refugees fleeing from the Red Army’s advance into East Prussia. It was beginning to snow and very cold. Just after 9pm, about 12 miles off the coast of Pomerania, the Gustloff was torpedoed by a Soviet submarine. She sank in less than an hour. It was the worst disaster in maritime history. This flawed but vivid book brings it to life.

Even today, this story is little-known outside Germany. In 1973, when this book was published, very few people in the English-speaking world would have known of it. The author of this book says in the introduction that he first heard of it by accident as early as 1948, when he was a journalist on assignment in Berlin, covering the Berlin Airlift. In later years, as he researched several books about the war at sea, he heard more, and began to get an inkling of what an enormous disaster it had been. According to the blurb for The Damned Don’t Drown, published in 1973, about 6,500 people were aboard. To put this in perspective, the number of dead on the Titanic was about 1,500; the worst peacetime maritime disaster, the loss of the ferry Doña Paz in the Philippines in 1987, killed about 4,400 people. In fact Sellwood’s figure was far too low; later research by a Gustloff survivor, Heinz Schön, eventually put the death toll at 9,343, mostly civilians, and many of them children.

Sellwood seems to have been very much a journalist, not an historian. He wrote a number of popular non-fiction books, sometimes co-written with his wife, Mary, or others. Most were on the war at sea but they included one on Victorian railway murderers, and a 1964 “startling exposé� called Devil Worship in Britain. This journalistic approach is very evident in The Damned Don’t Drown. It sometimes grates. Sometimes he adopts the viewpoint of an eyewitness, which of course he was not, or writes as if he knew someone’s thoughts: “In one of the few intervals he could spare... [Captain] Petersen found time to wonder briefly how the passengers were finding it. ...he felt a twinge of sympathy for their plight.� Petersen did survive, but died a year or so later and won’t have spoken to the author. There’s a fair amount of this sort of thing. There is also very little explanation of how the ship came to be caught by the submarine; Sellwood simply says that it was “waiting in their path� and saw them by accident. In fact Petersen was so worried about collision with other German vessels that he was not taking evasive action, and had the navigation lights on.

But it doesn’t really matter, because that’s not what you read this book for. The strength of The Damned Don’t Drown is its vivid survivors� accounts. Here, Sellwood’s book really excels. And if I had a choice of being on the Titanic or the Gustloff, I know damn well which I’d choose.

As the ship started to sink, literally thousands of people were trapped below deck, and the stories of those who did get out are gripping. So are the accounts of the fights to get into the lifeboats, the struggles to launch them from frozen davits, the attempts by the crew to keep order at gunpoint, and the bitter cold as the temperature dropped to (Sellwood says) -20 deg C.

There is cowardice; a Party official shoots his wife as part of a suicide pact, then lacks the courage to kill himself (a passing soldier, disgusted, does the job for him). There is brutish behaviour; people on an already overloaded raft “used feet and fists to batter swimmers struggling to join them ...until finally the float itself was overturned. Dozens drowned in the ensuing panic.�

But there is also great courage and selflessness. A teenager who Sellwood names as Ilse Bauer (it won’t have been her real name) is being evacuated after being raped by Soviet troops in East Prussia. She is slipping down the icy, sloping deck into the sea when a sailor rescues her and wedges her behind a deck fitting, where an older woman hugs her to keep her warm; later, the woman gives Bauer her fur coat, then jumps into the sea, presumably to her own death. The coat protects Ilse and she survives, just. A newly-married naval auxiliary, Ruth Fleischer, is literally flung onto a lifeboat by a burly seaman who thrusts aside others who are fighting for a place. Fleischer too survives, although her new husband � the communications officer on a nearby cruiser � is convinced for some days that she is dead.

The Damned Don’t Drown isn’t a history book and doesn’t pretend to be. There’s no index, and nothing is referenced; presumably it’s all from survivor interviews and some of it will have been secondhand. It’s also quite brief (the US edition is 160 pages). Anyone who wants a well-researched book in English should read Dobson, Miller and Payne’s The Cruellest Night (Cruelest in the US), published not long after, in 1979; this is an outstanding book that combines journalism and historiography, both to a high standard. It also covers the sinking, a few days later, of the General Steuben by the same Soviet submarine, which caused similar loss of life. There is also a much more recent book on the Gustloff, Cathryn J. Prince’s Death in the Baltic (2013); this is not as complete or well-researched an account, but does give a moving portrait of some of the passengers.

Still, journalism is the first draft of history. In any case, The Damned Don’t Drown, whatever its flaws, is a quite extraordinarily vivid book that does give just a taste of what that appalling night must have been like � in particular, the 45 minutes or so between the torpedo hits and the sinking. After all, the naval archives are still with us; the survivors, increasingly, are not.

This and other books about the disaster are reviewed on my blog at "
]]>
Review7401671627 Thu, 13 Mar 2025 21:07:36 -0700 <![CDATA[David added 'The Fighter Pilots A Comparative Study of the Royal Air Force, the Luftwaffe and the United States Air Force in Europe and North Africa 1939 - 45']]> /review/show/7401671627 The Fighter Pilots A Comparative Study of the Royal Air Force... by Edward H. Sims David gave 5 stars to The Fighter Pilots A Comparative Study of the Royal Air Force, the Luftwaffe and the United States Air Force in Europe and North Africa 1939 - 45 (Hardcover) by Edward H. Sims
There are three levels to this book. First, it's an introduction to the role of fighter aircraft in air combat over Europe, North Africa and Russia in World War II. The author likes numbers and you get some useful data here; not tables, just well-chosen statistics embedded in the text. Although the book came out in 1967 the great majority of the data remains valid. A lot of amateur and professional research since then has given greater precision to some of the numbers but without necessarily changing their import. In general terms the author's facts and conclusions still hold up.

The second level is his introduction to how fighters were organised and employed in the RAF, the USAAF (particularly the Eighth Air Force operating over northern Europe) and the Luftwaffe. The author knows his subject (he flew 33 operational fighter sorties with the Eighth Air Force) and this is all good solid material. He puts a lot of emphasis on the aces and experten, acknowledging that they overclaimed but making the reasonable point that they did most of the damage to the enemy. However the author wasn't aware in 1967 of just how much overclaiming went on.

The third level comprises accounts of eight memorable dogfights fought by eight famous air aces: four British, three German and one American. The author sketches their personalities from the perspective of trying to understand what made them different from most pilots, and actually interviewed seven of them regarding their careers and these particular fights (the other pilot didn't survive the war, but the author interviewed two of his comrades who flew with him that day and used an account by one of his victims). The accounts are more analytical than dramatic but collectively provide a good idea of what air combat was like in World War II.

The author actually puts the reader in the pilot's seat for these dogfights, describing how each pilot prepared for his mission, the take-off and the flight to and from the battle area, plus detailing the pilot's actions and, for the sake of verisimilitude, describing random small details such as the colours of various knobs in the cockpit. The author isn't really a dramatic narrative writer so none of this will raise the reader's heartrate to dangerous levels, but it is interesting.

Incidentally the aces are Tuck, Bader, Lacy and Johnnie Johnson for the RAF, Marseille, Hartmann and Galland for the Luftwaffe, and Robert Johnson for the USAAF.

The book is clearly written, although sometimes a bit repetitive, and is a very good read for anyone with an interest in the subject. ]]>
ReadStatus9092130903 Wed, 19 Feb 2025 15:49:25 -0800 <![CDATA[David wants to read 'The Master and His Emissary: The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World']]> /review/show/7337300284 The Master and His Emissary by Iain McGilchrist David wants to read The Master and His Emissary: The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World by Iain McGilchrist
]]>
Review7017338405 Thu, 30 Jan 2025 23:02:45 -0800 <![CDATA[David added 'The House of Dust']]> /review/show/7017338405 The House of Dust by Conrad Aiken David gave 5 stars to The House of Dust (Paperback) by Conrad Aiken
bookshelves: to-read
Beautiful and haunting. If you like Aiken's 'Senlin: a Biography' you ought to read this. It contains the same species of dreamlike images as 'Senlin', evocative of a Maxfield Parrish painting, perhaps too indefinite for some readers, but stimulating to the imagination, and the words just sing.

He does get down to earth, though, with modernist cityscapes and characters, some unpleasant to the point of nightmarish. There's a hint here and there of his pal T.S. Eliot's early poems, particularly 'Prufrock', but it's clear that Tom when writing 'The Waste Land, which came out two years after this, balanced the books by doing his own borrowing from this work. Perhaps it's truer to say they had similar preoccupations and their poetry resulted from discussions between them over shared modernist influences.

Aiken, of course, indulges in vaporous, pastel poesy that you don't find in Eliot, but under it his psychological insights can be hard-edged and dark. This is great poetry and straightforward to read, at least at a surface level.
]]>