Charlotte Mecklenburg Library discussion

This topic is about
Frankenstein
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
Community Read
>
The Advancement of Technology
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Charlotte Mecklenburg
(new)
-
added it
Oct 13, 2016 11:44AM

reply
|
flag

Just because we can do something doesn't mean we should. And it's important to think through the consequences. She was writing in a time when science, medicine and other fields were in their adolescence � that impulsive period when you don't fully grasp the consequences of your actions.
I recently saw a 60 minutes show on artificial intelligence, and it felt like a parallel to this story. These people are in a race to create artificial intelligence that surpasses human intelligence, but it's unclear to me whether they have thought through all of the ethics and potential consequences. It's a little scary.
I grew up around scientists, and I'm constantly urging my kids to learn and understand science. I think there's so much potential good that we can do if we are guided by the right principles!

Victor's greatest "sin" wasn't in creating life (though, as he tells it, that's the basis of his remorse), it was in failing to take responsibility for it. He runs from it, literally abandoning it in the middle of the night and afterwards refers to it as "fiend", "daemon" and "monster". A moral lesson less about the use and/or misuse of science than a more ageless one about regretful paternity, perhaps? Creating life is pretty easy. Dealing with one's creation is a different story.
While "Frankenstein" is considered by many to be the first science fiction novel, there's really very little science in it. The actual process is never described. The creation of "the monster" just sort of happens. Also, there was electricity involved.
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.