The Catholic Book Club discussion
General
>
What are you reading now?
message 51:
by
Mary
(new)
Apr 11, 2018 08:34AM

reply
|
flag

I love Chesty :-) (G.K. Chesterton).





Newbie here. I have just recently joined this group, and downloaded the book for April. I doubt I will finish it before month's end, but it sounded interesting.
Just wanted to say hello. I hope to make some new friends here.
Blessings,
Tom
Tom wrote: "Hi, Friends.
Newbie here. I have just recently joined this group, and downloaded the book for April. I doubt I will finish it before month's end, but it sounded interesting.
Just wanted to say ..."
Welcome to the Group, Tom.
Newbie here. I have just recently joined this group, and downloaded the book for April. I doubt I will finish it before month's end, but it sounded interesting.
Just wanted to say ..."
Welcome to the Group, Tom.

Newbie here. I have just recently joined this group, and downloaded the book for April. I doubt I will finish it before month's end, but it sounded interesting.
Just wanted to say ..."
Tom it's wonderful to have you here! Hope you enjoy the group. I'm relatively new myself but love it so much. So many wonderful people and discussions.

At this moment i am readt the Agony and ecstasy by Irving Stone.

You know I think I still have my parents copy of that. Great idea for reading!



God bless...


I have to agree. I'm almost finished and she gives me hope. I have a special needs adult daughter at home and what is in the book seems to be helpful to her (she's reading it also), as it is for me.
God bless...


To Love An Invisible God



I have been reading a lot of Civil War books lately, so when I found this one: Civil War (1862-1865) of Journal of Bishop William Henry Elder, Bishop of Natchez I decided to read it, between what I am supposed to be reading. ;-)








"Never define, never expound, never discuss; only assert and assume. Where there is dogma, there is always a possible basis for agreement; where there is explanation, there is always the peril of mutual understanding; where there is argument, there may be victory and the dreadful prospect of peace. Again, it is often unwise, and always unnecessary, to invite examination into the merits of your case; far better to rely on a devout invocation of the sacred authorities "Science tells us...", "Progress demands...", "Modern thought goes to show...". Phrases such as these, uttered with a condescending smile, are far less answerable and provoke infinitely greater irritation.
Be especially careful, when baiting Neo-Scholastic and other superstitious theologians, never to have studied their doctrines -it will only cramp your style and offer them a handle for controversy. You need only pick up at thirdhand enough of their technical jargon to use it inaccurately and so make rational debate impossible. Follow the example of the Blessed St. Hydra, and when your adversary has hewn away (as he thinks) one misconception, let two sprout in its place; that will tire out his patience. Strive earnestly to confuse every issue; there are no injuries so estranging as those that are dealt in the dark by men who do not know what the quarrel is about.
One final warning: do not fall into the error of intellectual intolerance. Reserve your resentment for people, not for ideas."
Mariangel wrote: "Dorothy Sayers, "The whimsical Christian":
"Never define, never expound, never discuss; only assert and assume. Where there is dogma, there is always a possible basis for agreement; where there is..."
Yes, defenders of atheism do precisely this. You just have to read the book "The God Delusion" by Richard Dawkins and will see this advise in action. He actually says that he has never read a theologian text. As it is (for him) a subject without an object, why lose his time reading them?
The post in my blog published today deals with these matters:
Atheism, theism and science
"Never define, never expound, never discuss; only assert and assume. Where there is dogma, there is always a possible basis for agreement; where there is..."
Yes, defenders of atheism do precisely this. You just have to read the book "The God Delusion" by Richard Dawkins and will see this advise in action. He actually says that he has never read a theologian text. As it is (for him) a subject without an object, why lose his time reading them?
The post in my blog published today deals with these matters:
Atheism, theism and science

Pity it's for a book club and not for a class, im ready to go off on this book like I'm riding into the O.K. Corral

Marcia wrote: "Just finished a compelling novel by the Nobel prize winner Isaac Bashevis Singer -- The Slave. It is set in Poland after the devastation of the Cossack raids, a beautifully written love story of a ..."
I love Singer's writing.
I love Singer's writing.
Marcia wrote: "Just finished a compelling novel by the Nobel prize winner Isaac Bashevis Singer -- The Slave. It is set in Poland after the devastation of the Cossack raids, a beautifully written love story of a ..."
My favorite by Bashevis Singer is "The power of light," a collection of short stories. I haven't read The Slave.
My favorite by Bashevis Singer is "The power of light," a collection of short stories. I haven't read The Slave.




Books mentioned in this topic
Hope in Time of Abandonment (other topics)Heresies and How to Avoid Them: Why It Matters What Christians Believe (other topics)
The Christmas Story (other topics)
Warranted Christian Belief (other topics)
The Shining Company (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Jacques Ellul (other topics)Ben Quash (other topics)
Chad A. Ripperger (other topics)
James V. Schall (other topics)
C.S. Lewis (other topics)
More...