A Game of Thrones
discussion
Why does everyone hate Sansa?
message 1:
by
Hannah
(last edited Jun 26, 2014 04:01PM)
(new)
-
added it
Jun 26, 2014 03:59PM

reply
|
flag


When she is brutalized by Joffrey she is sympathetic because nobody wants to see someone treated that way, but she played a hand in her situation, and even sympathy is balanced with a bit of poetic justice.
She does develop a bit over time in the books. I suspect she's going to wind up being like either her mother or Cersei, but I'm leaning more towards bad than good. We'll see.

Sansa is easy to hate because she betrays her father to the Lannisters. She was stupid and selfish (like a lot of teenagers), but for the rest of her life she's going to have to live with the fact that her angst now has a body count, to paraphrase the Heathers! But her development from there on is really interesting. I think the people who "hate" Sansa are being a bit short-sighted- she is definitely one of the "weaker" characters/wills in operation in the book, and people tend to despise vulnerability. But her weaknesses serve an intrinsic purpose within the narrative, and I suspect she's going to becomes a crucial player in the later books.


Sansa isn't stupid, but certainly in the first few books she is incredibly naive (I actually think Arya and John are also naive, but their actions don't generally have as dramatic consequences). She trusts Joffrey and then Cersei for far longer than she should, she really doesn't see the game the Tyrells are playing until far too late, and her capture by Littlefinger (whose sexual attention she's also mostly oblivious to) is engineered largely through her willingness to go along with romantic notions of rescue. Sansa is slowly being disabused of all her prior notions of life- her personality is being remolded in much the same way that Arya's is at the house of Black and White. I think that Sansa is a fascinating character precisely because of this exploration of her flaws.


She does evolve, as most of George R.R. Martin's do. But she is a ready made patsy at the outset. In my experience, one group that really likes to put down the "too pretty girls" are the "bookish girls" and I'm sure that there are a fair number of them that read of and loathe "early Sansa."

So I don't know why people dislike, detest or despise Sansa because I love her. I do believe that she will win this Game of Thrones not because she is the greatest warrior or most cunning strategist, but because she is, plain and simple, the right person for the job.

She does stamd a good chance! If I had to lay money on the three most likely candidates to survive and take the throne it would be her Bran or Daenerys.
I grew to love Sansa, and I'm not sure I'd like her so much if she hadn't been so unlikeable in the beginning. I respect GRRM for making his characters human, not just likable.
Of course, she's one of my favorites now, so watch her die :(
Of course, she's one of my favorites now, so watch her die :(



But this is the opposite of the reality in ASOIAF. Apart from Stark characters - which can be classified as good - there are no good or evil characters. So when I hear Sansa talking, I constantly find her annoying, whiny and dim-witted.
She does undergo changes though. But she still has a hard time catching up with the situation she is in.

I never understood what is so great about Jon? He's really boring and he whines more than she does and his situation is better than hers. Why is he so well liked?

I get that. Jon is self absorbed and he often offends others because of his bastard obsession. But on the other hand he's the rebel Stark, since Rob was supposed to be a more traditional take on a king- righteous and fair. but yeah, Sansa has definitely been through more stuff han Jon, I mean he's surrounded by friends at Castle Black.

That leaves Sansa. She's subjected to physical abuse, but the level of danger she finds herself in (pre-Purple Wedding) pales in comparison to the adversity facing the other Stark children. I think she's too accustomed to being pampered and living a highborn lifestyle, and so being dragged into a world of deceit, plots and intrigue is very alien to her.

If she'd shown more backbone then, perhaps many things might have been different now. Remember... King Robert was on the verge of sending Joffrey away to foster with Lord Aryn before he was poisoned. If Robert had sent Joffrey to foster with someone at the time of the wolf incident, just think how differently the story might have gone.

If she'd shown more b..."
I agree that she should have defended her sister at the time, but I don't hold it against her now. At the time she was, what, 11? And she never said that Arya attacked Joffrey or that Joffrey was lying. She was trying to mediate. She was an, albeit poor, ambassador for peace.

She is a bit bratty in the first book but I loved reading all her chapters.

If sh..."
Agreed. And she only wrote those letters to her mother and sibling about her father's "treason" because she had too. She didn't know they would kill her father the same way she didn't know they would kill that village boy when the direwolf attacked Joffrey.

If she'd shown more b..."
My sentiments exactly. The only reason i hated* her was because she got Lady killed indirectly. her stupidity did. while it might have sparked a war then and there if she told joffrey attacked her sister and nymeria was only defending her. i'd still would have loved to see some sense of family (duty,honor) in her, family first, always.
*past tense. hated. she's not so bad once i read through the books.

She's so often compared to Arya and said to be weaker, but thats complete crap. They both are really strong, but in different ways. She's said to be weak because she doesn't go around stabbing anyone who hurts her (don't get me wrong, I love Arya, but thats a different sort of strength). She has a more quiet sort of strength, she perseveres and survives and stays strong and loyal throughout. She's more contained, but is still a fighter and a surviver. I think that the audiences are more perceptive and appreciative of the other type of strength, and thats why she's so often ignored.
Yes, she still has a ton of faults and has made a lot of mistakes, but I think she has lot of potential to become a stronger person and a major player, maybe even a queen (a good and just one). She's complicated, but so are all of GRRMs characters, and thats why I love them so much.
(sorry for the long post, I just have a lot of Sansa love and will defend her to the death)

I do think she has started to grow and change, but her final scenes of last season show that she is changing for the worse, not for the better. At the end of the day though, GRRM created characters for us to hate and characters for us to love. I personally hate her and love Jon Snow. Others feel the other way around and that's just one of the many reasons this series is AMAZING.

That's great! That's what this thread is for! I agree people compare her to Arya to much, they have different strengths. I think Sansa could be a great queen.

Yes. The betrayal. It killed, for me, what may have been starting as sympathy. Oh, poor baby, you don't want to go home because you love the creepy, spoiled buy who got your wolf killed with his whiny theatrics? You're so blind to the situation around you that when your father says, you're going home because it's dangerous, you tell the bitchy, fake mother of your intended, thus getting your father killed? Let me bring out my sympathy for you. Not exactly.

She does evolve, as most of George R.R. Martin's do. But ..."
Yes, early Sansa. I'm almost finished with the first installment, having not seen the series, and trying to stay unspoiled! But it's left me with a bad taste for her, although Arya is deliberately volatile and trouble causing on her own,I never got a feeling of pettiness or sabotage from her character.

Iris wrote: "I do NOT hate Sansa. She is top three favorite characters for me. (Behind only Brienne and Arya.) I think that she is wise to keep her head down and do what she is told, (it's kept her alive this f..."
Actually, Sansa never figured out who killed Joffrey. It was Littlefinger who told her who it was.

Sansa did not think going to Cersei was a bad thing. She believed Cersei was a good person, how was she supposed to know otherwise? She acted immaturely but she had no idea of the consequences. Don't blame her for something she didn't know the outcome of.



On a personal level, after Cersei has Sansa's wolf killed rather than Arya's (who had hers run away) I think Sansa should be aware of Cersei's character. In lying to everyone about Joffrey's actions in that moment she saw not only saw her own pet killed, but she had to be aware that the butcher's boy was killed as well. So, I think a reasonable person would be aware that Cersei was not of good character, and would be equally aware that the consequences were life and death.

This for me should have made her question her childishly romantic notions about the court & behaviour there. That she continued to want to be part of it - for the surface glamour - does not endear her to me.

If I had to guess, I would say the way she's disliked is because of the fact that no one would want to trade places with her. It's sort of an automated defense, to think that just because someone is in the crappy situation is because they deserve to be. It's much harder to acknowledge that the world is can be a crappy place and a person can get what they don't deserve.

I hope not! I really look forward to her chapters. She is pretty cool if you ask me.

That doesn't apply to me. Good & bad things happen to the deserving and undeserving. I dislike her because she was willfully blind to the reality of what happened to & around her. I think she told Cersei about her father's plans to leave Kings Landing because she wanted to stay there. She wouldn't give up her romantic ideal of princely love and court when she knew from bitter personal experience that Cersei would want revenge paid out even if the only target was an unrelated party. Sansa wasn't stupid, she made her choices. She also gets the consequences of them.

Yes, she made a choice and it was a mistake. But to say that she should have known better based on a single incident which resulted in her pups being killed because one bit Joffrey is overreaching to say the least. She had no way of knowing what was going on between Cersei and Ned, or what was at stake. And she had no way of knowing what would come of it.
She also had no way of knowing the depth of Cersei's vindictiveness or ambition, since she didn't have the benefit of an omniscient view the way the reader did. In all honesty, it sounds like this DOES apply to you. Hearing you're estimation of her, it really seems like you are looking for a reason to blame her for her own suffering.

wow, make a massive assumption. What part of good & bad things happen to everyone did you fail to notice me saying??
Sure she didn't know Cersei's depths, but she didn't wait to find out either. Even after her direwolf was killed and the butcher's boy - someone she knew! She wasn't the type of person I would have liked when I was that age. I might have a better understanding of her now, but that doesn't mean I have to endorse her behaviour.
There are consequences for how we behave, and even as an eleven year old I was aware of this. How she managed to be oblivious baffles me given her father's fairly direct approach to justice, but I accept that this is a work fiction.
I hope she matures as she grows up, but that remains to be seen.

Arya's friend, the butcher's boy, was also hunted and murdered as part of the same incident--and that's really the more important part--so I don't think it's over-reaching. She sees Cersei being extraordinarily callous and bloodthirsty, yet decides to go to her later and betray her family. That's not a smart move.


Well, now, THAT seems like over-reaching....

wow, make a massive assumption. What part of good & bad th..."
Sure, you said "bad things happen to the deserving and undeserving alike", and then you went on to say "I dislike her because she was willfully blind to the reality of what happened to & around her." How am I assuming anything? You've outright said you don't like her because you think she should have known better. And as I said, these sound like unrealistic expectations based on an omniscient view.
And so does "she didn't wait to find out". What do you mean by this? That she should have waited to know more about Cersei's character before trusting her? How does that work? They were in the midst of a crisis and she did what she thought was right. Saying she should have taken the time to test what kind of person Cersei was first sounds like more of the same.

Hate her if you will for being childish and naive, which she was, but let's not say she should have been smarter based on an expectation of what children are supposed to know.

It may be, but truly, people who are so harsh on a child scare me around kids, for real. Not all the comments are too harsh (some are just illogical), but some are as over-reaching as you found mine.

Some children know to be observant and take notice of dramatic things that happen around them. Some don't. Some are selfish & some aren't.

Some children know to be o..."
Obviously you we never selfish! Pleeez!

I still hope that he is alive.
all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic
George R.R. Martin (other topics)
Books mentioned in this topic
A Game of Thrones (other topics)Authors mentioned in this topic
George R.R. Martin (other topics)George R.R. Martin (other topics)