SciFi and Fantasy Book Club discussion
GoodReads Authors' Discussion
>
Writing Characters
date
newest »


I find my characters tend to come up with themselves. I get the idea for a story and the characters come out to play.
Fleshing them out is more of a problem, though. They want to be perfect. Who doesn't? So I have to persuade them to show their flaws. Some are easier than others.
Take Carthinal, my MC in my fantasy series, The Wolves of Vimar. He is quite a flawed character, although he does have a great charisma. He is very handsome and women throw themselves at him, and he finds it hard to resist them. Let's face it, he doesn't really try. He has a very quick temper that he struggles to control, and he is ambitious to the point of it being a flaw. He wants to advance in magic above all else and this causes him to consider whether to betray his friends and his country in the pursuit of magic. (This is in book 2).

I feel it's really important to show a fully-realized character, so in the editing phase I really try to go deep with the character on their journey, to show who they are, both the good and the bad of them, and to let the surrounding side-characters shine so they feel like real people too, even if they don't get a PoV. I try, anyway!
I normally form up my main characters even before I start writing my story, as they literally are the backbone of my books. I first define (for my own benefit) their physical and mental attributes (sex, ethnicity, IQ, physique, general attitude, knowledge, skills), then gradually let the readers discover my MCs via their actions and thinking as the story goes. It is very important to me that my MCs be and stay in character and don't swing from good to bad on a whim.

When creating a character one must take into account many things. Where did this character grow up? Who were their parents? Who were their friends? Basically all the things that make you a person are the same things that make your character real to the reader.
It's the little things. The twitch of an eye. The way a character plays absently with an old scar. Their favorite food. The memories a scent or color calls forth. The way certain personalities are either pleasing or perhaps rub them the wrong way. The reaction to situations and how they deal with the aftermath.
Simply giving a character a list of strengths and weaknesses will leave them flat and unbelievable. The chief question you must ask yourself is what makes you real, what gives you your individuality? Then apply that formula to fiction.

I absolutely agree. You did a great job expounding on this. It's very important to show that for the character, life does not begin on page one of the novel. It's definitely one of the ways to make your character more believable and add depth. I mentioned weaknesses because that main character wound can drive the internal conflict of the story and therefore it's important.

Most of the backstory for my characters was created when thinking about various plot points between drafts (often when walking through the hills, and the worse the weather, the more ideas I got).


Sometimes I have what I would describe as either 'the shower epiphany' or 'the coffee epiphany.' ie. the places where the sudden realisation of 'something,' occurs.

Finally, someone else with an internal movie player :D I've tried explaining it to so many friends throughout the years but never found anyone who describes it that exact way.

Nice to meet a fellow internal player of movies 😊😊😊
"It's the little things. The twitch of an eye. The way a character plays absently with an old scar. Their favourite food."
Ummm.... No? For me, character would be the protagonist noticing these things in others to portray them as observant. But having the protagonist or any other character do these things doesn't add anything of value to a story. The braid pulling in The Wheel of Time immediately comes to mind. An exploration or explanation of why they do them might be interesting but it's not the sort of thing that can be done in a sentence or two.
I think of character as the motivations of actions, not the actions themselves.
Ummm.... No? For me, character would be the protagonist noticing these things in others to portray them as observant. But having the protagonist or any other character do these things doesn't add anything of value to a story. The braid pulling in The Wheel of Time immediately comes to mind. An exploration or explanation of why they do them might be interesting but it's not the sort of thing that can be done in a sentence or two.
I think of character as the motivations of actions, not the actions themselves.

The Art of Character: Creating Memorable Characters for Fiction, Film, and TV


I've always thought that play and daydreaming are an essential part of any creative person's life. So, take the time and let your mind wander.
... plus I watched a lot of TV as a kid. :S





Also, what would they most hate to happen right now?
That can be fun.

Also, what would they most hate to happen right now?
That can be fun."
Thats a good one.
I also do: how woukd they react to rhis situation right now?
Grocery stores, theme parks, the dmv...
This is a thread for how you come up with and flesh out your characters.