Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Has anyone noticed some inconsistencies throughout the book? Some right off the top of my head:

1. In FSDarker, Ana gets angry at Christian for buying SIP, but in FSGrey Christian's POV, Christian actually bought SIP BEFORE he knew Ana got a job there, yet he doesn't use that for his defense during their argument in FSDarker and takes full blame like he knew all along in FSD Christian's POV.

2. In FSD, Christian and Ros got in a helicopter crash and they make it back to Seattle. When Christian was back at Escala, his family and Ana and some other people sat together and talked about the crash. Christian said that Ros and his phone were both dead and the truck driver Seb didn't have a phone either, yet when his family and friends left and Christian and Ana were alone, Ana accuses Christian of not calling him on his way back to Seattle because he knows Ana was gonna be with Jose, and Ana gets angry about it. Again, Christian takes the blame for it??? He didn't even have any access to a working phone.

These are just some inconsistencies. It sounds a whole lot like EL James is trying to antagonize Christian on things that are simply a coincidence (example 1) or things that he didn't even have control over (example 2). What do you guys think?