Classic "Children's" Literature Book Club discussion

This topic is about
Stuart Little
June 2022
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Elizabeth
(new)
Jun 01, 2022 11:18AM

reply
|
flag
I've done a terrible job commenting in here, but this book just did NOT hold my interest very well. I'm sure a lot of it has to do with everything else going on in my life and the 'real world' but...good grief! I wanted so badly to love this and instead I felt very meh about the entire experience.

Do I think it is still relevent in today's world - probably not. I am not sure that children today would relate to it.
probably not, to be honest. Alayna, who is just shy of 10 now, was very concerned. How did she have a mouse? why would you send your child down the bathtub or into the moving bits of the piano? The part she wasn't worried about was him being in love with a bird. I am right there with her

I can relate to all of Alyna's concerns. It was just weird and even though it was supposed to be magical realism, it was too far fetched.

I have listened to this before on audio, but it's been several years. I think I've even listened to a sequel or two.
I concur with the stuff y'all are saying. The book is trying to ride a line between fantasy and realism and can't seem to decide which side to fall on. On the one hand, you have a mouse who talks and wears clothes and tries to do human things, even though he acknowledges that he is a mouse. But on the other hand, there is a "mouse hole" in the house, so it is acknowledged that at some point another mouse lived in the house as a rodent in the wall and not as a child of the family. They don't even say that he is a pet. He has full family privileges. The family also has a cat. Why doesn't the cat have full family privileges? Why isn't he treated as a child they way that Stuart is?
The thing I always questioned is how did Stuart come to be a part of the family. They never use the word adoption. We know that Mrs. Little certainly couldn't have given birth to Stuart, but it is written in such a way that the reader is led to believe that the second son arrived in the same way that the first one did, and the reader should not discriminate.

Elizabeth - the movie has them adopting Stuart but the book certainly does make it seem as if she birthed him. Maybe Snowball doesn't speak and that's why?
Annie - the fantastical/magical realism element was/is a big part of so many children's books but this one fell off somehow. I did LOVE The Borrowers as well. Children's stories in the 18th century were more morality stories and prior to that they were fairy tales, myths, and Bible stories but I feel like we're still finding that sweet spot because children change as the world changes...even though adults don't seem to be that different.
Annie - the fantastical/magical realism element was/is a big part of so many children's books but this one fell off somehow. I did LOVE The Borrowers as well. Children's stories in the 18th century were more morality stories and prior to that they were fairy tales, myths, and Bible stories but I feel like we're still finding that sweet spot because children change as the world changes...even though adults don't seem to be that different.