Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Two-part question�

Despite their surveillance of Vullion, he manages to elude them and assault Carla Ruiz again but Lucas figures it out before he kills her. However, Lucas orchestrates Vuillon’s death to look like self defense. Your thoughts on what he did…wrong, right, somewhere in the gray?

Vuillon successfully eluded capture because he followed a set of rules…religiously. When he saw Lucas as a worthy opponent, it became more of a game as well. What ultimately did Vuillion in?

I understand Lucas' wanting to kill Vullion. He would get off. I know cops feel frustrated sometimes, but two wrongs don't make a right. However, it is entertaining in fiction and the movies. As I mentioned in a previous question, Lucas is a Dirty Harry type cop.

He broke one of his own rules. Never return to the scene of the crime.

I agree with Sharon's point about the so-called self defense setup.
I didn't like it, though; but I could understand how a policeman would be so tempted. The fact that Lucas had Carla behind a closed door, and that he was reflecting on the kind of damage a witness testimony about that shooting, tells us that Lucas knew he was wrong.

Vuillon, when he thought about Lucas being a gamer, displayed his true weakness when his own gamesmanship was challenged. It was certainly his downfall.

Who knows when he would have been caught if he resisted that temptation to go to Carla's?

Charlene wrote: "I agree with Sharon's point about the so-called self defense setup.
Who knows when he would have been caught if he resisted that temptation to go to Carla's?"

I believe this right here is why Lucas made the plan to kill him and 'frame' it as self defense.