The Seasonal Reading Challenge discussion
SUMMER CHALLENGE 2024
>
Group Reads Discussion - Into The Drowning Deep
date
newest »


I'm about halfway through Into the Drowning Deep and I can confirm that you do not need to read the prequel. I liked the prequel and would recommend it, especially if you are interested in this book. It is short, only 128 pages. It fits a few tasks
However, sometimes none of the group reads are appealing and you just pick the least painful one to you. If you are avoiding this one because of the prequel, it is entirely unnecessary.

6/4/24
4 stars
I found this entertaining in the same way Relic, Jurassic Park, and Extinction are. It's not perfect. There are definitely a bunch of TSTL moments. It was longer than I wanted it be. I have no idea if any of the "science" makes sense and I don't care. Overall, a fun book to listen to. I will check out other books by this author. I plan to recommend it to my son.
Thank to the nominator of this book.

6/4/24
4 stars
I found this entertaining in the same way Relic, Jurassic Park, and Extinction are. It's not perf..."
Thanks for note about Relic - I’m planning on using it for Nick’s task

(view spoiler)
Anyway, 3/5 stars for me here. I may read the prequel in the future. James Cameron, this has your name written all over it. This book is begging for an adaptation.

but I do like mira grant's world-building - and like above, i think this could be a decent movie adaption.

I'm about halfway through Into the Drowning Deep and I can confirm th..."
So, does reading the prequel actual spoil any reveals in Into the Drowning Deep? I'll probably read both (I like Seanan McGuire, and Mira Grant is her alias), but I'm not sure which to do first.

I'm about halfway through Into the Drowning Deep and ..."
I read the prequel first, and it made me interested in this story. I think if I had read book #1 first, and then the prequel, I would think it was ... I guess like a bonus read for fans.

I'm about halfway through Into the Drowning Deep and ..."
I just looked this question up online because sometimes there is a recommended reading order, and I found someone wrote this in their review (from the website Mangoes and Mayhem):
"I recommend reading both (each delivers something different). But� If you’re only going to read one, read Into the Drowning Deep. It’s a full-length novel, so there’s more complexity, more build-up, and more time spent getting to know each of the characters. If you’re going to read both, read Into the Drowning Deep first. That’s what I did and I’m glad about it. There are events towards the end of Rolling in the Deep which may spoil the ending of Into the Drowning Deep."
Having already finished Into the Drowning Deep, I can see why that would be the case because there is a little bit of a drawn parallel between the endings of both books suggested. Happy reading!
I read the prequel last year or the year before on audio and it was creepy creepy. I honestly didn't even know that this was a separate book at first and just thought I'd re-read what I thought was the same book I previously read. And then I questioned why it was a lot longer than the other one I read.
Anyway, y'all didn't need to know all of that.
I loved this book, I loved it a lot. It was creepy and I couldn't stop reading it.
Five stars for me.
Anyway, y'all didn't need to know all of that.
I loved this book, I loved it a lot. It was creepy and I couldn't stop reading it.
Five stars for me.


The beginning of ITDP read like a non-fiction book being way too technical causing the story to drag until the last few chapters. Things were unnecessarily repeated which made the book longer than it needed to be. And I felt that the ending was rushed and therefore too easy, almost a copout. I felt there were too many inconsistencies. The scientist characters simply didn't act like scientists at all which was disconcerting.
I think I'll stick to reading Seanan McGuire and skip her Mira Grant alter ego.

I gave it 3 stars.
I read Rolling in the Deep last year. I don't think it matters which order you read them in - they both have sort of minor spoilers for each other.
Every Heart a Doorway, by the same author (different pen name) is one of my favourite books of all time and it has a very different vibe to this one.

While most characters were okay, I didn't find any particularly standing out except for the 2 unlikeable killers. They stood out a mile; probably because I was kind of bored with the story but they bring life to the whole thing. And what was that thing at the end?! A little too anticlimactic after all the build-up. Overall, the read was okay but seriously too big at close to 500p.

I listened to the prequel before also listening to Into the Drowning Deep. I liked the prequel enough that I was looking forward to the full-length book. Unfortunately, it didn't live up to my expectations.
I felt that there were too many characters to the point that I was getting confused about who everyone was. Nobody stood out nor was anyone likable so that when the creatures arrived, I didn't care who survived or was killed. Disappointing read that was a generous three stars for me.

The only unbelievable characters to me were Jacques and Michi, who came off as a little cartoonish, but were still fun/interesting characters. The book wasn't as "scary" as I would have liked, but remained intriguing throughout. 5 stars!
Susan A wrote: "I found this entertaining in the same way Relic, Jurassic Park, and Extinction are..."
You had me at the comparison to Relic. Relic is one of my favourite "readable twaddle" books, where it's completely ridiculous but a whole lot of fun.
I considered reading A Tale of Two Cities for this season instead, but between the above comment and the fact that ITDD dovetails neatly with something I'm working on for a Call of Cthulhu game, I switched tracks.
I'm currently about a quarter of the way through and so far I'm enjoying it, although not without some degree of criticism - mainly on the grounds that the eco messaging is about as subtle as a brick. Unless readers have been living under a rock, I think everyone's aware that the oceans and marine wildlife are in need of protection and not exploitation, we really don't need to be walloped over the head with it every few pages. It just ends up coming across preachy and a bit patronising.
On a similar note, I was initially somewhat frustrated about the caricature-ish nature of the obvious baddies (seriously, they might as well have neon signs over their heads sayings "we're evil"), but as my partner pointed out, that all makes a lot more sense if you view things through the lens of a slasher film, which I can only assume is the vibe Grant's going for. You know who's got the death flags waving, you're just waiting to watch the spectacle when all hell breaks loose. With that in mind, I think I'm going to enjoy it more going forward after mentally reframing it all.
You had me at the comparison to Relic. Relic is one of my favourite "readable twaddle" books, where it's completely ridiculous but a whole lot of fun.
I considered reading A Tale of Two Cities for this season instead, but between the above comment and the fact that ITDD dovetails neatly with something I'm working on for a Call of Cthulhu game, I switched tracks.
I'm currently about a quarter of the way through and so far I'm enjoying it, although not without some degree of criticism - mainly on the grounds that the eco messaging is about as subtle as a brick. Unless readers have been living under a rock, I think everyone's aware that the oceans and marine wildlife are in need of protection and not exploitation, we really don't need to be walloped over the head with it every few pages. It just ends up coming across preachy and a bit patronising.
On a similar note, I was initially somewhat frustrated about the caricature-ish nature of the obvious baddies (seriously, they might as well have neon signs over their heads sayings "we're evil"), but as my partner pointed out, that all makes a lot more sense if you view things through the lens of a slasher film, which I can only assume is the vibe Grant's going for. You know who's got the death flags waving, you're just waiting to watch the spectacle when all hell breaks loose. With that in mind, I think I'm going to enjoy it more going forward after mentally reframing it all.

It was engaging and entertaining, and I definitely wouldn't have read it otherwise, but I wasn't taken with any of the characters enough to care too deeply about them, or be concerned if they lived or died.
My one issue was, they determine the creatures are Sirens and not Mermaids, but I really don't think they showed why, or explained the difference. I mean, I know what a Siren is, but what made them determine, and this came out during the biological exam, not from the discussion of language, and I really didn't understand what made that distinction come about.
Apple wrote: "My one issue was, they determine the creatures are Sirens and not Mermaids, but I really don't think they showed why, or explained the difference. I mean, I know what a Siren is, but what made them determine, and this came out during the biological exam, not from the discussion of language, and I really didn't understand what made that distinction come about."
I got the sense that the renaming was more to eradicate the issue of incorrect gendering - hardly appropriate to call them mermaids when they were male! That said though, 'siren' as an alternative doesn't really work either - if my memory of Greek mythology is correct, sirens were winged and birdlike.
I just finished the book today, and despite what felt like an abrupt ending, I did enjoy it. I might well consider going and checking out the prequel novella, especially if there's a suggestion of more in a series coming up.
Having just read Jurassic Park as well, I do see the comparisons. Just because we can go and use science for entertainment, doesn't mean we necessarily should. The whole thing about the ship being sent out while not in full working order felt eerily reminiscent of the OceanGate tragedy too, despite the Titan incident happening five years after the book was published.
I got the sense that the renaming was more to eradicate the issue of incorrect gendering - hardly appropriate to call them mermaids when they were male! That said though, 'siren' as an alternative doesn't really work either - if my memory of Greek mythology is correct, sirens were winged and birdlike.
I just finished the book today, and despite what felt like an abrupt ending, I did enjoy it. I might well consider going and checking out the prequel novella, especially if there's a suggestion of more in a series coming up.
Having just read Jurassic Park as well, I do see the comparisons. Just because we can go and use science for entertainment, doesn't mean we necessarily should. The whole thing about the ship being sent out while not in full working order felt eerily reminiscent of the OceanGate tragedy too, despite the Titan incident happening five years after the book was published.

Overall, I did enjoy it, as much as I ever enjoy this type of book (World War Z, Jurassic Park, Devolution, etc.). They are entertaining but they don't really stick with me in any way, and sometimes that's exactly what the brain needs!
I agree with the assessment of other posters that the characters were a bit caricature-ish and obvious, but that jives with other books of this type that I have read so it didn't bother me as much as it might have otherwise. It did make it easier to cheer for the mermaids...sirens...whatever, in some cases lol. I was also a little disappointed in the ending!!

I enjoyed the snippets and the documentary feel of it. Oceans are scary and awesome at the same time, science is cool, these things I believe and the book portrayed them well. Would love to see this adapted to a movie (give us the gay Underwater we deserve! lol)
Books mentioned in this topic
Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil (other topics)Extinction (other topics)
Jurassic Park (other topics)
Relic (other topics)
Into the Drowning Deep (other topics)
More...
The requirement for task 20.10: You must participate in the book's discussion thread below with at least one post about the contents of the book or your reaction to the book after you have read the book.