Glens Falls (NY) Online Book Discussion Group discussion
ABOUT BOOKS AND READING
>
What's your opinion of the meaning of the number of stars assigned to a book?
date
newest »


IMO, a bad beginning deserves one star because it prevents me from wanting to read further. The same goes with movies with boring beginnings! As they say, "I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take this anymore!" LOL (That's a quote from the 1976 award-winning movie "Network" with Peter Finch.)
SEE/HEAR IT ON YOUTUBE:



You mentioned prologues. I don't know why, but I don't like books with prologues, even if they are an accepted device in telling a story. I am eager to get into the story. A prologue gives me the feeling that I must struggle through it before I can get to the story. I always see it as an obstacle.
The more I am given the opportunity to review a book here on Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ, the more I seem willing to voice my criticisms. As you say, we give our "honest appraisal". Of course, we are all coming from different points in our literary development. Also, we all have different tastes. We have to remember that as we read the reviews of others.





I don't give star ratings to books I didn't finish, but that's just my personal practice; I don't see anything at all unethical about doing so. If you didn't finish a book, that's a pretty good indication in itself that you weren't liking whatever part of it that you did read; and that response of not liking is just as legitimate as it would be if you had forced yourself to read the whole thing.


Nina, to answer your question, I don't mine epilogues. They're OK with me. The reason I mind prologues is that they seem to be an obstacle to my starting the meat of the story.


I haven't read that book, Nina. I'll look into it: A Woman Of Independent Means
That first line in A Map of Betrayal sounds like a good hook! :) I've put the book on my "keep in mind" shelf. Thanks. Maybe I will put in on my "to read" shelf. :)


"Bess Steed marries her childhood sweetheart in the early part of the 20th century and begins a life in the high society of Dallas, Texas. As time goes by, things do not work out as she expects..."
I have it in the "Saved" section of my Netflix Queue. As you've said before, that means "never"! LOL
NETFLIX DESCRIPTION: "Oscar winner Sally Field stars as Texas belle Bess Steed, who blossoms from a high-society wife into a prominent businesswoman over seven tumultuous decades in this lavish 1995 miniseries, based on the novel by Elizabeth Forsythe-Hailey."

The GR description of _A Map of Betrayal_ mentions "espionage". Does it get complicated?

"Bess Steed marries her childhood sweetheart in the early part of the 20t..."Joy, I recommend reading the book, "Woman of Independent Means" as it is an easy enjoyable read. As for the other espionage book, it probably does get complicated but I haven't gotten to that point yet. I'll let you know after I finish the book.


I'll keep it in mind, Nina. Thanks.

Happy Mother's Day to you too, Nina, and to all the mothers! I really should take a walk today too. This beautiful weather isn't going to last long, I'll bet! It IS lovely seeing all the fresh green colors around, especially on the trees.
Books mentioned in this topic
A Woman of Independent Means (other topics)A Woman of Independent Means (other topics)
A Woman of Independent Means (other topics)
A Map of Betrayal (other topics)
/review/show...
MY QUESTION: Do you think it's fair that I assigned a "star-assessment" (one star) to this book when I had read only 35 pages of it?
Because I not only found those pages uninteresting, but I also didn't like the style of writing (including the personality/attitude of the protagonist), I felt that I could definitely assign only one star because the one star reflects MY opinion of the book and not the actual artistic or literary merit of the book.
What do you think?
Furthermore, what do you think the star-assignment of a reader should signify? Should it reflect how much the reader enjoyed a book? Or should it reflect the potential worth of a book over-all?