Challenge: 50 Books discussion
Do you skim or read every word?
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Bj
(new)
May 09, 2010 02:40PM

reply
|
flag

I used to think that if I learned to 'speedread' I would be a more effective reader (and human being!) - but frankly, unless you're trying to synthesize the arguments of a very long paper on a very dry subject or trying to survive through the most classic of classics, it just doesn't seem 'right.' I don't think I'd ever want to apply speedreading techniques to fiction that I'm reading for pleasure.
With that being said, I think the speed of your reading, fully absorbed, can be increased with practice - aka more reading! - and pushing yourself through rough patches or dry passages rather than giving in to distraction. Distraction is what slowed me down the most when I really got back into reading this year, and I forced myself to work through those bits and just keep going most of the time, and It helped me get through many books.
As a final consideration, it's interesting to look at the types of books that many other "readers here," as you mention, are reading. While some seasoned readers are ripping through Dostoevsky in a day, it seems that many people are reading quickly because the books they're picking are lighter (if we're considering 'literary' as heavier) or literally shorter. I always find it's easier to whip through something by Philippa Gregory, or those silly-but-fun Hunger Games, than it is to push through many other novels.
Final word: How long did it take you to read my ramblings, huh? :) Good luck!
I tend to read pretty much every word, or at least, I don't consciously skip. I've been known to skim through long/boring/pointless passages on occasion. I read about 85 pages/hour of easy books with large-ish print and simple language, about 50 pages an hour of harder books, small print, or late at night.

It depends - I've recently read a couple of books by Sarah Waters and I'm happy to say that I would have felt that I had missed out on so much if I'd skipped even a sentence. However, when reading chick-lit or fluff books if they have lots of descriptive paragraphs, I don't mind skipping a few lines. Earlier this year when I read The Gargoyle I skipped large chunks (like 20 pages at a time?) because it was just too stupid and predictable.




I don't think I could ever speed-read. It would defeat the purpose of enjoying the story. And some stories need to be digested slowly for the real effect to take place.

I often run across people in book discussions who get lost and ding the book because they skimmed the "unimportant" bits.





I read a lot, though, usually 100+ pages a day. Don't feel badly that you don't read as fast as some; what's important is that you're enjoying it!



I love the idea of "rediscovering the pleasure of reading for its own sake". But its even more than that. When I compare my notes on a book with a friend often I'll mention a part of the book and they'll have no idea what I'm talking about, even though it was a pretty main event in the plot. Skimming causes you to lose a lot of the story and actually miss parts - if you're not going to read the whole storey than you're not going to get the whole storey and really whats the point?






Rose


L.J.
The Sex Club
Secrets to Die For
Thrilled to Death

Same here, but if I catch myself getting bored or skimming too much, I either put the book aside or I don't include it in my official yearly read count. For example I'm on my 32nd book of the year, but this number would be a bit higher because I have completed other books; however, I gave in and skipped passages or skimmed a lot in those. I choose not to count those books because it feels like I cheated or something. LOL. So for me I only count the books which I know I read without any conscious skimming.

Books mentioned in this topic
Thrilled to Death (other topics)The Sex Club (other topics)
Secrets to Die for (other topics)
The Electric Church (other topics)
The Gargoyle (other topics)