K. Scott Oliphint
Born
The United States
Website
![]() |
Covenantal Apologetics: Principles and Practice in Defense of Our Faith
by
8 editions
—
published
2013
—
|
|
![]() |
The Battle Belongs to the Lord: The Power of Scripture for Defending Our Faith
9 editions
—
published
2003
—
|
|
![]() |
Know Why You Believe (KNOW Series)
by
3 editions
—
published
2017
—
|
|
![]() |
God with Us: Divine Condescension and the Attributes of God
3 editions
—
published
2011
—
|
|
![]() |
Reasons for Faith: Philosophy in the Service of Theology
2 editions
—
published
2006
—
|
|
![]() |
Things That Cannot Be Shaken: Holding Fast to Your Faith in a Relativistic World
6 editions
—
published
2008
—
|
|
![]() |
Revelation and Reason: New Essays in Reformed Apologetics
4 editions
—
published
2007
—
|
|
![]() |
The Majesty of Mystery: Celebrating the Glory of an Incomprehensible God
|
|
![]() |
Should You Believe in God?
4 editions
—
published
2013
—
|
|
![]() |
Thomas Aquinas
by |
|
“We know that when we speak the truth found in Christianity, we are automatically “connectingâ€� that truth with the truth that God has given through his creation.4 No other religion makes that connection, since every other religion is a suppression of the truth.”
― Covenantal Apologetics: Principles and Practice in Defense of Our Faith
― Covenantal Apologetics: Principles and Practice in Defense of Our Faith
“In Adam we will, even if it kills us, do all that we can to avoid what is patently and clearly made obvious to us by God himself.”
― Covenantal Apologetics: Principles and Practice in Defense of Our Faith
― Covenantal Apologetics: Principles and Practice in Defense of Our Faith
“Unbelief cannot sustain itself; it is unable to make sense of the facts, many of which are the most obvious facts of the world; it assumes, rather than shows, that there is no God, that the world is not created by him, that his character is not obvious in creation, and so on. Then it proceeds to argue its case not by attempting to support those assumptions, but simply by assuming them and then arguing as if the assumptions themselves are, or must be, universal if one is to be “rational.”
― Covenantal Apologetics: Principles and Practice in Defense of Our Faith
― Covenantal Apologetics: Principles and Practice in Defense of Our Faith
Is this you? Let us know. If not, help out and invite K. to Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ.