Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

My son and his wife recently had a baby boy - my first grandchild! Such a wonder! Both mama and baby are in good health as is daddy, though both parents are a bit sleep deprived at the moment.Ìý

It's been thirty years since I had my last baby, and things have changed since then, at least in my city. When I had my babies in the late 80s and early 90s, it felt very progressive to have the father in the delivery room. That certainly wasn't the case for my mother when she gave birth to me in the 60s. Then, my father sleptÌýa recliner in the waiting room while my mother was alone with the doctor and nurses, only to be startled awake by a nurse holding a swaddled newbornÌýwho announced, "You have a daughter."

When it was my turn to give birth, my husband was in the room witnessing new life with his own blurry eyes. Then he got to go home to sleep, and the kind nurses took my baby to the shared nursery so I could sleep, bringing my child to me every few hours to nurse. Visitors could come to the maternity ward and view all the newborns in their bassinets through a large window, guessing which baby was the one they were there to see.

Not so anymore.Ìý

Now the baby goes directly into theÌýhospital room with both parents and stays with them. Dad has a cot to sleep in beside mom's hospital bed, and they're basically on their own, day and night, except for when the nurses pop in. Talk about jumping into the deep end without knowing how to swim! As soon as baby and mom are deemed healthy to go, they are gone. No extended hospital stays to rest up.

My daughter-in-law was in post-op (after a planned c-section) for 2hrs, and the whole time my son and his son were in their room alone together. "I've never been alone with a baby before," he said. Thankfully, he's a quick study. I can see the benefits to this. It's super scary for new parents, intense and intimidating, but it's a case--to stay with the pool analogy--of sink or swim.

The changes over three generations made me wonder whatÌýthe delivery experienceÌýreally would've been like for someone in Ginger Gold's time in the 1920s.Ìý

Giving birth in the 1920s was a very different experience compared to modern times, both in terms of medical practices and social expectations.Ìý

Here's what the internet has to say:

1. Medical EnvironmentHome Births Were Common: In the early 1920s, most women still gave birth at home, assisted by a midwife or general practitioner (GP). Hospitals were becoming more common for childbirth, but they were often seen as places for complicated births or emergencies.Hospital Births Increasing: By the late 1920s, hospital births were becoming more prevalent, particularly in urban areas, but they were still not the norm for everyone. Hospitals provided more sterile environments and access to trained doctors, but there was also a higher risk of medical intervention, including forceps deliveries, which were sometimes overused.Midwives: In rural or working-class areas, midwives were often the primary caregivers for childbirth. They usually lacked formal training, but many had significant practical experience.2. Pain ReliefTwilight Sleep: One of the significant developments in childbirth during the 1920s was the introduction of Twilight Sleep, a form of pain relief using a combination of scopolamine and morphine. It didn’t relieve pain completely but made women forget the experience by inducing semi-consciousness. It was popular because it was seen as a way to shield women from the pain and trauma of labor, but it often left women disoriented and unable to fully participate in their delivery.Lack of Control: Women under Twilight Sleep often had no memory of giving birth and were sometimes restrained because the drug could make them thrash or become uncooperative. While it promised pain relief, it came with risks like prolonged labor, complications for the baby, or even harm to the mother.3. Medical InterventionsForceps Delivery: Forceps were commonly used during difficult deliveries. Doctors sometimes overused them, especially in hospital births, leading to injuries for both mother and baby. With less understanding of proper use, this tool could be both lifesaving and harmful.Caesarean Section: C-sections were rare and often a last resort in the 1920s. They carried significant risk because of less advanced surgical techniques and the lack of antibiotics to prevent infections.4. Prenatal CareLimited Knowledge: Prenatal care was not as systematic as it is today. Women might not have seen a doctor regularly during pregnancy unless complications arose. Advice was often based on folklore, family traditions, or the advice of midwives.Nutritional and Lifestyle Recommendations: There was little emphasis on nutrition, though women were often advised to get rest and avoid strenuous activity. Smoking was not widely discouraged during pregnancy, and alcohol consumption was still common.5. Infant Mortality and Maternal HealthHigh Infant Mortality: Despite advances in medicine, infant mortality rates were still high in the 1920s, especially for lower-income families. Infections, complications during delivery, and poor sanitation were significant factors.Maternal Mortality: Childbirth was a dangerous time for mothers as well. Without antibiotics, infections such as puerperal fever (postpartum infections) were common causes of death. Hemorrhaging and other complications during delivery were also life-threatening without modern surgical interventions.6. Social ExpectationsChildbirth Seen as Natural but Private: Childbirth was often considered a natural but private event. Many women had several children during their lifetimes, and pain during labor was seen as a normal part of the process. Discussions about childbirth were often kept within female circles, and there wasn’t much public or medical discourse about improving the childbirth experience.Social Pressure on Motherhood: Women were expected to become mothers, and those who didn’t were often stigmatized. There was strong pressure to bear children, and having a large family was seen as a sign of success. For middle- and upper-class women, motherhood was often idealized as a woman’s primary role.Birth Control: Although discussions around birth control were becoming more common by the 1920s, it was still controversial and not widely available. The Comstock Laws in the U.S. restricted information on contraception, and many women had limited control over the number of children they bore.7. Postpartum CareRest and Recovery: After childbirth, women were expected to rest, especially if the birth was difficult or they were part of a wealthier class. A period of confinement at home, typically around a month, was common, during which women recovered and were attended to by midwives or family members.Breastfeeding vs. Wet Nursing: Breastfeeding was common, though some wealthier women used wet nurses. By the 1920s, formula feeding was beginning to emerge as an option, but it wasn’t widespread until later in the century.8. Support SystemsFamily and Community Support: In working-class and rural communities, women often had help from female relatives, neighbors, or local midwives. These women formed the support network during labor, birth, and recovery.Professional Medical Help: Access to professional help was more common in cities, where doctors and hospitals were more available. However, many lower-income families still relied on community-based support rather than medical intervention.

Thanks Google! It's pretty clear that the fathers had very little to do when it came to bringing babies into the world and postnatal care.

WHAT DO YOU THINK? PLEASE LET ME KNOW IN THE COMMENTS.

Ìý

We've come a long way in 100 years. Men and women are more of a team when it comes to parenting, and being a hands on dad is not only the norm (in most cases) but expected.Ìý

Ginger experienced the miracle of birth when her daughter Rosa was born. Rosa Reed has her own mystery series as an adult in the 1950s.Ìý

Rosa's birth happened in.

Available as an , in and in .

Rosa Reed's first book is .

Available as an .

Don't miss the latest Ginger Gold,

Ìý