Books I Want To Talk About discussion
Bleak House
>
Bleak House
Wow! Mr. Tulkinghorn is one shady character. I suppose he might be trying to pay Lady Dedlock back for some snobbery.

I'm about 150 pages ahead of you Jeremy (75% complete).
Hard to figure out his motive. The power of knowing peoples secrets and weaknesses and using against them seems to be it. But then money and envy could come into play.
Just wait Jeremy! You haven't even gotten to the good part (I think. I'm fuzzy on the actual page number when the "plot thickens".)
Sera wrote: "I know! He's turned out to be THE villain in the book. I am not sure what his problem is yet or what's on the agenda for him, but he's a piece of work.
I'm about 150 pages ahead of you Jeremy ..."
I don't know. guppy really did me in. Creepy. He'd totally be an online stalker today.
I'm about 150 pages ahead of you Jeremy ..."
I don't know. guppy really did me in. Creepy. He'd totally be an online stalker today.
Oh - I am sure there is so much more to come! Dickens certainly is sympathetic to Skimpole! Reminds me a bit of Copperfield's older friend who kept going to debtor's prison. That character didn't have the same attitude as Skimpole nor the rich friend to keep bailing him out!

(view spoiler)
Ummmm.......spoiler on Esther and marriage possibilities!! :)

I'm going to spoiler tag everything because it appears as Meghan had said that the twists and turns are going to be coming in abundance now :)
No worries! I must be almost there. I hope to catch up very soon...(haven't I been saying that all along?)

I hope to finish it by Monday (haven't I been saying that all along?)
Sera wrote: "Ok, I hit a really big spoiler last night at around Chapter 50 or 51. Jeremy, don't look at this one until you get to that part :)
[spoilers removed]"
That's the "dun, dun, dun" moment I was talking about!
[spoilers removed]"
That's the "dun, dun, dun" moment I was talking about!
Jeremy wrote: "Ummmm.......spoiler on Esther and marriage possibilities!! :)"
I promise you haven't been too spoiled :) she's in high demand, our Esther.
I promise you haven't been too spoiled :) she's in high demand, our Esther.
I didn't get so far after all but did get to the Esther proposal and acceptance. It does seem odd to me but kind of makes sense given Esther's role with John. Now she is off to attempt to sway Richard. Again.

I haven't read anything since last week so you should be catching up to me, Jeremy. I'm at 80% or so complete. I have 200+ pagest to go.
I will read that part very very soon. But I probably won't get too much further for a couple of days as I have to finish my weekly allotment of Swann's Way before I get more than 200 posts behind in the discussion!

I'm sure that Meghan is in for more discussion, too :)
I did finish the next chapter but it didn't seem to reveal much other than that Richard is still quite immovable in his resolve to be a selfish deadbeat!
I am. Richard has still plenty of more ways to exasperate you too! Dickens was quite clever in coming up with all those turns.
The paragraph of Mrs.Bagnet having to eat the poultry prepared by her husband was classic and priceless Dickens humor!

I have made much progression now. And the twists and turns have been very nice! He did have me thinking it was Lady Deadlock for quite awhile and I was glad when it turned out to be her ex-maid. I know what to expect in Dickens but I thought it was a little bit of a stretch that Mrs. Rouncewell would turn out to be George's mother. It was that one over the top connection, but still another surprise. Although I am not yet to the point to see if it will matter or not since Bucket has already done his job. And I am liking Bucket much much better after he put Smallweed in his place!
The biggest thing I am wondering right now is what ever happened happened to the loud fellow that is on the adjoining property to Sir Leicester? He seems to have disappeared altogether. My guess is he pops up real soon.
The biggest thing I am wondering right now is what ever happened happened to the loud fellow that is on the adjoining property to Sir Leicester? He seems to have disappeared altogether. My guess is he pops up real soon.
I'm not exactly sure where you are, but I think he makes a brief appearance at the end. But I think his story is almost over.
I kind of wondered if Dickens wasn't using his story (with Leicester) to show how ridiculous these things start out to be and how they can go on eternally if someone doesn't man up and take the high road? Otherwise you end up with court cases that no one wants to touch.
I kind of wondered if Dickens wasn't using his story (with Leicester) to show how ridiculous these things start out to be and how they can go on eternally if someone doesn't man up and take the high road? Otherwise you end up with court cases that no one wants to touch.
Not much to say at the moment but Lady Dedlock just died. Like people do in Dickens novels. They do not have to commit suicide - they just die from shock and broken hearts!
I had this sudden but not quite so profound thought that this is much like a Shakespearean tragedy. I honestly can't remember if I read Othello or not in college as we read a number of them and it was all I could do to keep up, I do wonder that Bucket made the sudden reference to this play to Mrs. Snagsby in terms of her mental state and now I would like to know if there is indeed some literary reference embedded into this whole story.
I had this sudden but not quite so profound thought that this is much like a Shakespearean tragedy. I honestly can't remember if I read Othello or not in college as we read a number of them and it was all I could do to keep up, I do wonder that Bucket made the sudden reference to this play to Mrs. Snagsby in terms of her mental state and now I would like to know if there is indeed some literary reference embedded into this whole story.
Curious that this was said in an article which is not the reason for my thinking but also reminds me how I originally thought the book was sort of written like a play at times:
Bleak House is Dickens's most Shakespearean novel in that every character speaks what they are thinking. Speechifies rather. What they're thinking and why they're thinking it. And why they're saying what they're thinking.
Article location:
Bleak House is Dickens's most Shakespearean novel in that every character speaks what they are thinking. Speechifies rather. What they're thinking and why they're thinking it. And why they're saying what they're thinking.
Article location:
Also, I am wondering if Jarndyce isn't actually now trying to set up Esther and Woodcourt.....
You are now getting to the good parts! The story should roll now for you.
I like the Shakespeare references. I would say, given it's Dickens, it's deliberate. Maybe that's why I liked this one so well...I like Shakespeare.
Othello is interesting. But Dedlock's husband didn't kill her nor did Sir Leicester. Or is she Othello? And it was her actions that killed her sailor guy?
I like the Shakespeare references. I would say, given it's Dickens, it's deliberate. Maybe that's why I liked this one so well...I like Shakespeare.
Othello is interesting. But Dedlock's husband didn't kill her nor did Sir Leicester. Or is she Othello? And it was her actions that killed her sailor guy?
So probably not Othello...I was thinking along the lines that Lady Dedlock felt the need to die when Sir Leicester was more than willing to forgive her and at the same time her disappearance and death did him in. That would be of the Romeo and Juliet tragedy type but I wonder if it falls in line with another play or just the way Dickens rolls with characters dying of broken hearts. But interesting you also think of tying in the murder....
I finished up last night and confirmed my suspicions from message 187. Interestingly, when Jarndyce was telling her he knew he would want to marry her when she was a little girl I couldn't help but think Lolita even though I have not read that yet. Imagine my surprise when I go back to the front of the book and there is a portion of a lecture on Bleak House by none other than Vladimir Nabokov.
I have to say that nothing surprised me at the end. I don't know if I read a spoiler somewhere or if Dickens just foreshadowed it so well but I was pretty confident that once the court case was resolved that there would be no money left.
All the same it was a great read for me which is no surprise.
I have to say that nothing surprised me at the end. I don't know if I read a spoiler somewhere or if Dickens just foreshadowed it so well but I was pretty confident that once the court case was resolved that there would be no money left.
All the same it was a great read for me which is no surprise.
I think Dickens made it fairly obvious about the case itself. But I thought it was interesting what it did to Richard.
I think Dickens romanticized this story, which surprised me. I guess I felt he gave everyone a happy ending (although probably not so much Lady Dedlock).
And the Jarndyce marrying Esther thing bothered me too. On the one hand, it gave a poor girl a safe haven. On the other hand, creepy old guy!
But yay to you for finishing it. Now you can devote yourself to Proust. I think you lost Sarah though on that journey.
I think Dickens romanticized this story, which surprised me. I guess I felt he gave everyone a happy ending (although probably not so much Lady Dedlock).
And the Jarndyce marrying Esther thing bothered me too. On the one hand, it gave a poor girl a safe haven. On the other hand, creepy old guy!
But yay to you for finishing it. Now you can devote yourself to Proust. I think you lost Sarah though on that journey.
Jeremy wrote: "So probably not Othello...I was thinking along the lines that Lady Dedlock felt the need to die when Sir Leicester was more than willing to forgive her and at the same time her disappearance and de..."
I didn't think of it like that. I always think of Othello as murderously jealous rage. I think I tend to forget the nuances. There is a certain star-crossed lovers tragedy to it. Although I suppose you could pick any tragedy and make it work. Dickens was fairly broad here.
Love the Nabokov find! That is really cool. I don't particularly care for Lolita, but I like him.
I didn't think of it like that. I always think of Othello as murderously jealous rage. I think I tend to forget the nuances. There is a certain star-crossed lovers tragedy to it. Although I suppose you could pick any tragedy and make it work. Dickens was fairly broad here.
Love the Nabokov find! That is really cool. I don't particularly care for Lolita, but I like him.

ETA: I found the guardian thing with Esther to be creepy. I'm glad that they didn't end up together and that Esther received a happy ending.


I have Charles Dickens: A Life that I am hoping to get to this year, too. Does anyone else have this one?
Yes, Richard was very tragic. And incredibly stubborn. Although it might have been hard to deal with him if he turned out as angelic as Esther and Ada. It might have seemed too happy happy joy joy. Can only have so many David Copperfields!
I liked how in the end Boythorn and Leicester turned out to be adversaries for sport and weren't truly angry with each other anymore.
I do not have that book on Dickens. I think I'd rather read all of his fiction before getting to the biographical type stuff...but maybe that will change after I've read a few more. I liked Great Expectations the best, too, but still do not have one I don't like. And hopefully I don't bring this up too much, but the point on his works becoming darker. I finally checked and realized that I have not read a single work from the first half of his career. I think I am going to finish the "older" books, with likely exception to Edwin Drood as it was unfinished and then start from the beginning of his works.
I liked how in the end Boythorn and Leicester turned out to be adversaries for sport and weren't truly angry with each other anymore.
I do not have that book on Dickens. I think I'd rather read all of his fiction before getting to the biographical type stuff...but maybe that will change after I've read a few more. I liked Great Expectations the best, too, but still do not have one I don't like. And hopefully I don't bring this up too much, but the point on his works becoming darker. I finally checked and realized that I have not read a single work from the first half of his career. I think I am going to finish the "older" books, with likely exception to Edwin Drood as it was unfinished and then start from the beginning of his works.

By the way, I really enjoyed our first buddy read together! I hope that we can do another down the road.
Meghan, thanks for chiming in. As always, your comments were much appreciated!
Every time someone mentions Drood, I think of Doctor Who (Dickens appeared in one of the episodes) and they playfully implied how he was influenced in writing it.
Well, let me know if either of you pick up another one. Little Dorrit is on my up-next list, although no time table set.
Well, let me know if either of you pick up another one. Little Dorrit is on my up-next list, although no time table set.

I can handle November, although I have found I tend to read him in the summer. Interesting. But would love to do a group read. This was fun. Sort of sad I didn't read this one with you both.
Books mentioned in this topic
Charles Dickens (other topics)The Things They Carried (other topics)
Our Mutual Friend (other topics)
Vanity Fair (other topics)
The End of the Affair (other topics)
More...
I made a note of the O'Brien books. He is a gap in my reading that I would like to address, and I agree that you and I do tend to have similar reading tastes.
Skimpole is different. The last chapter that I had read before going to bed last night puts him in an interesting light, which may change your perspective. I'll be curious to see :)