Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ Librarians Group discussion
Looking for a Project?
>
Reader level
date
newest »



So, it is remove that reference from the title and insert it in the description, right?
And if it is an adaptation it should be separated from the original book, correct?

So, it is remove that reference from the title and insert it in the description, right?
And if it is an adaptation it shoul..."
correct. You should also make certain, if it's an adaptation, that the adaptors name is listed first, and the author of the orignal work second, to prevent accidental combining in the future.
ETA: you'll hardly go slower than me, I caught the page with all the Houghton Mifflin School editions... lol.

What to do with listings like this (teacher's reading resource kits?)
/book/show/1...

Mimi wrote: "QUESTION FOR RIVKA (or someone similarly qualified):
What to do with listings like this (teacher's reading resource kits?)
/book/show/1......"
Leave them be. They are usually a book (or several books), regardless of that "kit" designation.
What to do with listings like this (teacher's reading resource kits?)
/book/show/1......"
Leave them be. They are usually a book (or several books), regardless of that "kit" designation.


What to do with listings like this (teacher's reading resource kits?)
/book/show/1......"
I realized they're a collection of books, I'm just having a hard time figuring out how to clean up the titles...
Honestly, they're driving me bonkers today, I'll leave them for another volunteer.

We're just posting on which page we're starting as to not run into eachother too much (3 librarians working from the same page results in double work and problems ;) )
And yes, eventually the amount of pages will be dwindle down. :)
Mimi wrote: "I realized they're a collection of books, I'm just having a hard time figuring out how to clean up the titles..."
The one you linked looked correct as is.
The one you linked looked correct as is.


However, I've started on page 20 for today. Results are like in this book:
/book/show/9...
I'm also including a "change note" that goes like this:
Removed information from the title field to the description field as part of a GR project to adjust to policy.

Rivka's linked list, although it shows 100 pages, is actually 165 pages long! (3289 items divided by 20 items per page) That means that it will be a while before we start seeing the numbers go down.
I have been working on subsets of the linked page just so I can see some progress. ("Readers Level" - x) It helps when I am feeling overwhelmed.
That's information that could go in the description field, but not the title.
Note: Many of these are adaptations, but not all.