2025 Reading Challenge discussion

This topic is about
The Color of Magic
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
ARCHIVE 2019
>
The Color of Magic (Discworld #1)
date
newest »


I have quite a bit of knowledge of Discworld which I think I must have gained through osmosis. I have also heard that although The Colour of Magic is the first book in the series, it may not necessarily be the best and to not let that put you off from continuing to explore Discworld. Anyway, I can't wait to see what it's like for myself.
* Would highly recommend Good Omens if you haven't read it already. Especially if you like the humour in The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy.


That depends, can you commit to a 41-month schedule?
I kid, welcome, join in, bring some friends. One book or all of them or somewhere in between. I will be reading all of them whether or not the group read is maintained.

I am only going to read Book One for now but I am interested in returning to Discworld in the future so if we do the series buddy read, you may see me pop up there.
Marc, having read the series before, if you had to pick just one, which Discworld book is your favourite?

Huuuuhhh... I don't have an easy answer to this, since I read them over a 30-year period, most of them only once, and my critical judgment has hopefully evolved over that time. With that said... Small Gods, The Truth and Thief of Time stand out. I was always partial to the early Guard books (Guards, Guards! and Men at Arms). Mort and Reaper Man are also stand-out for featuring the character and cosmology of Discworld's Death.

Depends on how much I enjoy the first book and when my library has the others available. I mostly read sci-fi and mystery, this is my first proper fantasy read (I don't count the urban fantasy stuff I've read).



For those who don't love this book (or the second book in the series), the series improves quite a bit with the third book. Fans of the series often encourage new readers to start with other books in the series and return to the first two books later but for what it's worth I prefer to read them in chronological order.

I wanted to start reding his books in order of publishing for so long

I wanted to start reding his books in order of publishing for so long"
Welcome over here!
RJ wrote: "...(Ankh-Morpork is similar to Fritz Leiber's Lankhmar from his Fafhrd and the Grey Mouser stories - and those characters appear briefly in this book as "Bravd and the Weasel")..."
Thanks for that note. I have never read Lankhmar but the first book is in my "read in 2019 or die" list (only 6 books to go in that list). A lot of the humor and fantasy references escaped me when I first read Colour of Magic at age 10 or 11; I only became aware of the Ankh-Morpork name riff fairly recently. I probably was well aware of the origins of Cohen the Barbarian (I think I saw the Arnold Conan movie at age 9). I didn't get "in-sewer-ants" as a kid.
One part of Discworld that never worked well for me was Cut-me-own-throat Dibbler. I am not sure if he first appears in Colour of Magic or later. I was unfamiliar with the idea of selling meat pies on the street or the character concept at all as a young reader. Is it a particularly British construct? I will be curious to see what my take on him will be on this go-around.


I finished the first story. Really funny.
Update:: Okay i guess 8 is some magical/good/evil/special number in the story so it makes sense to have 8 seasons, 8 colors, 8....

More on that in part two.

Answered in the first footnote (the first of many glorious footnotes that will grace us in this series), on p. 5 or thereabouts.

I previously posted that the first book may be a little rough; I am not finding this to be the case at all now that I have started it. The writing is charming and the humor is spot on. Cosmic sex joke by page 2! The world's cosmology and Ankh Morpork's character are given shape wonderfully. Pratchett's depictions of human nature (both individual and collective) and politics in the first chapter are delighful. In fact, "delightful" is the word for my whole experience with this book right now. I am only on like, page 30 or so. I was very pleased at the explanation of Twoflower's place of origin; that detail must have not sunk in or had escaped me since my last read 30 years ago. I finally get "reflected-sound-of-underground-spirits"
I am excited too to read it in the 1983 hardcover book club edition. The cover art is amazing:

I got it and about 25 more similarly bound Discworld books recently at my local Friends of the Public Library book sale. They put on huge donation-driven sales and I volunteer at them to set up so that I can get first look at the offerings; I walked away with these gems for $1 each. I don't think this edition is worth any $$ but it is precious to me.
I also still have my first paperback copy, the 1985 Corgi edition, with Josh Kirby's madcap grotesque cover art:

So yeah, loving it.

I was surprised that I misrembered Cohen being in this one. We got a different barbarian instead.
What I especially liked was that it had fun with fantasy conventions without mocking them; making fun with instead of making fun of. I don't really think of it as parody or satire, rather simply good-hearted, humorous fantasy.

I'm in for the first four books only.
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.
Books mentioned in this topic
The Colour of Magic (other topics)The Colour of Magic (other topics)
I later grew up with every Discworld entry, buying them in paperback throughout my teens (in Canada, they only came out in paperback for many years).
The last time I re-read The Colour of Magic many many years ago, it was kind of rough. While foundational, it might not be up to the quality that the Discworld series achieved over time. Like, it even has chapters. So to my fellow buddy readers, I request that you stick with the series for a few books before passing judgment if this is your first time. If struggling with this, we can always decide to skip ahead to titles that are generally acknowledged as indicative of the quality of the series as a whole.