ŷ������

Well, I did say it would all end in chaos, but comparing to The Scream naturally grabbed my attention. But the analogy is way off the mark. In fact, it shows they don't understand the essence of agony beyond an earthly reality.

More information can be found at . Free eBook.

Reading this article on the in the workplace sheds lights on their “very different" and “secret world��.

I can well believe that the male members' "attitudes worsen as they rise through the ranks from junior barrister to judges" and that it is “pointless to complain... to the clubbable world of senior members". After all, I complained about the barristers and judges involved in Lily's kidnapping but got absolutely nowhere.

The most telling quote for me was: "The boys in my chambers I look at them and think I don’t think they are like it when they join...��. Sounds like they sell their morals to join the club. So, is it really farfetched to believe the barristerhood would cover-up a mistake by a (QC barrister) judge even if it involved (technically at least) the kidnap of a child?

More information can be found at . Free eBook.

There are no #FathersDay cards behind these four walls. Although that doesn't make me feel sad �� that reservoir of emotion ran dry years ago �� the torture of injustice compels me to fan the embers of hope once again....

Continuing on the topic of democracy , it occured to me that the Clintons also grace, albeit briefly, the pages of my own tome. There is one passage that mentions the letter I wrote to the then US Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton:

In the letter, I mentioned that she might know my MEP Mrs Kinnock who recently attended the presidential inauguration as a personal guest of Vice President Joe Biden and that if she needed independent confirmation of the information I provided, she could call Mrs Kinnock who knew of the matter. Eva was an American citizen, so I thought there was an outside chance that something would come of my letter to Clinton. Also, if I were a US law enforcement officer, I would have gone straight to the US Central Authority and checked through some files after reading that letter. I would then have taken some actions, which would definitely have protected children in the USA. I hoped Clinton might reciprocate and help.

Surely the protection of their children is more important to US voters than the financial affairs of a political dynasty. So, in a proper functioning democracy, the US media would also give my book some coverage? Ideally yes, but the truth is friendly nations put their relations and image before truth and justice.

Although the US has donned its world-police cap in tackling corrupt institutions such as FIFA, it won't rock the boat with UK authorities over its Hague Convention on Child Abduction abuse even though such abuse has consequences for all countries. Because to do so would heap intense criticism on government agencies, politicians, judges and powerful law firms and attack the very notion that the UK respects its citizens and the rule of law. Consequently, don't expect to see a journalist put a microphone under Hillary's nose and ask if she did indeed take steps to protect US children from being kidnapped �� in the UK, child abduction by fraud is classified as kidnapping �� or any mention of Lily's abduction in the US media for that matter.

More information can be found at . Free eBook.

This week, a news article discussed a on the Clintons financial arrangements. As Hillary is running a presidential campaign, this book will get plenty of public exposure in the media. And rightly so, because in a proper functioning democracy, the electorate should know what their elected-representatives-to-be get up to. Which made me wonder (again) why my book hasn't garnered a single column inch in any media publication.

My book poses a number of important questions that politicians and political parties should answer:
1/. Did the Prime Minister sack Baroness Kinnock (as I predicted) to cover-up Lily's abduction?
2/. Did the (current) Prime Minister tell my MP to renege on his offer to help my family for the same reason?
3/. Did both Prime Ministers force anonymity on my family under pressure from the Ministry of Justice?
4/. Did the Ministry of Justice indeed pressure the Parliamentary Ombudsman to reverse her decision?
5/. Why did politicians from all main parties (Justice and Europe Ministers etc.) stand by and do nothing when they could have done something?

The list goes on but you get the idea. Three years after publication, not one politician has been asked a single question. And some of them are currently running for re-election, including the Prime Minister. So why is that? I suspect because they did indeed cover-up my daughter's abduction. Both a major fail for democracy and justice.

More information can be found at . Free eBook.

Last week, the that UK children had suffered abuse on an "industrial scale". Like most ordinary people, I had no idea this was going on. The book's message, "Defend the Children of the Poor and Punish the Wrongdoer", is prophetic indeed. The chances of its discovery in such a manner are enormous as this extract from my book reveals:

The odds on finding that maxim...are quite simply astronomical �� try it yourself: pick an issue that has been on your mind recently; select seven people you would like to discuss it with if you could; over the next twenty-four hours, select a phrase or some words that you have never come across that really connects you to the issue; then check the Internet to see if those words are derived from ancient religious scriptures and are written, word for word, on the faces of any of the people you chose and that person works towards its meaning and poses in a way identical to the source of the phrase or words you found."

But then that still dwarfs the probability described in the final chapter, which is also related to the maxim. You may dismiss one or the other but can you dismiss both?

More information can be found at . Free eBook.

Within the last month, we have seen Rotherham council branded as “not fit for purpose��, the National Health Service (NHS) management blamed for unnecessary deaths, the NHS accused of (still) being tough on whistleblowers, banks accused of helping tax dodgers, Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (HMRC) not prosecuting the rich and political donors accused of tax dodging. The link between them all is that there is a culture of “turning a blind eye�� by institutions helping themselves or elites while damaging the public in the process. Those involved are also in denial.

This culture is found in all sectors but not in the legal profession it seems �� I cannot recall a single case of a whistleblower in that profession �� and a factor why the following is to be found in my book:

Loyalty in the legal world is distorting its own peculiar sense of reality. Loyalty is the legal world's gravity: it holds that world together; it is omnipotent; it cannot be seen but its effects are observable; it can be a powerful force of destruction. As it grows stronger and more powerful, one can only hope such a strange world will be ultimately crushed by its own “weight��.

More information can be found at . Free eBook.

I really identified with this powerful article, .

And these words in particular:

#the sanctity of whistleblowing may be written into law, in both the UK and US, but for most it will be a traumatic experience
#I realised what they were talking about was real, not just a mental health issue �� their lives were under threat
#Most of us like to think we would stand up and be counted when faced with wrongdoing, but the hard truth is that most of us don’t
#They often also have a courage drawn from an ideology, religion or strong set of principles...from “a sense of belonging to something greater than the organisation they work for, whether God, humanity or some broader community��
#People are suddenly plunged into a world they didn’t know existed, where the rules they thought applied don’t
#The loneliness and isolation that comes with the territory seems to feed our view of them as weird misfits who have merely found their natural state
#the strongest-willed individuals find the burden of standing out from the crowd unbearable over time...and we have a clear picture of ourselves as social creatures who, for the most part, would rather be wrong than isolated
#our healthy and necessary desire to be social can be turned against us within bad systems, or by bad leaders
#Ideally, whistleblowers should always form a small team, because when you’re a whistleblower against a powerful system, the system dismisses you as a fanatic. But if you have three people, what you’re saying becomes a point of view.��

And the last one is just one factor in my isolation and the total media block.

More information can be found at . Free eBook.

I came across this today and it reminded me of certain conclusions I drew in my book.

Compare these quotes from the article and my own book:

Article
The group is alleged to have included senior figures in public life, the military, politics and law enforcement.
..."They had no hesitation in doing what they wanted to do," Nick said. "Some of them were quite open about who they were. They had no fear at all of being caught, it didn't cross their mind."

Book
The cover-up was so complete that it must have involved several people in positions of real power across the whole spectrum of the Establishment. That observation is supported by the fact that even though some of the cover-up activities were serious, the perpetrators obviously didn't think there was a risk in doing them....It was as if the Establishment had hit the emergency button, classified the cover-up as priority number one and locked down every avenue to justice. That every political party, lawyer, police authority, charity, court and media entity I contacted were nullified beggared belief.

Nothing has changed. Those that aided Lily's abduction and the subsequent cover-up just knew they would get away with it.

In this country ironically called Great Britain, institutions are protected at the expense of the public: reputation before truth and justice.

More information can be found at . Free eBook.

This week, that the police prioritise car crime over serious crimes against children. The news story even made its way onto national television. All of this made me wonder (again) why a similar story published in this very blog a year ago didn't merit any interest whatsoever from the media.

also shows that human trafficking is taken seriously by the police, which makes it even more of a mystery as to why they won't investigate my daughter's abduction.

After eight years of knocking, the key to unlocking justice's door is as elusive as ever. But then it has been securely bolted from the inside.

More information can be found at . Free eBook.

In my opinion, you can't trust the UK Prime Minister when he says he wants . After all, he did nothing to help my family when asked and actually aided the gagging of our tortuous treatment that continues to have a serious impact.