Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Celebrate Mystery/Thriller week with a FREE copy of The Camelot Shadow (is there a catch�?)

There's something to be said for original ideas. There's also something to be said for copycatting unoriginal ideas that work just dandy.

Last year, to celebrate mystery/thriller week on GR, we did a giveaway of The Camelot Shadow that was so wildly successful, virtual bookshelves everywhere started groaning under the weight of the tomes given away. So, let's run it back and do it again for the millions of adoring would-be fans who have added the book to their TBR since then. (I'm even liberally copying my own text from last year's post.)

The best part about this giveaway is that EVERYONE IS A WINNER, I’m not even going to make you read through all of my rambling, turgid prose below before telling you how to get your copy (though you’re more than welcome to continue reading my rambling, turgid prose, which is essentially what you’re committing to doing if you’re reading The Camelot Shadow anyway).

So, what do you need to do? Two simple things:

1) Add The Camelot Shadow to your “to read� list on GR so all your friends can see what good taste you have in handsomely-nosed independent authors; and

2) in the comments section below, list your favorite mystery or thriller (if you’re feeling effusive, please feel free to tell us why). (Also, I wouldn’t be upset if you shared this link with your GR friends.)

The only catch: you’ve got to do it by midnight (Eastern) on Sunday, April 8.

Once you’ve commented, I’ll send you a private message asking which format you’d like the book in (Mobi/ePub/PDF) and what email to send it to. It’s that easy, folks!

Now, if you’re only here for my goodies, you can stop reading (and, let’s face it, who DOESN’T want my goodies?).

Now then…you there—in the back. I see you waving your hand frantically. What is it?

“But, Mr. Handsomely-Nosed Independent Author—is The Camelot Shadow REALLY a mystery/thriller? I mean, come on—it’s set in Victorian times, when they didn’t even have cell phones or Snapchat or Dippin� Dots ice cream, and there’s magical stuff going on, and it’s got King Arthur references that don’t have anything to do with the Guy Ritchie movie (I mean, what’s that all about?), and the pacing is kind of slow out of the gate. Also, your nose isn’t all that handsome.�

Well, I’m glad you asked that, Mr. Bludgeoned Repeatedly and Enthusiastically With the Ugly Stick. The Camelot Shadow is something of a cross-genre hodgepodge, mainly because that’s exactly the kind of thing that I like to read. While I dig fast-paced, straight up thrillers on occasion (more on that below), I’m an even bigger fan of a slow burn mystery that builds up as characters are simultaneously built up and clues revealed, where an unexpected twist throws you off track and, before you can recover, you get twisted right back around, and where the characters can’t rely on high-tech gizmos to help save the day (not that there’s anything wrong with stories where that happens; I just love the dramatic tension of characters not instantly being able to communicate with each other across distances or find an answer to an unsolvable mystery in less than two seconds by Googling it). Throw in elements of history, fantasy, bromance/buddy movies, and a Victorian setting and you’ll literally see me drool. (Not that seeing me drool is a particularly unusual occurrence, incidentally, as all of my stained shirts will attest.)

So, sure—The Camelot Shadow isn’t a mystery/thriller in the same way that a Janet Evanovich or Nelson DeMille book is a mystery/thriller, but it’s got enough of such elements for me to use this week as an excuse to give you free books, so be quiet. If you dig mixing all of those genre elements together, you might like the book (and, if you don’t, I promise I won’t be mad if you have to publicly trash it in your review—reading is subjective, and we can still be friends). And, I have no idea what that Guy Ritchie/King Arthur nonsense was all about. Let's pretende it never happened.

As for MY favorite mystery or thriller? First off, I think those are two different things—a book can certainly have elements of both, but a story can also just be a straight mystery (that’s not so thrilling, and I don’t mean that pejoratively), or a straight thriller (where the reader knows what’s going on but the characters don’t, and it’s a pulse-poundingly, rip-roaringly paced yarn). Putting that aside, though, and with nods to more contemporary writers like Douglas Preston and Lincoln Child (the Pendergast books never fail to entertain), Dan Brown (The Camelot Shadow borrows from the formula that Brown has popularized so adeptly in his Robert Langdon books), and John Saul (that man writes some creepy thrillers), as well as masters of the genre like Agatha Christie and Edgar Allen Poe (arguably the inventor of the genre), I have to go with a tale featuring a certain deerstalker-wearing detective: The Hound of the Baskervilles. The combination of Holmes and Watson (the best detective duo ever, for my money), a haunting setting, the intimation of supernatural chicanery afoot, and some of Doyle’s most effective pacing makes for an unforgettable reading experience.

Now then—let’s hear from you�
19 likes ·   •  41 comments  •  flag
Published on April 02, 2018 09:44 Tags: camelot-shadow, free-books, mystery, thriller
Comments Showing 1-41 of 41 (41 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Patrick (new)

Patrick I am fond of Agatha Christie's Miss Marple series for reasons I've never quite understood. The Body In The Library stands out for me.


message 2: by Sean (new)

Sean Gibson Patrick wrote: "I am fond of Agatha Christie's Miss Marple series for reasons I've never quite understood. The Body In The Library stands out for me."

Can't go wrong with those, Patrick! My only gripe with Miss Marple is that it just makes me think someone is misspelling "maple," and then I start thinking about maple syrup, which makes me want waffles, and then I completely lose the thread of the story (also, paper + drool = suboptimal combo).


message 3: by Gary (last edited Apr 02, 2018 01:44PM) (new)

Gary Sundell While Holmes and Watson are tough to beat, at least Inspectors Gregson abd Lestrade always said so. There are others I enjoy just as much. Wolfe and Goodwin, Mason and Drake and Street, Lam and Cool, the detectives at the 87th Precinct, Luis Mendoza and his crew in Robbery and Homicide, Poirot, and Marple, for starters.

Thrillers: Sigma Force, The Odessa File, Where Eagles Dare.

Just a few to help the conversation along.


message 4: by Sean (new)

Sean Gibson Gary wrote: "While Holmes and Watson are tough to beat, at least Inspectors Gregson abd Lestrade always said so. There are others I enjoy just as much. Wolfe and Goodwin, Mason and Drake and Street, Lam and Coo..."

Jeez, Gary...I don't know half of those characters! What books are they from? And where should I start?


message 5: by Gary (last edited Apr 02, 2018 11:28PM) (new)

Gary Sundell very funny....I left out Frank and Joe and their buddy Chet Morton.


message 6: by Sean (new)

Sean Gibson Is it bad that I was being serious and don’t actually know half those characters??


message 7: by Gary (new)

Gary Sundell You haven't read Nero Wolfe, Perry Mason, Donald Lam and Bertha Cool (by the same author as Perry Mason), the 87th Precinct is by EdMcBain, Luis Mendoza is by Elizabeth Linnington writing as Dell Shannon. Thd add on was the Hardy Boys.

Sigma Force is by James Rollins, Where Eagles Dare by Alistair MacLean, The Odessa File by Frederick Forsythe.


message 8: by Sean (new)

Sean Gibson Gary wrote: "You haven't read Nero Wolfe, Perry Mason, Donald Lam and Bertha Cool (by the same author as Perry Mason), the 87th Precinct is by EdMcBain, Luis Mendoza is by Elizabeth Linnington writing as Dell S..."

See, except for the Hardy Boys, those are all unfamiliar to me! You're givin' me a schoolin' on mysteries...


Adi Rocks Socks Hercule Poirot will always rule the genre for me � all about using those little grey cells, non? My favourite of the Poirot books has got to be Five Little Pigs � it’s one of Poirot’s finest, imo.

Uhhh, what else? James Rollins� Sigma Force series has already been mentioned, and I totally agree � it’s fab! And about Holmes and Watson � I do enjoy Doyle’s work, but I think I enjoy the retellings it has rendered possible even better, right from stories about the Baker Street Irregulars to television shows like Sherlock and Elementary. Sherlock Holmes is a genre unto itself.

Also, twelve year old me thought Artemis Fowl and Alex Rider were both thrilling and captivating, and twenty one year old me totally agrees.

And one last shout out to Otto Malpense from the HIVE series!

(Okay, I’m done rambling. 🕵ï¸â€â™€ï¸�)


message 10: by Adi Rocks Socks (new)

Adi Rocks Socks Adult me would like to add to the above: Anything by Robin Cook. If you look up the meaning of thrillers in the dictionary, you’ll find his name there, sitting in bold typeface.


message 11: by Sean (new)

Sean Gibson broken-barriers wrote: "Hercule Poirot will always rule the genre for me � all about using those little grey cells, non? My favourite of the Poirot books has got to be Five Little Pigs � it’s one of Poirot’s..."

Poirot is pretty splendiferous--I'll co-sign on that proposition. :)

Holmes really is its own genre at this point, and there is some delightful Holmesian pastiche out there (there's also some execrable Holmesian pastiche, but, well, them's the breaks when you create the most famous detective in the history of detecting).

Thanks for weighing in! :)


message 12: by Sean (new)

Sean Gibson broken-barriers wrote: "Adult me would like to add to the above: Anything by Robin Cook. If you look up the meaning of thrillers in the dictionary, you’ll find his name there, sitting in bold typeface."

Adulting is highly overrated in my humble opinion, but we'll allow this nod to maturity. :)


message 13: by Gary (new)

Gary Sundell Sean wrote: "broken-barriers wrote: "Hercule Poirot will always rule the genre for me � all about using those little grey cells, non? My favourite of the Poirot books has got to be [book:Five Little Pigs|121648..."

My favorite faux Holmes is the Solar Pons series by August Derleth and later Basil Copper.

The Ellery Queen and Sherlock Holmes novel Study in Terror is great fun as well.


message 14: by Sean (new)

Sean Gibson Ooh, Study in Terror—I think I need to check that out.


message 15: by Gary (new)

Gary Sundell Sean wrote: "Ooh, Study in Terror—I think I need to check that out."

It is loosely tied to the movie of the same name. Holmes takes on Jack the Ripper. The manuscript by Watson ends up in Ellery's hands. Ellery is not in the movie.


message 16: by Sean (new)

Sean Gibson Gary wrote: "Sean wrote: "Ooh, Study in Terror—I think I need to check that out."

It is loosely tied to the movie of the same name. Holmes takes on Jack the Ripper. The manuscript by Watson ends up in Ellery's..."


I haven't seen the movie, either...will you stop piling on things I need to check out?? I'm only one man, Gary!


message 17: by Gary (new)

Gary Sundell Sorry my friend. If you lived nearby I'd loan you my copy of the paperback of the novel. I recently reread the ebook version which Open Road Media/Mysterious Press has published.


message 18: by Sean (new)

Sean Gibson Curse your lack of proximity! :)


message 19: by Laura Tenfingers (new)

Laura Tenfingers A recent thriller I enjoyed was Good Me, Bad Me, a very non-put-downable one-sitting read.
As for mysteries... Hercule Poirot is quite iconic, but for something different I'll say The Queen's Man by Sharon Kay Penman, a medieval mystery.


message 20: by [deleted user] (new)

How many mysteries/thrillers need to be mentioned? I have lots and please do not force me to choose.

1. Sherlock Holmes by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. THE original detective; still fun to read.
2. Hercule Poirot and Miss Marple by Dame Agatha Christie. Nobody created more complicated, but (im)possible to solve mysteries. Just avoid her political thrillers.
3. Nero Wolfe and Archie Goodwin by Rex Stout. The best interaction between the main characters.
4. Perry Mason. I hate courtroom drama with a passion. This one is a notable exception. Perry Mason makes boring court proceedings look exciting.
5. Anything by Dashiel Hammett. The guy created noir genre.
6. Philip Marlowe by Raymond Chandler. This guy took pulp literature (noir) and made it art form.
7. Lew Archer by Ross Macdonald. If you think good noir takes place in the beginning of the 20th century, take a look at this. Nobody does "Skeletons in a family closet" better. Nobody.

I think I covered the major people :)


message 21: by Sean (new)

Sean Gibson Thanks for the great inputs, Laura and Evgeny--many more to add to my list!


message 22: by Sean (new)

Sean Gibson Kristy wrote: "Thriller authors I enjoy include Dean Koontz and John Saul"

Love me some John Saul!


message 23: by Sean (new)

Sean Gibson Kristy wrote: "When I was quite young I read "Comes the Blind Fury" at my older sisters suggestion. Since then I developed a serious suspicion of all dolls..and my sisters wicked intentions"

Haha! Dolls are just plain creepy. And so are your sisters, apparently.


message 24: by Andrew (new)

Andrew Caldwell Love, Sherlock Holmes, Poirot and especially the Saint ....


message 25: by Adi Rocks Socks (new)

Adi Rocks Socks Sean wrote: "Kristy wrote: "When I was quite young I read "Comes the Blind Fury" at my older sisters suggestion. Since then I developed a serious suspicion of all dolls..and my sisters wicked intentions"

Haha!..."


Dolls indeed are creepy � that’s my major take back from all those horror movies that I somehow end up watching.


message 26: by Sean (new)

Sean Gibson Andrew wrote: "Love, Sherlock Holmes, Poirot and especially the Saint ...."

All good choices, Andrew!


message 27: by Derpa (new)

Derpa I'm a sad person, because I don't really read mystery. Not because I don't want to, but because I don't know where to start and even just picking from my own tbr causes me distress. Send help.


message 28: by Sean (new)

Sean Gibson Derpa wrote: "I'm a sad person, because I don't really read mystery. Not because I don't want to, but because I don't know where to start and even just picking from my own tbr causes me distress. Send help."

Haha! A daunting problem, to be sure.

I'd start with Sherlock Holmes...


message 29: by Luisa (new)

Luisa I'm a Sherlock fan myself :)


message 30: by Sean (new)

Sean Gibson Luisa wrote: "I'm a Sherlock fan myself :)"

Well of course you are, Luisa--you have an exquisite taste in books. Possibly the most refined on Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ. :)


message 31: by Dichotomy Girl (new)

Dichotomy Girl Mystery isn't really my go-to genre, unless it's in space or involves magic, or takes place in a evil dystopia.

I could name many authors or series that I've enjoyed over the years, the classics, the obscure, the delightfully bizarre. But the most recent mystery series that I enjoyed is the Cormoran Strike series by Robert Galbraith aka J.K. Rowling


message 32: by Sean (new)

Sean Gibson Dichotomy Girl wrote: "Mystery isn't really my go-to genre, unless it's in space or involves magic, or takes place in a evil dystopia.

I could name many authors or series that I've enjoyed over the years, the classics, ..."


I'm with you on the enhancing qualities of magic/supernatural in mysteries! (Hence, The Camelot Shadow.)


³Õ²¹±ô¾±Ã« Débora I don't usually go for mystery or thriller.... but maybe the Dresden Files series would apply?
It has lots of action, magic, mithology references... and all while being a series of detective cases.
No doubt the world's best wizard named Harry.


message 34: by Sean (new)

Sean Gibson ³Õ²¹±ô¾±Ã« wrote: "I don't usually go for mystery or thriller.... but maybe the Dresden Files series would apply?
It has lots of action, magic, mithology references... and all while being a series of detective cases...."


That is a solid choice! (Though I suspect many Potterites may take umbrage with your choice of best wizard named Harry... :))


message 35: by Sean (new)

Sean Gibson I think I have reached out to everyone who posted here about getting their copy of The Camelot Shadow, but if you haven't heard from me, kick me in the shins! Or message me, which would be less painful for me.


message 36: by Cynthia Law (new)

Cynthia Law So many books, so little time... yes, that is an overused cliche but so true!

Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, Agatha Christie, J.K. Rowling (read all her books aloud to my kids), Nancy Drew and the Hardy Boys (from way back, not on my Kindle) and others buried in the electronic bits and bytes of my tablet. Iris Johansen (especially the stories about the rescue dog), Dick Francis (adventures on horseback). My list could get ridiculously long, so I'll stop.


message 37: by Sean (new)

Sean Gibson Cynthia Law wrote: "So many books, so little time... yes, that is an overused cliche but so true!

Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, Agatha Christie, J.K. Rowling (read all her books aloud to my kids), Nancy Drew and the Hardy ..."


Excellent choices all! I read the first two HP books to my son when he was still a bun baking in the oven (along with the Hobbit and The Princess Bride). :)


message 38: by Danielle (new)

Danielle Sherlock Holmes or Cormoran Strike novels by JK Rowling. I love British mysteries. I typically don’t love American mysteries. American mysteries always seem full of gore.


message 39: by Sean (new)

Sean Gibson Danielle wrote: "Sherlock Holmes or Cormoran Strike novels by JK Rowling. I love British mysteries. I typically don’t love American mysteries. American mysteries always seem full of gore."

Thanks for weighing in, Danielle! I'm glad we're all united in our Sherlockian love. :)


message 40: by Luisa (new)

Luisa Sean wrote: "Well of course you are, Luisa--you have an exquisite taste in books. Possibly the most refined on Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ. :)"

Why thank you kind sir, could that statement possibly have anything to do with being a big fan of a certain "Mr. Handsomely-Nosed Independent Author"?


message 41: by Sean (new)

Sean Gibson Luisa wrote: "Sean wrote: "Well of course you are, Luisa--you have an exquisite taste in books. Possibly the most refined on Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ. :)"

Why thank you kind sir, could that statement possibly have anything to..."


Of course not! That's just a complete coincidence. (Though it really does back up my assertion.) :)


back to top