Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Dawn Stowell's Reviews > What We See When We Read

What We See When We Read by Peter Mendelsund
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
28363483
's review

it was amazing
bookshelves: lit-crit, my-reviews
Read 2 times. Last read January 13, 2020 to January 15, 2020.

After my university course, I took in the year 2000, "An Introduction to Literary Theory and Criticism," my love of reading was completely destroyed by overanalysis and the formal application of the process of literary deconstruction that permeated and depleted my entire belief system. My worldview became incredibly jaded and it could not have been more bitter. I simply could no longer read fiction, and I could not believe in anything else either as my willing suspension of disbelief was much, much too greatly damaged. It took years to rediscover, rebuild and recover from this both psychic and intellectual injury. It truly nearly utterly destroyed me.

This is a book that offers full and complete redemption for that soul-rending experience. It is a brilliant, fascinating love affair with the visual that explores the act of reading. It takes abstract thoughts about reading and draws them down to the earth, makes love to meaning itself and gently writes them upon the minds of the receptive. This book solidifies the belief that all authors are curators of experience. It elicits an even deeper feeling of reverence than what was revealed to me previously. The like of which I experienced when I read The Guttenberg Elegies with its description of reading as "a resonance of deep time"( paraphrased) It takes the reader into this same space of "a resonance of deep time," and maps the constellations while still eluding assigning them mythological names or contemporary labels. The author keeps it real.

"the level of detail determines not what a person sees as they read, rather it informs their experience - their reading experience." (paraphrase)

"The feeling of reading in general (is of being)- in many many places at once.�

"We colonize books with our familiars and we exile, repatriate the characters to lands that we are more acquainted with."

"words potentiate meaning."

My summary, based on my understanding of Mendelsunds closing argument, is that:

"we reduce. And it is not without reverence that we reduce. This is how we apprehend our world. This is what humans do.�

---> is that all perception is the result of a blurring of the senses together with a melding of thoughts. These by the necessity of needing to stream and simplify this gestalt ocean of data become outlines, types, categories that are, at best, blurred versions of our perceived realities. And there is a huge, huge difference between deconstruction and reduction that I never knew existed until now. This book exalts (and does not deconstruct) the meaning of 'reduction,' and it also defines the glory to be found in our human attunement to this process of reduction that lovingly blurs our differences.

Perhaps then the unworded proposition is that reading is the act of seeing a bit better through this blur?

I think I might be in love with this book. Can you tell? Or perhaps it's awe, true awe. This is the rare phenomenon of being awestruck by beauty and magnificence combined.
11 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read What We See When We Read.
Sign In »

Quotes Dawn Liked

Peter Mendelsund
“Words are effective not because of what they carry in them, but for their latent potential to unlock the accumulated experience of the reader. Words "contain" meanings, but, more important, words potentiate meaning...”
Peter Mendelsund, What We See When We Read

Peter Mendelsund
“When you first open a book, you enter a liminal space. You are neither in this world, the world wherein you hold a book (say, this book), nor in that world (the metaphysical space the words point toward). To some extent this polydimensionality describes the feeling of reading in general-one is in many many places places at at once once.”
Peter Mendelsund, What We See When We Read


Reading Progress

September 6, 2014 – Shelved as: to-read
September 6, 2014 – Shelved
December 30, 2019 – Shelved as: lit-crit
January 13, 2020 – Started Reading
January 13, 2020 – Started Reading
January 15, 2020 – Finished Reading
January 15, 2020 – Finished Reading
December 18, 2021 – Shelved as: my-reviews

Comments Showing 1-3 of 3 (3 new)

dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Charlene (new) - added it

Charlene What a lovely review! I had a similar experience with coursework that sent me into a slow cycle of basically no longer being able to read fiction. We had to deconstruct Turn of the Screw, going line by line to say what the sentence says and what the author meant. Our final draft was longer than the book. Utter absurdity. However bad this sounds, it was worse. I

feel bad anytime I review a novel, even historical fiction novels, because I am so hard on what is probably fairly good work when compared with other fiction. I used to love fiction, to the point where I could not help but memorize passages and go over them in my mind for days or even years after. Now I seem to only be able to achieve a feeling of awe from nonfiction books that reveal beautiful scientific secrets of the world and larger universe. Maybe I should give this a look.


Dawn Stowell Charlene - I stumbled across your comment just now (for some reason I received absolutely no notification of it) - -- so this is a belated thank you for your words of appreciation and sharing your own personal experiences. I really like your, "reveal beautiful scientific secrets," To me, this relates to the concept that the underlying truths of any book are at their essence a matter of individual perception and reader response.

Mendelsund's offering really worked to help rewire my connections and to affirm my initial love of reading. He is a book cover artist/designer now trying his hand in the world of fiction.

Despite his lower Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ average rating 3.08 on his book "Same Same," I think I will have a look for myself.

Yes, if you have an inclination to things visual and being presented with ideas in a lateral way, sort of like in the manner of an optical illusion) then I highly recommend this book.

Thanks again, :)


message 3: by Charlene (new) - added it

Charlene Heather wrote: "Charlene - I stumbled across your comment just now (for some reason I received absolutely no notification of it) - -- so this is a belated thank you for your words of appreciation and sharing your ..."

I have definitely missed people's comments. For me, they can get lost in too many notifications. (Right now my orange button, which floats above my goodreads notification, says "50+" --pretty typical for me.

Sometimes I end up loving a low rated book. I was obsessed with Mary Beth Keane's Fever, historical fiction about Typhoid Mary. It has over 9,000 ratings and only averaged a 3.67. It was very simple, which is maybe why it didn't get a very high rating, but I enjoyed the hell out of it. So, you never know. Hopefully you will enjoy Mendelsund's Same Same. I read the description and it actually sounds like it has a lot of potential. The premise reminds me of something Lars von Trier or Charlie Kaufman would come up with.


back to top