Kat Kennedy's Reviews > Wither
Wither (The Chemical Garden, #1)
by
by

Kat Kennedy's review
bookshelves: kat-s-book-reviews, oppressive-dystopian-regime, to-ya-or-not-to-ya
Aug 16, 2010
bookshelves: kat-s-book-reviews, oppressive-dystopian-regime, to-ya-or-not-to-ya
After a great deal of reflection, I can't shake off the fondness I had for this novel. For me it had a deep, rich, intoxicating quality that I don't often read in Young Adult novels and has become an increasing rarity for me.
Many reviews make a deal of the problems associated with the implausible premise. If you think that’s going to bother you then you’re best to steer clear of this one. As for me, unbelievable characters or plot holes will ruin my reading experience but I’ve never necessarily been deterred by an implausible story vehicles so long as it gave me a good ride (TWSS). As with Unwind, I prefer to see the value of the idea fulfilled than to wonder over how likely, or unlikely it is.
However, Unwind’s premise was always very clearly tied to its themes and intentions which didn’t always feel as such with Withered. I found it difficult to determine what the main themes of Withered actually were. The value of freedom glimpsed from a gilded cage? The systematic oppression of women when society is placed under stress? The insidious nature of Stockholm syndrome?
Despite the ambiguity of the above, Wither is very readable, complete with unsettling atmosphere, interesting, relatable characters and a compelling plot. I wonder at the characterization of Linden, though, and it worries me. Raise The Red Lantern depicted this setting best, for me, by not even showing the husband on screen.
It strained credibility that he could be so naïve, so blind to the world around him and, at times, felt weak to not portray him as a more realistic character. Realistically, he would have been a character who purchased three girls from slave traders and, with full knowledge and forethought, forced them to marry him.
Perhaps that is the crux of the issue. Despite Rhine’s seeming pragmatism, there was a romanticizing, idealic undertone that couldn’t be ignored. Where the bad people are irredeemably bad and the good are great and we all know which side of that line they’re on. Whether black or white. Still, I can’t complain really. I thought every character was reasonably complex and interesting � even if I would have preferred to read this story with a different type of Linden, just to see a more bold stance by the author.
I think DeStefano’s strong stylistic abilities and natural story telling flare saved this for me. Parts of me wanted it to be a grittier, rawer read, but the other half wasn’t sure my blood pressure would take it.
So if you're looking for an interesting, thought-provoking YA Dystopian, give this a try!
Many reviews make a deal of the problems associated with the implausible premise. If you think that’s going to bother you then you’re best to steer clear of this one. As for me, unbelievable characters or plot holes will ruin my reading experience but I’ve never necessarily been deterred by an implausible story vehicles so long as it gave me a good ride (TWSS). As with Unwind, I prefer to see the value of the idea fulfilled than to wonder over how likely, or unlikely it is.
However, Unwind’s premise was always very clearly tied to its themes and intentions which didn’t always feel as such with Withered. I found it difficult to determine what the main themes of Withered actually were. The value of freedom glimpsed from a gilded cage? The systematic oppression of women when society is placed under stress? The insidious nature of Stockholm syndrome?
Despite the ambiguity of the above, Wither is very readable, complete with unsettling atmosphere, interesting, relatable characters and a compelling plot. I wonder at the characterization of Linden, though, and it worries me. Raise The Red Lantern depicted this setting best, for me, by not even showing the husband on screen.
It strained credibility that he could be so naïve, so blind to the world around him and, at times, felt weak to not portray him as a more realistic character. Realistically, he would have been a character who purchased three girls from slave traders and, with full knowledge and forethought, forced them to marry him.
Perhaps that is the crux of the issue. Despite Rhine’s seeming pragmatism, there was a romanticizing, idealic undertone that couldn’t be ignored. Where the bad people are irredeemably bad and the good are great and we all know which side of that line they’re on. Whether black or white. Still, I can’t complain really. I thought every character was reasonably complex and interesting � even if I would have preferred to read this story with a different type of Linden, just to see a more bold stance by the author.
I think DeStefano’s strong stylistic abilities and natural story telling flare saved this for me. Parts of me wanted it to be a grittier, rawer read, but the other half wasn’t sure my blood pressure would take it.
So if you're looking for an interesting, thought-provoking YA Dystopian, give this a try!
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
Wither.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
August 16, 2010
– Shelved
January 24, 2012
–
Started Reading
January 26, 2012
–
Finished Reading
January 29, 2012
– Shelved as:
kat-s-book-reviews
January 29, 2012
– Shelved as:
oppressive-dystopian-regime
January 29, 2012
– Shelved as:
to-ya-or-not-to-ya
Comments Showing 1-50 of 111 (111 new)
message 1:
by
Tatiana
(new)
-
rated it 2 stars
Jan 03, 2012 04:37AM

reply
|
flag


http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/...
http://www.goodreads.com/user_status/...
http://www.goodreads.com/author_blog_...

The review that started it all had a completely valid point to make. It doesn't reflect well on every author involved to have chosen that particular one to stir the trouble around.
And this Dan person is determined to have a bad rep even before his debut is out?

Tatiana wrote:The review that started it all had a completely valid point to make. It doesn't reflect well on every author involved to have chosen that particular one to stir the trouble around..."
I know and the sad part is the stuff Kira was concerned about is just getting overwhelmed with bullshit. Cross gets congratulated for acting like an adult in the face of criticism when the relevant thing was why she chose to portray a feminist that way. I'm glad she took a different path than Dan and I certainly respect her actions a thousand fold more than his, but all of this just brushed aside the original complaint.
Personally, I'll never know if Dan's book was any good. I'd rather stick a fifty dollar bill in a blender than support his career.

Same here. I didn't know his name before, but now I do and thanks, but no thanks, Mr.




This is the comment she left on my blog:
"When we responded to Dan, we had no idea about the Tempest review, and actually I had no idea what was going on until I had a bunch of less-than-savory emails and replies to a blog I wrote about a year ago: http://www.goodreads.com/author_blog_... I deleted most of them because I saw the discussion taking an ugly turn and I didn't want to turn what was meant to be an inspirational post into something ugly, which is where it was headed. I think my comment about Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ and 4chan was taken out of context. It had NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS REVIEW. I have never participated in a comment thread on a negative review, directly or indirectly or passive-aggressively.
I kept mostly silent for the past few days because I thought anything I said would just make matters worse, but given what I'm seeing here, maybe speaking up wouldn't hurt. If you saw my tweet and took offense, my intention was NOT to take part in the ongoing drama. I am cool with people disliking me because of, I dunno, my haircut or my last name, or flat out hating my book. But please don't think I hate reviewers, readers, or people who use this site. I love the crap out of readers. I spend most of every day tweeting, facebooking, blogging, answering questions and interacting with readers and my life would be heather gray without them."
Here's her official statement for it:
"Hi guys,
Yes, I clearly made the comment that you are linking to here on twitter. I thought a friend was talking about a negative review and I was commiserating (apparently I am the only one who didn't delete her tweets, as the rest of the discussion is gone). For authors, reading their own negative reviews or the negative comments on their person from people who have never met them IS worse than scrolling through 4chan. If I had to choose between 8 hours of scrolling through 4chan or 8 hours of scrolling through people saying things that are detrimental to me, I'd choose 4chan. I think most people probably would, but I can only speak for myself here. I have absolutely read things about authors and books that make 4chan look like a hallmark card, signed with a pink gel pen and dotted with hearts. Does this mean I think readers should be censored or nicer or more tactful? No. I stand by what I said in this blog. I'm glad my book has reviews, good, bad, indifferent, and I don't think there should be guidelines. I think GR is a place for reviewers and readers to do their thing. But I also stand by my tweet--for an author it is often quite damaging to seek out. It doesn't take away from the fact that I love readers. I love every email I get from them and I love their questions and discussions, and I love that this place exists. But I stay far, far away from its dark corners. Okay, just wanted to say my part. Carry on! "
I totally understand if people are angry over it still. Hurt and disappointment doesn't go away in a flash.
I just guess, at the end of the day, I don't really care anymore. She took the time to personally message me and apologize profusely over about eight messages. Massive author egos, in my experience, don't do that. So I guess I'm choosing to believe she was in earnest.
That or she is a fabulous actor/manipulator and has tricked both myself and Hannah Moskowitz, in which case, she still deserves kudos because that's pretty badass.

Love this
Lauren: "Your face is stilted."and this
Lauren: "and people commented and somebody said that I had whale arms."That funny shit needs to be written in a book somehow someway.
Hannah: "Whales don't even have arms."
Lauren: "Huh."

Also, I really liked this book, except for one tiny part that really had only a minor part in the story. Won't spoil it, though. I bet when you get to it, you'll know what I mean.








Miriam wrote: "I'm curious why there is so much emphasis on LD being "too young". Her bio says she is 28. I don't think that is particularly young to be published, especially in YA."
Yeah, I was just going to say this. I can see why a person would think she was a teenager, though.
I love Raise the Red Lantern.


I think she's just like that.


Sparrow - don't shatter my illusions! I'm concocting an elaborate conspiracy in my head in which DeStefano somehow knew I was misinformed and carefully cultivated this information to purposely trip me up.
There's no place for making sense here!

Sparrow - don't shatter my illusions! I'm concocting an elaborate conspiracy in my head in which DeStefano somehow knew I was misinformed and carefu..."
haha! I also hear that she buys young girls, marries them and feeds them nothing but gross-sounding candies all day long.

I heard she can juggle encyclopedias while burping the national anthem.

I heard she can juggle encyclopedias while burping the national anthem."
WHAT? I heard she makes her slave girls post all her pictures of small animals AND do all her burping for her! We need to get some kittens and puppies and small disabled children to do some research about this for us.

That was the cutest stationary I've ever seen and it made a lovely bookmarker. :D
And now I have just realized that I did not capitalize the "S" in her last name. Off to edit my Fever review once again.

Sparrow - also, yes, Raise The Red Lantern rocked so hard!

Is it any more troubling to you that she wrote a 13-y-o begging for statutory rape and getting lecturey about breast feeding now that you know she's a grownup woman?

Sparrow - also, yes, Raise The Red ..."
I know! What kind of reviewer am I? Nothing was as bad as someone telling me I spelled Sci-Fi wrong in my profile. O.O Talk about embarrassing! It was a tiny typo, but made me look like an idiot. LOL. I blame my "mommy brain".
Iz can spell, peoplez! I promisssseee!!

Sparrow - that aspect didn't bother me, really because it was very similar to a personal situation of mine.

I just noticed this statement - you mean she sent you a love note on this stationary too! Damnit, I thought I was special! I thought we had a blossoming friendship. I even made her matching Kindred Spirit friendship bracelets.
Did she sign your book too? I was really hoping for an inscription of some sort as well. Something like this would have been nice, "You are a crazy, psycho hose beast. I had to send this to you to placate your insanity. I hope you're happy. I hope you're real happy. Damnit, where are my pills? See what you've reduced me to? Burn in hell, Kat Kennedy! Burn in hell! Your friend, Lauren DeStefano."
Alas it wasn't to be...

I just noticed this statement - you mean she sent you a love note on this stationary too! Damnit, I thought I was..."
Hahaha! I've knitted her mittens and a matching hat. I cannot have her fingers freezing off while she has book three to write!
Yes, she signed mine too. I didn't even notice it until after I had started reading. She happened to write me an ego pumping note, "Stephanie, you are the coolest person ever! I die from overexposure to your awesomeness on GoodReads on a daily basis. Yours forever and ever and ever, Lauren <3."
True story, bro. XD

DeStefano, boo!
Y u no like me moar, eh?
I haz a sad now.