Kim's Reviews > A Civil Contract
A Civil Contract
by
This review contains some spoilers
I know from reading Jennifer Kloester’s excellent biography of Georgette Heyer* that A Civil Contract was not an easy novel for Heyer to write. Before starting work on it, Heyer wrote to a friend that she wanted to write a new kind of novel that would be “neither farcical nor adventurous�. Heyer wrote that the novel would depend for its success on whether she could make the hero as charming as she believed him to be and also on whether she “could make a quiet story interesting�. (Kloester p 330).
However, completion of the novel was delayed because Heyer’s mother became ill and required care. When she went back to writing it, she wrote to her friend that the manuscript remained
I am very glad that Heyer overcame writer’s block and completed the novel. For while I probably wouldn’t have thought much of it if I’d read it when I first discovered Heyer’s novels at age fourteen, having read it for the first time forty years later I think it is one of her best works.
This is the story of Adam Deveril, Viscount Lynton, who fought in the Peninsular War. Returning to England after his father’s death, Adam finds that his father’s extravagant spending has reduced the family fortune to a pittance. Adam’s financial situation is so dire that if he doesn't find a way to acquire money, he will be unable to support his sister and, crucially, he will have to sell the family home. All of this means that Adam cannot marry his beloved, Julia Oversley. In order to save the family estate, Adam agrees to contract a marriage of convenience with plain and practical Jenny, daughter of the fabulously wealthy but vulgar merchant, Jonathan Chawleigh, who wants his daughter to achieve the social status that marriage into an aristocratic family will bring. Jenny, who is an old school friend of Julia’s, marries Adam knowing that he continues to love Julia. They have a child, Adam manages to win back some of his fortune through speculation and they ultimately settle down to a happy and comfortable � if not passionate –life together.
Heyer did manage to achieve something different with this novel. While it doesn't have the sparkling comedy or wit of many of her other novels, it does have other qualities. At its heart, the novel is an exploration of what makes a successful marriage. And Heyer’s conclusion is that it’s not blinding, heart-stopping passion which makes a relationship last, but friendship, kindness, tolerance, patience, a commitment to the same goals and a shared sense of humour. That’s not something I would have understood or appreciated as a teenager. As someone who has been happily married to the same person for almost thirty-five years, it's now a message that rings true.**
That’s not to say that there’s anything wrong with a bit of blinding, heart-stopping passion in a marriage. And this is why there’s an undertone of sadness in the final paragraphs of the novel, as Jenny, while assured of Adam’s love for her, is nevertheless conscious that she had had an “impractical dream� of inspiring in Adam the “passionate adoration� that he had felt for Julia. However, Jenny is right in concluding that “life [is] not made up of moments of exaltation, but of quite ordinary, everyday things�, which are “not very romantic, but � really much more important than grand passions or blighted loves�.
Of all Heyer’s novels, A Civil Contract owes the most to Jane Austen. Indeed, it can be read as a tribute to Austen in general and to Sense and Sensibility in particular. Heyer establishes the link to Sense and Sensibility very early on, by describing Jenny as someone who “looked as though she had more sense than sensibility�. Shortly thereafter, Jenny says that she is reading a book which is “by the author of Sense and Sensibility�. Jenny remarks that she liked Sense and Sensibility, although Julia “thought it too humdrum�.
It’s not surprising that Julia thought Sense and Sensibility humdrum, because Julia is very much like Marianne Dashwood, in both temperament and in fate. (She eventually acquires an older suitor who knows that she loves another man). Indeed, the novel can be read as what would have happened if Willoughby had married a rich but physically unattractive woman a lot like Elinor Dashwood in temperament, while still having to see Marianne socially. For Jenny has a lot in common with Elinor: she’s sensible, competent, practical and puts other people’s needs � well, Adam’s needs, anyway � ahead of her own. She’s also a little like Fanny Price from Mansfield Park (another novel which Jenny is reported as having read), but only insofar as she is in love with a man she knows loves another woman. Adam’s character can be distinguished from that of Willoughby, though. He is not a cad and while selfish and at times insensitive, he is mostly aware of his faults and makes some effort to overcome them. Of all Adam's shortcomings the worst is probably that he doesn't realise that Jenny actually loves him, and is not just sensible and kind.
The parallels to Austen added a lot to my enjoyment of this novel. However, there’s more to it than that. Adam and Jenny are interesting characters in their own right. Jonathan Chawleigh is a masterpiece. (Heyer wrote that he “continually tried to steal the whole book, & had to be firmly pushed off the stage�. Kloester page 334). Adam’s sister Lydia is enchanting and his annoying mother and overbearing aunt are a lot of fun. The novel also benefits from its historical setting. Heyer sets the narrative at the time of the premature celebrations that followed the initial defeat of Napoleon in 1814 and the financial panic which preceded the victory at Waterloo the following year. Her research is excellent and historical detail is conveyed in an unforced manner, without resorting to the dreaded information dump.
While my fourteen-year-old self would not have appreciated this novel to the extent it deserves, my adult self appreciates it a lot. And while I rather wish I’d read it some years ago, I’m very glad that I've finally done so.
This was another enjoyable buddy read with my friend Jemidar.
*Georgette Heyer: Biography of a Bestseller
** ETA: I don't mean to imply that these factors are a substitute for love in a successful relationship. Rather, they are an important part of what constitutes love.
by

This review contains some spoilers
I know from reading Jennifer Kloester’s excellent biography of Georgette Heyer* that A Civil Contract was not an easy novel for Heyer to write. Before starting work on it, Heyer wrote to a friend that she wanted to write a new kind of novel that would be “neither farcical nor adventurous�. Heyer wrote that the novel would depend for its success on whether she could make the hero as charming as she believed him to be and also on whether she “could make a quiet story interesting�. (Kloester p 330).
However, completion of the novel was delayed because Heyer’s mother became ill and required care. When she went back to writing it, she wrote to her friend that the manuscript remained
much where it was � & where it ought to be is in an incinerator & would be if I hadn’t pledged myself to write it. To be honest with you, I do not want to write this book. Or any other book. I have no inspiration, no energy, no enthusiasm, & no power-of-the-pen! I sit & look at the bloody thing, & wonder what can have possessed me to embark on it.
I am very glad that Heyer overcame writer’s block and completed the novel. For while I probably wouldn’t have thought much of it if I’d read it when I first discovered Heyer’s novels at age fourteen, having read it for the first time forty years later I think it is one of her best works.
This is the story of Adam Deveril, Viscount Lynton, who fought in the Peninsular War. Returning to England after his father’s death, Adam finds that his father’s extravagant spending has reduced the family fortune to a pittance. Adam’s financial situation is so dire that if he doesn't find a way to acquire money, he will be unable to support his sister and, crucially, he will have to sell the family home. All of this means that Adam cannot marry his beloved, Julia Oversley. In order to save the family estate, Adam agrees to contract a marriage of convenience with plain and practical Jenny, daughter of the fabulously wealthy but vulgar merchant, Jonathan Chawleigh, who wants his daughter to achieve the social status that marriage into an aristocratic family will bring. Jenny, who is an old school friend of Julia’s, marries Adam knowing that he continues to love Julia. They have a child, Adam manages to win back some of his fortune through speculation and they ultimately settle down to a happy and comfortable � if not passionate –life together.
Heyer did manage to achieve something different with this novel. While it doesn't have the sparkling comedy or wit of many of her other novels, it does have other qualities. At its heart, the novel is an exploration of what makes a successful marriage. And Heyer’s conclusion is that it’s not blinding, heart-stopping passion which makes a relationship last, but friendship, kindness, tolerance, patience, a commitment to the same goals and a shared sense of humour. That’s not something I would have understood or appreciated as a teenager. As someone who has been happily married to the same person for almost thirty-five years, it's now a message that rings true.**
That’s not to say that there’s anything wrong with a bit of blinding, heart-stopping passion in a marriage. And this is why there’s an undertone of sadness in the final paragraphs of the novel, as Jenny, while assured of Adam’s love for her, is nevertheless conscious that she had had an “impractical dream� of inspiring in Adam the “passionate adoration� that he had felt for Julia. However, Jenny is right in concluding that “life [is] not made up of moments of exaltation, but of quite ordinary, everyday things�, which are “not very romantic, but � really much more important than grand passions or blighted loves�.
Of all Heyer’s novels, A Civil Contract owes the most to Jane Austen. Indeed, it can be read as a tribute to Austen in general and to Sense and Sensibility in particular. Heyer establishes the link to Sense and Sensibility very early on, by describing Jenny as someone who “looked as though she had more sense than sensibility�. Shortly thereafter, Jenny says that she is reading a book which is “by the author of Sense and Sensibility�. Jenny remarks that she liked Sense and Sensibility, although Julia “thought it too humdrum�.
It’s not surprising that Julia thought Sense and Sensibility humdrum, because Julia is very much like Marianne Dashwood, in both temperament and in fate. (She eventually acquires an older suitor who knows that she loves another man). Indeed, the novel can be read as what would have happened if Willoughby had married a rich but physically unattractive woman a lot like Elinor Dashwood in temperament, while still having to see Marianne socially. For Jenny has a lot in common with Elinor: she’s sensible, competent, practical and puts other people’s needs � well, Adam’s needs, anyway � ahead of her own. She’s also a little like Fanny Price from Mansfield Park (another novel which Jenny is reported as having read), but only insofar as she is in love with a man she knows loves another woman. Adam’s character can be distinguished from that of Willoughby, though. He is not a cad and while selfish and at times insensitive, he is mostly aware of his faults and makes some effort to overcome them. Of all Adam's shortcomings the worst is probably that he doesn't realise that Jenny actually loves him, and is not just sensible and kind.
The parallels to Austen added a lot to my enjoyment of this novel. However, there’s more to it than that. Adam and Jenny are interesting characters in their own right. Jonathan Chawleigh is a masterpiece. (Heyer wrote that he “continually tried to steal the whole book, & had to be firmly pushed off the stage�. Kloester page 334). Adam’s sister Lydia is enchanting and his annoying mother and overbearing aunt are a lot of fun. The novel also benefits from its historical setting. Heyer sets the narrative at the time of the premature celebrations that followed the initial defeat of Napoleon in 1814 and the financial panic which preceded the victory at Waterloo the following year. Her research is excellent and historical detail is conveyed in an unforced manner, without resorting to the dreaded information dump.
While my fourteen-year-old self would not have appreciated this novel to the extent it deserves, my adult self appreciates it a lot. And while I rather wish I’d read it some years ago, I’m very glad that I've finally done so.
This was another enjoyable buddy read with my friend Jemidar.
*Georgette Heyer: Biography of a Bestseller
** ETA: I don't mean to imply that these factors are a substitute for love in a successful relationship. Rather, they are an important part of what constitutes love.
Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read
A Civil Contract.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
June 2, 2011
– Shelved
March 12, 2012
–
Started Reading
March 15, 2012
–
49.0%
March 17, 2012
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-41 of 41 (41 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Jemidar
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Mar 14, 2012 12:35AM

reply
|
flag


I'll read my other book tonight and give you a chance to catch up. Or with any luck, I'll just go to sleep!


Abigail, I don't remember it much. I'll see if the hero makes such a poor impression on me next time.
Wonderful review -- I skimmed over the parts I thought might contain spoilers. Maybe this will be a good one to pick up after I finish my re-read of Sense and Sensibility.

Abigail, I understand your reaction and you make a good point. I reacted to the book differently and I've been thinking about why that is.
I agree that Adam has plenty of class prejudice. That kind of prejudice has been rife in English society for as long as English society has existed. Frankly, I think it exists in all societies - it's just that what constitutes the different social classes varies from society to society. However, I don't think that it's Adam's class prejudice which is the real issue in the difficulty he has with Jenny's father. Rather, it's his sensitivity to Mr Chawleigh's almost oppressive generosity. I can kind of understand that position: deciding (rightly or wrongly) that the only way forward is to marry for money, but then feeling the humiliation which comes from losing the independence which you voluntarily gave up. It may be hypocritical, but it's also rather human.
While Adam may be hyopcritical in cringing at vulgarity while taking his father-in-law's money, I nevertheless felt that there was more to him than that. He mostly recognised when he was behaving unreasonably and tried to make amends. He liked his father-in-law and genuinely wanted to have him around, even if he did get angry and distressed at times.
In addition, Adam is rather removed from Heyer's typical aristocratic hero: he is a soldier (and that is mostly, but not exclusively an occupation undertaken by Heyer's secondary male characters; where a soldier is the hero he usually has some skills and qualities lacking in the other types of Heyer-hero). In addition, he enthusiastically embraces farming and engages in the physical labour involved. And then he has a son to whom he gives his father-in-law's name. I don't want to overstate this, but it's as if Heyer is suggesting that Adam and Jenny's son will be a part of a new social class, as the aristocracy and the newly wealthy industrialist class become linked (so that they can oppress agricultural labourers and factory workers together, no doubt!!).
Anyway, one of the things I liked about Adam was that he is very flawed. I wanted to slap him because he got a lot more than he deserved. But I still felt that he was aware - dimly, maybe, but still aware - that that was the case.

Thanks, Abigail. I can absolutely understand not liking Adam. If I wanted to marry one of Heyer's heroes (heaven forfend!) I wouldn't choose him, but I did rather like him in spite of his flaws. That said, I agree with what you said in your review about Jenny being worth ten of him. Of that there can be no doubt.
And there is definitely a price to pay for reading Heyer! :)

Thanks, Jeannette. I know that the review and some subsequent comments have been spoilerific and I'm sorry for that. Although this was the first time I'd read this novel, I've been familiar with the plot for many years, so from that point of view the novel was spoiled for me before I started reading it!
As you can see from my discussion with Abigail, there are differing views about this book. Lots of readers who are otherwise fans of Heyer don't like it at all. Others rate it very highly. Heyer fans are like that. Everyone has their favourite book or books and almost everyone has one or more they can't stand! I guess it's the same way with the works of other prolific writers.
I really don't know if you would like the novel, but coming fresh from S&S you will probably be able to see why Jemidar and I both think it is a tribute to that work. I am not going to pretend that Heyer is in any way comparable to Austen as a writer. She isn't!

"...but it's as if Heyer is suggesting that Adam and Jenny's son will be a part of a new social class, as the aristocracy and the newly wealthy industrialist class become linked (so that they can oppress agricultural labourers and factory workers together, no doubt!!)."
Kim, I love this! LOL.

I thought that a lot of Mr Chawleigh's behaviour had as much (or possibly even more) to do with his personality than it did with his class, although thinking everything can be bought might certainly be consistent with the psychology of the self-made man. As well-meaning as he was, he would have driven me crazy, so I'm with you in not finding Adam's reaction to him surprising.

To me Mr Chawleigh wasn't really the "gentleman" (even a self made one rather than an aristocratic one) and he pursued his dream in the only way he knew how but he never ever stopped to consider he might be embarrassing Jenny and making things more difficult for her, whereas Adam was often aware of that and tried to make amends.
Well, I'm not a big Heyer fan, so you never know, I might like this one. I am curious about any novel that gets such a lively discussion going.
Don't worry about the spoilers on my account. Like I said, I sort of skim-read most of it, just to follow along. I'll go to the library to see if I can ILL this one. My local library doesn't carry much Heyer.
Don't worry about the spoilers on my account. Like I said, I sort of skim-read most of it, just to follow along. I'll go to the library to see if I can ILL this one. My local library doesn't carry much Heyer.

Which of course it is, and these are perhaps not youthfully- appealing qualities , carrying as they do overtones of 'settling' and accepting and understanding and even condoning loss.
I think ACC in it's unassuming way is a minor human tragedy ( I mean in the dramatic sense, not actual human tragedy as in Somalia, say). Jenny quietly and with dignity accepting that while she may never have exactly what she wants, also knows, as an adult, that few people do. Adam is still not fully adult, and she allows him his protracted adolescence. But he may well grow to be worthy of her I think . ACC is one Heyer I really wish there was a sequel to!

I agree Barbara that this is a novel which is much less likely to appeal to the young. As much I've never particularly hankered after sequels to Heyer's novels, as a reader you'd hope that Jenny ended up with a good bargain.
As I was reading the novel, I wondered how much some aspects of the relationship between Jenny and Adam reflects aspects of Georgette Heyer's relationship with her husband. From Kloester's biography, you get the impression that Heyer and her husband were above all very good friends who shared a sense of humour.


Thanks for your comment, Desi. I like literary biographies, so reading Kloester's bio of Heyer suited me down to the ground!





This is definitely not a traditional romance, Geeks, so you might like it. On the other hand, it's kind of sad, and not at all typical Heyer. Let me know what you think.


That seems to be the classic response Jessica (see my comment I9 above) . I think had I read it very early on , I would have found it sort of lacklustre too. Almost like reading about one 's parents cohort or something , instead of a bit of swash and buckle and hilarious brother and their slow witted friends etc !

Well ,you know Shari , I don't think it was sad , certainly not by the end . There was not much 'passion' but that was never GH chosen style anyway . I liked the coming of age (Adam 's ) notion via marriage and parenthood.


