ŷ

Kim's Reviews > A Civil Contract

A Civil Contract by Georgette Heyer
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
4542979
's review

really liked it
bookshelves: buddy-reads-with-jemidar, kindle


This review contains some spoilers

I know from reading Jennifer Kloester’s excellent biography of Georgette Heyer* that A Civil Contract was not an easy novel for Heyer to write. Before starting work on it, Heyer wrote to a friend that she wanted to write a new kind of novel that would be “neither farcical nor adventurous�. Heyer wrote that the novel would depend for its success on whether she could make the hero as charming as she believed him to be and also on whether she “could make a quiet story interesting�. (Kloester p 330).

However, completion of the novel was delayed because Heyer’s mother became ill and required care. When she went back to writing it, she wrote to her friend that the manuscript remained
much where it was � & where it ought to be is in an incinerator & would be if I hadn’t pledged myself to write it. To be honest with you, I do not want to write this book. Or any other book. I have no inspiration, no energy, no enthusiasm, & no power-of-the-pen! I sit & look at the bloody thing, & wonder what can have possessed me to embark on it.

I am very glad that Heyer overcame writer’s block and completed the novel. For while I probably wouldn’t have thought much of it if I’d read it when I first discovered Heyer’s novels at age fourteen, having read it for the first time forty years later I think it is one of her best works.

This is the story of Adam Deveril, Viscount Lynton, who fought in the Peninsular War. Returning to England after his father’s death, Adam finds that his father’s extravagant spending has reduced the family fortune to a pittance. Adam’s financial situation is so dire that if he doesn't find a way to acquire money, he will be unable to support his sister and, crucially, he will have to sell the family home. All of this means that Adam cannot marry his beloved, Julia Oversley. In order to save the family estate, Adam agrees to contract a marriage of convenience with plain and practical Jenny, daughter of the fabulously wealthy but vulgar merchant, Jonathan Chawleigh, who wants his daughter to achieve the social status that marriage into an aristocratic family will bring. Jenny, who is an old school friend of Julia’s, marries Adam knowing that he continues to love Julia. They have a child, Adam manages to win back some of his fortune through speculation and they ultimately settle down to a happy and comfortable � if not passionate –life together.

Heyer did manage to achieve something different with this novel. While it doesn't have the sparkling comedy or wit of many of her other novels, it does have other qualities. At its heart, the novel is an exploration of what makes a successful marriage. And Heyer’s conclusion is that it’s not blinding, heart-stopping passion which makes a relationship last, but friendship, kindness, tolerance, patience, a commitment to the same goals and a shared sense of humour. That’s not something I would have understood or appreciated as a teenager. As someone who has been happily married to the same person for almost thirty-five years, it's now a message that rings true.**

That’s not to say that there’s anything wrong with a bit of blinding, heart-stopping passion in a marriage. And this is why there’s an undertone of sadness in the final paragraphs of the novel, as Jenny, while assured of Adam’s love for her, is nevertheless conscious that she had had an “impractical dream� of inspiring in Adam the “passionate adoration� that he had felt for Julia. However, Jenny is right in concluding that “life [is] not made up of moments of exaltation, but of quite ordinary, everyday things�, which are “not very romantic, but � really much more important than grand passions or blighted loves�.

Of all Heyer’s novels, A Civil Contract owes the most to Jane Austen. Indeed, it can be read as a tribute to Austen in general and to Sense and Sensibility in particular. Heyer establishes the link to Sense and Sensibility very early on, by describing Jenny as someone who “looked as though she had more sense than sensibility�. Shortly thereafter, Jenny says that she is reading a book which is “by the author of Sense and Sensibility�. Jenny remarks that she liked Sense and Sensibility, although Julia “thought it too humdrum�.

It’s not surprising that Julia thought Sense and Sensibility humdrum, because Julia is very much like Marianne Dashwood, in both temperament and in fate. (She eventually acquires an older suitor who knows that she loves another man). Indeed, the novel can be read as what would have happened if Willoughby had married a rich but physically unattractive woman a lot like Elinor Dashwood in temperament, while still having to see Marianne socially. For Jenny has a lot in common with Elinor: she’s sensible, competent, practical and puts other people’s needs � well, Adam’s needs, anyway � ahead of her own. She’s also a little like Fanny Price from Mansfield Park (another novel which Jenny is reported as having read), but only insofar as she is in love with a man she knows loves another woman. Adam’s character can be distinguished from that of Willoughby, though. He is not a cad and while selfish and at times insensitive, he is mostly aware of his faults and makes some effort to overcome them. Of all Adam's shortcomings the worst is probably that he doesn't realise that Jenny actually loves him, and is not just sensible and kind.

The parallels to Austen added a lot to my enjoyment of this novel. However, there’s more to it than that. Adam and Jenny are interesting characters in their own right. Jonathan Chawleigh is a masterpiece. (Heyer wrote that he “continually tried to steal the whole book, & had to be firmly pushed off the stage�. Kloester page 334). Adam’s sister Lydia is enchanting and his annoying mother and overbearing aunt are a lot of fun. The novel also benefits from its historical setting. Heyer sets the narrative at the time of the premature celebrations that followed the initial defeat of Napoleon in 1814 and the financial panic which preceded the victory at Waterloo the following year. Her research is excellent and historical detail is conveyed in an unforced manner, without resorting to the dreaded information dump.

While my fourteen-year-old self would not have appreciated this novel to the extent it deserves, my adult self appreciates it a lot. And while I rather wish I’d read it some years ago, I’m very glad that I've finally done so.

This was another enjoyable buddy read with my friend Jemidar.

*Georgette Heyer: Biography of a Bestseller

** ETA: I don't mean to imply that these factors are a substitute for love in a successful relationship. Rather, they are an important part of what constitutes love.
228 likes · flag

Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read A Civil Contract.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

June 2, 2011 – Shelved
March 12, 2012 – Started Reading
March 15, 2012 –
49.0%
March 17, 2012 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-41 of 41 (41 new)

dateUp arrow    newest »

Jemidar Hey Kim, where are you up to?


message 2: by Kim (new) - rated it 4 stars

Kim Chapter 3. They're long chapters and I was tired!


message 3: by Jemidar (last edited Mar 14, 2012 12:48AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Jemidar LOL. I had a bad night so got lots of puzzle and reading done. Any excuse to hang out in the lounge with the air con!


message 4: by Kim (new) - rated it 4 stars

Kim Ah ... so I have lots of catching up to do then? I don't like my chances!


Jemidar I'm up to the beginning of Chapter 6. I'm really starting to get into it and liking it a lot. There's some good Jane Austen references :-).

I'll read my other book tonight and give you a chance to catch up. Or with any luck, I'll just go to sleep!


message 6: by Kim (new) - rated it 4 stars

Kim I like it too. Hopefully I'll catch up tonight, although I am rather tired. I nodded off on the bus this morning, which was not a good thing. I hope you get some sleep!


Jemidar Excellent review Kim :-).


Barbara Hoyland Great review Kim , I do like the analysis of the Austen connections.


message 9: by Kim (new) - rated it 4 stars

Kim Thank you both!


Hazel Very nice review, Kim. Thank you, I think I'll revisit this book.

Abigail, I don't remember it much. I'll see if the hero makes such a poor impression on me next time.


message 11: by [deleted user] (new)

Wonderful review -- I skimmed over the parts I thought might contain spoilers. Maybe this will be a good one to pick up after I finish my re-read of Sense and Sensibility.


message 12: by Kim (last edited Mar 20, 2012 07:33PM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Kim Abigail wrote: "I found this one rather distasteful. Not because of the conclusions drawn by Heyer, vis-a-vis what makes for a good marriage, but because of the 'hero,' whose class prejudices are never really addr..."

Abigail, I understand your reaction and you make a good point. I reacted to the book differently and I've been thinking about why that is.

I agree that Adam has plenty of class prejudice. That kind of prejudice has been rife in English society for as long as English society has existed. Frankly, I think it exists in all societies - it's just that what constitutes the different social classes varies from society to society. However, I don't think that it's Adam's class prejudice which is the real issue in the difficulty he has with Jenny's father. Rather, it's his sensitivity to Mr Chawleigh's almost oppressive generosity. I can kind of understand that position: deciding (rightly or wrongly) that the only way forward is to marry for money, but then feeling the humiliation which comes from losing the independence which you voluntarily gave up. It may be hypocritical, but it's also rather human.

While Adam may be hyopcritical in cringing at vulgarity while taking his father-in-law's money, I nevertheless felt that there was more to him than that. He mostly recognised when he was behaving unreasonably and tried to make amends. He liked his father-in-law and genuinely wanted to have him around, even if he did get angry and distressed at times.

In addition, Adam is rather removed from Heyer's typical aristocratic hero: he is a soldier (and that is mostly, but not exclusively an occupation undertaken by Heyer's secondary male characters; where a soldier is the hero he usually has some skills and qualities lacking in the other types of Heyer-hero). In addition, he enthusiastically embraces farming and engages in the physical labour involved. And then he has a son to whom he gives his father-in-law's name. I don't want to overstate this, but it's as if Heyer is suggesting that Adam and Jenny's son will be a part of a new social class, as the aristocracy and the newly wealthy industrialist class become linked (so that they can oppress agricultural labourers and factory workers together, no doubt!!).

Anyway, one of the things I liked about Adam was that he is very flawed. I wanted to slap him because he got a lot more than he deserved. But I still felt that he was aware - dimly, maybe, but still aware - that that was the case.


message 13: by Kim (new) - rated it 4 stars

Kim Abigail wrote: "You make some excellent points, Kim - and I can't argue with them (always a first time for everything, no?). I guess Adam just irritated me enough that, while aware that he wasn't an out-and-out vi..."

Thanks, Abigail. I can absolutely understand not liking Adam. If I wanted to marry one of Heyer's heroes (heaven forfend!) I wouldn't choose him, but I did rather like him in spite of his flaws. That said, I agree with what you said in your review about Jenny being worth ten of him. Of that there can be no doubt.

And there is definitely a price to pay for reading Heyer! :)


message 14: by Kim (new) - rated it 4 stars

Kim Jeannette wrote: "Wonderful review -- I skimmed over the parts I thought might contain spoilers. Maybe this will be a good one to pick up after I finish my re-read of Sense and Sensibility."

Thanks, Jeannette. I know that the review and some subsequent comments have been spoilerific and I'm sorry for that. Although this was the first time I'd read this novel, I've been familiar with the plot for many years, so from that point of view the novel was spoiled for me before I started reading it!

As you can see from my discussion with Abigail, there are differing views about this book. Lots of readers who are otherwise fans of Heyer don't like it at all. Others rate it very highly. Heyer fans are like that. Everyone has their favourite book or books and almost everyone has one or more they can't stand! I guess it's the same way with the works of other prolific writers.

I really don't know if you would like the novel, but coming fresh from S&S you will probably be able to see why Jemidar and I both think it is a tribute to that work. I am not going to pretend that Heyer is in any way comparable to Austen as a writer. She isn't!


message 15: by Jemidar (last edited Mar 21, 2012 04:36AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Jemidar I rather liked Adam, mainly because he was so human and flawed. It would've been surprising had he not reacted the way he did especially over the matter of class but on the whole I thought he acted a good deal better than he might've. Mr Chawleigh was also a product of his class and acted accordingly but I felt he showed less sensitivity in his actions than Adam did and really did ride roughshod over everyone thinking money could buy whatever he wanted. I agree wholeheartedly that Jenny was worth a lot more than both of them put together!

"...but it's as if Heyer is suggesting that Adam and Jenny's son will be a part of a new social class, as the aristocracy and the newly wealthy industrialist class become linked (so that they can oppress agricultural labourers and factory workers together, no doubt!!)."

Kim, I love this! LOL.


message 16: by Kim (new) - rated it 4 stars

Kim Jemidar wrote: "I rather liked Adam, mainly because he was so human and flawed. It would've been surprising had he not reacted the way he did especially over the matter of class but on the whole I thought he acte..."

I thought that a lot of Mr Chawleigh's behaviour had as much (or possibly even more) to do with his personality than it did with his class, although thinking everything can be bought might certainly be consistent with the psychology of the self-made man. As well-meaning as he was, he would have driven me crazy, so I'm with you in not finding Adam's reaction to him surprising.


message 17: by Jemidar (last edited Mar 21, 2012 05:33AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Jemidar I think they were all well meaning, even Julia to a certain extent but Jenny was the only one that had a good grasp of the reality of the situation and had to walk the tightrope.

To me Mr Chawleigh wasn't really the "gentleman" (even a self made one rather than an aristocratic one) and he pursued his dream in the only way he knew how but he never ever stopped to consider he might be embarrassing Jenny and making things more difficult for her, whereas Adam was often aware of that and tried to make amends.


message 18: by [deleted user] (new)

Well, I'm not a big Heyer fan, so you never know, I might like this one. I am curious about any novel that gets such a lively discussion going.

Don't worry about the spoilers on my account. Like I said, I sort of skim-read most of it, just to follow along. I'll go to the library to see if I can ILL this one. My local library doesn't carry much Heyer.


message 19: by Barbara (last edited Mar 24, 2012 12:24AM) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Barbara Hoyland Kim mentioned in message 15 above that ACC is a Heyer disliked by some otherwise full-bore Heyer fans. If I may add to this observation, I'd just like to say that , at least according to Almacks, pretty much THE on-line Heyer discussion forum, that those who disliked ACC tended to be young or had disliked it when they were young. The reasons given were always to do with it being overly pragmatic or anti-romantic .
Which of course it is, and these are perhaps not youthfully- appealing qualities , carrying as they do overtones of 'settling' and accepting and understanding and even condoning loss.
I think ACC in it's unassuming way is a minor human tragedy ( I mean in the dramatic sense, not actual human tragedy as in Somalia, say). Jenny quietly and with dignity accepting that while she may never have exactly what she wants, also knows, as an adult, that few people do. Adam is still not fully adult, and she allows him his protracted adolescence. But he may well grow to be worthy of her I think . ACC is one Heyer I really wish there was a sequel to!


message 20: by Kim (new) - rated it 4 stars

Kim Barbara wrote: "Kim mentioned in message 15 above that ACC is a Heyer disliked by some otherwise full-bore Heyer fans. If I may add to this observation, I'd just like to say that , at least according to Almacks,..."

I agree Barbara that this is a novel which is much less likely to appeal to the young. As much I've never particularly hankered after sequels to Heyer's novels, as a reader you'd hope that Jenny ended up with a good bargain.

As I was reading the novel, I wondered how much some aspects of the relationship between Jenny and Adam reflects aspects of Georgette Heyer's relationship with her husband. From Kloester's biography, you get the impression that Heyer and her husband were above all very good friends who shared a sense of humour.


message 21: by Desi (new) - rated it 4 stars

Desi Thank you for the author background at the time of her writing. I'm always interested in this, was the best part of any literature class or book club discussion. But I'm never motivated enough to go look it up myself online :)


message 22: by Kim (last edited Feb 27, 2015 11:58PM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Kim Desi wrote: "Thank you for the author background at the time of her writing. I'm always interested in this, was the best part of any literature class or book club discussion. But I'm never motivated enough to g..."

Thanks for your comment, Desi. I like literary biographies, so reading Kloester's bio of Heyer suited me down to the ground!


 ~Geektastic~ How do you feel about this as a first time Heyer experience? I just got it from the left Brady and I've never read her before. I find the ambiguity to be kind of intriguing compared to her reputation for lighter romance.


message 24: by Desi (last edited Aug 07, 2015 09:41PM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Desi This question was not addressed to me, but I am already on the site atm :) For a first-time reader of Heyer I would probably not suggest they start here. "Frederica" is not a bad one to start with, but it is admittedly a little far fetched so that really is all about your personality or mood. I'm not up to revisiting the moroseness of "A Civil Contract" but my old review explains pretty much why it's not for non-Heyer fans /review/show...


 ~Geektastic~ Thanks! But I probably am a cynic first time reader who hates traditional romance, so I've got that going for me.


 ~Geektastic~ Thanks! But I probably am a cynic first time reader who hates traditional romance, so I've got that going for me.


message 27: by Desi (new) - rated it 4 stars

Desi lol Then you will be fine. The writing is quality, whatever else is happening.


message 28: by Kim (new) - rated it 4 stars

Kim ~Geektastic~ wrote: "Thanks! But I probably am a cynic first time reader who hates traditional romance, so I've got that going for me."

This is definitely not a traditional romance, Geeks, so you might like it. On the other hand, it's kind of sad, and not at all typical Heyer. Let me know what you think.


Minerva Spencer Fantastic review!


Rachel Really great review! Finished this novel last night and you almost exactly mirror my sentiments.


message 31: by Jessica (new)

Jessica Excellent review! I first read this book when I was 14 and found it very disappointing. However, re reading it recently (many years later) I really appreciated the different tone to Heyer's other romances and the nuanced development of the relationships.


Barbara Hoyland Jessica wrote: "Excellent review! I first read this book when I was 14 and found it very disappointing. However, re reading it recently (many years later) I really appreciated the different tone to Heyer's other r..."

That seems to be the classic response Jessica (see my comment I9 above) . I think had I read it very early on , I would have found it sort of lacklustre too. Almost like reading about one 's parents cohort or something , instead of a bit of swash and buckle and hilarious brother and their slow witted friends etc !


Barbara Hoyland Shari Kay wrote: "Lovely review. Though i'm also as old as dirt...I think I still need my 'passion' in a romance. This story sounds too sad for me in the end."

Well ,you know Shari , I don't think it was sad , certainly not by the end . There was not much 'passion' but that was never GH chosen style anyway . I liked the coming of age (Adam 's ) notion via marriage and parenthood.


Barbara Barrett Excellent review Kim.


message 35: by N (new) - added it

N Excellent review , never noticed the Austen connection until you pointed it out ! I discovered Heyer as a 13 year old , and the 13 year old me hated this book . I kept thinking something would happen to plain Jenny and Adam ( in the magical way of romance novels ) gets to keep his Julia and become rich !


message 36: by Holly (new)

Holly Jones I agree- it’s my favourite now but wasn’t when I was 16. I love the fact that Jenny has all the skills needed to restore Fontley not just money. The agricultural history is really interesting too.


message 37: by AM (new) - rated it 4 stars

AM I'm rereading this at the moment and was just thinking how Austen-esque it is.


message 38: by Anne (new) - added it

Anne I am going to read this for the first time in fifty years . I do remember the feeling of disappointment at 17 but know that I will really understand and enjoy this now as a very mature married woman .


silvia r grove What a beautiful review. Worthy of the gentle kindness and intelligence of this lovely book


Sharyn Excellent analysis and thanks for the Austen reminders that I just read right past.


message 41: by Ka (new) - added it

Ka I normally have zero interest in this genre (Regency romance), but (weirdly?) I still love Jane Austen novels and your review piqued my interest, so I think I'll give this one a try sometime!


back to top