Jan-Maat's Reviews > Foucault's Pendulum
Foucault's Pendulum
by
by

This is a novel that contrasts the acceptance, and delight, in the world as it is with the consequences of the desire to read in meanings to everything that we see about us.
In Eco's earlier book,The Name of the Rose, the detective mystery was parodied and this is taken one step further in this novel. The Detective mystery assumes that there is a mystery that can be solved. It invites investigation. In this novel the constant working deeper into mysteries produces only more obscurity ("the penis is just a phallic symbol"(view spoiler) ) which is undercut, or rather has the cork removed, by the surface of events. The childhood memories of one character, the love and impending fatherhood of another. The desire to find out why Professor Plum is dead in the library with a lead pipe next to him is shown to be a self-destructive one that can only end in a never ending kaleidoscope of ambiguity.
Eco's next step, naturally enough, in Baudolino is to show extraordinarily commonplace and political origins for some of the myths and legends that so obsess the legion of diabolicals in this novel.
At the centre of the story are an unlikely trio; Belbo, Causabon and Diotallevi. They work for a curious publisher, Garamond. The curiosity lies partly in the everyday with the one armed warehouseman who deals with all the deliveries and dispatches and partly in the esoteric transmutation of ordinary mortals into authors. The publishing house has two parts. One a respectable business the other a theatrical lure to entice and catch self-financing authors. It is a vanity press and a very profitable business the production of authors turns out to be.
Spotting a gap in the market they become involved in producing a series of books on magic, mysticism and hermetic 'learning' to feed the credulity of the reading public. The publishing house here is not a beacon of enlightenment but rather a smoky fire that seeks to deepen a smog of obscurantism over readers. As we read we are drawn through a world of varied, contradictory but passionately held beliefs. As the publishing house offers the untalented the opportunity to become authors. So too the cults and sects the trio deal with offer meaning and a grand significance to people's lives.
In short both sides of the operation, the publishing and the cults, are a con. The kind of con in which you get exactly what you wanted, but it simply costs more than you expected.
This allows Eco to give a good kicking in passing to Holy Blood Holy Grail but also shows how bizarre beliefs in the hollow earth, the Druidical training of the Aryan Jesus and the fantasies of the Alchemists in a divinely meaningful universe spill over to affect our cultural and political lives. Perhaps is a novelist's response to Religion and the Decline of Magic.
The heroes attempt to out do the irrational beliefs of a world of faith, clinging only to the involvement of the Templars with everything, is sure to end badly when their inventiveness is taken terribly, terribly seriously.
Remember, The Templars have something to do with everything.
At the same time this is also a book about the stories that we create and recreate about ourselves while growing up and how one can become trapped within them and as it turns out, few things are as fatal as being trapped within a story of one's own construction.
(An earlier version of this review was eaten by the Templar internet.)
In Eco's earlier book,The Name of the Rose, the detective mystery was parodied and this is taken one step further in this novel. The Detective mystery assumes that there is a mystery that can be solved. It invites investigation. In this novel the constant working deeper into mysteries produces only more obscurity ("the penis is just a phallic symbol"(view spoiler) ) which is undercut, or rather has the cork removed, by the surface of events. The childhood memories of one character, the love and impending fatherhood of another. The desire to find out why Professor Plum is dead in the library with a lead pipe next to him is shown to be a self-destructive one that can only end in a never ending kaleidoscope of ambiguity.
Eco's next step, naturally enough, in Baudolino is to show extraordinarily commonplace and political origins for some of the myths and legends that so obsess the legion of diabolicals in this novel.
At the centre of the story are an unlikely trio; Belbo, Causabon and Diotallevi. They work for a curious publisher, Garamond. The curiosity lies partly in the everyday with the one armed warehouseman who deals with all the deliveries and dispatches and partly in the esoteric transmutation of ordinary mortals into authors. The publishing house has two parts. One a respectable business the other a theatrical lure to entice and catch self-financing authors. It is a vanity press and a very profitable business the production of authors turns out to be.
Spotting a gap in the market they become involved in producing a series of books on magic, mysticism and hermetic 'learning' to feed the credulity of the reading public. The publishing house here is not a beacon of enlightenment but rather a smoky fire that seeks to deepen a smog of obscurantism over readers. As we read we are drawn through a world of varied, contradictory but passionately held beliefs. As the publishing house offers the untalented the opportunity to become authors. So too the cults and sects the trio deal with offer meaning and a grand significance to people's lives.
In short both sides of the operation, the publishing and the cults, are a con. The kind of con in which you get exactly what you wanted, but it simply costs more than you expected.
This allows Eco to give a good kicking in passing to Holy Blood Holy Grail but also shows how bizarre beliefs in the hollow earth, the Druidical training of the Aryan Jesus and the fantasies of the Alchemists in a divinely meaningful universe spill over to affect our cultural and political lives. Perhaps is a novelist's response to Religion and the Decline of Magic.
The heroes attempt to out do the irrational beliefs of a world of faith, clinging only to the involvement of the Templars with everything, is sure to end badly when their inventiveness is taken terribly, terribly seriously.
Remember, The Templars have something to do with everything.
At the same time this is also a book about the stories that we create and recreate about ourselves while growing up and how one can become trapped within them and as it turns out, few things are as fatal as being trapped within a story of one's own construction.
(An earlier version of this review was eaten by the Templar internet.)
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
Foucault's Pendulum.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Finished Reading
June 13, 2011
– Shelved
Comments Showing 1-40 of 40 (40 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Riku
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Jan 12, 2014 03:04AM

reply
|
flag

I've probably proved one of Eco's points by trying to read a secret connection into things that are otherwise unconnected! :(

I've probably proved one of Eco's points by trying to read a secret connection into things that are otherwise u..."
You cannot win when it is human nature being parodied. You will expose yourself as only human!

Heh. And so has the almost obsessive human need to find meaning everywhere, even in the meaningless. Great review.

Fair enough!
Dolors wrote:"Heh"
Thank you :)

I think you've disproved him - you've shone a light on the obscurity of both this title, which I haven't read (imagining it to be fathomless), and Baudolino which I abandoned as unfathomable. Who needs Inspector Clouseau when we have our very own Jacques Cousteau to demystify the Umbertian deeps.

Thank you, very kind, er, tres gentil Madame. The only reason why I picked up Baudolino is because of my enthusiasm for the Emperor Frederick Barbarossa and his world, which I don't expect many to share

I've probably proved one of Eco's points by trying to read a secret connection into things that are otherwise u..."
Haha! This is a wonderful review of a really great book. Makes me want to re-read it.

Ah, we just had a re-read, sorry that you (have mostly) missed it:
/group/show/...


This comment (which seems to be about The Name of the Rose?) is equally applicable and important to FP.

It was intended to be a comment about this book, sorry that it was unclear. It would be a bit of a stretch to apply it to the name of the rose I think...

I thought so. It's a very nice, succinct comment though. Thanks for the other insights in your excellent review as well.

Very nice! Ha, I'd actually forgotten the bit about Jesus being Aryan and that Christianity can be traced to a Druidic origin, ha ha, that was pretty funny.
And btw, thanks for having participated in the group reading of this.
Katie wrote: "I saw that that was going on! I would have joined it if it was going on at another time, but things are a bit too busy right now for an Umberto Eco read. Maybe over the summer! I'll bookmark that g..."
But we want to read more books! This time, it would be nice if you joined us! :)

Though the druids of course were simply Templars...



I haven't read it. But that's one way that Foucaults pendulum works, it inoculates you against those kind of stories because you can come up with the equal in craziness of any theory. Naturally Jesus was a Templar, the alchemical references in the last supper and the feeding the five thousand prove it ;)

I would love to join you! Keep me updated about what you're going to be doing next.


it certainly works very well for him


the templars have something to do with everything, who can doubt the mystical meaning of computer games?

that's one of the effects of literature!

ok, everybook is the same, we read them all one page at a time. It is long, Eco's books are all on the longer side, but it has lots of short chapters

oh, don't say that! sorry it did not amuse you more

thank you! at least one of us pleased you!


oh thank you! that is a lovely thing to say, I appreciate it
perhaps the difference is that I have only read three of his books