ŷ

Thomas's Reviews > Ender’s Game

Ender’s Game by Orson Scott Card
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
984874
's review

it was ok
bookshelves: my-science-fiction-bookshelf

I read this a number of years ago and was disappointed for a number of reasons. First, it won a coveted Hugo and Nebula award but was, in my opinion, seriously flawed.

This is the only book wherein I lost my suspension of disbelief. It happened toward the two-thirds mark in the book (about where the author originally had ended the story) and Ender and his older sister (by a couple of years) were on retreat. Ender was swimming around a floating dock where his sister was sun bathing and discussing the "situation." Somewhere and out of nowhere Ender made a comment having to do with the physical development of their bodies, referring to their age (which, given his comment, would have placed them about 8 or 9 for ender and 10 or 11 for his sister.

The comment was out of place for Ender as he had never, ever said anything like it before, anywhere in the book. He had always maintained a clean mouth, despite the military environment (after all, he was a kid).

The second problem was that I had felt the story had advanced over the period of enough years that Ender was now a teenager and to be reminded that he was still a fourth or fifth grader yanked me out of the story faster than the Chris Reeves character was yanked back to the present in Somewhere in Time.

Finally, the last third of the book was an add-on. In talking with others familiar with the work and its history, Card was asked to make it longer. As such, the last third of the book is poorly connected to the first two-thirds of the book and introduces concepts and character types not encountered or even hinted at earlier. I really have to wonder why this thing won the Hugo or the Nebula. The SF community must have been desperate the year this came out.

I cannot recommend this to many people, mostly because of the suspension of disbelief problem and the add-on disjointed story-line. I really wish Card had gone back and rewritten the entire book. It would have been much better.
5 likes · flag

Sign into ŷ to see if any of your friends have read Ender’s Game.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Finished Reading
March 27, 2008 – Shelved
March 27, 2008 – Shelved as: my-science-fiction-bookshelf

Comments Showing 1-5 of 5 (5 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Charly (last edited Mar 28, 2008 07:57AM) (new) - rated it 1 star

Charly I kind of cringed when I went back and read my LDS comment. I only meant that the book ends with a religion that is spread via word of mouth-perhaps the only commonality with LDS. I should have made that more clear. Just wanted you to know that I wasn’t taking a swipe at LDS for its own sake…but I think you got that anyway. �



Thomas No problems on the comment. The book irritated me and it was the same with you. I was so put off by the loss of suspension of disbelief that I didn't pay much attention to the end of the book, so missed the spreading of the new religion. In today's world, the LDS are no longer the only group out there spreading the "word." Among them are Jehovah's Witnesses and groups targeting Jews and Mormons. It has become very political, which brings me back to Card. He really should have rewritten the book and in so doing, he could have played up the politics of religion.


message 3: by Andy (new)

Andy The complete phrase is "willing suspension of disbelief", implying an active effort on the part of the reader or audience to allow for the impossible in favor of pursuing the delicate and universally human themes. I'm not condemning or condoning your review of the book I'm just meticulous and anal.


Thomas Andy, you are correct. I don't mind being corrected on the phrase.


Brenden O If you give this 2 stars you obviously don't know an amazing book when you see one!!


back to top