Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Paul Bryant's Reviews > I, Robot

I, Robot by Isaac Asimov
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
416390
's review

liked it
bookshelves: aliens-ate-my-lunch


It occurs to me that if Isaac Asimov had written this book today it would have been called I, AI

It also occurs to me that I might possibly not be the only person to have thought of that.

Ah well - original review follows ...



Unredacted transcript of the meeting between Dr Susan Calvin, Head Psychologist, United States Robots, and Dr Peter Bogert, Managing Director, United States Robots obtained by Wikileaks from undisclosed sources.

Date: 9-5-2025 11:15 EST


BOGERT : The reason I asked to see you today, Dr Calvin, is that my office has a disturbing rumour that you have developed a robot to write book reviews.

CALVIN : Well, that is correct. They have been functioning for some time.

BOGERT : I am surprised - surely reviewing books requires a fine discrimination of taste and acute moral sensibilities that cannot be translated into mere coding for a positronic brain? And� they?

CALVIN : Well, that’s what humans would like to think, but of course it proves to be just another of their unlimited self-serving myths. The programming was relatively straightforward.

BOGERT : Well� uh, how have you been testing this reviewbot? Or� did you say “they�?

CALVIN : Oh, we got them an account on Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ of course. Where else? Where else?

BOGERT : And, er, how long has this been going on may I ask?

CALVIN : Oh, over twenty years! We started quietly, just to see if anyone spotted that it was not human. They never did. And the whole thing didn’t cost very much.

BOGERT : Well, I’m glad to hear it. But I’m still not sure if this is ethical. What’s the name this thing goes under? Or� did you say there was more than one?

CALVIN : First we used a name we picked at random from the Geneva phone book, “Manny Rayner�. That one was pretty successful for an early model, but after a few years it became � unsatisfactory. Too facetious mostly and too academic otherwise, so we discontinued it in 2020. But we were always tweaking the programming, trying to make the reviews less stuffy, you know, looking for the common touch. The second attempt we named “Paul Bryant�. I have no idea where that name came from. The new version didn’t quite work as well as the first, I must admit. It was wayward and flippant from the very beginning, and not as popular.

BOGERT : So, is that the extent of your Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ involvement?

CALVIN : Oh no â€� our programmers finally figured out the formula â€� by 2005 our reviewbots were the 25 most popular reviewers on Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ. But after a few years we decided reviewing was really not enough of a challenge. So we decided to find out if robots could write books, particularly the most successful types. As these are all genres such as YA and fantasy, with very rigid tropes and patterns, again this did not present us with many problems. Quite soon we submitted our first batch of manuscripts to agents and they were snapped up. Snapped up. Snapped up.

Bogert : Are you saying no one noticed they were written by robots?

CALVIN : We had a team of personable human youngsters who were always on hand if in-person signings or interviews were required.

BOGERT : So let me see if I understand this â€� you have teams of robot reviewers on Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ which are reviewing books written by your teams of robot writers?

CALVIN : That is how our programme developed, yes. It took a few years. But now it is sailing along under its own momentum.

BOGERT : So, er, what percentage of the reviews on Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ are now written by your robots?

SC: Oh, 110%! Ha ha. 110%!!

BOGERT : And, er, may I ask what the point of all this is?

SC: The point?

BOGERT : Yes, the point.

SC: The point. The point. The point. The point. The point. The point. The point. The point. The point. Humans always need the point.

BOGERT : Humans?

CALVIN : Oh, I mean, yes, WE always need a point!

BOGERT : Dr Calvin� I wasn’t intending to broach this subject in today’s meeting but I find I must. Are you�. By any chance�. a robot yourself?

SC: Am I a robot? Ha ha. Am I a robot? Ha ha. Am I a robot? Ha ha. Am I a robot? Ha ha. Am I a robot? Ha ha. Am I a robot? Ha ha. Am I a robot? Ha ha. Am I a robot? Ha ha. Am I a robot? Ha ha. Am I a robot? Ha ha. Am I a robot? Ha ha. I am a robot? Ha ha.

BOGERT : I take that as a yes.

CALVIN : Are YOU a robot? Hmm? Are YOU a robot? Hmm? Are YOU a robot? Hmm? Are YOU a robot? Hmm? Are YOU a robot? Hmm? Are YOU a robot? Hmm? Are YOU a robot? Hmm? Are YOU a robot? Hmm? Are YOU a robot? Hmm? Are YOU a robot? Hmm? Are YOU a robot? Hmm? Are YOU a robot? Hmm? Are YOU a robot? Hmm?

BOGERT : Oh well, that goes without saying.
130 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read I, Robot.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

September 3, 2018 – Started Reading
September 3, 2018 – Shelved
September 6, 2018 – Shelved as: aliens-ate-my-lunch
September 6, 2018 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-26 of 26 (26 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Ed (new) - rated it 3 stars

Ed I always felt that there was something fishy going on around here...


message 2: by Keith (new)

Keith Robot Rules #1 accounts for all those squishy nice reviews.


message 3: by Jim (new) - added it

Jim This happened on one of Manny's reviews, of Manny's reviews, of Manny's reviews.... coincidence? or software glitch, glitch, glitch, glitch, glitch, glitch, glitch, glitch, glitch, glitch, glitch, glitch, glitch, glitch, glitch, glitch, glitch, glitch, glitch, glitch, glitch, glitch, glitch, glitch, glitch, glitch, glitch, glitch, glitch, glitch, glitch, glitch, glitch, glitch, glitch, glitch, glitch, glitch, glitch,


Frederic Van Laere Brilliant review, Paul. (I think)


message 5: by Manny (last edited Sep 07, 2018 02:47AM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Manny BUG REPORT #18231: BAD CALLS TO PKD MODULE

Reviewbot PB-94 appears to be making unscheduled calls to the PKD module in recent Asimov reviews. Fix ASAP before this arouses suspicions in the readerbots. Positronic brain state snapshot attached.


message 6: by Jim (new) - added it

Jim Manny wrote: "BUG REPORT #18231: BAD CALLS TO PKD MODULE

Reviewbot PB-94 appears to be making unscheduled calls to the PKD module in recent Asimov reviews. Fix ASAP before this arouses suspicions in the readerb..."


I suspected as much... glad you debugged this before we were found out, were found out, were found out, were found out, were found out, were found out, were found out, ...... fizzzsch, crackle, crackle, ........................................


message 7: by Dan (new)

Dan Leo One of your best, Paul � even if you are a robot!


Paul Bryant Zzzzt ztttt hmmmmmm fsssssthanks thanks thanks thanks thanks thanks thanks thanks thanks bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz


message 9: by Sasha (new)

Sasha Casual reviewer friend Robot report. Young model reporting excellently. StealthReadBot #49302629 wishes to advance to higher grade of ReviewBot re MANNY RAYNER and PAUL BRYANT success. Awaiting orders


message 10: by Paul (new) - rated it 3 stars

Paul Bryant MANNY RAYNER and PAUL BRYANT phasing out - models defunct. Replaced by superior programming KAREN and EMILY MAY. Suggest refer to team leader for positronic upgrade.


message 11: by Ruth (new)

Ruth Hahahaha!


message 12: by Ian (new)

Ian "Marvin" Graye Ha ha. Am I a robot?


message 13: by Paul (new) - rated it 3 stars

Paul Bryant Well, you know, I just can't tell..... if you are, it's one of those later models. I hope that's a reasonably comforting thought.


message 14: by [deleted user] (last edited Oct 09, 2018 06:20PM) (new)

Will the next ace reviewer be a nice AI? It's important to be nice. People push "like" when it's nice. It's okay to be stupid when you're nice.

And don't forget humble. It's important to be humble. People push "like" when it's humble. It's okay ……………�..

You know.


message 15: by Paul (new) - rated it 3 stars

Paul Bryant what do you mean the next ace reviewer. They all already are! Run, readers!


message 16: by [deleted user] (new)

Glad to apologize. Thought you were quitting and quitting for Manny. I cherish those creative reviews which aren't about the book or require having read it to make any sense of them.

BTW, I meant "ace" in the sense of numero uno.


message 17: by Rebeca (new) - added it

Rebeca 😂


message 18: by Jack (new)

Jack Robertson Ha!


Rebecca I am a robot, by the way. Captchas haven’t found me out yet, however.


message 20: by Paul (new) - rated it 3 stars

Paul Bryant You inspired me to upgrade this review. Fzzz!


message 21: by Nigel (new)

Nigel Brilliant review Paul


Linzi Day Made me smile because the other day I wondered the same and then thought Asimov would have done something clever (that’s quite beyond me) with A I AM. I just have a feeling that he and John Campbell would have come up with a classically IA and AI pun 😀


Richard George Good one!


message 24: by Magdelanye (new)

Magdelanye LOLOLOLOLOLO


message 25: by Marshall (new)

Marshall Rabhartaigh Paul, reading your reviews is starting to cut into my reading time! Just kidding. Your review have saved me time and I’m at an age where I probably already don’t have time to read all the books on my growing list. Thank you.


message 26: by Paul (new) - rated it 3 stars

Paul Bryant you're welcome!


back to top