Stephanie's Reviews > I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings
I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings (Maya Angelou's Autobiography, #1)
by
by

When I picked up I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings by Maya Angelou I knew two things:
1. The author is friends with Oprah and the Clintons.
2. The book is considered a classic.
The book is mostly set in the tiny town of Stamps, Arkansas. I lived much of my childhood within an hour's drive of Stamps so I found that detail very interesting.
The account of life as a Negro (the term Ms. Angelou uses) in rural Arkansas was fascinating. Some of it brought to mind memories of my own childhood (though I am "lily white"). Ms. Angelou's detailed description of food left my mouth watering. Barbecue. Mmm! Fried chicken. Oh, yeah! Where can I get some of that?!
I felt outrage at the shoddy treatment Maya and other Negoes in her community received at the hands of Whites. I sympathized with the fear of lynchings (which I confess I've never learned much about). And I admired their ability to feel proud and strong under oppressive circumstances.
That's what I liked about the book.
I did NOT appreciate the explicit descriptions of Maya's rape at age 8 by her mother's boyfriend. Or those of her 11 year old brother "playing family" in a tent in the backyard. Or of her emotionless experience with a teenage neighbor which leaves Maya pregnant.
These accounts left me feeling sick to my stomach and in need of some way to cleanse my mind. I realize that these acts were horrendous but it seemed that Ms. Angelou went out of her way to make them as vulgar and disgusting as possible, which wasn't necessary to get her point across.
It is outrageous to me is that this book is used in 9th and 10th grade English classrooms. This book is NOT appropriate for teenagers! I won't quote you the explicit details Ms. Angelou uses. Trust me, I've read trashy romance novels that had less detail than this book.
So, because of the explicit portions of the book, I cannot recommend it to anyone. Not adult. Definitely NOT teenager.
Edited October 2014:
About once a year I come to this review and read all of the comments that people have left. The older I get (now 40 yrs old) and the older my kids get (currently 6-11 yrs old) the more I stand by my review.
This book is disturbing. The descriptions of sexual abuse are graphic. The thing about words and images is they burn themselves into our minds. They influence our thinking and our decision-making, often without us realizing it. If they didn't influence us then there would be no purpose for their existence. That's why we must be careful about what we expose ourselves to!
I am saddened that the overwhelming argument in the comments FOR tweens/teens reading this book is that it's no worse than what they are exposed to in their interactions with friends, or what they view on TV/movies. Just because they've already learned about rape doesn't make that knowledge healthy or good for them!
That's called 'desensitization.' When you are exposed to something over and over it eventually loses it's power to influence you; it impacts your emotions and thoughts differently than when you were first exposed. Eventually you lose the sense of shock, horror, and outrage. You become numb or calloused.
I do not want to ever become numb or calloused to the horror of sexual abuse. To do so would dishonor my real life friends who endured sexual abuse. It would belittle the 8 yr old victim of the level two child molester living in my neighborhood (that I learned about today).
The other argument for this book is to educate about the terribleness of sexual abuse. Education of this nature should always have a purpose.
Knowledge just for the sake of knowledge is only good if you are a contestant on a game show.
Reading this book influenced me in two ways: it made me more committed to choose age-appropriate materials for my children AND to empower my children to handle inappropriate situations.
We talk a lot about how private parts of your body are ONLY for you and if anyone asks to see them or touches them you tell your parents. We discuss NOT going somewhere alone with an adult. We also explain that some movies/TV shows are not appropriate for them at their current ages.
We make these choices for our children because an education of this graphic level would have no purpose. It would only horrify and frighten them. Eventually we will educate our children about the proliferation of child pornography, about child sexual abuse, about the sex slave trade that is alive in well in our country and around the world. We won't need to go into graphic detail because the horror of such activities is natural.
After they are educated we will offer them outlets for their outrage. We will provide a list of organizations that fight these atrocities that we can support with our time and money. We will teach them to write letters to government officials on behalf of good legislation.
In other words we will give them the means to DO something with their horror; to act on their education. Which ought to be the purpose of all education.
Okay, so you read the book. You are now 'educated.' What are you going to DO with that education? How has this education changed you, your thinking, motivated your actions? How does this knowledge influence you?
1. The author is friends with Oprah and the Clintons.
2. The book is considered a classic.
The book is mostly set in the tiny town of Stamps, Arkansas. I lived much of my childhood within an hour's drive of Stamps so I found that detail very interesting.
The account of life as a Negro (the term Ms. Angelou uses) in rural Arkansas was fascinating. Some of it brought to mind memories of my own childhood (though I am "lily white"). Ms. Angelou's detailed description of food left my mouth watering. Barbecue. Mmm! Fried chicken. Oh, yeah! Where can I get some of that?!
I felt outrage at the shoddy treatment Maya and other Negoes in her community received at the hands of Whites. I sympathized with the fear of lynchings (which I confess I've never learned much about). And I admired their ability to feel proud and strong under oppressive circumstances.
That's what I liked about the book.
I did NOT appreciate the explicit descriptions of Maya's rape at age 8 by her mother's boyfriend. Or those of her 11 year old brother "playing family" in a tent in the backyard. Or of her emotionless experience with a teenage neighbor which leaves Maya pregnant.
These accounts left me feeling sick to my stomach and in need of some way to cleanse my mind. I realize that these acts were horrendous but it seemed that Ms. Angelou went out of her way to make them as vulgar and disgusting as possible, which wasn't necessary to get her point across.
It is outrageous to me is that this book is used in 9th and 10th grade English classrooms. This book is NOT appropriate for teenagers! I won't quote you the explicit details Ms. Angelou uses. Trust me, I've read trashy romance novels that had less detail than this book.
So, because of the explicit portions of the book, I cannot recommend it to anyone. Not adult. Definitely NOT teenager.
Edited October 2014:
About once a year I come to this review and read all of the comments that people have left. The older I get (now 40 yrs old) and the older my kids get (currently 6-11 yrs old) the more I stand by my review.
This book is disturbing. The descriptions of sexual abuse are graphic. The thing about words and images is they burn themselves into our minds. They influence our thinking and our decision-making, often without us realizing it. If they didn't influence us then there would be no purpose for their existence. That's why we must be careful about what we expose ourselves to!
I am saddened that the overwhelming argument in the comments FOR tweens/teens reading this book is that it's no worse than what they are exposed to in their interactions with friends, or what they view on TV/movies. Just because they've already learned about rape doesn't make that knowledge healthy or good for them!
That's called 'desensitization.' When you are exposed to something over and over it eventually loses it's power to influence you; it impacts your emotions and thoughts differently than when you were first exposed. Eventually you lose the sense of shock, horror, and outrage. You become numb or calloused.
I do not want to ever become numb or calloused to the horror of sexual abuse. To do so would dishonor my real life friends who endured sexual abuse. It would belittle the 8 yr old victim of the level two child molester living in my neighborhood (that I learned about today).
The other argument for this book is to educate about the terribleness of sexual abuse. Education of this nature should always have a purpose.
Knowledge just for the sake of knowledge is only good if you are a contestant on a game show.
Reading this book influenced me in two ways: it made me more committed to choose age-appropriate materials for my children AND to empower my children to handle inappropriate situations.
We talk a lot about how private parts of your body are ONLY for you and if anyone asks to see them or touches them you tell your parents. We discuss NOT going somewhere alone with an adult. We also explain that some movies/TV shows are not appropriate for them at their current ages.
We make these choices for our children because an education of this graphic level would have no purpose. It would only horrify and frighten them. Eventually we will educate our children about the proliferation of child pornography, about child sexual abuse, about the sex slave trade that is alive in well in our country and around the world. We won't need to go into graphic detail because the horror of such activities is natural.
After they are educated we will offer them outlets for their outrage. We will provide a list of organizations that fight these atrocities that we can support with our time and money. We will teach them to write letters to government officials on behalf of good legislation.
In other words we will give them the means to DO something with their horror; to act on their education. Which ought to be the purpose of all education.
Okay, so you read the book. You are now 'educated.' What are you going to DO with that education? How has this education changed you, your thinking, motivated your actions? How does this knowledge influence you?
Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read
I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Comments Showing 1-50 of 75 (75 new)
message 1:
by
Katie
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
May 04, 2009 09:48PM

reply
|
flag






I was unfortunate enough to pick this book up and read it for an English class. (Who knows how it ended up in our school library?) My teacher approved it and even said it was a great choice, but he was wrong. I honestly wish I had never given it a second glance. I'm only 14, and it pretty much ruined my childhood innocence, which is not something I enjoy losing. Just because the kids I walk by at school are corrupted and perverted doesn't mean I have to be. Call me sheltered or naive or whatever you want. I'd rather be naive than to have those things going around my mind.







I still believe that this is a book best read by adults. I can only imagine how a teen girl who has been raped would feel after reading this book for a high school literature class. It is completely inappropriate for school.

Also, you really should consider using a different term to describe black people, as you are a white woman and this is not 1950.

As for teenagers, being sexually assaulted is a very alienating act whether or not the victims come forward. If anything, I would think it would be a sign of inspiration to see how Angelou has turned a traumatizing act in her childhood into an award-winning masterpiece. It is so important for women, especially if they've been abused, to tell their stories, not ignore them.
Teaching teenagers how to deal with complex themes is what high school literature is for. If you take away stories with issues and trauma you're destroying the point, which is to challenge them intellectually and morally. You're also attempting to directly deceive them from the true happenings in the world. I can't imagine a greater disability to explore newly found independence with at 18, than a sheltered mind.


Sincerely,
The 10th grader analyzing this book for summer reading.

For the record, I hold a BA degree in history with a minor in political science and a focus on American History. Before my children were born I was licensed to teach 7-12 grade social studies in two states. I think I know just a little about southern American history and the American educational system.
The purpose of high school literature is to teach students to analyze and critique the writings of others so that their own compositions will transmit the ideas and beliefs they intend to express. It is not a high school teacher's job to teach students how to handle complex issues in life - that is a parent's job.
I do not have to read the explicit details of a violent crime to know that it is horrific. Just as I do not need to read the explicit details of war, or starvation, or dying from cancer to understand these are terrible things and feel empathy for those who suffer from them.

It may be shocking to you but that is completely different than saying the writer intended to be shocking. And that being said only of those couple of pages. So a few pages color your whole perception of the book?

Anyway, I'm 25 now but I read this while I was in high school ten years ago, but on my own time as it was getting a lot of hype back then. I don't think I was ever required to read it. Regardless, I loved it. Personally, though I'm older now, I'm a little offended that you think teenagers are either too naive or not "strong" enough to deal with this type of material.
In fact, your belief of such, along with your incredulity of the scenes in this book, and your mention that there are "trashy romance novels" that aren't as graphic...lead me to believe that 1)You haven't been reading the right romance novels and 2)You apparently have the maturity of what YOU assume teenagers to have.
Everything about this book is real. THAT is why I loved it.


And that is just one aspect covered in this book.



Good for you for posting your opinion here, Maxy! It's hard to stand up against the crowd, but your feelings are real and valid. I'm sorry you had your innocence shattered. Reading this book may be helpful for some people, but that doesn't mean it was good for you. My son feels the same way as you do. I strongly feel that this book should not be required reading for high school kids. Optional reading okay, but it was required for my son's English class and a teacher saw no problem with it. So many negative comments on here, but I support Stephanie and Jones.

I am honestly really upset that you are so naive that you don't see how teenagers are exposed to these things all the time. Talking about it is a good thing. How are they supposed to know it's okay to feel bad about being raped, and that it's not their fault, and they shouldn't feel ashamed, if no one ever tells them? By reading this book, people who have been through this can see that they are not alone. And that is so important.
I cried when I read this. I wanted to throw something at the wall, because it hurts me that people do this. Rape. But that's an okay reaction, that means I understand how wrong it is. And that makes me stronger.
I have several friends who got raped, before the age of eighteen. I've talked with them about this and it made them feel better.
Never, ever stop talking about this.
And remember this actually happened to Maya. She didn't make it up to provoke. It happened, and it happens everyday.



Books remain classic for good reason, and that you created such a backlash through your comment demonstrates how deeply some feel for the story.
Think critically though, if she--as a writer-- made you feel disgusted, that alone, is very powerful.
Silence would have been defeat. Some victims of abuse and violence die because they are too afraid to tell anyone and are threatened to remain silent.
She needed to speak out about the abuse and how she had been violated, and she used her pen to do so.
Even the title of the book tells a story: a caged bird (imprisoned) sings (speaks out; begs for freedom or communicates to those who are free).

Rape is disgusting. Racism is horrible. Poverty is ugly. Sex sometimes can be completely meaningless.
I don't ever want to read a book where some ones tries to "soften the blow" "make nice of a bad situation" or "mellows out" the real and fucking honest truth of life.
Also, any teenager that would read this book and not be able to "recover" has been sheltered and just had their eyes opened to the real world. That is not the problem, it's a solution. You have to know what this world really is to make it and maybe then change it



You wouldn't even recommend it to adults? This is how ignorance continues to rear it's head in our society. It also demonstrates your ignorance that the sexual aspects of this book are the only ones you feel the need to comment on.

Most people when they feel uncomfortable, it's because they fear what they do not understand. Let's hope none of your children are ever harmed, raped or assaulted, as your lack of understanding is already evident.

Maya has a many well earned awards (a Pulitzer, and a million other awards). She did not win that for naught. Her stories are the most beautifully written, musically inclined, works of art I can read. I would give all limbs to be able to craft a story like any of hers. There is pulse there. Better than that, she has real people that bleed real blood on her pages. What do we think? All of the children are stupid, weak, and unable to form thoughts and opinions? Do not underestimate our children- do not hold their minds back. (Shout out to Dr. Humprey at E- High, who forced opinions out of all of us in 10th and 11th grade, making me realize a lot of things about myself, making me a better person, communicator, writer, and getting me to college. Also, for giving me a huge stack of Morrison and Angelou.) Why are you afraid of the kids?
I recognize the argument is "think of the children," but it reads like "oh no! I may have to explain some awful things, and I'm not prepared to do that!" or maybe "parental yelling! React! React!" The stupid thing is, it's not REQUIRED that all schools use the novel, it's just on a list of approved books. There is obviously great use of the literary devices used in order for people to keep coming back and call this novel a classic. So, what's next? What other books should be eliminated? Who else should be silenced? I'm thinking if you cut out Maya, and silence victims, then you've got to take out the Catcher in the Rye. Only fair. And then, obviously, To Kill A Mockingbird. I'm sure there's more. They basically act out raping a pig and then violent murder children in Lord of the Flies (Latin translation: Beelzebub, Satanism too!), so why is that ok?
PS- just bc the author uses the term negro, doesn't mean you can repeatedly use it. You may quote once or twice, but c'mon. You know.

Teenagers cannot be protected from everything. Bad things happen in this world. If Dr Angelou hadn't even brave enough to frankly talk about the abuse she experienced then she wouldn't be as inspirational to as many people. She survived and prospered despite the abuse she suffered. This could inspire a teenager going through similar to keep going. And anyway, kids see so much lewdity and sex on TV that to think this book would damage them is quite condescending.

Better reading about it than experiencing it. Now you, as a young girl, will better able to protect yourself, and Dawn's son who "didn't like" the book will be able to empathize with victims of sexual abuse.

Masterfully said Tom.

It's not fair that Maya Angelou and others have to go through things like rape and are mistreated for confronting it. They don't have a CHOICE!!! Reading books like this require the reader to empathize with the writer, which is what she deserves! It takes courage to relive these experiences and share them with the world.
All it takes is a little understanding...

I am a seventeen year old female and I could relate to this book in other ways than the rape scene.
I've also read Speak, a couple of times actually! That is another beautiful book about the hardships of coping with rape.
Maya Angelou was just explaining her experiences they she went through them. If her parents monitored and censored her behavior, her life would have been completely different and she probably would not have been able to mature in such an honorable fashion. She became a stronger woman because of her experiences.
I don't have any issues with this being taught in schools. I've never had to read it for school and I probably never will because parents believe it should be banned for graphic and sexual content.
However, that's just life. Kids need to learn about life to grow into mature adults. Life is not a censored book with parts left out.
Take Anne Frank's diary, for example. Otto Frank requested that parts of it should be edited out and now there is some controversy about how much her diary could have been manipulated (i.e. adding or subtracting details to change things up).