Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ

Paul Bryant's Reviews > Voodoo Histories: The Role of the Conspiracy Theory in Shaping Modern History

Voodoo Histories by David Aaronovitch
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
416390
's review

liked it
bookshelves: modern-life, conspiracy-theory

THE PROTOCOLS OF THE ELDERS OF WALMART

OR, IF EVERYBODY’S IN ON IT, WHY HAVEN’T THEY ASKED ME?


Our text for today is :

Things only appear random because you're standing TOO CLOSE!

Let's cut to the chase here. Conspiracies are real. A trade union is a conspiracy against the rat-bastard capitalist running dogs who run big business. The capitalist running dogs in turn conspire against the honest workers to screw them out of every penny and when they're coughing and flopping about from emphysema, sack em and be done with em! A political party is a public conspiracy against its rivals - or, it's the public face of a private conspiracy. Football teams sit around and watch videos of the team they're up against next and figure out where the weaknesses are - they're conspiring in secret too.

So : you look at it one way, and everything's a damnable conspiracy! And that's the way I'm looking at it today! That woman across the road has some remarkable hanging baskets outside her house, but I REALISE NOW that all those peonies and dahlias are hiding cameras! They can't fool me. I call upon you all as witnesses, in case I'm found in a bag of quick drying cement on a grassy knoll somewhere.

Pardon me, I have to take my tablets.

David Aaronovitch's introduction spells out nicely enough why the conspiracists get my goat and my other pack animals so successfully. It's because they put me in the position of having to defend the authorities ! Yes! Me! Like I would want to do that! But that's what I'm doing when I bat away these crazy theories, which are like, you know, only a theory like gravity's a theory - we know they're really saying this is how 9/11 really went down, man . (It was Mossad!) So then I have to say no, no, you're wrong, the FBI is an organisation of great integrity and would never fabricate evidence and never perpetrate falsehoods upon the public! That's right! Of course they wouldn't!

There's a word for the position these conspiracists put me in : invidious. There's a feeling I get when blustering about how the authorities are honest and trustworthy : mortified.

That's the first reason why I hate these conspiracy theories. And the second is : they mess with my mind in making me think that facts aren't facts at all but received opinion. In this they are like a sharp course in practical philosophy - how do you know what you know, Descartes, what lies beyond the veil, cogito ergo vomit, how do you know you're not a brain in a tank and all that kind of stuff which is alright in theory but not when someone is ranting about the death of Robert Calvi, the CIA and the first Gulf War and the vatican and Monica Lewinsky and the protocols of the elders of Walmart.

As David says elegantly :

given the desire to believe, it is easy to confuse detail with thought.


9/11 : in August 2004 Zogby Opinion Research found that 2/3 of New Yorkers under the age of 30 thought that the US Government either knew the attacks were going to happen and allowed them to proceed or actively engineered them. So what? Most people living in the US and UK believe their governments are corrupt, cover up crimes routinely, steal you blind, go to war for hideous ignoble reasons and lie about them all the time, it’s the nature of government. So what? Do we think that people in former centuries thought they were blessed with their Kings and Popes?

Let’s imagine that � say � America wakes up one day and says - Stone the crows!* You were right! Bush and Cheney are indeed war criminals! Let’s try ‘em! Let’s prosecute all those who sold this phoney war to us citizens and got so many soldiers killed for nothing! What then? Will future governments never make these blunders again? Will the CIA become a force for Good? Do the conspiracists dream of a world without spies? Or again: the Iraq war was according to many conspiracists “all about oil�. If oil is going to become scarce in the West in � say � 50 years time, wouldn’t it be a prudent thing for the US government to secure future supplies? And since you can’t invade a country just like that you have to find a reason, hence WMD and the non-existent threat of Saddam Hussein? Hey, you purple in the face anti-Bushers, you should be praising this great president for guaranteeing our lovely Western lifestyle for another few decades!

What happens in Britain : a big controversial event takes place (death of Diana, invasion of Iraq) � official explanations are offered and routinely derided � the whole outraged nation demands a public enquiry with one voice � and they get one � 18 months later the chairman Lord Seriously-Old or Sir Dreadful Bastard announces the results � which confirm the official explanation was correct in all particulars � two thirds of the nation by then have become bored and are playing on their X-Boxes � the one third left all denounce the findings as Yet Another Whitewash. What has been accomplished? It is a kind of theatre. Everyone takes their appointed place and goes through their allotted script.

VARIOUS OBSCURE PEOPLE HAVE DIED IN UNCLEAR CIRCUMSTANCES

It doesn’t matter if the theorist believes in his own conspiracy theory because these theories are, like religion, a series of psychological strategies which exist to deal with the extreme perplexities of our human situation. We are meaning-seeking individuals in an apparently meaningless and very big & scary universe. Yesterday I heard an astronomer on the radio describing what you would find if you rocketed off to outer space and didn’t stop for nothing � her voice became a pleasant, relaxing drone� “then when you leave the solar system you see now that you are in an outer arm of the Milky Way galaxy which contains hundreds of billions of stars and then you see that the Milky Way itself is part of a cluster of galaxies each of which which contains hundreds of billions of stars and then you see that there are far away hundreds of billions of other galaxy clusters each of which which contains hundreds of billions of galaxies containing hundreds of billions of stars� and by this time I was seriously freaking OUT and in a burst of Tourette’s syndrome I screamed at the radio “HEY LADY, WHO KILLED BRIAN JONES?�

So, for instance, the theory of the deliberate blowing-up of the levees in New Orleans in order to flood the black areas � almost endorsed by Spike Lee’s film � is an expression of the perennial feelings of people who feel oppressed. Many of the main theories propose such a vast complex conspiracy that they become truly farcical � you get quite indignant that you aren’t in on it, everyone else seems to be. So this stuff appears to me to be like the secularised, dark shadow cast by the setting sun of religion. Whereas the Christian cosmology presents an essentially benevolent universe spelled out by Jesus:

Are not five sparrows sold for two farthings, and not one of them is forgotten before God? But even the very hairs of your head are all numbered. Fear not therefore: ye are of more value than many sparrows.

GODLESS MALIGNANCY. COOL!

The conspiracist sees only godless malignancy, a world of men suborning each other, killing the good, doing harm. I note that each believer, the religious and the conspiracist, denies the existence of accident, co-incidence or mistake : everything is intentional in these thought worlds. There is always a Plan. The conspiracists replace one God with many � but are they not all facets of the One in an infinite dance? No. The hundredheaded gods of the conspiracists don’t dance at all � you put a foot wrong and the CIA or the Freemasons or the Jews or the British Royal Family or the Order of the Solar Temple or the Jesuits or the Knights Templars or the Communists or the Mob will frug you to death.

I realise now I have been conspiring against my own peace of mind for years!


3.5 stars.


* A Nottingham expression of surprise
59 likes ·  âˆ� flag

Sign into Å·±¦ÓéÀÖ to see if any of your friends have read Voodoo Histories.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Finished Reading
May 3, 2009 – Shelved
August 26, 2009 – Shelved as: modern-life
February 24, 2025 – Shelved as: conspiracy-theory

Comments Showing 1-25 of 25 (25 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Pete (new)

Pete daPixie Interesting title of the book. Got me thinking. Shouldn't it be 'How modern History is shaping the role of the conspiracy theory'.
Nothing new about conspiracy theories. History is littered with them. Maybe our mass communication electronic age just cultures and spreads them faster.


Paul Bryant It sounds as if the author thinks conspiracy theory is affecting modern historians' understanding, which is very intersting, if true. He was on Radio 4 this morning - I'll take a listen now.


message 3: by Trevor (new)

Trevor Who needs conspiracy theories? The world is insane enough. And I can prove it:

Fact: Sarah Palin stood for Vice-President of the world's most powerful nation.

Rea;ity gas become more bizarre and less believable than the conspiracy theories I'd always assumed were there to mock reality - something needs to be done.


message 4: by Whitaker (new)

Whitaker Actually, this entire site, no, the entire Internet is a vast global conspiracy. Every time you log djgfurjidskjiufjfhghyrhu you can't silenece me the truth will be tilf


Paul Bryant I know only too well.


Paul Bryant Oh yes, I agree this stuff can be read either way. However, the author is not knocking down the obvious alien-abduction-style green-lizard conspiracies but the more insidious racist stuff like the protocols, like the idea that Mossad flew the 9/11 planes, and so forth. As I say, disbelieving most conspiracies does indeed make you have to defend the authorities, and as I say this is acutely uncomfortable. But it's a false dichotomy - either the CIA and FBI are honest and upright at all times OR they lie to us and connived in the destruction of the WTC. The conspiracists are always thrusting this at you. Neither is true.


Jason Paul, just read it. Once again, we're within 0.5 of the same star rating.


message 8: by Ian (new)

Ian "Marvin" Graye wow, you guys knew each other in 2009.

btw, didn't my avatar invent monotheism?


message 9: by Richard (new)

Richard Derus I mean, David, really now - if I were Stalin - which, I hastily point out, I am not - I would have that sentence taken out and had it shot. And a lot of others just like it in this excruciating chapter.

I don't know if I'll get around to reading this book during this lifetime, since I've read your review, which was ever so much more fun than the book could possibly be.


message 10: by Ian (new)

Ian "Marvin" Graye Richard, that probably applies to most of Paul's five star reviews of three star books.


message 11: by Kalliope (new)

Kalliope The Reichstag fire in 1933. Is this another conspiracy theory case?


message 12: by Arthur (new)

Arthur Graham For an excellent satire on conspiracy "theories" and the ways in which they take on lives of their own, see Roland Denning's The Beach Beneath the Pavement. Highly recommend it!


message 13: by Kemper (last edited Jun 28, 2012 07:49AM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Kemper "David Aaronovitch's introduction spells out nicely enough why the conspiracists get my goat and my other pack animals so successfully. It's because they put me in the position of having to defend the authorities !"

Exactly.


message 14: by Katy (new)

Katy My dad was a huge fan of various conspiracy theories, especially those that related to race or ethnicity. So I heard some doozies growing up about the New World Order and the Bilderbergers and the secret agenda of the Zionists... Many of my Jewish friends are delighted to hear about the Zionist conspiracies because it gives them something to do on those slow weekends - help to take over the world!

I loved this comment in your review: 18 months later the chairman Lord Seriously-Old or Sir Dreadful Bastard announces the results � which confirm the official explanation was correct in all particulars � two thirds of the nation by then have become bored and are playing on their X-Boxes � the one third left all denounce the findings as Yet Another Whitewash. (especially the part I emphasized in bold) People are way too easily distracted from important events by the bread-and-circuses entertainment venue of sports, videogames and reality TV. What a sad, sad world we live in when important events are overshadowed by the latest celebrity "baby bump." *sigh*


message 15: by Richard (new)

Richard Derus I hate to be both contrarian and elitist, but considering how stupid and uneducable most people are, I'm all for bread and circuses.

Then again, I wrote my high school English book report *defending* Brave New World and calling for the development of soma.


message 16: by Whitaker (new)

Whitaker Odd. I must have voted for this first time round but I see that I haven't. Duly corrected.


message 17: by Paul (last edited Jun 28, 2012 10:15AM) (new) - rated it 3 stars

Paul Bryant I rewrote this review which is why it popped up again. I took out all the comments I made about the actual book itself, they were plainly irrelevant.

Brian - yes, to a certain extent I agree with your above comment. Problem is that you can spend enormous abouts of time trying to get a grip on these theories. I checked out the truthers' theories about the collapse of the WTC and man alive, it went from zero to advanced particle physics in 0.5 seconds.


message 18: by Rakhi (new)

Rakhi Dalal Excellent review Paul!


message 19: by Paul (last edited Jun 28, 2012 12:53PM) (new) - rated it 3 stars

Paul Bryant Thanks Rakhi...

Yes, it's a point, Brian, but there's a but. In chemistry, etc, you get peer reviewed. In cinspiracies there are no peers. There are no standards of evidence. This becomes clear in the trial David Irving vd Deborah Lipstadt & Penguin Books. Remember that one? Irving kept in raising the bar of proof to inhuman levels in his attempt to prove there were no gas chambers as Auschwitz.

(That is not to say that conspiracy theoreticians are in any way unsaviury Irving types, but he does give a great example of what I mean).


message 20: by Paul (last edited Jun 28, 2012 02:37PM) (new) - rated it 3 stars

Paul Bryant Yes, if a trial is ever conducted, then arguably that will peer-review the evidence, although there are many trials which don't or which have a battle of experts involved, and who is to say if the jury understands the experts. I was really referring to the majority of alleged conspiracies which are never brought anywhere near a court. In these cases, there is no peer review, there is a tower of babel. I have a very interesting and depressing book about JKF - this one -

http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/...

my problem is that us citizens are simply not in a position to make any judgements about the conflicting evidence. Same goes with 9/11. How are we to get a handle on these things? I completely agree that we were handed down from on high a plateful of fabrications about Saddam hussain - in Britain there was a big lie about him being able to activate missiles aimed at British citizens in Cyprus within 45 minutes - it was a passive lie, the government allowed the newspapers to make an incorrect hysterical inference and emblazon it all over the headlines. They knew it was wrong but they didn't correct the misinformation because it mightily helped their pro-war cause. So that was a conspiracy to fool the British people. Which was revealed in a subsequent official inquiry to widespread indifference.

I don't see who we could trust to investigate something like 9/11. No one is impartial.


message 21: by Paul (last edited Jun 28, 2012 05:03PM) (new) - rated it 3 stars

Paul Bryant In Britain, as I say, we have official inquiries, such as the ongoing Leveson Inquiry, all about the phone hacking scandal and the corruption of the police and politicians by the Murdoch press; we have also had two inquiries into the origins and cinduct of the Iraq war. These produce hundreds of witnesses and thousands of pags of transcripts and I think they don't change anyone's mind.

So my first question is - are such official inquiries useful?

Let's now take 9/11 as the recent best example of a possible conspiracy. There have neen a million words written about this. doens of actual books and then the great amount of debate online.

Second question is - do you still think the truth about 9/11 has not been discovered? I.e. do you think the identification of the hijackers and their motives is suspect?


message 22: by Richard (new)

Richard Derus Paul wrote: "Let's now take 9/11 as the recent best example of a possible conspiracy. There have neen a million words written about this. doens of actual books and then the great amount of debate online.

Second question is - do you still think the truth about 9/11 has not been discovered? I.e. do you think the identification of the hijackers and their motives is suspect? "


Gent called William of Ockham fixed this one up nice when he posited that the simplest answer is almost always the correct one.

Those Saudi lads did it, and did it to strike a blow at the heart of a system of hegemony they disliked and resented enough to die resisting. The various gummints involved knew bits and patches of the story as it unfolded and no one was smart enough to put it all together.

It fits the facts. It requires no elaborate backstory or complex manipulation. It's probably the correct version of what happened.

The wife and three kids of a friend died that day. The woman living in my old apartment on Rector Place was injured by shrapnel. It's just awful that these things occurred; it's not a result of some Grand Conspiracy. Reality very seldom is.


message 23: by Paul (new) - rated it 3 stars

Paul Bryant Brian - on the subject of 9/11, did you ever read The Looming Tower? As ever, I would be very interested in your thoughts on that one. There are two very contrasting views on it - mine and Jessica's (we both think her review is great).


message 24: by Paul (new) - rated it 3 stars

Paul Bryant I didn't get that far.... but it's right up your street.


message 25: by Alfaniel (new)

Alfaniel Aldavan Paul wrote: "I rewrote this review[...]. I took out all the comments I made about the actual book itself, they were plainly irrelevant."

Sounds like good times.


back to top