this explanation/intro will be posted before each day’s short story. scroll down to get to the story-review.
this is the FIWELCOME TO DECEMBER PROJECT!
this explanation/intro will be posted before each day’s short story. scroll down to get to the story-review.
this is the FIFTH year of me doing a short story advent calendar as my december project. for those of you new to me or this endeavor, here’s the skinny: every day in december, i will be reading a short story that is 1) available free somewhere on internet, and 2) listed on goodreads as its own discrete entity. there will be links provided for those of you who like to read (or listen to) short stories for free, and also for those of you who have wildly overestimated how many books you can read in a year and are freaking out about not meeting your 2020 reading-challenge goals. i have been gathering links all year when tasty little tales have popped into my feed, but i will also accept additional suggestions, as long as they meet my aforementioned 1), 2) standards, because i have not compiled as many as usual this year.
IN ADDITION, this may be the last year i do this project since GR has already deleted the pages for several of the stories i've read in previous years without warning, leaving me with a bunch of missing reviews and broken links, which makes me feel shitty. because i don't have a lot of time to waste, i'm not going to bother writing much in the way of reviews for these, in case gr decides to scrap 'em again. 2020 has left me utterly wrung out and i apologize for what's left of me. i am doing my best.
DECEMBER 29: UNDER THE WAVE - LAUREN GROFF
And all was stripped from her and all she was was wildness and pain and her lungs bursting in the cage of her chest and her body battered by a hundred invisibilities and the terrible swirl.
Out of the wildness, the branch of an oak plucked her from the water and she clung there, animal, as orange dawned over the marsh made alien with mud.
if you think it's a cop-out to use a quote in place of an actual review, you're gonna love this:
fulfilling book riot's 2020 read harder challenge task #5: Read a book about a natural disaster
yeah, how you like me now? look, 2020 was HARD, and i didn't get to meet all my goals, so i'm using this short story to complete that task and i don't wanna hear anything out of y'all, especially if you get to work from home and aren't one of the handful of suckers commuting into a pandemic-y city each day; at-risk and exhausted, breathing through damp cloth with foggy glasses on. boo-urns. i didn't think this particular prompt would be one of the last ones rattling around, scrambling to be met, since i LOVE natural disaster books, but it was a weird year all around, i guess.
anyway, it's a great story, and the immediacy with which she wrote the natural disaster part of it was exquisite and got me right in my anxious bits.
fulfilling book riot's 2020 read harder challenge task #11: Read a debut novel by a queer author
set on a plantation in antebellum mHAPPY PRIDE MONTH!!
fulfilling book riot's 2020 read harder challenge task #11: Read a debut novel by a queer author
set on a plantation in antebellum mississippi, this is a story about two slaves—isaiah and samuel—who find respite from the brutality of their lives in their love for each other, and how this relationship brings hope, comfort, or danger to those around them.
as far as story, content, and characters go, this book is a mega-star. i had difficulty with some of the author’s prose/style choices, but the parts that i loved far outweighed the parts that i didn’t.
it’s a sprawling novel—there are many character POVs, looping back and forth through time and locale. and when he’s writing in the grounded and immediate, it’s superb. however, he also tends towards the abstract and ethereal, the slippery and poetic—not only in the observations/commentary of “the seven,� whose mysterious ancestral/divine presence surfaces throughout the novel, spouting foreshadowy bits of ominous, impressionistic speech—but also in the ordinary/mortal characters, like timothy—artist-son of the slaveowner:
He had learned that horrors could be planted like seeds, spring to life if given the right tenderness of soil, water, and shine. Unfurl slowly beneath the earth’s skin, burrowing down even as it stretched upward toward an open sky. Hiding, at first, its center, it could be coaxed to reveal its core, exposing colors vibrant enough to make even animals weep, unveiling fragrances that could seduce even the most ferocious of bees. You would never know it was poison until you touched it or consumed it, but by then it was already too late. You had already been choked, just like the ones before you. And there was no one left unscathed enough to tell the tale, to warn the next person foolish enough to stop and admire, plucked when they should have just left well enough alone.
this is probably not the best example of the phenomenon, but it’s the first one i flipped to just now. this kind of writing is not my jam, and it weighed me down with its mooshiness—having to parse so many amorphous clause-riddled sentences for meaning, when so much of the rest of the prose was so sharp and precise:
It was worse when the cruelty came from other women. It shouldn’t have been; after all, women were people, too. But it was. When women did it, it was like being stabbed with two knives instead of one. Two knives, one in the back and the other in a place that couldn’t be seen, only felt.
the only other complaint i had was that there are a ton of characters; their relationships and motivations so many spinning plates, so it gets a little messy and convoluted in the resolution.
long story short—i didn't love all of it, i didn't even understand all of it, but having said that, the most important takeaway here is that the parts that were great were GREAT.
because once you get used to his style, it’s such an impressive debut. the female characters are particularly well-rendered, and the way he expands the thematic focus of the typical historical slavery novel to consider not only gender, but also sexuality, is spectacular. i could have read an entire novel about the matriarchal african tribe led by king akusa, and the slave ship passages were excruciatingly powerful.
one last quote and then i’m out:
To survive in this place, you had to want to die. That was the way of the world as remade by toubab, and Samuel’s list of grievances was long: They pushed people into the mud and then called them filthy. They forbade people from accessing any knowledge of the world and then called them simple. They worked people until their empty hands were twisted, bleeding, and could do no more, then called them lazy. They forced people to eat innards from troughs and then called them uncivilized. They kidnapped babies and shattered families and then called them incapable of love. They raped and lynched and cut up people into parts, and then called the pieces savage. They stepped on people’s throats with all their might and asked why the people couldn’t breathe. And then, when people made an attempt to break the foot, or cut it off one, they screamed “CHAOS!� and claimed that mass murder was the only way to restore order.
fulfilling book riot's 2020 read harder challenge task #22: Read a horror book published by an indie press
She lumbers towA GHOST FROM SPOOKTOBER PAST!
fulfilling book riot's 2020 read harder challenge task #22: Read a horror book published by an indie press
She lumbers toward me through the oiled dark, breathing hard, and all I can think is: I wonder how we’ll look when they find us.
this book is twenty-two pages long short. and in those twenty-two pages it manages to be spookier than many books with considerably more space in which to develop their spookiness.
it’s all about the haunted house at 25 trumbulls road; each of the five chapters recounting the experiences of a different family inhabiting the residence over the years, whilst also maybe being inhabited themselves in turn.
this book is exactly what i thought Guestbook: Ghost Stories was going to be before i read it—creepy and sparse and suggestive—the kind of horror that stands behind you whispering in your ear. Guestbook: Ghost Stories is a beautiful objet and its content was occasionally unsettling, but it was almost exclusively the read-between-the-lines brand of unsettling. a lovely, disquieting book for sure, but not quite horror. with this one, even though there's ambiguity and offscreen action and plenty of gaps with things left unsaid, there’s enough context to string together the overt and the unspoken into actual horror, engaging you-the-reader in the process in a way that makes you feel affected, perhaps even a little haunted yourself.
these are the chapters:
CASE 3 (August 2000) CASE 8 (April 2005) CASE 22 (July 2006) CASE 34 (September 2013) CASE 56 (June 2018)
which of course begs the question(s) “why these five specific cases?,� and “who is recording or documenting these incidents, and why?,� and “what the hell happened between april 2005 and july 2006 to cause such an escalation of incidents?,� etc.
each of the five chapters are broken up further into segments marked exhibits; chunky paragraphs of narrative like little prose poems, which themselves include gaps; for example jumping from EXHIBIT 2 to EXHIBIT 5, occasionally including an exhibit and its number with the text redacted, pockmarking these 22 pages with lacunae whose creepy details you’re gonna have to fill in on your own.
to get you started, here's the book’s opening paragraph:
EXHIBIT #1 The first night in our new house, I had a dream about a woman who lived under the floor. She smelled raw and cried as she pulled her body between the wide pine planks. I wanted to help her but felt that would be rude somehow. She quieted when she took me outside the house, which miraculously looked exactly like the one we just moved into; our real cars were in the driveway, my real cat was silhouetted in the upstairs window, licking its paw. She brought me into the nearby woods and seated me atop a stump. I watched as she shuffled around a great, gnarled apple tree, humming, dragging her damaged feet. She stopped abruptly and turned toward me, opening her mouth wide. When I woke up, I felt unusual, almost heartsick. The morning was glorious, and my daughter Sophie asked me to join her outside after breakfast to explore our new neighborhood. We went into the woods, discovered an abandoned doll house with three little beds, each bed holding only the head of a doll, nothing more. We kept going, pushing at brambles and dead pine, until we happened upon an apple tree. Around the base of the tree was a muddy, worn path. I felt the blood leave my face, and I could hear music not far off.
what happens in EXHIBIT #7?? hint: it, too, involves dolls and dolls are never NOT creepy.
oooh, goodreads choice awards finalist for best fantasy 2020! what will happen?
fulfilling book riot's 202oooh, goodreads choice awards finalist for best fantasy 2020! what will happen?
fulfilling book riot's 2020 read harder challenge task: #16 Read a doorstopper (over 500 pages) published after 1950, written by a woman
[image]
HAPPY SPOOKTOBER!
okay, so this was a bit of a cheat on my part. i knew going into it that this wasn’t going to be the most spooktobery of spooktober reads, but my whole deal of “only reading horror in october� is a self-imposed condition-tradition, and since i could justify reading this because witches are a halloween-decoration staple, i let my conscience be my guide because i really REALLY wanted to read it. and while it was in no way scary, it was scary-good.
as much as i loved The Ten Thousand Doors of January, i loved this one even more. it’s as beautifully-written as her debut, but it’s a much bigger story, more ambitious and more rewarding. it’s about three estranged sisters reuniting, but it’s also about Sisterhood; about what women can accomplish when they are united in a common cause, and it’s both a celebration and a triumphant battle cry of defiance and female power.
the worldbuilding is incredibly dense—set in alt-history 1893 in the town of new salem, it loops in historical elements like the suffragette movement, the underground railroad, the triangle shirtwaist factory fire, the salem witch trials, and fairytales (genderswapping their authors into the sisters grimm and a female perrault). harrow packs a lot into this story, but every part has weight and purpose and it never feels overburdened.
the magical elements are handled with great restraint. it’s not (all) presented in big, dramatic, showy spectacles, but in small, household magic cobbled together and repurposed inventively—female ingenuity making the most out of what they have; their magic hidden in plain sight in all the overlooked and underestimated domestic trappings of women’s spheres. it’s a practical, modest; “That’s all magic is, really: the space between what you have and what you need.� here, magic is a legacy handed down through generations, what women use to compensate for what they’re not permitted to have or be or want, or as she so eloquently, alliteratively states, “witchcraft isn’t one thing but many things, all the ways and words women have found to wreak their wills on the world.�
i’m not particularly drawn to witch stories, but in order to fulfill a social anthropology requirement my freshman year at nyu i took a history of witchcraft course that i ended up lo-ving, and reading this, i recognized enough in the detail work to make me appreciate how much dingdang research harrow must have done. i’m in no way slighting her powers of imagination, but there’s a lot of history in this alt-historical, which takes time and effort to accumulate, and skill to incorporate without it seeming clunky. it is also to her credit that she included witchcraft traditions with more of a global consideration than most writers, drawing from the west indies and russian folklore to make a richly textured magical melting pot.
inclusion is, after all, one of the big themes here. historically, witchcraft accusations were essentially a way for a society to rid itself of its troublesome women—to get a new wife, to remove a sexual rival, to punish a trollop, to divest itself of the burden of the elderly. midwives and others who worked in the dark arts of women’s health were also frequently targeted, for all the reasons you’d expect. in repressive societies, nonconformists who offended the olde god-fearing sensibilities could very publicly be executed as witches, keeping potentially unruly women in line. and harrow makes a place for them here, a witchy found family of these mothers and maidens and crones, these whores and abortionists and foreigners, these lesbians and trans women and women who wanted more from life than they were given. AND SHE GIVES THEM BROOMSTICKS.
i love her so much.
four years ago, i read her story The Autobiography of a Traitor and a Half-Savage (read it for free ), giving it five stars and ending my review with the declaration: “this author has just made my watch list.� then last year, having forgotten that vow and not recognizing the name, i read both The Ten Thousand Doors of January, and A Witch’s Guide to Escape: A Practical Compendium of Portal Fantasies (read it for free ), and i gave both of THEM five stars. and that’s pretty rare for me. a five star book means it hit me and lodged in my brainheart. going into this one, i was apprehensive because the early reviews ranged from disappointed to baffled, but that was not at all my own experience—this one hit me hard with its characters and lodged in my brainheart but good with its breathtaking prose and its layers and layers of build. and so many great lines. i'm a filthy page-folder, and even though i didn't want to dog ear this one at first because it is so beautiful, and also because it’s so hard to find a pagefold in a deckle-edged book, eventually i couldn't help myself and i regret nothing.
this is more of a note-to-self, but feel free to peer over my shoulder: the whole time i was reading this i was picturing bella as daisy from Giant Days, Vol. 1:
[image]
and as i was writing this review today, i realized that confident, messy, impulsive esther would make a fine juniper (tho she's no maiden)
[image]
while fierce, independent, and protective susan is very much team agnes.
[image]
in short, witches.
[image]
**
[image]
this beauty just arrived at my HOME! and i'm stuck looking at it longingly for at least a week before i'll have time to dive in. ggrrrrrrrrr
fulfilling my 2020 goal to read (at least) one book each month that was given to me as a present that i haven't yet gotten around to reading because ifulfilling my 2020 goal to read (at least) one book each month that was given to me as a present that i haven't yet gotten around to reading because i am an ungrateful dick.
AND
fulfilling book riot's 2020 read harder challenge task #13: Read a food book about a cuisine you’ve never tried before.
looking for great books to read during black history month...and the other eleven months? i'm going to float some of my favorites throughout the monthlooking for great books to read during black history month...and the other eleven months? i'm going to float some of my favorites throughout the month, and i hope they will find new readers!
fulfilling book riot's 2020 read harder challenge task #6: Read a play by an author of color and/or queer author
i don’t really read plays. i only read this because challenge told me i had to read a play, and its blurbs sounded promising, with words like “funny,� “demented,� “fury,� etc.
i’m finally sitting down to review it, but i'm warning you: i’m bad at reading plays, i’m even worse at writing about them.
there are three plays in this collection.
END OF REVIEW.
[image]
fine, i will try.
reading these plays made me hope jacobs-jenkins would write a novel someday. which sounds insulting, but is not that way intended. here is a play i wrote to explain:
EXCELLENT BAKER: would you like a freshly-baked scone?
ME: no thank you. i do not care for scones. i prefer muffins. do you have any muffins?
EXCELLENT BAKER: no, i only bake scones, but i am an excellent baker and they are full of things you like: cinnamon and blueberries and nuts and everyone else loves them. try one. (hands ME the scone)
ME: okay, fine, but i really do not enjoy scones. (eats of the scone, tentatively) okay, i'll grant you—as far as scones go, this is pretty good, but if these flavors were in a thing that i like very much—say, a muffin—i bet it would be even better. will you make me a muffin?
EXCELLENT BAKER: no, i will murder you instead! (stabs ME)
ME: NOOOOOOOOO! (dies)
FIN
[image]
i like his writing, i like his humor, but i do not think i would enjoy attending a performance of these plays. however, i would be very interested in the how of it—again, i know nothing about theater, but these seem very ambitious, with elaborate stage directions that may or may not involve training rodents, and the expectation that the audience will be able to decipher what is meant by the volume and duration of recorded cicada-buzzing.
the stage directions my actually be my favorite part of these plays—i love how they deviate from the traditional or expected by being voicey, “But I guess I worry about the whole thing becoming too Brechtian. Though, does it matter? Also, can I help it?� or poetic, “Then moonlight happens,� or vague, “She takes a deep breath or something,� or highly specific, “Grace gets on the table holding her baby, which is, ideally, a white baby in blackface.� they almost function like the footnotes in Infinite Jest—going off on their own journeys, not necessarily bound to what they’re meant to be explaining. his are full of asides, musings, and contradictions; details a live audience will never get to appreciate.
(M’Closky jumps up on his chair, throws money in the air, and makes it rain—perhaps literally, perhaps figuratively—the theater is a space of infinite possibility)
i’m torn between whether or not i would want to see these performed. i've probably gotten all the important bits out of the plays by reading them here in my home, but reading a play is a little like reading something in translation—you're left with the feeling there’s a piece of the work you haven’t been given access to.
however, my experience of going to plays is that i will either become self-conscious or sleepy (or better—self-conscious or unconscious, because i definitely dozed off during that albee play i was dragged to).
these plays might be too modern for me to appreciate. they’re maybe more for the post-narrative theater crowd, folks who dig the “theater experience,� who wanna leave a play feeling slightly rattled. i know that these are a million miles away from *actual* experimental theater, but while i loved encountering all of the metafiction flourishes strutting through them, i simply don’t have the patience for any theater of discomfort stuff (which i am pretty sure is a thing that exists with its own specific rules and characteristics, but i've learned my lesson about wasting time googling shit), so i’m for sure using the phrase wrong, but i'm okay with that. i'm using it to mean maybe artistic discomfort? "is this meant to shock or titillate me?"discomfort. something the disrupts the narrative with...whatever you want to call it when a “mostly—if not completely—naked� man applies whiteface (body painting optional) onstage, which procedure “should go on for some time� before he “very, very slowly and very, very stoically� gives himself “a powerful wedgie.� which i suppose won't be possible if the actor is completely naked, unless we are adding mime skills to the mix. i’m not offended by any of that, but i’m also not interested in paying money to see it if it doesn't serve the story. if i wanted to see naked dudes do weird stuff, i’d just get on the subway. which is no doubt the theater-philistine equivalent of “my kid could paint that,� but i’m truly not sophisticated enough a theatergoer to get any value out of something designed to test or provoke an audience or make them question their expectations of theater's possibilities or whatever shit like that is meant to do. i have no expectations to subvert; i’m a preschooler who wants to be told a story and given a juice box at intermission.
so although i enjoyed reading the plays, i think seeing them performed would range from excruciating—the first one with alla that yelling and the long monologues (okay, the one two-page monologue that seems long to me but maybe isn’t that long?), to exhausting: the third play’s energy and quickchange tone and long body-painting intervals. i suppose i’d goldilocks the middle play, but that can’t take more than twenty minutes to perform, so i’m not sure it counts.
anyway, here are some thoughts on the individual plays even though no one’s still reading this.
play #1: APPROPRIATE
in which a shitty white family is revealed to be even shittier when racist family secrets are exposed. it’s like when you buy an onion that looks normal, but the rot starts just under the surface and gets worse with each layer. with each scene, each act, everyone’s behavior gets progressively more toxic.
so much yelling, by people and cicadas.
it ends with two pages of stage directions that i absolutely love and think is a perfect ending to such a corrosive play. it almost reads like a short story in itself, particularly the cicada part that opens it, and this is why i want him to write something i’m better at reading:
The cicadas? They just go on singing—singing loudly, singing incessantly—a long, enormously complicated, deeply layered, entirely improvised, ancient song, which is mostly about the morning, but also about the evening and the day but also the night and the sun but also the moon and about waking up and flying around and what it is like to fly around and about loving each other and hating each other and fucking each other and hurting each other but also about trying to find each other in order to hurt and/or fuck each other but also about falling asleep and then waking up again and the quiet and the noise that accompany each day and the sounds of each other’s voices and the occasional music but mostly about the noise and the grass and the sky and the air and the water but also the water in the air and the heat in the air and the dry in the air and the birds in the sky and the birds on the grass and the birds on the branches and always birds—birds always—but also the sap in the branches and the sweetness of the sap in the branches of the trees but also the trees themselves on the grass and the grass on the dirt but also the dirt itself and how they miss the dirt and how they miss their homes in the dirt, the palaces where they came from, and the feeling of missing the thing you can never go back to and the mystery of the way one moves away from it and through the present and the mystery of the present and the mystery of the movement itself and the leaves on the branches and the birds in the leaves on the branches and the branches on the trees and the trees on the grass and the grass on the dirt and dying.
And we can’t understand any of it.
how is this conveyed? i don’t know, but the theater is a space of infinite possibility, right?
play #2: I PROMISE NEVER AGAIN TO WRITE PLAYS ABOUT ASIANS�
this is a six-page monologue, so there’s not much to it, but it’s sharp and angry and very funny and SPOILER ALERT it ends with blood pouring out of the actor’s mouth, with the stage direction:
This goes on for as long as it can.
play #3: AN OCTOROON
this is a wild adaptation of a play by boucicault i have vague memories of reading in undergrad; an upgrade that changes everything from how it is cast—several actors taking on multiple roles, to some modern, anachronistic dialogue:
MINNIE: You ever thought of running away?
DIDO: Aw, hell naw. What am I going to look like running through this hot-ass swamp? Uh-uh.
MINNIE: I know, right? Grace’s ass always talking about running away now that Massa dead and I’m like, “Bitch, you need to calm your busybody ass down.�
as well as the addition of several scenes and characters along the way, decked out in metafiction and spectacle and bre’r rabbit cameos.
this is my favorite of the three, despite those things i know would annoy me, like the wedgies and the extremely loud music, &etc. but this one almost NEEDS to be seen to be appreciated. it’s confusing to read several actors playing multiple roles, sometimes in the same scene, and the visual effects and fourth wall-breakage are flatter on the page than they would be live.
but yes, this one was my favorite for the flaca-and-maritza relationship between minnie and dido;
[image]
their bullshit and banter, their scramble to make sure they get sold together; they make an excellent comedy duo.
MINNIE: Girl, is it just me or has it been really quiet?
DIDO: You know, I was just thinking the same thing.
MINNIE: Right?
(Beat.)
(As they work) Even all these white people are being really quiet. I wonder what’s going on today. I couldn’t read that sign out front, because I can’t read.
DIDO: I can’t read it, either. You know it’s illegal for us to read.
MINNIE: Yeeuh, but I was hopin� you wuz one of them secret readin� niggas. You know, like Rhonda.
DIDO: Rhonda can read?!
MINNIE: Shh, girl! It’s a secret.
however, this play’s more serious meta-scenes, where the playwright character gets to vent, are impressive and satisfying in a more lasting way, which is where i’m going to leave this “review,� because i’ve gone on a lot longer than i intended to, and i feel silly and self-indulgent, so here’re some words from an excellent writer who makes me wish i liked theater.
I believe an important part of being a good artist is recognizing your limits. So I can respect the pussies who pussy out of a project. I respect it when they get their “people� to be all like, “Well, such-and-such doesn’t really get the stuff about slaves.� I’m like, “What is there not to get? It’s slavery. And I’m not even asking you to play the slaves. You’re playing the goddamn slave owner.� I mean, God forbid you ask a black guy to play some football-playing illiterate drug addict magical negro Iraq vet with PTSD who’s secretly on the DL with HIV but who’s also trying to get out of a generic ghetto with his pregnant obese girlfriend who has anger-management issues from a history of sexual abuse� in fact, everyone’s been sexually abused and it all climaxes with someone’s mother having a monologue where she’s snotting out of her nose and crying everywhere because she’s been caught smoking crack and fired from her job as a hotel maid�
(Beat)
(I just made that up…Dibs.)
(Beat)
God forbid any actor of color not jump at the chance to play an offensive bag of garbage so far from his own life but which some idiot critic or marketing intern is going to describe as a gritty, truthful portrayal of “the black experience in America,� but the minute you ask a white guy to play a racist whose racism isn’t “complicated� by some monologue where he’s like, “I don’t mean to be racist! It’s just complicated!� he doesn’t return your phone calls? Then my therapist was like, “Don’t you think you ought to not shit where you eat?� and I was like “Well, what happens if I shit where I starve?�
fulfilling book riot's 2020 read harder challenge task #17 Read a sci-fi/fantasy novella (under 120 pages)
I woke to find her lying next to me, quite d
fulfilling book riot's 2020 read harder challenge task #17 Read a sci-fi/fantasy novella (under 120 pages)
I woke to find her lying next to me, quite dead, with her throat torn out. The pillow was shiny and sodden with blood, like low-lying pasture after a week of heavy rain. The taste in my mouth was familiar, revolting, and unmistakable. I spat into my cupped hand: bright red. Oh, for crying out loud, I thought. Here we go again.
best. opening. ever.
short and not even a little bit sweet, unless you count the sweet sweet taste of revenge, this novella has more depth than its length would suggest.
it features a man whose honorable birthright is to hunt hell’s 72,936 demons on earth. a highly skilled exorcist, he stretches the definition of "honorable," as honor isn't really part of his prey's makeup, and he's rightfully peeved at the demons for their habit of invading his own body and making him do things he wouldn't ordinarily do, like waking up beside the corpse of a murdered woman with his hands all bloody. part of a guild, he is himself only responsible for the 109 demons operating within his jurisdiction-grid, but that's plenty to handle, especially when one of those demons really has it in for him. see the aforementioned bloody hands.
this is a tale of strategy and power plays, not-so-good and evil, double-triple crossings, demonic possession, and scruples? who needs 'em?
this exorcist is very good at his job. there will be casualties.
fulfilling book riot's 2020 read harder challenge task #20: Read a middle grade book that doesn’t take place in the U.S. or the UK
The first book in a
fulfilling book riot's 2020 read harder challenge task #20: Read a middle grade book that doesn’t take place in the U.S. or the UK
The first book in a can't-put-it-down, can't-read-it-fast-enough action-thriller trilogy that's part Hatchet, part Little Shop of Horrors!
i read this at what i felt was an appropriate pace, and i could and did put it down, so now i'm worried that i may be a grouch. how can you tell when you've crossed over?
i barely read any middle grade, but this seemed like it would be right up my alley. and yet, i didn't love it. i mean, it's fine, i'm probably just too old for it, but i thought i would give it a shot because i'm intrigued by the new wave of eco-horror that's been coming out lately (the novels, not the news). this one delivered more plant-specific horror than The Book of Koli, but i'm not sure if i will keep going with the series (even though i know who i am so i probably will, but it will feel more like duty than pleasure)
the plant-aggression was fun at first—seeds raining from the sky, assault-by-pollen, vines rocketing thru town, gulpy mario plants, etc
[image]
but then it got...silly.
even though it's middle grade, the protagonists; petra, anaya, and seth, are teenagers, but they're not much else. they're defined by individual primary-color traits: seth is a new-here foster kid, petra is beautiful and popular and allergic to water, anaya is allergic to...everything, the girls were friends and now they are not, GO!
there's not much character depth and there's too much about being pretty and being jealous. the girls read kind of samey, and seth is just this moony kid in the middle of 'em; arbiter and prophetic dream-haver, forecasting that soon their individual "things" will transmute into another "thing" by which they will be identified.
Last night I had a dream. I was flying, and when I came down low over the earth, I saw both of you. And we were all something different and extraordinary.
and if you're asking, on the runway of 'different and extraordinary,' i'm team petra.
things happen fast here, and again—i knoooow it's middle grade (and canada!), but i've grown out of the part of me that was able to gloss over the unrealistic, which here is not so much the monster plants and...other developments, but the crisis response and management—it is too efficient! this tiny island handles the unprecedented like champs and things are more okay than they ought to be, considering.
it was a fine-not-great read for me. it's basically a video game, with an ending that signifies a new level has begun, with more difficult challenges; donkey kong throwing barrels twice as fast or something.
someone please time machine me some donkey kong cereal.
in conclusion, i inquire BEST OR WORST TIME TO READ THIS BOOK?:
Petra knew from her dad that the little hospital was already overloaded. For most people, it was like having a really bad cold, or the flu. But some people had much more severe reactions—or life-threatening asthma attacks—and needed to be transferred to Victoria or Vancouver—where the hospitals were also packed.
AND ALSO
A few people hurried from their cars into the shops, sneezing, covering their faces. A lot of people wore masks—a very common sight since the pollen started flying. Petra had even seen a few people with those scary heavy-duty things with the canister filter. Like in pandemic movies.
fulfilling book riot's 2020 read harder challenge task #7: Read a historical fiction novel not set in WWII
here is the blurb i wroteHAPPY PRIDE MONTH!!
fulfilling book riot's 2020 read harder challenge task #7: Read a historical fiction novel not set in WWII
here is the blurb i wrote about this book for indie next, for those of you who like succinct praise and/or capital letters:
A powerful historical debut about two orphaned siblings coming of age during America's Gold Rush. Born to parents who left China for better prospects (heh), the pair forge their individual identities—one craving adventure, the other stability, as they navigate a land hostile to otherness on their search for a place to call home.
now that that’s out of the way, lemme loosen my belt a little bit. this book is excellent. for me, it’s all about the characters; not only siblings sam and lucy, but also their parents, whose own stories emerge as the novel wends sinuously through the past and present, through lucy and sam’s experiences together and apart, through the mythic and the actual versions of the american dream.
a lot of it reads like a cormac mccarthy-style western, with morally conflicted characters and that perfect blend of incongruously lyrical prose and gritty coarseness. there’s plenty of prettily-described ick in this book, much of it centered around the siblings transporting their father’s deliquescing corpse through the desert to give him a proper burial, what’s left of his body shaped by the trunk as a stew is shaped by its pot. however, there’s a deep emotional undercurrent here; a coming-of-age identity narrative wrapped around a family saga about ambition and the immigrant experience, where adolescent characters struggle to carve their unique adult selves out from under the weight of the past with its layers of secrets and lies and memories, its burdens of sacrifice and love and duty.
sam and lucy are eleven and twelve years old when they become orphans. having already suffered the loss of their mother, the hardships of poverty, and the physical and emotional abuse of their bitter alcoholic father, they are now forced to make their way through a brutal landscape to find a new place to call home. all they have left in the world is each other, but although they begin their journey together, their paths soon diverge and they are left to reinvent themselves alone in a borrowed country where, as their parents discovered before them, race and gender are obstacles to achieving those promised-land dreams, and sometimes you gotta dig your own way in.
this review is coming out badly because my brain doesn’t work anymore, but don’t let my stolid gravy of run-on sentences deter you, the book itself is excellent; raw and lonely and powerful. it’s a beautiful story about a not-so-beautiful family who, like me—hell, like america itself—is deeply flawed but still trying.
review to come, but look! the ARC's pages are GILDED!!
oooh, goodreads choice awards finalist for best horror 2020! what will happen?
*
fulfilling book riot's 2020 read harder coooh, goodreads choice awards finalist for best horror 2020! what will happen?
*
fulfilling book riot's 2020 read harder challenge task #24: Read a book in any genre by a Native, First Nations, or Indigenous author
but more importantly, WELCOME TO SPOOKTOOOOBER!!
[image]
****
this book opens big and strong and violent, but then it sort of shifts, taking a moment to readjust its focus, and in that time i started to have doubts about whether it was going to return to the early promise of those opening pages, but then WHOOOOOO BOY.
if this happens to you—this slackening of reader engagement because you're confused about or not really into where the story’s going, don't worry—it's a temporary dip and once it settles into its groove, it's rich and dark and relentless, kinda like It Follows but with elk.
the story will shift, and shift again, because of REASONS that are for me to know and for you to find out, but it was only that first shift that dislodged me; once i was invested, i stayed invested and every subsequent turn or diversion was earned and appreciated.
i’d heard so many good things about this book, but i was still unprepared for how much i would love it. it is astonishing; the atmosphere, the imagery, how real the characters feel. it’s a horror novel, but it’s so much more than its horror. it’s splattery, but it’s also smart.
there's a very thomas hardy-esque sensibility driving the narrative arc; the longtailed memory of promises made and not kept, the necessity of paying for long-ago sins—in this case a youthful indiscretion committed by four friends growing up on a blackfeet reservation; an act which violated both tribal law and custom, resulting in the kind of waste that nature abhors and will ultimately demand parity.
the repercussions of that event are a long time coming, but when they do, revenge is inevitable and merciless; the brutality of nature given supernatural determination. the experience of being haunted by one’s past is both literal and figurative here, manifesting in the physical and psychological dimensions; characters are haunted by guilt while being stalked by a past that remembers.
the bulk of the story follows lewis, who has long since moved away from the reservation and married a white woman. lewis feels the burden of his past strongly; troubled by guilt and regret as well as the existential dilemma of what it means to be blackfeet in the wider world; the clash between tradition and modernity, the expectations put on him by his own and other people.
it’s a tricky straddling of two worlds, and fate will rush into that space, filling the chasm between doubt and belief, fact and superstition. lewis catches eerie glimpses bridging the past and the present; prickly suspicions giving rise to a simmering paranoia before escalating sharply into deliciously horrific episodes.
but, hey, it’s also funny.
the humor is often self-deprecating or ironic, playing on stereotypes and cliches, but there are also plenty of sly reference points and genre subversions, and when gabe muses, “One little, two little, three little Natives .�.�. doesn’t really sound right, does it?�, you know he's invoking agatha christie's second, slightly less offensive, title of the book now known as And Then There Were None, with cheeky intent. and when he superimposes a ceiling fan with an animal in a living room, you can almost hear grace zabriskie screaming.
[image]
it's brilliant work about identity and heritage and loss, setting up several mirrored oppositions and power dynamic reversals across nature and history, predator and prey, white man and indian, and all of the collective memory passages are sublime.
i tried to avoid learning too much about the specific plot points of this book before reading it, and i think that was a good move, so i'll say no more. but, damn. DAMN.
gutting perfection.
*
i went into this half-blind but full-hearted—i fell hard for that cover at first sight, and i was anticipating its release for what seemed like ages. when it got covid-delayed, i was INCONSOLABLE, but then ended up sitting on it for a couple more months anyway, knowing it would be the perfect book to ring in spooktober. it did not disappoint.
fulfilling book riot's 2020 read harder challenge task #3: Read a mystery where the victim(s) is not a woman
i knew i was in trouble with this one fromfulfilling book riot's 2020 read harder challenge task #3: Read a mystery where the victim(s) is not a woman
i knew i was in trouble with this one from the very first page:
Claudine couldn't see them outside the salon's picture window, her head stuck under a hooded dryer. With a freshly French-manicured hand, she reached into her cream-colored Chanel flap bag and pulled out the guest list: not counting herself, Henry, and their six employees. There hadn't been much time to put the list together. Zara had let her know she was coming just a few days before. Considering the short notice and how packed Aspen social calendars were during the holiday season, these were good, solid choices:
Captain and Mrs. Tiggleman Kevin and Jerry The Alpine Brothers
it goes on from there to enumerate her reasons for inviting each of these people and how they will contribute to her 'sell a house to a pop star at a holiday party' scheme, but surely there's a more credible transition to that bit o'exposition than to have a character for whom physical appearance is clearly a priority risk her new manicure to consult a written list of six names? because she can't just remember those names on her own?
sure, it's a tiny moment that most readers probably sailed through without distress, but it's a clumsy move so easily avoided, and it just set the tone for me, clouding my opinion from the get-go.
the premise sounded great: a festive white elephant exchange goes awry when one of the unwrapped items turns out to be a statue that hosts claudine and her husband henry recognize as the murder weapon responsible for all of their professional successes, and which they assumed had been safely tucked away in a police evidence locker all these years. someone knows their murdery secret! but who? someone is messing with their heads! but why? it is all very distressing!
for the characters, maybe. for the reader, it's kind of a drag. the statue isn't even revealed until page 136, with fewer than 100 pages to go, so there's not much in the way of tension-building on the journey to whodunnit-town.
worse than that, this synopsis of this book promised me Clue, and it did not give me even a tiny bit of Clue, other than there being a house full of people and some inclement weather. there's no humor, there's no cast of colorful characters with seeeecrets, there's not even a murder at this damn party! there's some murder in the past, and claudine and her husband for sure have some secrets, but the rest of the characters are just...there, not even developed enough to be viable suspects.
the synopsis is also misleading with its claim that Further adding to the drama is a snowstorm that closes nearby roads—preventing anyone from leaving, as well as keeping law enforcement from the scene. i mean, sure, there's a mighty snowstorm, but there's never a scene where guests try to leave and are prevented from leaving because of the snowstorm, and there's no mention of the police until page 224 of 229.
[image]
even then, it's more about getting the paramedics there than the cops, and the difficulty of getting to the house is delivered in a single, grammatically awkward sentence: Once they were called, it took them a while to get there, the roads were terrible.
hardly synopsis-worthy.
it's a fast read, but there's not much to it. there's some shitty behavior by people in their personal and professional lives, a lot of blurry background characters eating hors d'oeuvres, one reveal that was predictable and one that unsatisfyingly toes the line of the genre's rules of fair play, plus a cringey late-stage attempt at moralizing w/r/t polite society's fascination with true crime stories.
i give it a three because twos are what i give books that i resent for wasting my time, and this one was such a quickie that it didn't put me out much, but it's a weak-tea three at best.
fulfilling book riot's 2020 read harder challenge task #10: Read a book that takes place in a rural setting
whichNOW AVAILABLE!!!
goodreads giveaway AND
fulfilling book riot's 2020 read harder challenge task #10: Read a book that takes place in a rural setting
which describes 89% of what i already read...
**
this book's description immediately grabbed me by my steve erickson/evan dara-loving tendrils, shouting, KAREN! I AM YOUR HUCKLEBERRY!
Community radio host Ciara receives dozens of unmarked cassette recordings every week and broadcasts them to a listenership of none. Ex-musician Tom drives an impractical bus that no one ever boards. Publican Jenny runs a hotel that has no patrons. Rick wanders the aisles of the Woolworths every day in an attempt to blunt the disappointment of adulthood.
In a town of innumerable petrol stations, labyrinthine cul-de-sac streets, two competing shopping plazas, and ubiquitous drive-thru franchises, where are these people likely to find the truth about their collective past � and can they do so before the town completely disappears?
Shaun Prescott’s debut novel The Town follows an unnamed narrator’s efforts to complete a book about disappeared towns in the Central West of New South Wales. Set in a yet-to-disappear town–a town believed by its inhabitants to have no history at all–the novel traces its characters� attempts to carve their own identities in a place that is both unyielding and teetering on the edge of oblivion.
this is the kind of slipstreamy, surreal-but-grounded, quasi-apocalyptic, unsettling stuff i love. atmospheric, mind-bendy irreality with overlapping narratives that challenges the reader with ambiguity, multiple interpretations, a slight displacement that lingers long after the story ends. it sounded like it would have touchpoints comparable to The Sea Came in at Midnight and Infinite Jest, with maybe a little Flee, for good measure.
and it was fine, occasionally more than fine, but it just didn't live up to my expectations.
and i'll just come right out and say that i am an asshole american who knows zero about disappeared towns in the central west of new south wales, so the real-world phenomena inspiring the book was a significance completely lost on me, and all i can really respond to is the writing and storyline.
it's about a man researching the disappearing towns in the central west of new south wales. i know i just said that in the paragraph above, but the unnamed narrator does not refrain from repeating that phrase, so neither shall i. the disappearing towns in the central west of new south wales. the disappearing towns in the central west of new south wales. the disappearing towns in the central west of new south wales.
squatting himself down in this disappearing town in the central west of new south wales for research and observation, he meets several of the region's inhabitants; oddballs and loners who are deeply lonely, and they share their stories which he records as the town (in the central west of new south wales) disappears around them.
and many of these stories are affecting and interesting-enough reads, but the overall vibe of this book is...sludgy. when the characters are relaying their stories, it's grand, but the in-between parts are a bit boring and confusing, and while the atmosphere is steve erickson-adjacent; with its tone characterized by a creeping dread of an unknown but inevitable catastrophe—and keeping in mind that i know nothing about aboriginal populations in australia; specifically the wiradjuri people to whom this book is dedicated—for me, the book became a bit tedious and turgid and it took me way to long to get through.
Slumped in the lounge with the bottle between his legs, Rob said it was very painful having a person fall out of love with you. Every day when he woke up, it was only a matter of seconds before he remembered that he was in immense pain. The immense pain did not subside until he passed out that night. Before, he could never have imagined what it would be like to feel so much pain. He had not thought it feasible that this amount of pain could affect one person at any given time. It was simply intolerable. Why did people continue living when this much pain was possible?
so, while i know my ignorance prevented me from appreciating a lot of nuance here, i'm a human person who can relate to the universal feelings of loneliness and dread and the observable violence of a world on-edge, and i certainly thought he did a good job with the broad-spectrum humanity of it, but i'm left feeling about this book the way the narrator describes his own:
It would be no masterpiece, but it certainly would be a book.
however, big points for the inclusions of icehouse, specifically their song Great Southern Land, which can be listened to on the youtube
april is national poetry month, so here come thirty floats! the cynics here will call this plan a shameless grab for votes. and maybe tHAPPY POETRY MONTH!
april is national poetry month, so here come thirty floats! the cynics here will call this plan a shameless grab for votes. and maybe there’s some truth to that� i do love validation, but charitably consider it a rhyme-y celebration. i don’t intend to flood your feed� i’ll just post one a day. endure four weeks of reruns and then it will be may!
*
fulfilling book riot's 2020 read harder challenge task #8: Read an audiobook of poetry
[image]
after yesterday's debacle, it seems like a good time to review this one.
i was dreading this prompt, not only because i have trouble focusing on narrative audio in general, but also because the prospect of listening to a series of poems read aloud in full performative inflection made my soul itch.
and then i discovered trumpoetry, and it was impossible not to focus on it, nor to ever unhear his words. i would say "don't quit your day job, trump," but then i remembered—you've been fired. by america.
mind you, these are not actual poems actually written by donald trump; they're more like 'found poetry' curated from a selection of his (oh-so-many) tweets; magpie-ing a line here, a line there, arranged into coherence and displaying more humanity than most of trump's actual speeches, all read aloud by a #FAKETRUMP. it's a fine novelty-book, even if you're someone who never wants to have to think about him ever again.
the best thing is that this is a game anyone can play. here are some i've compiled myself, from a sampling of trumptweets:
Are you allowed to impeach a president for gross incompetence? I said no! They laugh at what fools our leaders have been. Dumb leaders. No more! my I.Q. is one of the highest -and you all know it! Will own America soon. Sorry everyone!
***
Everyone knows I am right that Robert Pattinson should dump Kristen Stewart. I try so hard to be his friend Maybe I just didn’t get the call?
***
Mexico will pay for the wall! I love Hispanics! I always insist on being politically correct. They cannot help the fact that they were born fucked up!
***
We have developed, under the Trump Administration, some really great drugs I feel better than I did 20 years ago! Party harder than any Democrat. Looking forward to Friday. as we wait for what should be EASY D!
***
There is nobody more Patriotic than me, your favorite President! They will soon be calling me MR. BREXIT! Should get a medal!
***
Where is the outrage for this Disney book? Will people never make a stand! The cast of Hamilton was very rude last night The Fake News refuses to report this! Windmills are the greatest threat in the US Suppression Media! I’ve had enough of this � good night!
***
Here is my statement. Don’t be afraid of Covid. Nothing can be done to cure that giant scam. Another HISTORIC breakthrough today! The United States shows more CASES than other countries What did these geniuses expect when they put men & women together? Only in America! SO TRUE! All others lived There has never been anything like this in our Country! Weekend daytime even worse, dead. It was my great honor to help, a tremendous achievement! No other politician would do this!!! It’s called total corruption! I just want to stop the world from killing itself! bad things happened. Sad end to great show Get well soon!
***
here's a call-and-response poem between those erstwhile lovers; trump and twitter:
do not flag this Twitter!
...I WON THE ELECTION, BIG. [image] Fraudulent result! [image] RIGGED ELECTION! [image] How can you have a presidency when a vast majority think the election was RIGGED? [image] ...AND I WON THE ELECTION. VOTER FRAUD ALL OVER THE COUNTRY! [image] Let them do it. BE STRONG! [image]
***
and here are some raw materials to make your own:
NO WAY WE LOST THIS ELECTION!
So much truth to this!
Suppression of thought!
Even a boring football game, kneeling and all, is better!
Every time I speak of the haters and losers I do so with great love and affection.
It’s freezing and snowing in New York—we need global warming!
I have never seen a thin person drinking Diet Coke
Actually, throughout my life, my two greatest assets have been mental stability and being, like, really smart.
WITCH HUNT!
Must also tree clear to stop fire from spreading!
Fools!
I am a Tariff Man.
MAKE AMERICA RICH AGAIN
I know tech better than anyone
The Media is deranged, they have lost their minds!
NEVER, EVER THREATEN THE UNITED STATES AGAIN OR YOU WILL SUFFER CONSEQUENCES THE LIKES OF WHICH FEW THROUGHOUT HISTORY HAVE EVER SUFFERED BEFORE. WE ARE NO LONGER A COUNTRY THAT WILL STAND FOR YOUR DEMENTED WORDS OF VIOLENCE & DEATH. BE CAUTIOUS!
Must be proactive!
Who wouldn't take Kate's picture and make lots of money if she does the nude sunbathing thing. Come on Kate!
It’s like the wheel, there is nothing better.
People are proud to be saying Merry Christmas again. I am proud to have led the charge against the assault of our cherished and beautiful phrase. MERRY CHRISTMAS!!!!!
many are saying I'm the best 140 character writer in the world. It's easy when it's fun.
Very unfair!
She was bleeding badly from a face-lift.
Obama went down
Oh no! What is going on?
Cancel culture at work!
Think I’ll stick around for awhile!
So sad for our country!
People are angry!
which is an international joke.
SILENCE THE TRUTH.
I will VETO!
Big “stuff�. Enjoy!
Gee, what a surprise.
What’s wrong with this guy? What is he hiding?
I won all three, by a lot!
Not statistically possible.
It won’t be needed. We will all WIN!
it is still a big, old, slow turtle. Get the dam vaccines out NOW
fulfilling my 2020 goal to read (at least) one book each month that i bought in hardcover and put off reading long enough that it is now in paperback.fulfilling my 2020 goal to read (at least) one book each month that i bought in hardcover and put off reading long enough that it is now in paperback.
AND CONVENIENTLY *ALSO*
fulfilling book riot's 2020 read harder challenge task #9: Read the LAST book in a series. ** an absolutely perfect ending to a trilogy i have loved every step of the way.
richly detailed and emotionally satisfying, everything that happens here slots perfectly into the world arden has created and respects the events of her previous books—every grief and failure, every bittersweet success is 100% earned. one of my personal grumbles with fantasy as a genre is that, where there is magic, where there are characters with powers, obstacles are frequently too easily overcome and all the potential for delicious dramatic tension is sidestepped. here, nothing is easy, nothing is deus ex machina'd away, and when powerful beings do intervene, it is never without a cost.
vasya as a character is just *finger kiss* mwah. such depth and authentically written growth and maturity; everything she's overcome has left its mark on her, and she grows into her womanself and her witchself beautifully, but not without considerable struggle and loss. her bravery and strength and defiance, her willingness to sacrifice herself on her own terms but not as someone else's pawn, her abiding love for her people even as they turn against her—these are pretty common qualities of the hero archetype, but arden breathes fresh life into old tropes and the result is a heroine who is both likable and fallible, shining up outta those pages, dusting herself off from each struggle with new scars and renewed determination.
it is gorgeous. all of it.
it's historical fantasy in setting and atmosphere—russian folklore woven into actual historical conflicts, incorporating a more modern feminist sensibility without shifting it too far into the trend of MAGICAL GIRL CAN DO ALL THE THINGS EFFORTLESSLY!
i don't want to get into too many details, because it's book 3 of a thing, but i need to shout-out that l'il mushroom ded grib as my favorite new character. i'm sure this series will be turned into a show or film at some point, and i'm gonna want some ded grib merch. to play with my baby yoda merch. because i am grown.
also, as much as i'm immune to romance in my entertainments
[image]
vasya and morozko's relationship arc is pretty great. not only do i love me some cold hands, but i appreciate that theirs is a qualified romance, with limits that are addressed in a way that few books involving entanglements between immortals and mortals bother to do. "As I could, I loved you" is my "You complete me" and like everything else in this series, all of their pleasure is mingled with pain.
anyway, there's your zero-plot review of a book i five-starred. i loved this trilogy, and i know i will love whatever she writes next.